Background of the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion Arrest

The following details the allegations and undertaking with the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion charges:

Who is Wesley Snipes?

Wesley Snipes is an American actor famous for his roles in such blockbuster films like The Blade Trilogy, White Men Can’t Jump, and New Jack City.

Date of the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion Arrest: The Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion arrest took place on December of 2006; however, records of his arrest illustrated that Wesley Snipes failed to pay taxes in years 1996, 1997 – he had been reported to not pay any taxes between the years 1999 – 2004

Location of the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion: The criminal activity undertaken by Wesley Snipes took place in the States of Arizona and California

Criminal Charges Associated with the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion Arrest

Wesley Snipes’ Tax Evasion charges cited him of purposefully and deliberately avoiding the fulfillment of taxes owed to the Federal Government Department of Taxation or the Internal Revenue Service (IRS); his deliberate deception of the United States government fallaciously conveyed inaccurate information with regard to his finances. Furthermore, Wesley Snipes undertook the purposeful misrepresentation of records illustrating inventory in order to substantiate and conceal his failure to accurately report earnings. Wesley Snipes’ tax evasion charges include the following:

The failure to claim earnings upwards of $12 million in the years 1996 and 1997

The failure to furnish any tax payment for the years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004

The Punitive Recourse of the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion

Subsequent to the findings by the presiding judge with regard to the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion trial, the sentencing of Wesley Snipes involved Wesley Snipes to undergo the following:

Wesley Snipes was ordered to serve upwards of 3-years in the McKean Correctional Facility, which is located in the State of Pennsylvania; his prison term began in December of 2010 – his release is reported to take place in July of 2013

The Notion of Celebrity within the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion Arrest

The Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – run the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial, much like that public was during the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion, the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion:

Due to the fact that celebrities typically possess higher earnings and greater fortunes than individuals considered to account for the median members of society, the implementation of financial recourse – in the form of fines or fees – is considered by many legal professionals to be subject to inefficiency with regard to punitive recourse; within the Wesley Snipes Tax Evasion trial, many individuals suspected that the enforcement of a median monetary payment furnished by Wesley Snipes would neither affect her finances nor serve as an effective punishment

However, since justice must be exacted in an objective fashion, other individuals claimed that prejudiced enacted with regard to the sentencing of celebrities – in the form of fines or fees that exceed those that would be exacted onto the median citizen of the United States – would be equally ineffective

Overview of the Jaime Pressly Divorce

The January 21st, 2011 Jaime Pressly Divorce filing marks the potential for a dissolution of the marriage between actor Jaime Pressly and famed Hollywood entertainment attorney, Simran Singh; the couple were wed in early 2010 – the finalization of the Jaime Pressly divorce would end the couples year and a half-long marriage:

The Jaime Pressly divorce filing was not without its controversy; on January 6th, 2011, Jaime Pressly was arrested in Los Angeles, California for the suspected operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated

Furthermore, upon the filing for her divorce from Simran Singh, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has brought forth claims that Jaime Pressly may owe upwards of half of a milliom dollars in unpaid – and unclaimed taxes

While the details with regard to the Jaime Pressly divorce filing are scarce, reports have surfaced that Jaime Pressly is requested that Simran Singh be denied any petition for the award of spousal support in the form of alimony; Jaime Pressly filed for divorce under the pretense of irreconcilable differences

The Parties Involved in the Jaime Pressly Divorce

Jaime Pressly is an American actor who has enjoyed an acting career spanning almost 2 decades; she has starred in popular films such as Not Another Teen Movie, Joe Dirt, and Bring it On! – she currently stars in the widely popular television program My Name is Earl – the couple share no children together.

Legal Venue of the Jaime Pressly Divorce Hearing

The Jaime Pressly Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Jaime Pressly Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Jaime Pressly divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Jaime Pressly divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Jaime Pressly Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Jaime Pressly Divorce, if both Jaime Pressly and Simran Singh opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Jaime Pressly Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Jaime Pressly and Simran Singh seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the James Cameron Divorce

The James Cameron Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between director James Cameron and actor Linda Hamilton; the James Cameron Divorce was finalized in 1999, which ended the 2-yearlong marriage. However, James Cameron and Linda Hamilton had been romantically involved since the couple had met on the film set of Terminator 2, a film that James Cameron had directed and starred Linda Hamilton. Although the case of the James Cameron Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss – heightened emotion was certainly prevalent within the James Cameron divorce:

James Cameron is considered to be one of the few film directors who has reached such elite milestones with regard to motion picture industry, including holding the title for the highest-grossing movies in the history of the world – twice; both the films Titanic  and Avatar, which were released 10-years apart from each other, both retained these tiles – in fact, Avatar is currently considered to be the highest grossing film in the history of the motion picture industry

Yet, despite his film accolades, Linda Hamilton was reported as describing James Cameron as a miserable and sad person; she described her in highly-negative terms, in addition to citing possible extramarital affairs undertaken by James Cameron with actors starring in films that he had directed

Legal Venue of the James Cameron Divorce Hearing

The James Cameron Divorce was heard before a judge in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the James Cameron Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the James Cameron Divorce, both James Cameron and Linda Hamilton seemed unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault. However, within the State of California, a contested – or challenged – divorce hearing allows for the release of certain details of the divorce settlement to be released into public record. Although James Cameron and Linda Hamilton presumably did not wish to have the details of the James Cameron Divorce released to the general public, the inability to arrive at a meeting of the minds earned the James Cameron Divorce a large amount of publicity at the time it occurred. Subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the J

James Cameron Divorce settlement:

Due to the procedure regulating the division of assets undertaken in the State of California, was Linda Hamilton was entitled to half of the couple’s combined, earned assets accrued during the time of their marriage; within the State of California, this is known as ‘Community Property’ – Linda Hamilton walked away with an estimated $50 million following the finalization of the James Cameron Divorce

Jay Mariotti Arrested: Case Details

Jay Mariotti, who is recognized both as a sports commentator for the ESPN network, in addition to his contributions to the America Online (AOL) sponsored sports blog ‘Fanhouse’ was arrested taking place sometime between August 21st and August 22nd, 2010 upon allegedly engaging in domestic violence with regard to his current girlfriend; the events transpiring during that weekend at a club in Santa Monica, California resulted in Jay Mariotti arrested on domestic violence charges:

Reports surfacing in conjunction to Jay Mariotti arrested illustrate that upon what he had suspected as his girlfriend flirting with another individual at a nightclub in downtown Los Angeles, Jay Mariotti allegedly became enraged and the couple; both 51 year old Jay Mariotti and his girlfriend undertook a verbal argument in the club

Although the results vary between witness testimony and the police reports furnished by the Los Angeles Police Department, the events leading to Jay Mariotti arrested included him shoving, , grabbing, and accosting his girlfriend in a violent manner; furthermore, police reports showed that the incident of Jay Mariotti arrested resulted in physical trauma noticeable on his girlfriend’s arms – this trauma was describes as various bruising and legions

Jay Mariotti was formally charged on the morning of August 22nd, 2010 for which a felony charge was issued; however, the release made to the public with regard to Jay Mariotti arrested was simply described as a ‘domestic incident’ – subsequent to his arrest, Jay Mariotti was released after furnishing $50,000 bail

Jay Mariotti Arrested: What is Domestic Violence?

The charges resulting in Jay Mariotti arrested d are considered to be akin to domestic violence enacted in both verbal and physical manners, which constitutes physical abuse or assault sustained a member of a romantic partnership at the hands of another member of the romantic partnership:

Physical Domestic Violence are types of abuse illustrating domestic violence in its physical form, which may include the mention of physical attacks, assaults, and expressed threats of violence

Emotional Domestic Violence is a type of abuse existing on both emotional and psychological levels, which may include the mention of verbal abuse, the posing of threats, and demeaning and insulting acts undertaken by the abusive partner

The Results of Jay Mariotti Arrested

Although the charges leading to Jay Mariotti arrested were neither formally filed nor finalized, his professional career still suffered; in addition to his firing from the ESPN network, he was also removed as a writer and contributor from the sports blog ‘Fanhouse’ by the AOL corporation.

Overview of the Jesse James Divorce

Motorcycle mogul Jesse James married adult film star Janine Lindemulder in 2000; the couple was divorced in 2004; however, the filing for the Jesse James divorce took place only a year following the wedding. Akin to traditional divorce proceedings – meaning, those undertaken by non-celebrity couples – the nature of the divorce settlement can range from amicable to scandalous; unfortunately, the Jesse James Divorce from Janine Lindemulder was classified as the latter – not only was the Jesse James Divorce considered to be amongst the most discussed, but it is considered to be amongst the most dramatic and chaotic divorce to ever have taken place in Hollywood:

In a bizarre turn of events, Jesse James and Janine Lindemulder not only allowed their wedding ceremony to be filmed for a television program on the Discovery Channel, but also allowed the initial months of marriage to be documented

Within this documentation, the film crew captured Janine Lindemulder physically assaulting Jesse James only hours after the couple was married

In 2003, Jesse James filed a restraining order against Janine Lindemulder as a result of a physical altercation in which Lindemulder reportedly assaulted James a number of times; this was considered to be the catalyst of the Jesse James divorce

The Parties Involved in the Jesse James Divorce

Jesse James was the star of the reality television show ‘West Coast Choppers’, which was based on the modification and construction of motorcycles. In addition to his fame garnered by his reality television show, Jesse James is the owner of ‘West Coast Choppers’, which is considered to be amongst the foremost and widely-sought after brand of motorcycles and motor cycle apparel. Janine Lindemulder gained her own brand of celebrity as a result of her employment both as a performer, as well as a producer within the adult film industry:

Janine Lindemulder endured her own legal troubles in 2008, in which she was cited for tax evasion by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS); the allegations consisted of upwards of $300,000 in back taxes that she had failed to pay – she was sentenced to incarceration for a period of 6-months’ time

Jesse James has received even more publicity in 2010 with regard to his romantic relationships subsequent to his infidelity while wed to actor Sandra Bullock

The couple shares one daughter – Sunny

The Terms of the Jesse James Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Although little is known about the specifics of the Jesse James Divorce settlement, joint custody of the couple’s daughter – Sunny – was shared between Jesse James and Janine Lindemulder; however, as a result of her incarceration, Jesse James was awarded primary custody of Sunny.

The Chaos Following the Jesse James Divorce from Janine Lindemulder

Subsequent to her release from prison in 2009, Janine Lindemulder was arrested in 2011 as a result of criminal allegations submitted by Jesse James that Janine Lindemulder had placed multiple telephone calls to his residence that were harassing in nature; Lindemulder defended her actions, identifying them as a response to Jesse James forbidding her to see her daughter, Sunny – at the time, Sunny was in the custody of Jesse James.

Overview of the Jessica Simpson Divorce

Singers Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey embarked on a romantic relationship at the close of the 20th century; nearly 2 years following their initial meeting, the couple wed on October 26th, 2002. In conjunction to rumors surfacing in November of 2005 suggesting that the couple would undergo separation, Jessica Simpson filed a petition for divorce only a month later, in which simply ‘irreconcilable differences’ were cited as the catalyst for what the media dubbed the ‘Jessica Simpson Divorce’. However, on June 30th, 2006 – almost 6 months following the separation notice – the Jessica Simpson divorce was finalized.

The Parties Involved in the Jessica Simpson Divorce

Jessica Simpson is an American singer who rose to fame in the final years of the 1990s into the early years of the 2000s; recognized as having an incredible voice, she was responsible for such hit singles including ‘I Wanna Love You Forever’, Irresistible’, and ‘A Public Affair’ – Jessica Simpson was also featured in various major motion pictures. Nick Lachey enjoyed the bulk of his fame in the late 1990s thanks to his fronting of the ‘boy band’ 98 Degrees, who were gained mainstream fame as a result of hit singles ‘I Do (Cherish You)’, ‘Thank God I Found You’, and ‘This Gift’.

The Impact of the Jessica Simpson Divorce

At the time of the Jessica Simpson divorce from husband Nick Lachey, the impact of the dissolution of the marriage is considered to have been amongst the most intense with individuals younger in age – or minors. Due to the fact that Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey starred in a reality show that aired on the MTV network, which was entitled ‘Newlyweds’, a young demographic of viewers were given the opportunity to not only witness the events taking place within the marriage of Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey, but also feel a heightened sense of kinship with the couple.

Legal Venue of the Jessica Simpson Divorce Hearing

The Jessica Simpson Divorce was heard before a judge in California’s State Superior Court; in accordance to the couple’s residence in Los Angeles County, the Jessica Simpson divorce hearing was heard before in the Los Angeles County branch.

The Terms of the Jessica Simpson Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Jessica Simpson Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Jessica Simpson Divorce settlement:

Due to the fact that neither Jessica Simpson nor Nick Lachey furnished a prenuptial agreement, the couples shared earning following the date of marriage were legally-required to be split; however, since Jessica Simpson was considered to be the partner with superior monetary value, a legal team was orchestrated in order to enact the Jessica Simpson divorce settlement – the couples net worth was estimated to be valued at $36 million

While the initial offer furnished by Jessica Simpson’s legal team was reported to be $1.5 million, Nick Lachey was reported to have requested $18 million – half of the couple’s shared assets; however, the final sum of the Jessica Simpson divorce settlement furnished to Nick Lachey was never released

The Background of the Kate Winslet Divorce

The filing for the Kate Winslet divorce took place in March of 2010; however, an impending Kate Winslet divorce has yet to be finalized – the finalization of the divorce would result in the dissolution of the 7-year marriage of actor Kate Winslet and her husband director Sam Mendes. Akin to many celebrity divorces, a multitude of rumors have circulated with regard to the reasoning for a prospective Kate Winslet divorce; yet, none of the rumors have neither been authenticated by Kate Winslet nor Sam Mendes. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Kate Winslet Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although rumors have surfaced that a prospective Kate Winslet is the result of an extramarital affair undertaken by Sam Mendes with actor Rebecca Hall, any such validation has yet to be furnished

Who Was Involved in the Kate Winslet Divorce Filing?

English actor Kate Winslet is one of the most famous faces in Hollywood; perhaps most widely-recognized for her starring role in the blockbuster hit Titanic, which was the highest grossing film of all time prior to 2010, Kate Winslet has starred in other successful films including Reservation Road, Quills, and Finding Neverland. Kate Winslet’s husband – English director Same Mendes – has shared in his wife’s success in the motion picture industry; he has directed the following films that have received international acclaim, such as Jarhead, The Road to Perdition, and American Beauty:

Both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes share one son, in addition to the custody of a daughter birthed to Kate Winslet in her previous marriage

The Plea within the Kate Winslet Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Kate Winslet divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Kate Winslet divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kate Winslet Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kate Winslet Divorce, if both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Kate Winslet Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Floyd Mayweather Arrested…Again

Professional boxer Floyd Mayweather is considered to be amongst the most premier boxers within modernity; however, his boxing accolades have not prevented him from engaging in run-ins with law enforcement agents. With regard to his latest arrest, that took place on December 17th, 2010 resulting from an alleged assault on a security guard, the events resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested only added to his presumed legal trouble.

Why Was Floyd Mayweather Arrested in 2009?

The events resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested took place on September 9th, 2010; classified as a multifaceted offense, which included larceny, domestic battery, and emotional domestic violence, the events unfolded as Floyd Mayweather engaged in a dispute with a former girlfriend of Mayweather’s named Josie Harris – both the charges of battery and larceny were classified as felonies punishable by up to 6 months incarceration if convicted. The following details are pertinent to the events surrounding Floyd Mayweather arrested:

The presence of the alleged  physical battery and assault of his girlfriend resulted in  Floyd Mayweather arrested for domestic violence in its physical form, which was reported as including the physical abuse or assault sustained Josie Harris;  the alleged physical domestic violence suffered upon his charges were unidentifiable by law enforcement agents – the claims of these charges were absent of noticeable signs of bodily injury

The posing of threats issued by events resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested were considered to be expressions of domestic violence taking place within its emotional or verbal form

The third charge resulting in Floyd Mayweather  arrested was the claim that he had unlawfully stolen the cellphone belonging to Harris, which was classified as Larceny including the presence of violence or harm posed as threats in the event that the victim in question refuses to comply with the demands of the individual committing larceny

Why Was Floyd Mayweather Arrested in 2010?

On December 17th, 2010, while Mayweather was on ‘The Las Vegas Strip’ in his home State of Nevada, he was identified by a 21 year old security guard who was under the employ of the gated housing community in which Floyd Mayweather resided. The guard had reported that Floyd Mayweather had assaulted him subsequent to receiving a parking summons issued by the guard; the reports included Floyd Mayweather poking the face of the security guard in an assaulting manner – this event resulted in Floyd Mayweather arrested:

Although the 2009 criminal charges resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested were still pending, the security guard alerted police of Floyd Mayweather’s whereabouts upon seeing him in downtown- Las Vegas; as a result, law enforcement agents arrived and arrested Floyd Mayweather on the charges of assault

However, reports released from the Clark County Police Department showed that despite Floyd Mayweather arrested that evening, he was released shortly thereafter without bail; there have been no subsequent reports in conjunction with the December 17th, 2011 assault charges

A Summary of the Greg Norman Divorce

The Greg Norman Divorce was finalized in September of 2007, which ended the 25-year marriage between Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy – the couple was wed in July of 1981. for those unfamiliar with the Greg Norman Divorce, the celebrity status of Greg Norman as an electrifying professional golfer thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event at the time that the Greg Norman Divorce had taken place:

Speculation surrounding the Greg Norman Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Greg Norman Divorce included allegations that Greg Norman had undertaken an affair with former tennis professional Chris Evert

In an ironic turn of events, Chris Evert had endured a costly divorce ten years prior, which was classified as amongst the most expensive with regard to spousal support furnished by a female spouse to a male spouse – her former husband, Andy Mill, was reported to have received upwards of $10 million in assets and monies

Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy share 2 children, both of whom were legal adults at the time of the Greg Norman divorce, which resulted in the determination of custody to be moot

The Terms and Conditions of the Greg Norman Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Greg Norman Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Greg Norman petitioned for alimony payments from Laura Andrassy upon the finalization of the Greg Norman Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Greg Norman Divorce:

Due to the fact that a confidentiality agreements – also known as a ‘gag order’ was required of Andrassy within the Greg Norman divorce settlement, Andrassy made public comments with regard to Chris Evert’s behavior; she claimed that Evert actively pursued her husband in plain sight

Although Greg Norman petitioned that Andrassy had violated the terms of the confidentiality agreement, Andrassy was awarded a lump sum of $107 million

Subsequent to the finalization of the Greg Norman divorce, Norman and Evert wed in 2008

The Greg Norman Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy – within the Greg Norman Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy to be released into public record:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review

The Details of the Kurt Cobain Death as They Were Reported

On April 5th, 1994, internationally-acclaimed musician Kurt Cobain was reported to have died subsequent to sustaining a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head in what was initially determined to be a suicide; Kurt Cobain was a beloved musical icon who – alongside his band ‘Nirvana’ enjoyed the sales of millions of albums in conjunction with sold-out performances and the adoration of millions fans. On February 24th, 1992, Kurt Cobain married fellow musician Courtney Love; on August 18th, 1992, Kurt Cobain and Courtney Love welcomed the birth of their daughter.

The Controversy Surrounding the Kurt Cobain Death

Prior to his death, the release of reports – the content of which varied in accordance with their respective validity – suggested a wide range of explanations substantiating the alleged Kurt Cobain death; certain claims were substantiated by Kurt Cobain himself, such as his addiction to heroin as well as a crippling gastroenterological ailment from which he suffered – many individuals credited these claims to account for the Kurt Cobain death. However, other individuals were quick to discredit the reports suggesting that the Kurt Cobain death was the result of a suicide; many of these detractors suspected that Kurt Cobain’s wife – Courtney Love – was responsible for orchestrating the Kurt Cobain death.

The Investigation of the Kurt Cobain Death

Upon reports from friends and family of Kurt Cobain to law enforcement agents, which were furnished as a result of a lack of communication with Kurt Cobain, investigators discovered the body of Kurt Cobain on April 8th, 1994 – 3 days following the exact date on which the Kurt Cobain was presumed to have taken place. The reports furnished by law enforcement agents conveyed that they had found the following upon the discovery of Cobain’s body:

A shotgun identified as the weapon Kurt Cobain had used to take his own life

A suicide note, which was allegedly penned by Cobain himself; the contents of the note were read remotely by Courtney Love over a loudspeaker at a vigil taking place in Seattle, Washington – the note appears to express Kurt Cobain’s depression and dissatisfaction with his life

A supply of heroin belonging to Kurt Cobain; a toxicology report was taken as a result of this discovery, which reflected an inexplicably large amount of heroine classified as fatal

The Dispute over the Nature of the Kurt Cobain Death

While various friends and family close to Kurt Cobain – in tandem with fans and unrelated, concerned individuals – maintain that the Kurt Cobain death was not the result of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, these claims were never investigated and currently remain classified as circumstantial evidence. However, the following inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and oddities were reported to have taken place with regard to the Kurt Cobain death:

The amount of heroin that was discovered in Kurt Cobain’s body was considered by many people to have debilitated Kurt Cobain, rendering him unable to not only pull a shotgun’s trigger, but hold the shotgun entirely

Handwriting analysis specialists have undertaken vast exploration of the suicide note allegedly penned by Kurt Cobain upon the Kurt Cobain death; the results of a bulk of these analyses have determined that the note was a letter of resignation in lieu of a suicide note – in addition, reports have stated that the note was not penned by Kurt Cobain in its entirety