Facts about the Michael Douglas Divorce

Michael Douglas is an American actor who met Diandra Luker at an inauguration ceremony for the upcoming presidential elect Jimmy Carter in March of 1977; at the time of their meeting Michael Douglas was 33 years old and Diandra Luker was 19 years old – the Michael Douglas divorce took place in 1998. While at the time of their marriage, Michael Douglas was not considered to have reached the height of celebrity that he would experience within forthcoming years; over the course of the marriage – prior to the Michael Douglas divorce – Michael Douglas became one of the highest-paid and most sought-after actors of his time:

Michael Douglas has graced the screen in a multitude of films; amongst the films for which he considered to be the renowned include Wall Street, Fatal Attraction, The War of the Roses, The Jewel of the Nile, Wonderboys, and Traffic

Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas share one child named Cameron, who was born in 1978; due to his age at the time of the Michael Douglas divorce, the need to establish custody for Cameron was unnecessary

Throughout the marriage of Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas, the couple was not without their share of domestic difficulty; in 1992, Michael Douglas confessed to an addiction to both drugs and alcohol and underwent treatment in a rehabilitation facility

Michael Douglas was also rumored to have undertaken extramarital partners; however, his alleged infidelity was never substantiated

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce

The Michael Douglas divorce – in conjunction with the respective calculations of alimony payments, the division of assets, and supplementary spousal support offered to Diandra Douglas from Michael Douglas – is considered to be amongst the most expensive in history. Although the terms of the Michael Douglas divorce settlement were kept highly-private, the following details were released:

Diandra Douglas walked away with an alleged sum of $45 million subsequent to the Michael Douglas divorce

Diandra Douglas was also awarded the couple’s formerly-shared homes in Beverley Hills, California and the island of Majorca

The Determination of Contest within the Michael Douglas Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Michael Douglas Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Michael Douglas Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Douglas Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas determined that the Michael Douglas Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Basketball icon Michael Jordan and his wife Juanita Jordan filed for divorce in 2006 after 17 years of marriage; the couple was married in 1989. Prior to this particular Michael Jordan divorce, the couple underwent a close-call with a divorce in 2002 subsequent to rumors of infidelity surfacing with regard to Michael Jordan; yet, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan managed to stay together until 2006. The couple shares 3 children. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Jordan Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan determined that the Michael Jordan Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature. However, the allegations of Jordan’s infidelity became a reality during the Michael Jordan divorce; reports stated that Michael Jordan had paid extramarital partners for their respective silence in conjunc
tion with affairs he had undertaken.

Why Was the Michael Jordan Divorce the Most Expensive?

Basketball superstar Michael Jordan earned his fame and notoriety both within the realm of athletics, as well as within the realm of marketing, entertainment, and endorsements. Both prior and subsequent to the Michael Jordan divorce, the basketball icon has been the face of Gatorade, Nike, and Hanes; Jordan’s value is reported to exceed an estimated $500 million.

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Michael Jordan Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Juanita Jordan petitioned for alimony payments from Michael Jordan upon the finalization of the Michael Jordan Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Michael Jordan Divorce:

Juanita Jordan received a sum of $168 million in spousal support

Due to the fact the couple’s 3 children exceeded 18 years of age, the determination of custody within the Michael Jordan divorce was not applicable

The Division of Assets in the Michael Jordan Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Michael Jordan Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

In addition to the $168 million payment furnished to Juanita Jordan following the Michael Jordan settlement, she was also given ownership of the couple’s luxury home in Chicago, Illinois

Overview of the Neil Diamond Divorce

The Neil Diamond Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy; the Neil Diamond Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 33-year long marriage. Although the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Neil Diamond divorce; despite the suspicion of extramarital affairs undertaken by Neil Diamond, which resulted in Marsha Murphy petitioning for half of his fortune, Neil Diamond responded that his former wife deserved the settlement amount and ‘was worth every penny’

Neil Diamond continued to thank Marsha Murphy for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Neil Diamond divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Neil Diamond Divorce

Neil Diamond is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters in world history; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, he was valued at an estimated $300 million – Diamond is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘I Write the Songs’ and ‘Sweet Caroline’. He met Marsha Murphy in 1965, where at the time, Murphy was employed as a production assistant; the couple shares 2 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Neil Diamond Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, both Neil Diamond and Marcia Murphy opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Neil Diamond Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

The nature of the Neil Diamond divorce resulting in an uncontested settlement has been presumed to have taken place as a result of the couple’s desire to keep the details of the Neil Diamond divorce secretive; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, Marsha Murphy discovered that he had undertaken various extramarital affairs – in many cases, these events of infidelity were highly-publicized by the media

Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce settlement:

Marsha Murphy walked away from the Neil Diamond divorce settlement with an estimated $150 million, which was reported to be half of Neil Diamond’s fortune; the Neil Diamond divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in history

Background of the Nick Hogan Arrest

The following details outline the shocking details of the 2007 Nick Hogan arrest and sentencing of Nick Hogan subsequent to his involvement in an automobile accident resulting in the passenger in the vehicle, John Graziano, withstanding life-changing injuries; the accident took place in Clearwater, Florida. Although Nick Hogan was not considered to have earned his celebrity status, he is the son of famed wrestler Terry Bollea, who is known as ‘Hulk Hogan’ to fans of professional wrestling on a worldwide basis. The cause of the accident in which Nick Hogan and John Graziano were involved was determined to be the result of both intoxicated driving, as well as reckless endangerment in the form of ‘drag racing’:

Who Was Involved?

Reports released with regard to the details of the car accident involving the vehicle that Nick Hogan was driving – in tandem with the injuries resulting from the accident itself – included 3 individuals driving one of Hulk Hogan’s cars, while Nick Hogan, 17, and John Graziano, 22, were reported as occupying the other vehicle. As previously mentioned, Nick Hogan – whose birthname is Nick Bollea – is the son of wrestling legend Hulk Hogan; John Graziano was a friend of Nick Hogan’s and a marine.

What Happened?

While the 5 individuals were en route to their destination, both Nick Hogan and the driver of the other vehicle belonging to Hulk Hogan began to race; reports submitted by fellow motorists and witnesses reported the cars to be traveling anywhere between 70 and 90 miles per hour – these reports alleged that Nick Hogan had been doubling the expressed speed limitations of that particular roadway. In the midst of driving, Nick Hogan began to drive outside of the lane as the vehicle spun around and sustained a massive impact against a concrete divider on the highway; reports state that the car also impacted a tree. Although Nick Hogan was wearing a seatbelt at the time of the impact, John Graziano was not – as a result, Graziano suffered irrevocable and debilitating injuries.

The Consequences of Nick Hogan’s Actions

After being airlifted to the nearest hospital within the area of Tamp, Florida, Nick Hogan was discharged later that day; however, John Graziano had suffered irreversible damage to his neurological system, which resulted in what would be determined to ensure that he would be in the care of assisted living specialists for the duration of his life.

Criminal Charges Filed Against Nick Hogan

The trial of Nick Hogan was a fairly simple one; the case details surfacing after the accident had revealed that Nick Hogan had a blood alcohol level of 0.05 at the time of the accident; although not above the legal limit, Nick Hogan was a minor at the time of the accident – in the State of Florida, a blood alcohol level exceeding 0.02 displayed by a minor is a criminal offense:

Nick Hogan was charged with a felony, which resulted from injuries sustained through the undertaking of reckless operation of a motor vehicle

Nick Hogan was charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol, which contributed to damage or injury; while Nick Hogan’s attorney attempted to substantiate that john Graziano’s injuries resulted from his failure to wear a seatbelt in lieu of Nick Hogan’s intoxication, the judge quickly dismissed them

Nick Hogan was sentenced to 8 months of incarceration, the loss of his license for 3 years, 500 hours of court-ordered community service, and a 5-year term of probation

Overview of the Olivia Wilde Divorce

In the event that the Olivia Wilde Divorce filing becomes finalized – which took place on February 8th, 2011 – it could mark the end of the marriage between actor Olivia Wilde and Italian filmmaker and Prince Tao Ruspoli. The couple was married on June 7th, 2003 – the marriage was enacted as a private ceremony that had taken place in an abandoned school bus in order to maintain privacy. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Olivia Wilde Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Olivia Wilde Divorce

Olivia Wilde has starred in various television and motion pictures, including the feature film of Tron, as well as a consistent role on the television drama House; Tao Ruspoli has not only directed a multitude of Italian documentary films, but he has also been responsible for the direction of documentaries that have received international acclaim, such as Behind the Wheel and Being in the World. Both Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli are renowned for the maintenance of their privacy, and as a result, few details have emerged with regard to the Olivia Wilde divorce filing; the details that have been made available are as follows:

The Olivia Wilde divorce filing was set forth on the grounds of irreconcilable differences; although the couple had been separated prior to the filing of the Olivia Wilde divorce, neither Olivia Wilde nor Tao Ruspoli were able to salvage their marriage

The couple currently share no children

Legal Venue of the Olivia Wilde Divorce Filing

The Olivia Wilde Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Olivia Wilde Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Olivia Wilde divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Olivia Wilde divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Olivia Wilde Divorce Filing

Due to the fact the couple filed for the Olivia Wilde divorce under the terms of irreconcilable differences, the nature of the divorce is considered to be uncontested. An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Olivia Wilde Divorce, if both Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail in 2011?

During his vast existence within the limelight of celebrity, many people – at many times – have wondered ‘Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?’ The reasons for such questions are considered to stem from Lil Wayne’s prolific personality, including his penchant for recreational drug use, sexual escapades, and possession of firearms – a multitude of these activities are commonly depicted within the lyrics of his music:

Lil Wayne is considered to be amongst the most loved – and most popular stars within modernity. However, the price of fame and public adoration will typically result in one’s personal matters being available for public consumption; both the private life of Lil Wayne, as well as the activities within which he engages is no exception

On March 8th, 2010, a verdict delivered by the State Court of New York mandated Lil Wayne going to jail for a prison sentence of 1-years’ time; he was charged with both the possession of firearms, as well as illegal narcotics

Why is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?

Lil Wayne has been charged with 2 separate offenses involving both firearms, as well as drug possession; the results of both of these instances have resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail – once in the state of Arizona, and the other in the State of New York. However, while the sentence mandated within the Arizona State Court resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail, he was already serving a prison sentence within the State of New York; as a result, the sentencing of Lil Wayne going to jail was permitted to be served ‘concurrently’ – this ideology means that the sentences would be able to be served at the same time:

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in Arizona

Although Lil Wayne was sentenced to prison time in the State of Arizona, he was able to serve his sentence while incarcerated in the State of New York; he was charged for the illegal possession of narcotics – the following are the details of the case that resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail:

On January 23rd, 2008, Lil Wayne’s tour bus was pulled over in Yuma, Arizona by law enforcement agents who discovered Lil Wayne to be in possession of a variety of amounts of MDMA – the drug known as ‘Ecstasy’, Cocaine, and Marijuana; in addition, a variety of drug paraphernalia was discovered by the arresting agents

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in New York

On July 22nd, 2007, Lil Wayne was arrested in the State of New York following a performance; the arresting officers discovered both firearms and Marijuana on his tour bus; during his 2009 hearing, Lil Wayne pleaded guilty to the charges set forth, which resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail for a year’s time:

While in prison, Lil Wayne was reported to be a model inmate, who oftentimes corresponded with his fans, wrote music, and spend time writing music and publications

Paris Hilton Arrested

Although socialite and heiress to the Hilton fortune from her great grandfather – hotel mogul Conrad Hilton – Paris Hilton has been no stranger to run-ins with law enforcement agents. Paris Hilton has undergone many arrests and criminal charges, including the possession and usage of drugs, as well as drunk driving. Akin to her fellow celebrities, who seem to have knack for escaping the punishments intended for crimes for average, non-celebrity citizens, the punishments for Paris Hilton arrested have resulted in mere day-long stints in prison, fines, and probation. However, due to her latest arrest that took place on August 28th, 2010 in the state of Nevada, the Clark County District Attorney assured that the past preferential treatment she may have enjoyed will not be repeated in future sentencing.

Why Was Paris Hilton Arrested For in 2010?

Although most commonly known for her drunk-driving arrests and alleged drug possession, Las Vegas law enforcement agents had Paris Hilton arrested on the evening of August 28th, 2010 when they discovered approximately .08 grams of cocaine on her person; she was pulled over while driving with her boyfriend and arrested:

Upon Paris Hilton arrested, she had claimed that many of the articles found in her purse were not hers; Paris Hilton claimed that someone had not only placed the cocaine in her purse, but also other items discovered – however, upon further investigation with regard to Paris Hilton arrested, she acknowledged that the purse was indeed hers

Cocaine is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of both addiction and death since its introduction to society; cocaine use and possession is considered to be a felony due to the fact that it can impair individuals in behavior, demeanor, and activity

The Punishments for Paris Hilton Arrested

The terms of Paris Hilton arrested were initially considered to be a felony resulting from the possession of cocaine; however, on September 17th, 2010, she struck a plea deal within the Clark County Court in the State of Las Vegas. The terms of her plea deal resulted in the felony charge being split into 2 separate misdemeanor charges including the possession of an illegal substance, as well as the use of an illegal substance. However, upon the striking of a plea deal subsequent to Paris Hilton arrested, the court ensured that Paris Hilton understood the gravity of her actions; the following are applicable to Paris Hilton’s sentencing:

Paris Hilton arrested resulted in a mandatory participation of 200 hours of community service, the furnishing of a $2,000 fine, and the mandatory entry into a drug counseling program; all of these requirement exist with regard to her probation

In any events that land Paris Hilton arrested during her probation, she will be required to serve 1-year of incarceration

The Latest Crime That Could Land Lindsay Lohan in Jail

Actress Lindsay Lohan’s participation in an alleged jewelry theft occurring on February 9th, 2011 could land Lindsay Lohan in jail if she is found guilty. In the Lindsay Lohan Court appearance, she rejected a plea deal in a offered by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Keith Schwartz offering Lohan between 60 to 90 days in jail upon pleading guilty to the alleged jewelry theft, a new trial before a Grand Jury in Los Angeles County will begin on April 22nd, 2011 – a guilty verdict within the Lindsay Lohan Court appearance and Grand Jury Trial is expected to result in jail time:

The Details of the Crime

On February 9th, 2011, Lindsay Lohan and a friend – who would later be named to be her stylist – entered the Los Angeles jewelry store ‘Kamofie & Co.’. The store’s surveillance footage shows Lohan admiring a necklace valued at $2,500 and subsequently obtaining it without paying:

The staff of Kamofie & Co. maintains that Lindsay Lohan obtained the necklace without any prior consent expressed to her that she would be able to do so without payment – this is a charge of theft

However, Lindsay Lohan maintains that the store allowed her to borrow the necklace upon the promise that her stylist would return it promptly

Yet, this claim is not only disputed by the staff of the jewelry store, but Lindsay Lohan’s stylist failed to return the necklace at the date on which she had allegedly promised to do so

The April 22nd, 2011 Lindsay Lohan Court Appearance

The Lindsay Lohan Court hearing scheduled for April 22nd, 2011 will be overseen by a new judge and grand jury; although Lindsay Lohan was offered a plea deal allowing her to remain incarcerated for a period between 60 and 90 days offered by a March 22nd, 2011 Lindsay Lohan court appearance, she rejected it. The reasons stated for this rejection are considered to be rooted within Lindsay Lohan’s refusal to submit a guilty plea for the alleged theft of the necklace:

Judge Schwartz showed neither consideration nor favoritism with regard to her celebrity within the Lindsay Lohan court appearance, reaffirming that she was required to adhere to legislation akin to every other citizen of the United States of America; during the Lindsay Lohan court appearance, he affirmed that another slip-up would result in her expedited return to prison without hesitation

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Paul McCartney Divorce

In 2008, the Paul McCartney Divorce was finalized, which symbolized the termination of the marriage of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills; the couple had been married since 2002. Paul McCartney was married once before his marriage to Heather Mills; his late wife Linda McCartney had died from breast cancer in 1998. While the couple attempted to refrain from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the Paul McCartney divorce, various expressions of dissatisfaction surfaced both from Mills, as well as from Paul McCartney:

Paul McCartney is considered to be amongst the most influential musicians in history with regard to his membership in the seminal music group, The Beatles; in addition, Paul McCartney is considered to be amongst the most valuable human being son Earth, with an estimated value ranging from $135 million to $400 million

Heather Mills is a former model who lost one of her legs in the midst of her modeling career; however, she continued to model despite her tragic accident

The couple birthed a daughter in 2003, named Beatrice McCartney; Paul McCartney and his late wife Linda birthed a daughter named Stella

The Paul McCartney Divorce Before the Royal Courts of Justice in the United Kingdom

The Paul McCartney divorce was considered to be amongst one of the most publicized and expensive divorce not only in the history of the United Kingdom, but also within the collective world. Within the Paul McCartney divorce settlement, various statements reflecting the couple’s growing dissatisfaction for one another was made public, in addition to attacks and defaming remarks set forth by Heather Mills:

Within the Paul McCartney divorce, statements released by Heather Mills included such allegations of substance abuse and mania exuded by Paul McCartney; in one report, she referred to him as ‘boring’ and ‘old’

Paul McCartney – upon the finalization of the Paul McCartney divorce – explained that he finally experienced as sense of ‘peace’ subsequent his divorce from Heather Mills

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Paul McCartney Divorce

A prenuptial agreement did not exist within the Paul McCartney divorce, which is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the United Kingdom, the female spouse within a marriage is entitled to half of the entirety of the net worth belonging to the male spouse. This statute exists in contrast of the divorce statutes applicable in the United States, which may include a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place resulting in the even split of ‘community property’ – a legal classification defined as assets attained subsequent to the marriage in a collective fashion:

The spousal support settlement within the Paul McCartney was considered to be amongst the largest in history, in which Heather Mills walked away with $50 million

There were contrasting claims set forth by the legal teams of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills with regard to Paul McCartney’s net worth – Paul McCartney maintained that his net worth was $125 million, while Mills maintained that his net worth was upwards of $400 million

A Criminal History Fit to Put Lindsay Lohan in Jail

Even prior to her February 9th, 2011 arrest for the alleged theft of jewelry, actress Lindsay Lohan has found herself in a variety of compromising legal situations; in conjunction with a number of criminal charges aimed at Lohan – ranging from driving while intoxicated to the possession of narcotics. The following is a profile of additional crimes charged to Lohan almost resulting in the placement of Lindsay Lohan in Jail:

May 2007

Subsequent to a drunk-driving arrest, the arresting officers find cocaine in the possession of Lindsay Lohan

July 2007

Lindsay Lohan satisfies the required substance abuse counseling mandated by the court in the ‘Promises’ rehabilitation center – the conditions of her release require that she wear a monitoring bracelet regulating the consumption of drugs or alcohol

Late-July 2007

Lindsay Lohan is arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol only a mere 10 days after her completion of her rehabilitation program – upon her arrest, the arresting officers discover cocaine in her possession

August 2007

Prior to an impending trial and the possibility of the placement of Lindsay Lohan in jail, a judge allows Lindsay Lohan to attend another rehabilitation facility in Utah, which is called ‘Cirque Lodge’

November 2007

The hearing for Lindsay Lohan’s drunk-driving and drug possession charges takes place in Los Angeles, California – the judge orders a ruling placing Lindsay Lohan in jail for 24-hours, 10 days of court-ordered community service, court-ordered probation for 3-years’ time, and the mandatory wearing of an alcohol and substance monitoring system

Late-November 2007

Due to overcrowding in the Los Angeles County prison, all non-violent offenders are allowed relocation or conditional release – in conjunction with the verdict, upwards of 80 minutes were considered to amount to the time spent by Lindsay Lohan in jail

January 2008

While in attendance at a private function hosted by 22-year old socialite Masha Markova, Markova’s prized fur coat was discovered to have gone missing; the fur coat was valued at an estimated $11,000. Markova, along with many of her guests, had suspected Lindsay Lohan to be the perpetrator of this theft; days later, the fur coat was returned anonymously to Markova – charges were never filed.

June 2009

While participating in photography shoot for the cover of ‘Elle UK’, one of the United Kingdom’s most prominent fashion magazines, Lindsay Lohan was allowed the opportunity to wear almost $400k worth of jewelry from fashion designer Christian Dior. After the shoot, the set director had noticed that two diamond earrings worn by Lindsay Lohan had gone missing; rumors and allegations alleging that Lindsay Lohan was responsible for this left were set forth, but Lindsay Lohan was never formally charged

May 2010

Upon a mandatory bench warrant set forth by the Los Angeles County Court with regard to the review Lindsay Lohan’s past criminal convictions, Lohan’s presence was required in the hearing; however, at the time of the hearing, Lindsay Lohan was not present – investigations revealed that Lindsay Lohan was in Cannes, France at the Internationally-renowned film festival:

Reports and rumors expressing that Lindsay Lohan was indulging in alcohol and parties began to surface; upon question by the court as to why she had failed to report to her hearing, Lohan alleged that her passport had been stolen and she was unable to board a flight back to California

Upon her failure to appear before the court, an arrest warrant was set forth that would mandate the placement of Lindsay Lohan in jail; however, she obtained a temporary passport – and upon her return to California – she posted $100k bond in lieu of incarceration

At her second trial resulting from the bench warrant issued by the Los Angeles Court, Lindsay Lohan was mandated by the court to wear an alcohol monitoring device regulating her consumption of alcohol; the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) alerts authorities if any trace of alcohol appears in the wearers bodily system

June 2010

While at a party following the ‘MTV Movie Awards’, Lindsay Lohan’s SCRAM monitor was triggered and she was subsequently issued an additional bench warrant for arrest by the court; although this warrant would have placed Lindsay Lohan in jail, she furnished a $200k bond in order to avoid incarceration.

July 2010

Upon her appearance before Judge Marsha Revel and the Los Angeles Superior Court, Lohan is mandated to attend a rehabilitation facility.

September 2010

Lindsay Lohan fails a drug test and is ordered to attend another rehabilitation facility until the close of October 2010