Overview of the Britney Spears Divorce:
Pop superstar married rapper/dancer Kevin Federline in January of 2007. The Britney Spears Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Spears and Federline; the Britney Spears Divorce was finalized in July 2007, which ended the 2-yearlong marriage between Kevin Federline and Britney Spears. Although the case of the Britney Spears Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:
The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Britney Spears Divorce:
An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Britney Spears Divorce, both Kevin Federline and Britney Spears opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Britney Spears Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.
The Terms of the Britney Spears Divorce Settlement:
As a result of Spears’ fortune and Federline’s relative modest finances, it was assumed that Spear’s would be crippled by the divorce settlement. Spears’ however, was shred enough at the time of marriage, to include a 65-page iron-clad prenuptial agreement that stringently limited Federline’s ability to assume the Spears’ fortune.
A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets between the couple. Federline and Spears had two children together; the only details made public concerning the divorce was the fact that custody was divided equally among the parents. According to various reports, Spears’ lawyer, Laura Wasser, asked the judge who presided over the Britney Spears divorce hearing, to keep the details relating to the specific timetable and transportation arrangements regarding the children, private. Wasser claimed that the release of “such information will greatly increase the chance that the actions of the media could threaten the safety of the minor children, for example, causing a traffic accident or by exposing the minor children to criminals who might target the minor children for a financial gain.” As a result of the couple’s celebrity status the term of the divorce settlement was widely kept private, although, it is assumed that Federline was impeded from the majority of Spears’ fortune due to the couple’s comprehensive prenuptial agreement.