Details of Snooki’s Arrest:

Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi, one of the stars of MTV’s hit reality show, Jersey Shore, was arrested during the filming of the show’s third season for disorderly conduct and public intoxication. The show, which has captured the 18-34 demographic (and beyond) embraces the “club culture” and commonly features alcohol abuse and ridiculous confrontations. On episode; howeve,r got a little out of hand as Snooki started drinking before the group ventured to their usual nighttime destinations.

Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi eventually drank to the point of severe inebriation; she became aggressive and stormed onto the beach, while talking utter nonsense. She was taken away by the police after becoming exceedingly disruptive during the filming of the hit MTV series. Police Officer, John Camera who was an arresting officer on the scene offered the following quote to the Star Ledger concerning Snookie’s Arrest: “She was being very disorderly on the beach, bothering other patrons here, when our officers went to deal with her situation, they found that they needed to arrest Snookie.”

Details of Snookie’s Arrest:

Seaside Heights Police Chief Thomas Boyd said that Snookie was arrested at 3:23 P.M. on the afternoon of July 29, 2010 and charged with disorderly conduct—a misdemeanor in the state of New Jersey. Snookie was later released on her own recognizance from the police station at roughly 7:00 P.M. This was the second arrested related to the show—in Season 1, a character was arrested for fighting on the boardwalk.

Snookie’s Arrest and Associated Terms:

Public Intoxication is a criminal charge occurs in the event that an individual – or individuals – are allegedly intoxicated in a public setting; furthermore, an individual can be charged with Public Intoxication in the event that they have traveled away from the vicinity in which the consumption and purchase of alcohol is permissible – upon entering a public setting, individuals are responsible for adhering to any and all applicable legislation:

Although associated statutes and legislation vary with regards to the classification of a Public Intoxication charge, the inherent act of Public Intoxication is considered to be a crime

Public Intoxication charges can include, but do not necessarily result from – criminal activity, damage, or public disturbance

Public Intoxication: Associated Terms and Charges

The following terms and charges are commonly affiliated with Public Intoxication:

Open Container Laws: With regard to Public Intoxication laws, an ‘open container’ is classified as a receptacle used to hold or transport alcohol in an opened state; this suggests that the individual in possession of such a container ingested, or intended to ingest, an alcoholic beverage – however, applicable legislation vary in accordance with open container laws

“Dry”: These terms are applicable to a specific institution’s policy with regard to the consumption of alcohol on its respective premises; in order to avoid instances of Public Intoxication, “Dry” institutions typically forbid the consumption of alcohol

Disorderly Conduct: The criminal charge that encapsulates disruptive behavior on a locational basis; while certain jurisdictions may permit certain behaviors, other jurisdictions may classify those same behaviors as disorderly conduct – although Public Intoxication is not synonymous with disorderly conduct, it is not uncommon for the two to exist in tandem

“Drunk Tank”: An expression that is associated with an administrative, penal holding cell – or an additional method of confinement – in which individuals charged with Public Intoxication may be confined until they are presumed to be of sober mind(s)

A Summary of the Lionel Ritchie Divorce

Lionel Ritche, born on June 20 1949, is an American singer, songwriter, record producer and wildly successful entertainer. Since 1968, he has been the prominent member of the musical group, the Commodores; although Ritchie is probably best known for his solo career. On October 18, 1975 Lionel Ritchie married his college sweetheart, Brenda Harvey. Although things were perfect, according to close and family, during the onset of their relationship, Ritchie began a relationship with another woman, Diane Alexander in 1986. While separated, Harvey discovered Lionel and Alexander together in a Beverly Hills hotel room; a confrontation ensued between the couple and Harvey attacked both Lionel and Diane in a savage manner. For this incident, Brenda was arrested for spousal abuse, assault, and vandalism and trespassing. Lionel and Brenda divorced on August 9, 1993 following their 17 year marriage.

Richie married Diane Alexander on December 21, 1995; together the couple has a son, Miles (born in 1994) and a daughter, Sofia (born in 1998).

Divorce Settlement between Lionel Ritchie and Diane Alexander:

Lionel Ritchie had sold over 100 million records throughout his career; as a result of such success, the music icon earned an obscene fortune. Lionel has blamed his marital problems on his career; sighting his workaholic attitude as the reason behind the neglectful treatment of his wives. Lionel Ritchie divorced Diane Alexander in January of 2004. Similar to many celebrity divorces, the end of this relationship garnered enormous media coverage. That being said, the Lionel Ritchie divorce is somewhat unique, as a result of the lavish settlement that Alexander received.

The terms of the initial settlement, which was offered by Ritchie, awarded Diane the couple’s 5 million dollar mansion and alimony payments of $55,000 per month. Although these terms were initially agreed upon, Diane filed a demand, 5 months after the agreement, for $300,000 in monthly support. She claimed that the $245,000 increase per month was justifiable as a result of her following expenses:   

Vitamins: $500 per month

Gifts for friends and family: $5,000 per month

Jewelry: $5,000 per month

Laser Treatment for Hair Removal: $5,000 per month

Dermatology Treatment: $3,000 per month

Shoes, clothing and other accessories: $15,000 per month

Plastic surgery:$20,000 annually

Tuition for their son: $125,000 annually

Diane believed she was owed the $300,000 per month support as a result of the couple’s lavish lifestyle they shared together; she wanted to remain living the high life. While the couple was married, there was no limit on what she could spend, so after these demands were made, the Lionel Ritchie divorce settlement got particularly messy.  Ultimately, to maintain a close bond with his children, Lionel succumbed to his wife’s demand by offering her an estimated $20 million dollar sum. Although this figure is somewhat disputed as a result of the details of the divorce kept private, it has been reported by various outlets that Ritchie’s $20 million payment ranks as the 23rd most expensive divorce settlement in the history of the United States.

Who is Bob Crane?

Born on July 13 of 1928, Bob Crane as an American actor, best known for his performance as Colonel Robert Hogan in the hit television sitcom Hogan’s Heroes, which aired from 1965 to 1971. Crane was born in Waterbury, Connecticut where he was influenced by music, particularly jazz. On June 21, 1948 Hogan enlisted in the National Guard, but was honorably discharged shortly thereafter in 1950. When Hogan left the National Guard he started a career in Radio broadcasting. Although Hogan started out small, working for local radio stations, he was eventually picked-up by the CBS radio network. During this time, Crane married his high school sweetheart and the couple had three children together. Crane ultimately moved his family to California where he hosted the morning show at KNX radio in Hollywood. Crane filled the broadcast with wit, drumming and interviews with premiere guests such as Bob Hope, Frank Sinatra and Marilyn Monroe. Crane’s show quickly surged to the top ranking in the LA area. Crane eventually parla

yed his successful broadcast career to various acting roles in hit television series.

In the spring of 1965, Crane was offered the starring role in a television pilot about a German P.O.W camp. The show, Hogan’s Heroes, quickly became a hit. Crane’s on-screen success propelled him to the pantheon of television stars. In addition to realizing an enormous pay increase, Crane went through significant personal changes as a result of the show’s success. The television star divorced his wife of 20 years and immediately re-married actress, Sigrid Valdis, whom he met on the set of Hogan’s Heroes in 1970.

During the mid-70’s Hogan’s Heroes was cancelled as a result of poor ratings. Disgruntled and frustrated by the cancellation, Crane was offered part-time and low-paying roles. With his career influx, Ben Crane’s life took a deadly turn in the late 1970’s.

Ben Crane’s Death:

During Hogan’s Heroes, illustrious run, costar Richard Dawson introduced Crane to John henry Carpenter, who worked with the video department at Sony Electronics. Crane and Henry over the next 4 years grew close as friends.

As a result of his position, Henry had access to early video tape recorders, which in later years, Henry used to photograph some of Crane’s sexual escapades with various women. On June 28, 1978 Crane, who realized what Carpenter had done, called the video technician to tell him that their friendship was over. The next day, Crane’s body was discovered in the Winfield Place Apartments in Scottsdale, Arizona bludgeoned to death with a weapon that was never recovered. Investigators on the scene described Crane’s body as savagely beaten; the body also had semen on it, which led investigators to believe that Crane’s killer had ejaculated on hm after the murder.

Bob Crane’s Death Investigation:

According to police officers on the scene, Carpenter had called the apartment several times and was not surprised that the police were there. Carpenter’s car, which he had rented the previous day, was ultimately searched where discoveries of blood smears were found that matched Crane’s blood type. DNA testing, which would have confirmed whether the smears were Crane’s or not, did exist during the late 1970’s. As a result of insufficient evidence, Maricopa County Attorney Charles Hyder declined to press any charges at the time of the murder.

Bob Crane Death Investigation Re-Opened:

The Bob Crane Murder case was reopened in 1990, where Carpenter was eventually placed on trial in 1994. Carpenter was ultimately found not guilty; he maintained his innocence until his death in September of 1998. Although authorities continue to believe that he was the killer, the murder of Bob Crane remains officially unsolved.

Who is Anna Nichole Smith?

Born November 28, 1967 Anna Nichole Smith was an American television personality, actress and model. Anna Nichole Smith first gained popularity in Playboy magazine, when she became the Playmate of the Year in 1993.

Anna Nichole Smith dropped out of high school and married when she was just 18 years of age. Her second marriage was highly publicized; Anna Nichole married oil tycoon, Howard Marshall, who was 62 years older than the Playmate. Widespread speculation mounted that Anna Nichole Smith had married Marshall for his money, allegations which Smith vehemently denied. Following Marshall’s death, Anna Nichole Smith was engaged in a lengthy legal battle over a share of Marshall’s estate. The case, known as Marhsall v. Marshall, was heard in the United States Supreme Court on a question of federal jurisdiction. Smith and her late husband’s son, Pierce Marshall, battled over her claim for half her late husband’s $1.6 billion dollar estate. The case lasted over a decade, producing publicized court battles and several judicial decisions that favored both for and against Smith during that time.

Smith claimed that her husband promised her half of his estate if she married him; in September of 2000, a Los Angeles Bankruptcy judge awarded Smith nearly $450 million dollars. This decision was ultimately appealed and eventually heard by the United States Supreme Court. The decisions; however, are now to continue in the name of Smith’s daughter, due to Smith’s untimely and unfortunate death.

Anna Nichole Smith Death:

On September 10, 2006 Anna Nichole Smith’s 20-year old son Daniel, tragically died from a lethal combination of Lexapro, Zoloft and methadone. Shortly after the death of her son, on February 8, 2007, Smith was found unresponsive in her room at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Hollywood, Florida. According to Seminole Police, Smith’s bodyguard administered CPR until paramedics arrived on the scene. Smith was rushed to Memorial Regional Hospital at 2:10 p.m. and was pronounced dead on arrival.

Following a seven week investigation, led by the county’s Medical Examiner and a Forensic Pathologist, it was announced that Smith died from a combined drug effort, with sleeping medication, chloral hydrate, acting as the major component. No illegal drugs were found in Smith’s system and Smith’s official report states that her death was not considered to be due to suicide, natural causes or homicide. The full report has been made public and can be observed online. Although there are rumors that Anna Nichole Smith’s death photos have been released online, there has been no evidence to believe such a rumor.

Who is Anthony Morrison?

Anthony Morrison is an Internet businessman who can be seen on various infomercials or online advertising videos. Morrison offers individuals a money making marketing system that requires little expertise and enormous rewards. Morrison’s pitch is somewhat unbelievable due to its simplicity and promise of exorbitant returns; Morrison claims that investors can make thousands of dollars working from home if they incorporate his system. To profit of the Anthony Morrison system the user is required to purchase books and various materials that are produced by Morrison himself.

Is Anthony Morrison’s Money-Making System really a Scam?

Anthony Morrison’s system revolves around the use of affiliate marketing, which is a marketing system that takes advantage of Google Adwords and keywords that people use to search for information or various websites. The user is required to pay thousands of dollars to access the Anthony Morrison scam; in addition to the cost, the user is required to satisfy monthly fees and other costs associated with the contract Morrison draws up. Following the payment to Morrison, the user is required to pay Google and other search engines who offer per clack advertising.

Although Anthony Morrison’s marketing strategy and business model is often regarded as a scam, the entrepreneur has not been charged with fraud, extortion or any other crime that would label his venture as a scam. That being said, investors who take notice of Morrison and take his words as the undeniable truth—meaning they will make thousands within minutes from following his simple steps—are susceptible to losing great sums of money. Similar to any other investment or business offering, those who undertake and invest in the idea are required to have a thorough understanding of the underlying mechanics and principals involved in the idea. 

It is possible to make a profit off the Anthony Morrison scam; however, similar to other start-ups or business ideas, the majority of investors lose money by partaking in such a risk. As a result of Morrison’s seeming omnipresent nature, the majority of investors believe everything he says. This is not the recommended course of action, for Morrison’s business model should be viewed like any other venture—with skepticism and reticence.

What is Fraud and is Anthony Morrison guilty?

Fraud is an illegal action that in regards to a broad definition refers to a deliberate misrepresentation, which directly or indirectly causes another person to suffer damages, typically in the form of monetary losses. The charge of fraud is typically attached to individuals who sell a product or service to the generic consumer base. If the underlying product is misrepresented or the selling party uses untruthful or devious means to sell the product, he or she will be committing fraud. Anthony Morrison has not been charged with Fraud because, in his contract and in the fine print of his infomercials, he labels his marketing strategy as simply a plan, which if followed, could result in great profit. As a result of the wording and the legal nature of the contract, Morrison has not been charged with any crime as of yet.

Who is Barry Bonds?

Barry Lamar Bonds is a former Major League Baseball player who holds the all-time Homeruns record; Bonds is viewed as one of the greatest major League Baseball players of all time—a label that is now deeply criticized for his involvement in the steroids scandal that rocked the core of the league’s morals and principals in the late 1990s and throughout the 2000s Bonds, who is regarded as a central figure in the steroid scandal, went from a rail-thin outfielder in the early 1990s (Bonds was a 3-time MVP and one of the game’s best players before the steroid scandal took place) to a 225-lb muscular slugger during the twilight of his career. While suspected of using steroids, Bonds evolved into the game’s most dangerous hitter; he routinely led the league in walks, intentional walks, on-base percentage and other offensive categories which demonstrated his ability to put fear in opposing pitchers.

On September 21, 2007, after breaking some of the game’s most hallowed records, the San Francisco Giants confirmed that they would not re-sign the slugger for the 2008 season. Bonds officially filed for free agency on October 29, 2007 but drew no interest from the other teams in the MLB.

Barry Bonds Steroid Allegations:

Since 2003, Barry Bonds has been the central figure in the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative (BALCO) scandal. Bonds was under investigation by a federal grand jury regarding a testimony he gave in the BALCO case—Bonds was indicted on obstruction of justice and perjury charges on November 15, 2007. Bonds became embroiled in the scandal when his trainer, Greg Anderson was indicted by a federal grand jury in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for supplying anabolic steroids to a number of athletes, including many major league baseball players. This indictment led to widespread speculation that Bonds had used performance-enhancing drugs during a time when no formal drug testing requirements, nor rules which banned stimulants, were found in Major League Baseball’s policy. During his grand jury testimony, which took place in December of 2003, Bonds said that he had used a clear substance and a cream that he received from Anderson, who told the star that the supplements were used to fight against arthritis and other ailments.

On November 15, 200 Bonds was indicted on four count of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice for his testimony to the federal government concerning BALCO. The trial commenced on March 21, 2011 in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, with Judge Susan Illston presiding over the matter.

Although the jury’s verdict is pending, numerous individuals close to the case believe that Bonds will avoid prison time for his alleged role in the steroids scandal. That being said, Bonds’ role and the majority belief that the slugger took illegal substances to prolong and benefit his career, has ultimately tarnished his once-great legacy. Not only was Bonds black-balled from the league, but it is unlikely that the slugger will get elected to the Hall of Fame.

Who is Ben Roethlisberger?

Ben Roethlisberger is a quarterback in the National Football League; Roethlisberger is a 2-time Super bowl Winner from the University of Miami Ohio. Roethlisberger plays for the Pittsburg Steelers and is best known for his toughness, ability to perform in the clutch and his enormous stature. The toughness, which allowed the Steelers to win so many games, almost ended Big Ben’s career; Roethlisberger was in a horrific motorcycle accident (he wasn’t wearing a helmet) that almost killed him in 2006.

Although Roethlisberger has experienced great success in the NFL, numerous off-the-field problems resulted in a 4-game suspension to start the 2010 season. Roethlisberger, who was known as a partier, often abused alcohol and used his glorified status in an overly-promiscuous nature. The addiction to alcohol and the entitlement issue ultimately placed Ben Roethlisberger in precarious and dangerous situations.

Ben Roethlisberger Rape Charge and Sexual Allegations:

On July 17, 2009 a civil suit was filed against Ben Roethlisberger in Washoe County, Nevada; the District Court accused the quarterback of sexually assaulting Andrea McNulty in June 2008. The report gave details that revolved around Roethlisberger’s intoxicated and aggressive nature while staying in a Lake Tahoe hotel for a celebrity golf tournament. Roethlisberger was cited as one of nine defendants listed on the docket report; McNulty could not obtain criminal charges against Roethlisberger due to a lack of evidence.

This suit, which sought $44,000 in damages from the quarterback, alleged that while McNulty was working as an executive host for the hotel’s casino, Roethlisberger called her and invited her to his room under by stating that the hotel’s TV had malfunctioned. When McNulty checked the TV and determined it was functioning properly, she claimed that Roethlisberger stood in front of the door, impeding her exit, then grabbed her and started to kiss her. In August of 2009, the Pittsburgh Gazette, published details as part of a motion filed by two of the other defendants named in the suit. In the affidavit, a former co-worker of McNulty claimed that the McNulty had bragged to her about having consensual sex with Roethlisberger. According to the affidavit, the co-worker also claimed that McNulty had revealed her hopes of getting pregnant with the star quarterback and expressed her willingness to travel to Pittsburgh to “run into” Roethlisberger. As a result of this affidavit and the lack of evidence filed against the quarterback, the charges were invariably dropped.

On March 5, 2010 Roethlisberger was investigated for his alleged sexual assault inside a women’s restroom of the Capital City Nightclub in Miledgeville, Georgia. The accuser, a then 20 year-old college student at Georgia College & State University, who had been hanging out with the quarterback for the majority of that evening. The young girl was taken to the hospital night after sustaining injuries to her face, head and neck. Roethlisberger, who spoke with police on the scene, stated that he did have contact with the girl that was not “consummated” but he did not physically harm her—the quarterback claimed that the accuser slipped and injured her head. When the accuser was treated for her injuries, an emergency-room doctor noted that a “superficial laceration and bruising and slight bleeding the genital area” was present—a rape kit was collected but no semen was recovered to create a profile or establish that a rape had taken place.

During interviews with the police on the night of the incident, the young girl alleged that the quarterback, after accepting an invite to join him in the V.I.P area of the club, encouraged her and her friends to drink an obscene amount of alcohol. When the girl became significantly inebriated, she claimed that the quarterback led her to the bathroom where he exposed himself. The girl claimed that Roethlisberger then had sex with her; at this time, the young girl’s friends reportedly tried to intervene, only to be thwarted by Roethlisberger’s bodyguards. On April 12, 2010, district attorney Fred Bright held a press conference to announce that the quarterback would not be charged in the incident due to a lack of evidence. Although Big ben avoided a trial and a subsequent prison sentence, a number of his sponsors terminated business deals and the league suspended the quarterback for the first four games of the 2010 season.

Background of the Winona Ryder Shoplifting Arrest

The following details took place during the Winona Ryder Shoplifting, which involved actor Winona Ryder:

Who is Winona Ryder?

Winona Ryder is an American actress who has enjoyed a longstanding career within the film industry, starring in a vast expanse of recognizable and beloved roles; amongst her most recognized films are the following:

Beetlejuice

Edward Scissorhands

Heathers

The Black Swan

Date of the Winona Ryder Shoplifting Arrest: The Winona Ryder Shoplifting arrest took place in December of 2001

Location of the Winona Ryder Shoplifting: The criminal activity undertaken by Winona Ryder took place in Beverley Hills, California

Criminal Charges Associated with the Winona Ryder Shoplifting Arrest

Subsequent to the police apprehension of Winona Ryder, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

Winona Ryder was accused of stealing $5,560 in Saks Store in Beverley Hills, California

The Winona Ryder Shoplifting charge involved Ryder obtaining merchandise available for commercial sale by the retailer. Winona Ryder undertook the unlawful, clandestine acquisition of merchandise in lieu of sufficient payment, removing that merchandise from the premises of a the Saks Store in Beverley Hills, California without financial restitution – legally, a shoplifting charge is considered to be theft or larceny

A vandalism charge within the Winona Ryder Shoplifting was instated due to Ryder’s purposeful defacement or deliberate misuse of the expressed, intended usage of property under the ownership of another individual

The Legal Venue of the Winona Ryder Shoplifting Trial: The criminal trial responsible for the implementation of judicial review for the Winona Ryder Shoplifting case took place in Los Angeles County in the State of California

The Punitive Recourse of the Winona Ryder Shoplifting

Subsequent to the findings by the presiding judge with regard to the Winona Ryder Shoplifting trial, Winona Ryder was ordered to enact the following activities with regard to her sentencing:

The participation in 480 hours of community service determined by the court

A term of probation for 3-years’ time

The furnishing of a monetary penalty of $3,700

The Notion of Celebrity within the Winona Ryder Shoplifting Arrest

Due to the fact that Winona Ryder was widely recognized a celebrity at the time of her arrest, the media scrutiny was exponentially higher with regard to the coverage of the details of the event described as the Winona Ryder Shoplifting:

Uniform Sentencing with the Winona Ryder Shoplifting Trial

The Winona Ryder Shoplifting trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – run the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial, much like that public was during the Winona Ryder Shoplifting, the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion:

Due to the fact that celebrities typically possess higher earnings and greater fortunes than individuals considered to account for the median members of society, the implementation of financial recourse – in the form of fines or fees – is considered by many legal professionals to be subject to inefficiency with regard to punitive recourse

Within the Winona Ryder Shoplifting trial, many individuals suspected that the enforcement of a median monetary payment furnished by Winona Ryder would neither affect her finances nor serve as an effective punishment

Overview of the Travis Barker Divorce

The Travis Barker Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between musician Travis Barker and former Playboy Playmate Shanna Moakler, which took place in 2004. Although the couple had engaged in various separations and attempts to reconcile the marriage, the Travis Barker Divorce was finalized on February 11th, 2008, ending the 4-year marriage. Over the course of the marriage between Travis Barker and Shanna Moakler, the couple were separated a variety of times; the couple also filed for divorce in 2006 – however, in 2007, Shanna Moakler announced that both she and her husband were going to attempt to reconcile the marriage one, final time. However, shortly after this announcement, the couple agreed that the filing for what the media dubbed as the ‘Travis Barker divorce’ was the only option available:

The Parties Involved in the Travis Barker Divorce

Travis Barker is most widely-known for his drumming in the rock and roll band Blink-182, who has gained international success and acclaim; in addition, Travis Barker has collaborated with the likes of fellow artists, including DJ AM, Lil’ Wayne, and Flo Rida. Incidentally, Travis Barker was on board the private plane with DJ AM upon its crashing; while both men survived, DJ AM took his own life shortly after the crash. Shanna Moakler enjoyed success upon winning the 1995 ‘Miss U.S.A.’ pageant, in addition to becoming the 2001 ‘Playmate of the Year’ given by Playboy magazine.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Travis Barker Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Travis Barker Divorce, both Travis Barker and Shanna Moakler seemed unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault. However, within the State of California, a contested – or challenged – divorce hearing allows for the release of certain details of the divorce settlement to be released into public record. Although Travis Barker and Shanna Moakler presumably did not wish to have the details of the Travis Barker Divorce released to the general public, the inability to arrive at a meeting of the minds earned the Travis Barker Divorce a large amount of publicity at the time it occurred.

The Terms of the Travis Barker Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Travis Barker Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Travis Barker Divorce settlement:

Although the available details of the Travis Barker divorce are scant, reports have cited that both Travis Barker and Shanna Moakler share joint custody of the couple’s 2 children; Atiana, who is the daughter with which Shanna Moakler shares with former partner – and professional boxer – Oscar De La Hoya, is under the primary custody of Moakler

The Background of the Wayne Rooney Scandal

The ‘Wayne Rooney scandal’ is an identifying tagline that has been associated with the alleged infidelity undertaken by British Football Player Wayne Rooney; Rooney is not only one of the most widely-recognized Football players for his talents as a forward – the position that he plays on Manchester United Football Club – but also for his notoriety within the Football Community:

The Wayne Rooney scandal involved the alleged extramarital affair undertaken by the Football star with Jennifer Thompson, who is named as a 21-year old prostitute; this affair has been alleged to have taken place in 2009

While the details of the Wayne Rooney scandal may seem as though they could not get any more scandalous, the alleged infidelity has been reported to have taken place in 2009 while Rooney’s wife – Colleen Rooney – was pregnant with the couple’s son, Kai

Jennifer Thompson’s Allegation in the Wayne Rooney Scandal

Jennifer Thompson is identified as the individual who formally released the details of the Wayne Rooney scandal to the British media; subsequent to the release of her allegations, Jennifer Thompson shared her story with various international media outlets – however, perhaps the most alarming detail of the Wayne Rooney scandal was Thompson’s release of sexually-charged photographs that she claims to have taken at Rooney’s behest:

Thompson’s role in the Wayne Rooney scandal has been massive; in addition to release of the photographs, she claims to have been engaging in sexual activity with Rooney for several months – furthermore, Thompson claimed to have done so with the full recognition of Wayne Rooney’s teammates on Manchester United

Thompson claimed that Wayne Rooney paid her upwards of 1,200 EU per night of sexual activity; upon selling her testimony to various media outlets, she disclosed the intimate details of her sexual activity with Rooney

Thompson continues to add insult to injury claiming that Wayne Rooney had engaged in this extramarital affair in his home while his wide was gone; the scandalous details of the situation earned the identifier ‘Rooneygate’ – a pun on the ‘Watergate Scandal’

The Legal Recourse of the Wayne Rooney Scandal

The details of the Wayne Rooney were not only considered to have deeply affected Wayne Rooney’s career and public image, but the aftereffects are still unfolding. While Wayne Rooney never denied his involvement in infidelity, he has attempted to put the past behind him; although charges have not been formally brought forth, the following charges are applicable to the Wayne Rooney scandal:

The engagement and patronage of prostitution, which is the criminal act defined as the exchange of sexual activity – which can include intercourse, penetration, and copulation – for financial or commercial gain or opportunity

The engagement in solicitation, which is the illegal and unlawful act of mindfully propositioning an individual to participate in criminal activity; in this case, Wayne Rooney willingly paid for sex, and as a result, assisted in the enactment of a criminal act

At the start of 2011, Coca-Cola pulled their sponsorship of a prospective reality-based television show starring Wayne Rooney, due to the fact that the show was targeted to discovering young Football players; reports indicate that the details latent within the Wayne Rooney scandal were not considered to coincide with the intended audience of his proposed television show