The Details of the Kurt Cobain Death as They Were Reported

On April 5th, 1994, internationally-acclaimed musician Kurt Cobain was reported to have died subsequent to sustaining a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head in what was initially determined to be a suicide; Kurt Cobain was a beloved musical icon who – alongside his band ‘Nirvana’ enjoyed the sales of millions of albums in conjunction with sold-out performances and the adoration of millions fans. On February 24th, 1992, Kurt Cobain married fellow musician Courtney Love; on August 18th, 1992, Kurt Cobain and Courtney Love welcomed the birth of their daughter.

The Controversy Surrounding the Kurt Cobain Death

Prior to his death, the release of reports – the content of which varied in accordance with their respective validity – suggested a wide range of explanations substantiating the alleged Kurt Cobain death; certain claims were substantiated by Kurt Cobain himself, such as his addiction to heroin as well as a crippling gastroenterological ailment from which he suffered – many individuals credited these claims to account for the Kurt Cobain death. However, other individuals were quick to discredit the reports suggesting that the Kurt Cobain death was the result of a suicide; many of these detractors suspected that Kurt Cobain’s wife – Courtney Love – was responsible for orchestrating the Kurt Cobain death.

The Investigation of the Kurt Cobain Death

Upon reports from friends and family of Kurt Cobain to law enforcement agents, which were furnished as a result of a lack of communication with Kurt Cobain, investigators discovered the body of Kurt Cobain on April 8th, 1994 – 3 days following the exact date on which the Kurt Cobain was presumed to have taken place. The reports furnished by law enforcement agents conveyed that they had found the following upon the discovery of Cobain’s body:

A shotgun identified as the weapon Kurt Cobain had used to take his own life

A suicide note, which was allegedly penned by Cobain himself; the contents of the note were read remotely by Courtney Love over a loudspeaker at a vigil taking place in Seattle, Washington – the note appears to express Kurt Cobain’s depression and dissatisfaction with his life

A supply of heroin belonging to Kurt Cobain; a toxicology report was taken as a result of this discovery, which reflected an inexplicably large amount of heroine classified as fatal

The Dispute over the Nature of the Kurt Cobain Death

While various friends and family close to Kurt Cobain – in tandem with fans and unrelated, concerned individuals – maintain that the Kurt Cobain death was not the result of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, these claims were never investigated and currently remain classified as circumstantial evidence. However, the following inconsistencies, inaccuracies, and oddities were reported to have taken place with regard to the Kurt Cobain death:

The amount of heroin that was discovered in Kurt Cobain’s body was considered by many people to have debilitated Kurt Cobain, rendering him unable to not only pull a shotgun’s trigger, but hold the shotgun entirely

Handwriting analysis specialists have undertaken vast exploration of the suicide note allegedly penned by Kurt Cobain upon the Kurt Cobain death; the results of a bulk of these analyses have determined that the note was a letter of resignation in lieu of a suicide note – in addition, reports have stated that the note was not penned by Kurt Cobain in its entirety

Floyd Mayweather Arrested…Again

Professional boxer Floyd Mayweather is considered to be amongst the most premier boxers within modernity; however, his boxing accolades have not prevented him from engaging in run-ins with law enforcement agents. With regard to his latest arrest, that took place on December 17th, 2010 resulting from an alleged assault on a security guard, the events resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested only added to his presumed legal trouble.

Why Was Floyd Mayweather Arrested in 2009?

The events resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested took place on September 9th, 2010; classified as a multifaceted offense, which included larceny, domestic battery, and emotional domestic violence, the events unfolded as Floyd Mayweather engaged in a dispute with a former girlfriend of Mayweather’s named Josie Harris – both the charges of battery and larceny were classified as felonies punishable by up to 6 months incarceration if convicted. The following details are pertinent to the events surrounding Floyd Mayweather arrested:

The presence of the alleged  physical battery and assault of his girlfriend resulted in  Floyd Mayweather arrested for domestic violence in its physical form, which was reported as including the physical abuse or assault sustained Josie Harris;  the alleged physical domestic violence suffered upon his charges were unidentifiable by law enforcement agents – the claims of these charges were absent of noticeable signs of bodily injury

The posing of threats issued by events resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested were considered to be expressions of domestic violence taking place within its emotional or verbal form

The third charge resulting in Floyd Mayweather  arrested was the claim that he had unlawfully stolen the cellphone belonging to Harris, which was classified as Larceny including the presence of violence or harm posed as threats in the event that the victim in question refuses to comply with the demands of the individual committing larceny

Why Was Floyd Mayweather Arrested in 2010?

On December 17th, 2010, while Mayweather was on ‘The Las Vegas Strip’ in his home State of Nevada, he was identified by a 21 year old security guard who was under the employ of the gated housing community in which Floyd Mayweather resided. The guard had reported that Floyd Mayweather had assaulted him subsequent to receiving a parking summons issued by the guard; the reports included Floyd Mayweather poking the face of the security guard in an assaulting manner – this event resulted in Floyd Mayweather arrested:

Although the 2009 criminal charges resulting in Floyd Mayweather arrested were still pending, the security guard alerted police of Floyd Mayweather’s whereabouts upon seeing him in downtown- Las Vegas; as a result, law enforcement agents arrived and arrested Floyd Mayweather on the charges of assault

However, reports released from the Clark County Police Department showed that despite Floyd Mayweather arrested that evening, he was released shortly thereafter without bail; there have been no subsequent reports in conjunction with the December 17th, 2011 assault charges

A Summary of the Andre Agassi Divorce

The Andre Agassi Divorce was finalized in April of 1999, ending the nearly 2-year marriage between Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields – the couple was wed in April of 1997. Speculation surrounding the Andre Agassi Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Andre Agassi Divorce included <; for those unfamiliar with the Andre Agassi Divorce, the celebrity status of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Andre Agassi Divorce had taken place:

Andre Agassi, at the time of the Andre Agassi Divorce, was considered to be amongst the most electrifying and talented Tennis Players in the world; he had been experiencing a multitude of internationally acclaimed victories in the Olympic Games in the sport of Tennis

Brooke Shields had established herself as an acclaimed actor at a young age, starring in her first film ‘The Blue Lagoon’, which thrust her into the limelight; in addition, Brooke Shield had been modeling on a consistent basis

The Determination of Contest within the Andre Agassi Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Andre Agassi Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Andre Agassi Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple expressed that they had grown apart and no longer could retain a connection; they added that the divorce took place mutually and amicably:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Andre Agassi Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields determined that the Andre Agassi Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Terms and Conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, as well as the division of collective assets:

The Division of Assets in the Andre Agassi Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Andre Agassi Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

The terms of the prenuptial agreement were kept confidential, but details regarding the division of assets provided information suggesting that couple would split what was estimated to be upwards of $130 million in communal assets, as well as homes in Los Angeles and Las Vegas

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Summary

Armando Montelongo, who is known as one of the foremost real estate gurus in modernity was arrested in 2007 after allegations furnished by a contracting company in Austin, Texas, which claimed that the reasons for Armando Montelongo arrested including the failure to satisfy the payment of $4k worth of appraisal services undertaken by the company. The construction appraisal company who were hired on a contractual basis by Armando Montelongo claimed that between the years of 2005 and 2006, the company had undergone a variety of appraisals for which they were never paid by Armando Montelongo.

The Irony of Armando Montelongo Arrested

Armando Montelongo is most commonly recognized for his role in his reality-based television program that is aired on the A&E television network called ‘Flip this House’; the program educates its viewers on the various methodology latent within the ‘House-flipping’ subgenre of real estate:

The act of ‘Flipping Houses’ is defined as the purchase of a home considered to be in unsatisfactory conditions, ranging from structural damage or neglect; a trend within the industry of flipping houses occurs as the poor condition of the home allows for a drastically-lowered purchase price – subsequent to the purchase, the buyer renovates the home and sells it for a far-larger amount of money than for which it was originally purchased

The Austin, Texas appraisal company was named as working closely with Armando Montelongo in tandem with an individual house flipping operation undertaken by Armando Montelongo; however, it was this same appraisal company that had Armando Montelongo arrested

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Conclusion

Upon the investigation that resulted in Armando Montelongo arrested, a variety of reports were released; Armando Montelongo explained that charges set forth resulting in Armando Montelongo arrested were baseless; Armando Montelongo assured that he would dispute the charges and have them overturned. The Austin, Texas Police Department – sitting in the heart of Travis County in the State of Texas – undertook the investigation; shortly after they had Armando Montelongo arrested, the charges set forth by the Austin, Texas-based appraisal company were reported to have been overturned:

Only days after Armando Montelongo arrested, Armando Montelongo continued shooting footage for his television show; subsequent charges have been filed against Armando Montelongo – his detractors believe that he undertakes illcit business dealings

Those lobbying for Armando Montelongo – including the A&E television channel – adamantly support Armando Montelongo; his career has not appeared to have suffered from Armando Montelongo arrested

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

In February of 2011, Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz filed for divorce; the couple had been married over 2-years, officially being wed in May of 2008. Ashlee Simpson is most commonly known for both her singing career, as well as for her familial ties; she is the younger sister of celebrity singer Jessica Simpson. Pete Wentz gained his celebrity status as a result of being the bass player in the rock group Fall Out Boy. Akin to the bulk of celebrity divorces – and their respective penchant for speculation with regard to the reason for the dissolution of the marriage – the Ashlee Simpson divorce is no exception; reports released in conjunction with the Ashlee Simpson divorce range from rumors of the couple having grown apart to alleged infidelity.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake specific stipulations with regard to filing for divorce:

The Absence of a Prenuptial Agreement in the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. In the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, neither Pete Wentz nor Ashlee Simpson enacted a prenuptial agreement; in contrast to a large part of celebrity marriages undertaken after the attainment of a varying degree of fame, these types of agreements are commonly undertaken:

Despite the absence of a prenuptial agreement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for spousal support in the form of alimony from Pete Wentz subsequent to the finalization of the Ashlee Simpson divorce

The Determination of Fault

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’, which is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. The receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property; yet, the division of assets with regard to the Ashlee Simpson divorce was not disclosed to the public.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce Child Custody Settlement

In November of 2008, the couple welcomed a son named Bronx Mowgli Wentz. Although the petitioning for custody with regard to a shared child – or children – may vary in conjunction with the terms of a divorce settlement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for not only primary physical custody of their son, but also for joint legal custody:

Legal custody allows the expressed permission of guardianship over a child produced from a marriage; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement, both Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz will be permitted to act on behalf of their son

Physical custody is the granting of exclusive custody of a child to one parent; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, Ashlee Simpson retains the right to establish when or if Pete Wentz will retain the right to visit with their son

This aspect of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement will also make Ashlee Simpson eligible to receive child support payments furnished by Pete Wentz

The Background of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

Edwin Valero, who was a 28-year old Venezuelan boxer, was accused of killing his wife in a hotel room in Valencia, which is a city in Venezuela on or around the time of April 19th, 2010; Jennifer Viera, who was Edwin Valero wife was 24-years old at the time of her murder; she was discovered in the early morning hours by law enforcement agents. While the details of his arrest in conjunction to the alleged murder of his wife remained hazy at first notice, Edwin Valero Wife murder investigation became clearer subsequent to the events that unfolded upon Valero’s apprehension.

The Arrest Charges of Edwin Valero Wife Murder

Edwin Valero was apprehended on Sunday the 19th after reports that Valero had allegedly confessed his crime to both hotel security, and then continued to confess the murder of his wife to police undertaking the Edwin Valero wife murder investigation upon their arrival to the hotel. Upon entering the hotel room shared by Valero and his wife, the lifeless body of Jennifer Viera was discovered; the police report mentioned the identification of 3 stab wounds on various locations her body – however, despite the confession expressed by the boxer for the Edwin Valero wife murder, the weapon assumed to have taken Viera’s life was never located by investigators.

A History of Domestic Discord Revealed in the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the past events involving domestic incidents involving Valero and his wife have resulted in charges alleged to Valero, including harassment, threats, and physical violence enacted upon Jennifer Viera; only months prior, Viera was rushed to a Venezuelan hospital after suffering broken ribs and a punctured lung resulting from an incident that Viera reported as an accidental fall.

Edwin Valero Takes His Own Life in the Midst of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the morning subsequent to his apprehension, Edwin Valero was found dead due to asphyxiation from a homemade noose fashioned out of his clothing in his jail cell the Monday morning after his arrest on the previous day. Reports issued by the Venezuelan police expressed that the suicide had taken place on Monday, April 19, 2010:

Valero’s suicide was reported by a fellow inmate who had witnessed the act taking place; upon mention of the suicide, the police rushed to the aid of Valero – while Valero showed slight signs of life upon the discover by police, he was unable to be revived and died shortly afterwards

Overview of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

The filing of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce occurred on April 2nd, 2011, which marked the ending of the relationship between actor Elizabeth Hurley and Indian industrialist Arun Nayar; the couple met it 2002 and began a romantic relationship shortly thereafter – the couple wed on March 2nd, 2007. Akin to traditional, non-celebrity divorce proceedings – including the filing, settlement, and finalization process –the impact of the dissolution of a union is considered to exist in a corollary fashion within celebrity divorces – the Elizabeth Hurley divorce was certainly no exception. As a result, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

Elizabeth Hurley is an English actor who has been featured in films such as Austin Powers, Permanent Midnight, and Bedazzled; in addition to her acting fame, she was also married to actor Hugh Grant at the time of his arrest from engaging in sexual activity with a prostitute. While not an actor himself, Arun Nayar is considered to be amongst the most successful textile magnates within the global marketplace; he is currently heir to one of the largest textile companies both in India, as well as worldwide – Arun Nayar was born in India:

The couple engaged in 2 marriage ceremonies; a civil proceeding in the United Kingdom, as well as an Indian ceremony in Jodhpur, India

Reports of infidelity surfaced with regard to the Elizabeth Hurley divorce, which cited Elizabeth Hurley undertaking an extramarital affair with the Australian professional cricketer Shane Warne; although these reports have yet to be validated, she has allegedly begun a romantic relationship with Warne

The Plea within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Elizabeth Hurley divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce, if both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Emmy Rossum Divorce

The Emmy Rossum Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between music executive Justin Siegel and actor Emmy Rossum; the Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized in December of 2010, which ended the couples year-and-a-half-long marriage – the couple wed on February 17th, 2008. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement; in the case of the Emmy Rossum divorce, Justin Siegel was responsible for the filing of the divorce petition – subsequent to the filing, the couple stated that the dissolution of the marriage resulted from irreconcilable differences:

The Parties Involved in the Emmy Rossum Divorce

Acotr Emmy Rossum has been featured in such films as The Day Before Tomorrow, Poseidon, Dragonball: Evolution, and Mystic River; she also enjoys a successful musical career. Justin Siegel works within the music industry, and has been known for the development of a variety of artists – the couple shares no children together.

Legal Venue of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Hearing

The Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized before a judge in the Los Angeles branch of the California Superieor Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Emmy Rossum Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Emmy Rossum Divorce, both Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel seemed unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault. However, within the State of California, a contested – or challenged – divorce hearing allows for the release of certain details of the divorce settlement to be released into public record. Although Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel presumably did not wish to have the details of the Emmy Rossum Divorce released to the general public, the inability to arrive at a meeting of the minds earned the Emmy Rossum Divorce a large amount of publicity at the time it occurred.

The Terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of !, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Emmy Rossum Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private . However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce settlement:

The Emmy Rossum divorce settlement awarded Justin Siegel with a sum of $57,000 as per his request for spousal support as a result of the dissolution of the marriage

Emmy Rossum was awarded with the couple’s shared residence in Bevereley Hills, California in addition to her jewelry and valuables; Justin Siegel was awarded an additional $11,200 deposit from the home in addition to the couple’s shared automobile

What is the Katie Holmes Prenup?

The legal instrument known as the ‘Katie Holmes Prenup’ is officially defined as the legislative document issued by Tom Cruise upon his marriage to Katie Holmes. A Katie Holmes Prenup is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise. The goal of a prenuptial agreement is to place limitations on prospective petitions, claims, and requests furnished by Katie Holmes or Tom Cruise in the event of the dissolution of a marriage.

Who is Involved in the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Primarily, the Katie Holmes prenup involves both partners of the marriage existing between actors Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes; however, akin to the trend associated with a variety of celebrity marriages, it may presumed that both the legal counsel responsible for the legal representation of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise – respectively – suggested the enactment of the Katie Holmes:

Careers Profiles

For those unfamiliar with the individual careers belonging to Tom Cruise or Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise is considered to be one of the single-most globally-recognized, iconic actors of the 20th century; Tom Cruise has starred in countless blockbuster films such as Top Gun, The Mission Impossible Series, Rain Man, Jerry Maguire, and Days of Thunder – Katie Holmes has also enjoyed a nominal amount of success in both television acting, as well as major motion pictures

What are the Alleged Terms of the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Although a variety of alleged reports substantiating the unofficial details expressed within the Katie Holmes prenup have been released, the verification of any and all statutes cited within the Katie Holmes prenup have been confirmed neither by publicists employed by Tom Cruise nor those employed by Katie Holmes. The following claims with regard to the Katie Holmes prenup have been alleged:

For every year that Katie Holmes remains married to Tom Cruise, the Katie Holmes prenup allows her $3 million annually

In the event that the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise withstands 11-years’ time, the Katie Holmes prenup becomes void; in the event of a divorce after a period of marriage exceeding 11-years’ time, Katie Holmes will become entitled to half of the combined assets and monies accrued by the couple since the date of the marriage – within the State of California as ‘Community Property’

What is the Need for the Katie Holmes Prenup?

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage:

The statues expressed within the statutes inherent within the Katie Holms Prenup are reported to not only address the receipt of any salaries and wages subsequent to the enactment of the marriage

Wages, assets, monies, or earnings in possession of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise not addressed within the Katie Holmes Prenup will result in the classification of such finances as community – or shared – property.

Why Was Katt Williams Arrested?

The events that resulted in comedian Katt Williams Arrested in November of 2009 were subject to a vast array of media coverage upon their release shortly after rumors of Katt Williams Arrested; what was reported to have begun as a simple misunderstanding quickly escalated into legal situation in which the report of missing valuables, theft, and trespassing were quickly brought to light:

Reports expressing the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested explained that while residing in the house of Barry Hankerson in the State of Georgia – the famed record producer – a steward in the Hankerson household had reported that almost $4k of valuables had gone missing

The accuser, who was named as Daniel Paul Broach, identified the comedian as the perpetrator of the crime and had Katt Williams Arrested; yet, the arrest was only the beginning of what would be considered a bizarre turn of events and situations.

The Criminal Charges that Resulted in Katt Williams Arrested

In the midst of his stay in the home of Barry Hankerson, a variety of charges were tossed around by Broach; with regard to each of the allegations, Williams’ legal team summarily defended and absolved their client of both participation, as well as the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested:

Katt Williams Arrested for Trespassing

A trespassing allegation contributing to Katt Williams Arrested was swiftly thrown out as a result of Hankerson substantiating that Williams was permitted to reside at his home. Broach claimed that Williams has undergone the unlawful encroachment onto the private and personal property belonging to Hankerson.

Katt Williams Arrested for Theft

Broach expressed that in the enactment undertaken by Williams upon the personal property belonging to Hankerson, he unlawfully obtained almost $4k in valuables that Broach had reported to have gone missing. Although a settlement of the criminal allegations was kept under wraps between Hankerson and Williams, the charges of burglary leading to Katt Williams Arrested were discharged.

Events Following Katt Williams Arrested

Subsequent the preparation of Katt Williams’ defense, both testimony offered by Hankerson – as well as testimony redacted by Broach – has resulted in the charges filed against Williams from the State of Georgia to be dropped.