Overview of the Jessica Simpson Divorce

Singers Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey embarked on a romantic relationship at the close of the 20th century; nearly 2 years following their initial meeting, the couple wed on October 26th, 2002. In conjunction to rumors surfacing in November of 2005 suggesting that the couple would undergo separation, Jessica Simpson filed a petition for divorce only a month later, in which simply ‘irreconcilable differences’ were cited as the catalyst for what the media dubbed the ‘Jessica Simpson Divorce’. However, on June 30th, 2006 – almost 6 months following the separation notice – the Jessica Simpson divorce was finalized.

The Parties Involved in the Jessica Simpson Divorce

Jessica Simpson is an American singer who rose to fame in the final years of the 1990s into the early years of the 2000s; recognized as having an incredible voice, she was responsible for such hit singles including ‘I Wanna Love You Forever’, Irresistible’, and ‘A Public Affair’ – Jessica Simpson was also featured in various major motion pictures. Nick Lachey enjoyed the bulk of his fame in the late 1990s thanks to his fronting of the ‘boy band’ 98 Degrees, who were gained mainstream fame as a result of hit singles ‘I Do (Cherish You)’, ‘Thank God I Found You’, and ‘This Gift’.

The Impact of the Jessica Simpson Divorce

At the time of the Jessica Simpson divorce from husband Nick Lachey, the impact of the dissolution of the marriage is considered to have been amongst the most intense with individuals younger in age – or minors. Due to the fact that Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey starred in a reality show that aired on the MTV network, which was entitled ‘Newlyweds’, a young demographic of viewers were given the opportunity to not only witness the events taking place within the marriage of Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey, but also feel a heightened sense of kinship with the couple.

Legal Venue of the Jessica Simpson Divorce Hearing

The Jessica Simpson Divorce was heard before a judge in California’s State Superior Court; in accordance to the couple’s residence in Los Angeles County, the Jessica Simpson divorce hearing was heard before in the Los Angeles County branch.

The Terms of the Jessica Simpson Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Jessica Simpson Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Jessica Simpson Divorce settlement:

Due to the fact that neither Jessica Simpson nor Nick Lachey furnished a prenuptial agreement, the couples shared earning following the date of marriage were legally-required to be split; however, since Jessica Simpson was considered to be the partner with superior monetary value, a legal team was orchestrated in order to enact the Jessica Simpson divorce settlement – the couples net worth was estimated to be valued at $36 million

While the initial offer furnished by Jessica Simpson’s legal team was reported to be $1.5 million, Nick Lachey was reported to have requested $18 million – half of the couple’s shared assets; however, the final sum of the Jessica Simpson divorce settlement furnished to Nick Lachey was never released

The Background of the Kate Winslet Divorce

The filing for the Kate Winslet divorce took place in March of 2010; however, an impending Kate Winslet divorce has yet to be finalized – the finalization of the divorce would result in the dissolution of the 7-year marriage of actor Kate Winslet and her husband director Sam Mendes. Akin to many celebrity divorces, a multitude of rumors have circulated with regard to the reasoning for a prospective Kate Winslet divorce; yet, none of the rumors have neither been authenticated by Kate Winslet nor Sam Mendes. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Kate Winslet Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although rumors have surfaced that a prospective Kate Winslet is the result of an extramarital affair undertaken by Sam Mendes with actor Rebecca Hall, any such validation has yet to be furnished

Who Was Involved in the Kate Winslet Divorce Filing?

English actor Kate Winslet is one of the most famous faces in Hollywood; perhaps most widely-recognized for her starring role in the blockbuster hit Titanic, which was the highest grossing film of all time prior to 2010, Kate Winslet has starred in other successful films including Reservation Road, Quills, and Finding Neverland. Kate Winslet’s husband – English director Same Mendes – has shared in his wife’s success in the motion picture industry; he has directed the following films that have received international acclaim, such as Jarhead, The Road to Perdition, and American Beauty:

Both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes share one son, in addition to the custody of a daughter birthed to Kate Winslet in her previous marriage

The Plea within the Kate Winslet Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Kate Winslet divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Kate Winslet divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kate Winslet Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kate Winslet Divorce, if both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Kate Winslet Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

A Summary of the Andre Agassi Divorce

The Andre Agassi Divorce was finalized in April of 1999, ending the nearly 2-year marriage between Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields – the couple was wed in April of 1997. Speculation surrounding the Andre Agassi Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Andre Agassi Divorce included <; for those unfamiliar with the Andre Agassi Divorce, the celebrity status of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Andre Agassi Divorce had taken place:

Andre Agassi, at the time of the Andre Agassi Divorce, was considered to be amongst the most electrifying and talented Tennis Players in the world; he had been experiencing a multitude of internationally acclaimed victories in the Olympic Games in the sport of Tennis

Brooke Shields had established herself as an acclaimed actor at a young age, starring in her first film ‘The Blue Lagoon’, which thrust her into the limelight; in addition, Brooke Shield had been modeling on a consistent basis

The Determination of Contest within the Andre Agassi Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Andre Agassi Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Andre Agassi Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple expressed that they had grown apart and no longer could retain a connection; they added that the divorce took place mutually and amicably:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Andre Agassi Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields determined that the Andre Agassi Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Terms and Conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, as well as the division of collective assets:

The Division of Assets in the Andre Agassi Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Andre Agassi Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

The terms of the prenuptial agreement were kept confidential, but details regarding the division of assets provided information suggesting that couple would split what was estimated to be upwards of $130 million in communal assets, as well as homes in Los Angeles and Las Vegas

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In 1997, and Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson filed for divorce; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources had reported that irretrievable differences with regard to each member of the couple’s career path had manifested in a contrasting fashion:

Kirstie Alley and Bob Alley wed in 1970 and divorced almost 7 years later; her marriage to Parker Stevenson was Kirstie Alley’s second marriage, which took place in 1983 – almost 14 years prior to the Kirstie Alley

Both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson are acclaimed actors, who have starred in a variety of noteworthy roles, such as ‘Look Who’s Talking’ and ‘A Separate Piece’

The couple produced 2 children from their marriage, William and Lillie; both children were adopted by the couple in a joint fashion

The Kirstie Alley Divorce in the State of California

Reports stated that Kirstie Alley wished to divorce in Maine, while Setvenson wished to divorce in California; ultimately, the Kirstie Alley divorce took place in California. The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement wass quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Kirstie Alley Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports showed both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson to have remained within good standing with each other. Yet, the parameters of the determination of ‘fault’ in the State of California require the following with regard to the determination of fault:

One or both of the parties must be deemed as mentally incompetent

Irreconcilable difference leading to the irretrievable dissolution of the union; in this case, the divergence of career paths was determined to serve as the catalyst for the Kirstie Alley divorce

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

No prenuptial agreement was formulated by the couple in order to serve as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

As per the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement, Kirstie Alley kept the couple’s home in Encino, California; she sold her home in 2010 – over 10 years following the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement

Custody and Children in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In a handwritten note located in tandem with the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement papers, Alley explains that she was requesting the right to bring her children to the set of ‘Deconstructing Harry’, which was a movie in which Kirstie Alley was slated to act.

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Summary

Armando Montelongo, who is known as one of the foremost real estate gurus in modernity was arrested in 2007 after allegations furnished by a contracting company in Austin, Texas, which claimed that the reasons for Armando Montelongo arrested including the failure to satisfy the payment of $4k worth of appraisal services undertaken by the company. The construction appraisal company who were hired on a contractual basis by Armando Montelongo claimed that between the years of 2005 and 2006, the company had undergone a variety of appraisals for which they were never paid by Armando Montelongo.

The Irony of Armando Montelongo Arrested

Armando Montelongo is most commonly recognized for his role in his reality-based television program that is aired on the A&E television network called ‘Flip this House’; the program educates its viewers on the various methodology latent within the ‘House-flipping’ subgenre of real estate:

The act of ‘Flipping Houses’ is defined as the purchase of a home considered to be in unsatisfactory conditions, ranging from structural damage or neglect; a trend within the industry of flipping houses occurs as the poor condition of the home allows for a drastically-lowered purchase price – subsequent to the purchase, the buyer renovates the home and sells it for a far-larger amount of money than for which it was originally purchased

The Austin, Texas appraisal company was named as working closely with Armando Montelongo in tandem with an individual house flipping operation undertaken by Armando Montelongo; however, it was this same appraisal company that had Armando Montelongo arrested

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Conclusion

Upon the investigation that resulted in Armando Montelongo arrested, a variety of reports were released; Armando Montelongo explained that charges set forth resulting in Armando Montelongo arrested were baseless; Armando Montelongo assured that he would dispute the charges and have them overturned. The Austin, Texas Police Department – sitting in the heart of Travis County in the State of Texas – undertook the investigation; shortly after they had Armando Montelongo arrested, the charges set forth by the Austin, Texas-based appraisal company were reported to have been overturned:

Only days after Armando Montelongo arrested, Armando Montelongo continued shooting footage for his television show; subsequent charges have been filed against Armando Montelongo – his detractors believe that he undertakes illcit business dealings

Those lobbying for Armando Montelongo – including the A&E television channel – adamantly support Armando Montelongo; his career has not appeared to have suffered from Armando Montelongo arrested

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

In February of 2011, Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz filed for divorce; the couple had been married over 2-years, officially being wed in May of 2008. Ashlee Simpson is most commonly known for both her singing career, as well as for her familial ties; she is the younger sister of celebrity singer Jessica Simpson. Pete Wentz gained his celebrity status as a result of being the bass player in the rock group Fall Out Boy. Akin to the bulk of celebrity divorces – and their respective penchant for speculation with regard to the reason for the dissolution of the marriage – the Ashlee Simpson divorce is no exception; reports released in conjunction with the Ashlee Simpson divorce range from rumors of the couple having grown apart to alleged infidelity.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake specific stipulations with regard to filing for divorce:

The Absence of a Prenuptial Agreement in the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. In the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, neither Pete Wentz nor Ashlee Simpson enacted a prenuptial agreement; in contrast to a large part of celebrity marriages undertaken after the attainment of a varying degree of fame, these types of agreements are commonly undertaken:

Despite the absence of a prenuptial agreement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for spousal support in the form of alimony from Pete Wentz subsequent to the finalization of the Ashlee Simpson divorce

The Determination of Fault

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’, which is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. The receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property; yet, the division of assets with regard to the Ashlee Simpson divorce was not disclosed to the public.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce Child Custody Settlement

In November of 2008, the couple welcomed a son named Bronx Mowgli Wentz. Although the petitioning for custody with regard to a shared child – or children – may vary in conjunction with the terms of a divorce settlement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for not only primary physical custody of their son, but also for joint legal custody:

Legal custody allows the expressed permission of guardianship over a child produced from a marriage; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement, both Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz will be permitted to act on behalf of their son

Physical custody is the granting of exclusive custody of a child to one parent; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, Ashlee Simpson retains the right to establish when or if Pete Wentz will retain the right to visit with their son

This aspect of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement will also make Ashlee Simpson eligible to receive child support payments furnished by Pete Wentz

What is the Katie Holmes Prenup?

The legal instrument known as the ‘Katie Holmes Prenup’ is officially defined as the legislative document issued by Tom Cruise upon his marriage to Katie Holmes. A Katie Holmes Prenup is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise. The goal of a prenuptial agreement is to place limitations on prospective petitions, claims, and requests furnished by Katie Holmes or Tom Cruise in the event of the dissolution of a marriage.

Who is Involved in the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Primarily, the Katie Holmes prenup involves both partners of the marriage existing between actors Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes; however, akin to the trend associated with a variety of celebrity marriages, it may presumed that both the legal counsel responsible for the legal representation of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise – respectively – suggested the enactment of the Katie Holmes:

Careers Profiles

For those unfamiliar with the individual careers belonging to Tom Cruise or Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise is considered to be one of the single-most globally-recognized, iconic actors of the 20th century; Tom Cruise has starred in countless blockbuster films such as Top Gun, The Mission Impossible Series, Rain Man, Jerry Maguire, and Days of Thunder – Katie Holmes has also enjoyed a nominal amount of success in both television acting, as well as major motion pictures

What are the Alleged Terms of the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Although a variety of alleged reports substantiating the unofficial details expressed within the Katie Holmes prenup have been released, the verification of any and all statutes cited within the Katie Holmes prenup have been confirmed neither by publicists employed by Tom Cruise nor those employed by Katie Holmes. The following claims with regard to the Katie Holmes prenup have been alleged:

For every year that Katie Holmes remains married to Tom Cruise, the Katie Holmes prenup allows her $3 million annually

In the event that the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise withstands 11-years’ time, the Katie Holmes prenup becomes void; in the event of a divorce after a period of marriage exceeding 11-years’ time, Katie Holmes will become entitled to half of the combined assets and monies accrued by the couple since the date of the marriage – within the State of California as ‘Community Property’

What is the Need for the Katie Holmes Prenup?

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage:

The statues expressed within the statutes inherent within the Katie Holms Prenup are reported to not only address the receipt of any salaries and wages subsequent to the enactment of the marriage

Wages, assets, monies, or earnings in possession of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise not addressed within the Katie Holmes Prenup will result in the classification of such finances as community – or shared – property.

Why Was Katt Williams Arrested?

The events that resulted in comedian Katt Williams Arrested in November of 2009 were subject to a vast array of media coverage upon their release shortly after rumors of Katt Williams Arrested; what was reported to have begun as a simple misunderstanding quickly escalated into legal situation in which the report of missing valuables, theft, and trespassing were quickly brought to light:

Reports expressing the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested explained that while residing in the house of Barry Hankerson in the State of Georgia – the famed record producer – a steward in the Hankerson household had reported that almost $4k of valuables had gone missing

The accuser, who was named as Daniel Paul Broach, identified the comedian as the perpetrator of the crime and had Katt Williams Arrested; yet, the arrest was only the beginning of what would be considered a bizarre turn of events and situations.

The Criminal Charges that Resulted in Katt Williams Arrested

In the midst of his stay in the home of Barry Hankerson, a variety of charges were tossed around by Broach; with regard to each of the allegations, Williams’ legal team summarily defended and absolved their client of both participation, as well as the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested:

Katt Williams Arrested for Trespassing

A trespassing allegation contributing to Katt Williams Arrested was swiftly thrown out as a result of Hankerson substantiating that Williams was permitted to reside at his home. Broach claimed that Williams has undergone the unlawful encroachment onto the private and personal property belonging to Hankerson.

Katt Williams Arrested for Theft

Broach expressed that in the enactment undertaken by Williams upon the personal property belonging to Hankerson, he unlawfully obtained almost $4k in valuables that Broach had reported to have gone missing. Although a settlement of the criminal allegations was kept under wraps between Hankerson and Williams, the charges of burglary leading to Katt Williams Arrested were discharged.

Events Following Katt Williams Arrested

Subsequent the preparation of Katt Williams’ defense, both testimony offered by Hankerson – as well as testimony redacted by Broach – has resulted in the charges filed against Williams from the State of Georgia to be dropped.

Overview of the Kenny Rogers Divorce

The Kenny Rogers Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers; the Kenny Rogers Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the 16-year long marriage. The Kenny Rogers Divorce received a massive amount of media coverage and publicity due to the singer’s expansive popularity as an acclaimed country singer. Despite the classification of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States, Kenny Rogers was reported as handling the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement with grace, respect, and class:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Kenny Rogers divorce; despite the citation of the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers described as irreconcilable differences, Kenny Rogers responded that his former wife ‘deserved every penny’ of the Kenny Rogers  divorce settlement amount

Kenny Rogers continued to thank Marriane Rogers for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Kenny Rogers divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Kenny Rogers Divorce

Kenny Rogers is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters both within the genre of country music, as well as within mainstream music; the true success and brilliance of Kenny Rogers’ career took shape as he managed to bring country music into the mainstream ‘popular’ charts; prior to the Kenny Rogers divorce, he was valued at an estimated $200 million – Kenny Rogers is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘Islands in the Stream’ and ‘The Gambler’, as well as his classification as an avid restaurateur and photographer:

Kenny Rogers met Marianne Rogers on the set of a television show in 1977 on which he was slated to perform; at the time, Marianne Rogers was an unrecognized actor on the television show ‘Hee Haw’ – however, Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers fell deeply in love and married shortly thereafter

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kenny Rogers Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kenny Rogers Divorce, both Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kenny Rogers Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement:

Marriane Rogers walked away from the Kenny Rogers divorce with an estimated $120 million, which was reported to be half of Kenny Rogers’s fortune; the Kenny Rogers divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States

The Background of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

Edwin Valero, who was a 28-year old Venezuelan boxer, was accused of killing his wife in a hotel room in Valencia, which is a city in Venezuela on or around the time of April 19th, 2010; Jennifer Viera, who was Edwin Valero wife was 24-years old at the time of her murder; she was discovered in the early morning hours by law enforcement agents. While the details of his arrest in conjunction to the alleged murder of his wife remained hazy at first notice, Edwin Valero Wife murder investigation became clearer subsequent to the events that unfolded upon Valero’s apprehension.

The Arrest Charges of Edwin Valero Wife Murder

Edwin Valero was apprehended on Sunday the 19th after reports that Valero had allegedly confessed his crime to both hotel security, and then continued to confess the murder of his wife to police undertaking the Edwin Valero wife murder investigation upon their arrival to the hotel. Upon entering the hotel room shared by Valero and his wife, the lifeless body of Jennifer Viera was discovered; the police report mentioned the identification of 3 stab wounds on various locations her body – however, despite the confession expressed by the boxer for the Edwin Valero wife murder, the weapon assumed to have taken Viera’s life was never located by investigators.

A History of Domestic Discord Revealed in the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the past events involving domestic incidents involving Valero and his wife have resulted in charges alleged to Valero, including harassment, threats, and physical violence enacted upon Jennifer Viera; only months prior, Viera was rushed to a Venezuelan hospital after suffering broken ribs and a punctured lung resulting from an incident that Viera reported as an accidental fall.

Edwin Valero Takes His Own Life in the Midst of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the morning subsequent to his apprehension, Edwin Valero was found dead due to asphyxiation from a homemade noose fashioned out of his clothing in his jail cell the Monday morning after his arrest on the previous day. Reports issued by the Venezuelan police expressed that the suicide had taken place on Monday, April 19, 2010:

Valero’s suicide was reported by a fellow inmate who had witnessed the act taking place; upon mention of the suicide, the police rushed to the aid of Valero – while Valero showed slight signs of life upon the discover by police, he was unable to be revived and died shortly afterwards