Overview of the Harrison Ford Divorce

The Harrison Ford Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Harrison Ford and Melissa Matheson; the Harrison Ford Divorce was finalized in 2004, which ended the 20-yearlong marriage. Although the case of the Harrison Ford Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness, loss, and humiliation:

This was indeed the case within the Harrison Ford divorce, as reports illustrated that couple had been separated 4 years prior to the finalization of the Harrison Ford divorce; however, within this time, Harrison Ford was cited as undertaking a relationship with fellow actor Calista Flockhart – reports surfaced stating that Harrison Ford had even gone so far as to adopt Flockhart’s 1-year old son

Harrison Ford and Melissa Matheson share 2 children from their marriage

The Parties Involved in the Harrison Ford Divorce

Harrison Ford is perhaps one of the most iconic, beloved, and revered American actors within the realm of the motion picture industry; over the span of his long and illustrious career, he has graced the screen in highly-acclaimed films such as The Indiana Jones Series, Star Wars, American Graffiti, and the Fugitive. Harrison Ford met Melissa Mathison, who was – and still is a movie screenwriter – in the early 1980s. The couple shares 2 children

Legal Venue of the Harrison Ford Divorce Hearing

The Harrison Ford Divorce was heard before a judge in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California

The Terms of the Harrison Ford Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the case of the Harrison Ford Divorce, Harrison Ford and Melissa Mathison undertook a divorce settlement hearing. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Harrison Ford Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Harrison Ford Divorce settlement:

Melissa Mathison walked away from the Harrison Ford divorce with $118 million, which has been cited as amongst the most expensive divorce settlements in history

Due to what was considered an amalgamation of Harrison Ford’s behavior prior to the finalization of the Harrison Ford divorce – involving his engagement in a romantic relationship – the assets accrued by the couple, and the reported despair that the Harrison Ford divorce elicited within Melissa Mathison, she petitioned for a considerable amount of money

Background of the Hugh Grant Arrest

The following details are applicable to the events that landed Hugh Grant Arrested:

Who is Hugh Grant?

Hugh Grant is an actor who was born in the United Kingdom. Although Hugh Grant got his start in the United Kingdom, he was – and is currently – considered to be amongst the most recognizable and beloved within the motion picture industry; his onscreen persona typically portrays his as an awkward, lovable, and charming character – as a result, his arrest for the solicitation of sexual activity from a prostitute came as a shock to many of his adoring fans.

Date of the Hugh Grant Arrest: The Hugh Grant arrest took place in July of 1995

Location of the Hugh Grant: The criminal activity undertaken by Hugh Grant took place in Los Angeles, California

Criminal Charges Associated with the Hugh Grant Arrest

Subsequent to the police apprehension of Hugh Grant, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

A prostitution charge is defined as the engagement and patronage of prostitution, which is the criminal act defined as the exchange of sexual activity – which can include intercourse, penetration, and copulation – for financial or commercial gain or opportunity; the prostitute was named as Divine Brown

A solicitation charge is the engagement in solicitation, which is the illegal and unlawful act of mindfully propositioning an individual to participate in criminal activity; in this case, Hugh Grant willingly paid for sex

The legal stipulations within Hugh Grant getting arrested did not require him to have engaged in sexual activity with regard to a solicitation charge; the expressed intent sufficed for his apprehension; however, he was charged with public indecency as a result of engaging in oral sex in his vehicle

The Punitive Recourse of Hugh Grant Arrested

Subsequent to the findings by the presiding judge with regard to the Hugh Grant trial, the sentencing of Hugh Grant involved Hugh Grant to undergo the following:

The furnishing of a fine of $1,180

The satisfaction of an educational program with regard to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) awareness and information

A probationary period of 2-years’ time with regard to any potential arrests or engagement in criminal activity

The Notion of Celebrity within the Hugh Grant Arrest

Due to the fact that Hugh Grant was widely recognized a celebrity at the time of the arrest, the media scrutiny was exponentially higher with regard to the coverage of the details of the event described as the Hugh Grant:

The Hugh Grant Trial within the Common Law System

The judicial system within the United States is considered to be a Common Law jurisdiction, which results in pertinent details latent within trials to be made available to public record; the notion of public record allows findings, sentencing, and judicial review to be both accessible within legal archives, as well as eligible for access by forthcoming trials similar in nature to the findings placed within public record – such was the case within the Hugh Grant sentencing

What is the Katie Holmes Prenup?

The legal instrument known as the ‘Katie Holmes Prenup’ is officially defined as the legislative document issued by Tom Cruise upon his marriage to Katie Holmes. A Katie Holmes Prenup is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise. The goal of a prenuptial agreement is to place limitations on prospective petitions, claims, and requests furnished by Katie Holmes or Tom Cruise in the event of the dissolution of a marriage.

Who is Involved in the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Primarily, the Katie Holmes prenup involves both partners of the marriage existing between actors Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes; however, akin to the trend associated with a variety of celebrity marriages, it may presumed that both the legal counsel responsible for the legal representation of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise – respectively – suggested the enactment of the Katie Holmes:

Careers Profiles

For those unfamiliar with the individual careers belonging to Tom Cruise or Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise is considered to be one of the single-most globally-recognized, iconic actors of the 20th century; Tom Cruise has starred in countless blockbuster films such as Top Gun, The Mission Impossible Series, Rain Man, Jerry Maguire, and Days of Thunder – Katie Holmes has also enjoyed a nominal amount of success in both television acting, as well as major motion pictures

What are the Alleged Terms of the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Although a variety of alleged reports substantiating the unofficial details expressed within the Katie Holmes prenup have been released, the verification of any and all statutes cited within the Katie Holmes prenup have been confirmed neither by publicists employed by Tom Cruise nor those employed by Katie Holmes. The following claims with regard to the Katie Holmes prenup have been alleged:

For every year that Katie Holmes remains married to Tom Cruise, the Katie Holmes prenup allows her $3 million annually

In the event that the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise withstands 11-years’ time, the Katie Holmes prenup becomes void; in the event of a divorce after a period of marriage exceeding 11-years’ time, Katie Holmes will become entitled to half of the combined assets and monies accrued by the couple since the date of the marriage – within the State of California as ‘Community Property’

What is the Need for the Katie Holmes Prenup?

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage:

The statues expressed within the statutes inherent within the Katie Holms Prenup are reported to not only address the receipt of any salaries and wages subsequent to the enactment of the marriage

Wages, assets, monies, or earnings in possession of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise not addressed within the Katie Holmes Prenup will result in the classification of such finances as community – or shared – property.

Why Was Katt Williams Arrested?

The events that resulted in comedian Katt Williams Arrested in November of 2009 were subject to a vast array of media coverage upon their release shortly after rumors of Katt Williams Arrested; what was reported to have begun as a simple misunderstanding quickly escalated into legal situation in which the report of missing valuables, theft, and trespassing were quickly brought to light:

Reports expressing the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested explained that while residing in the house of Barry Hankerson in the State of Georgia – the famed record producer – a steward in the Hankerson household had reported that almost $4k of valuables had gone missing

The accuser, who was named as Daniel Paul Broach, identified the comedian as the perpetrator of the crime and had Katt Williams Arrested; yet, the arrest was only the beginning of what would be considered a bizarre turn of events and situations.

The Criminal Charges that Resulted in Katt Williams Arrested

In the midst of his stay in the home of Barry Hankerson, a variety of charges were tossed around by Broach; with regard to each of the allegations, Williams’ legal team summarily defended and absolved their client of both participation, as well as the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested:

Katt Williams Arrested for Trespassing

A trespassing allegation contributing to Katt Williams Arrested was swiftly thrown out as a result of Hankerson substantiating that Williams was permitted to reside at his home. Broach claimed that Williams has undergone the unlawful encroachment onto the private and personal property belonging to Hankerson.

Katt Williams Arrested for Theft

Broach expressed that in the enactment undertaken by Williams upon the personal property belonging to Hankerson, he unlawfully obtained almost $4k in valuables that Broach had reported to have gone missing. Although a settlement of the criminal allegations was kept under wraps between Hankerson and Williams, the charges of burglary leading to Katt Williams Arrested were discharged.

Events Following Katt Williams Arrested

Subsequent the preparation of Katt Williams’ defense, both testimony offered by Hankerson – as well as testimony redacted by Broach – has resulted in the charges filed against Williams from the State of Georgia to be dropped.

Overview of the Kenny Rogers Divorce

The Kenny Rogers Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers; the Kenny Rogers Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the 16-year long marriage. The Kenny Rogers Divorce received a massive amount of media coverage and publicity due to the singer’s expansive popularity as an acclaimed country singer. Despite the classification of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States, Kenny Rogers was reported as handling the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement with grace, respect, and class:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Kenny Rogers divorce; despite the citation of the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers described as irreconcilable differences, Kenny Rogers responded that his former wife ‘deserved every penny’ of the Kenny Rogers  divorce settlement amount

Kenny Rogers continued to thank Marriane Rogers for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Kenny Rogers divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Kenny Rogers Divorce

Kenny Rogers is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters both within the genre of country music, as well as within mainstream music; the true success and brilliance of Kenny Rogers’ career took shape as he managed to bring country music into the mainstream ‘popular’ charts; prior to the Kenny Rogers divorce, he was valued at an estimated $200 million – Kenny Rogers is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘Islands in the Stream’ and ‘The Gambler’, as well as his classification as an avid restaurateur and photographer:

Kenny Rogers met Marianne Rogers on the set of a television show in 1977 on which he was slated to perform; at the time, Marianne Rogers was an unrecognized actor on the television show ‘Hee Haw’ – however, Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers fell deeply in love and married shortly thereafter

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kenny Rogers Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kenny Rogers Divorce, both Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kenny Rogers Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement:

Marriane Rogers walked away from the Kenny Rogers divorce with an estimated $120 million, which was reported to be half of Kenny Rogers’s fortune; the Kenny Rogers divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States

The Background of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

Edwin Valero, who was a 28-year old Venezuelan boxer, was accused of killing his wife in a hotel room in Valencia, which is a city in Venezuela on or around the time of April 19th, 2010; Jennifer Viera, who was Edwin Valero wife was 24-years old at the time of her murder; she was discovered in the early morning hours by law enforcement agents. While the details of his arrest in conjunction to the alleged murder of his wife remained hazy at first notice, Edwin Valero Wife murder investigation became clearer subsequent to the events that unfolded upon Valero’s apprehension.

The Arrest Charges of Edwin Valero Wife Murder

Edwin Valero was apprehended on Sunday the 19th after reports that Valero had allegedly confessed his crime to both hotel security, and then continued to confess the murder of his wife to police undertaking the Edwin Valero wife murder investigation upon their arrival to the hotel. Upon entering the hotel room shared by Valero and his wife, the lifeless body of Jennifer Viera was discovered; the police report mentioned the identification of 3 stab wounds on various locations her body – however, despite the confession expressed by the boxer for the Edwin Valero wife murder, the weapon assumed to have taken Viera’s life was never located by investigators.

A History of Domestic Discord Revealed in the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the past events involving domestic incidents involving Valero and his wife have resulted in charges alleged to Valero, including harassment, threats, and physical violence enacted upon Jennifer Viera; only months prior, Viera was rushed to a Venezuelan hospital after suffering broken ribs and a punctured lung resulting from an incident that Viera reported as an accidental fall.

Edwin Valero Takes His Own Life in the Midst of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the morning subsequent to his apprehension, Edwin Valero was found dead due to asphyxiation from a homemade noose fashioned out of his clothing in his jail cell the Monday morning after his arrest on the previous day. Reports issued by the Venezuelan police expressed that the suicide had taken place on Monday, April 19, 2010:

Valero’s suicide was reported by a fellow inmate who had witnessed the act taking place; upon mention of the suicide, the police rushed to the aid of Valero – while Valero showed slight signs of life upon the discover by police, he was unable to be revived and died shortly afterwards

Overview of the Kevin Costner Divorce

The Kevin Costner Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Kevin Costner and restaurateur Cindy Silva; the Kevin Costner Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 16-yearlong marriage. Although the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Within the reports surrounding the Kevin Costner divorce, Cindy Silva was cited for her attempts to reconcile the marriage at all costs, even despite the alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by her husband.

The Parties Involved in the Kevin Costner Divorce

Kevin Costner has enjoyed an illustrious and widely-acclaimed acting career within which he has acted in some of the most famed and beloved films in history, including Dances with Wolves, JFK, Field of Dreams, The Untouchables, and The Bodyguard; in addition to the vast critical acclaim bestowed on Kevin Costner for these roles, he amassed a large fortune over the course of his career. While both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva were students at the University of California at Fullerton, the couple embarked on a romantic relationship resulting in their marriage in 1978; the couple share 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kevin Costner Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kevin Costner Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

In contrast the presumed intentions of both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva with regard to the unchallenged file for divorce, allegation begun to fly with regard to the presumed infidelity undertaken by Kevin Costner throughout the couple marriage; however, these allegations were never substantiated –  the couple later cited irreconcilable differences with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement

The Terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The State of California implements a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage with regard to their classification as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Kevin Costner Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce settlement:

Despite reports of the efforts put forth by Cindy Silva to save their marriage, Kevin Costner furnished a payment of $80 million with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement; the amount of this payment is considered to be amongst the largest in the history of celebrity divorces occurring within the United States

Overview of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

The filing of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce occurred on April 2nd, 2011, which marked the ending of the relationship between actor Elizabeth Hurley and Indian industrialist Arun Nayar; the couple met it 2002 and began a romantic relationship shortly thereafter – the couple wed on March 2nd, 2007. Akin to traditional, non-celebrity divorce proceedings – including the filing, settlement, and finalization process –the impact of the dissolution of a union is considered to exist in a corollary fashion within celebrity divorces – the Elizabeth Hurley divorce was certainly no exception. As a result, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

Elizabeth Hurley is an English actor who has been featured in films such as Austin Powers, Permanent Midnight, and Bedazzled; in addition to her acting fame, she was also married to actor Hugh Grant at the time of his arrest from engaging in sexual activity with a prostitute. While not an actor himself, Arun Nayar is considered to be amongst the most successful textile magnates within the global marketplace; he is currently heir to one of the largest textile companies both in India, as well as worldwide – Arun Nayar was born in India:

The couple engaged in 2 marriage ceremonies; a civil proceeding in the United Kingdom, as well as an Indian ceremony in Jodhpur, India

Reports of infidelity surfaced with regard to the Elizabeth Hurley divorce, which cited Elizabeth Hurley undertaking an extramarital affair with the Australian professional cricketer Shane Warne; although these reports have yet to be validated, she has allegedly begun a romantic relationship with Warne

The Plea within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Elizabeth Hurley divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce, if both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Kid Cudi Arrested

On June 11th, 2010, Rapper and member of the Hip-Hip community Kid Cudi – whose real name is Scott Mescudi – was arrested in New York City within the area known as ‘Chelsea’. Despite Kid Cudi arrested, he remains one of Rapper Kanye West’s prodigies in addition to undertaking vast musical collaborations and a budding acting career. Yet, upon the arrival of law enforcement agents following the report of criminal activity, Kid Cudi was reported to have torn an apartment door from its hinges and broken into that same apartment using physical force – after Kid Cudi had gained access to the apartment of the unidentified female victim later named as Kid Cudi’s girlfriend, he was reported to have forcefully obtained and destroyed her cellphone:

If these events leading to Kid Cudi arrested were not enough, law enforcement found a glass bottle with what they had believe to be an illegal substance; upon testing, the substance was reported to be liquid cocaine

However, the events surrounding Kid Cudi arrested did not mention whether the artist was intoxicated at that time

Law enforcement agents had Kid Cudi arrested, despite the fact that he had been scheduled to perform at the ‘Bonnaroo Festival’, which is considered to be one of the nation’s largest musical festival held annually in Tennessee; however, despite Kid Cudi arrested, he managed to attend the festival and perform

What Was Kid Cudi Arrested For?

Upon Kid Cudi arrested, the applicable charges filed included criminal mischief and the possession of an illegal substance. However, due to the fact that both parties – Kid Cudi and his girlfriend – allegedly reported the incident to be the result of a domestic dispute, the charges were dropped conditionally; while the criminal mischief charges would be dismissed from Kid Cudi arrested, Kid Cudi would be required to plead guilty to possession charges regarding the glass of liquid cocaine:

What is Liquid Cocaine?

Cocaine – even in its liquid form – is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of millions of deaths since its introduction to society. Cocaine can impair individuals’ behavior and demeanor, which typically results in criminal activity and violence. While the possession of Cocaine is considered to be a criminal felony; depending upon the amount discovered on an individual’s person – in addition to their individual criminal record – will determine the punishment; due to the fact that Kid Cudi was without any prior convictions, he was placed on probation.

Results of Kid Cudi Arrested

Subsequent to Kid Cudi’s arrest, he was given mandatory community service, as well as a required meeting with a drug counselor; the events leading to Kid Cudi arrested also will place Kid Cudi on probation, requiring that he adhere to all legal statutes and lawful behavior. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact West Virginia lawyers.

Overview of the Emmy Rossum Divorce

The Emmy Rossum Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between music executive Justin Siegel and actor Emmy Rossum; the Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized in December of 2010, which ended the couples year-and-a-half-long marriage – the couple wed on February 17th, 2008. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement; in the case of the Emmy Rossum divorce, Justin Siegel was responsible for the filing of the divorce petition – subsequent to the filing, the couple stated that the dissolution of the marriage resulted from irreconcilable differences:

The Parties Involved in the Emmy Rossum Divorce

Acotr Emmy Rossum has been featured in such films as The Day Before Tomorrow, Poseidon, Dragonball: Evolution, and Mystic River; she also enjoys a successful musical career. Justin Siegel works within the music industry, and has been known for the development of a variety of artists – the couple shares no children together.

Legal Venue of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Hearing

The Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized before a judge in the Los Angeles branch of the California Superieor Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Emmy Rossum Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Emmy Rossum Divorce, both Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel seemed unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault. However, within the State of California, a contested – or challenged – divorce hearing allows for the release of certain details of the divorce settlement to be released into public record. Although Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel presumably did not wish to have the details of the Emmy Rossum Divorce released to the general public, the inability to arrive at a meeting of the minds earned the Emmy Rossum Divorce a large amount of publicity at the time it occurred.

The Terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of !, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Emmy Rossum Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private . However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce settlement:

The Emmy Rossum divorce settlement awarded Justin Siegel with a sum of $57,000 as per his request for spousal support as a result of the dissolution of the marriage

Emmy Rossum was awarded with the couple’s shared residence in Bevereley Hills, California in addition to her jewelry and valuables; Justin Siegel was awarded an additional $11,200 deposit from the home in addition to the couple’s shared automobile