Background of the Hugh Grant Arrest

The following details are applicable to the events that landed Hugh Grant Arrested:

Who is Hugh Grant?

Hugh Grant is an actor who was born in the United Kingdom. Although Hugh Grant got his start in the United Kingdom, he was – and is currently – considered to be amongst the most recognizable and beloved within the motion picture industry; his onscreen persona typically portrays his as an awkward, lovable, and charming character – as a result, his arrest for the solicitation of sexual activity from a prostitute came as a shock to many of his adoring fans.

Date of the Hugh Grant Arrest: The Hugh Grant arrest took place in July of 1995

Location of the Hugh Grant: The criminal activity undertaken by Hugh Grant took place in Los Angeles, California

Criminal Charges Associated with the Hugh Grant Arrest

Subsequent to the police apprehension of Hugh Grant, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

A prostitution charge is defined as the engagement and patronage of prostitution, which is the criminal act defined as the exchange of sexual activity – which can include intercourse, penetration, and copulation – for financial or commercial gain or opportunity; the prostitute was named as Divine Brown

A solicitation charge is the engagement in solicitation, which is the illegal and unlawful act of mindfully propositioning an individual to participate in criminal activity; in this case, Hugh Grant willingly paid for sex

The legal stipulations within Hugh Grant getting arrested did not require him to have engaged in sexual activity with regard to a solicitation charge; the expressed intent sufficed for his apprehension; however, he was charged with public indecency as a result of engaging in oral sex in his vehicle

The Punitive Recourse of Hugh Grant Arrested

Subsequent to the findings by the presiding judge with regard to the Hugh Grant trial, the sentencing of Hugh Grant involved Hugh Grant to undergo the following:

The furnishing of a fine of $1,180

The satisfaction of an educational program with regard to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) awareness and information

A probationary period of 2-years’ time with regard to any potential arrests or engagement in criminal activity

The Notion of Celebrity within the Hugh Grant Arrest

Due to the fact that Hugh Grant was widely recognized a celebrity at the time of the arrest, the media scrutiny was exponentially higher with regard to the coverage of the details of the event described as the Hugh Grant:

The Hugh Grant Trial within the Common Law System

The judicial system within the United States is considered to be a Common Law jurisdiction, which results in pertinent details latent within trials to be made available to public record; the notion of public record allows findings, sentencing, and judicial review to be both accessible within legal archives, as well as eligible for access by forthcoming trials similar in nature to the findings placed within public record – such was the case within the Hugh Grant sentencing

Overview of the Jaime Pressly Divorce

The January 21st, 2011 Jaime Pressly Divorce filing marks the potential for a dissolution of the marriage between actor Jaime Pressly and famed Hollywood entertainment attorney, Simran Singh; the couple were wed in early 2010 – the finalization of the Jaime Pressly divorce would end the couples year and a half-long marriage:

The Jaime Pressly divorce filing was not without its controversy; on January 6th, 2011, Jaime Pressly was arrested in Los Angeles, California for the suspected operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated

Furthermore, upon the filing for her divorce from Simran Singh, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has brought forth claims that Jaime Pressly may owe upwards of half of a milliom dollars in unpaid – and unclaimed taxes

While the details with regard to the Jaime Pressly divorce filing are scarce, reports have surfaced that Jaime Pressly is requested that Simran Singh be denied any petition for the award of spousal support in the form of alimony; Jaime Pressly filed for divorce under the pretense of irreconcilable differences

The Parties Involved in the Jaime Pressly Divorce

Jaime Pressly is an American actor who has enjoyed an acting career spanning almost 2 decades; she has starred in popular films such as Not Another Teen Movie, Joe Dirt, and Bring it On! – she currently stars in the widely popular television program My Name is Earl – the couple share no children together.

Legal Venue of the Jaime Pressly Divorce Hearing

The Jaime Pressly Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Jaime Pressly Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Jaime Pressly divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Jaime Pressly divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Jaime Pressly Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Jaime Pressly Divorce, if both Jaime Pressly and Simran Singh opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Jaime Pressly Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Jaime Pressly and Simran Singh seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

In February of 2011, Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz filed for divorce; the couple had been married over 2-years, officially being wed in May of 2008. Ashlee Simpson is most commonly known for both her singing career, as well as for her familial ties; she is the younger sister of celebrity singer Jessica Simpson. Pete Wentz gained his celebrity status as a result of being the bass player in the rock group Fall Out Boy. Akin to the bulk of celebrity divorces – and their respective penchant for speculation with regard to the reason for the dissolution of the marriage – the Ashlee Simpson divorce is no exception; reports released in conjunction with the Ashlee Simpson divorce range from rumors of the couple having grown apart to alleged infidelity.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake specific stipulations with regard to filing for divorce:

The Absence of a Prenuptial Agreement in the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. In the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, neither Pete Wentz nor Ashlee Simpson enacted a prenuptial agreement; in contrast to a large part of celebrity marriages undertaken after the attainment of a varying degree of fame, these types of agreements are commonly undertaken:

Despite the absence of a prenuptial agreement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for spousal support in the form of alimony from Pete Wentz subsequent to the finalization of the Ashlee Simpson divorce

The Determination of Fault

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’, which is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. The receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property; yet, the division of assets with regard to the Ashlee Simpson divorce was not disclosed to the public.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce Child Custody Settlement

In November of 2008, the couple welcomed a son named Bronx Mowgli Wentz. Although the petitioning for custody with regard to a shared child – or children – may vary in conjunction with the terms of a divorce settlement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for not only primary physical custody of their son, but also for joint legal custody:

Legal custody allows the expressed permission of guardianship over a child produced from a marriage; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement, both Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz will be permitted to act on behalf of their son

Physical custody is the granting of exclusive custody of a child to one parent; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, Ashlee Simpson retains the right to establish when or if Pete Wentz will retain the right to visit with their son

This aspect of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement will also make Ashlee Simpson eligible to receive child support payments furnished by Pete Wentz

The Background of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

Edwin Valero, who was a 28-year old Venezuelan boxer, was accused of killing his wife in a hotel room in Valencia, which is a city in Venezuela on or around the time of April 19th, 2010; Jennifer Viera, who was Edwin Valero wife was 24-years old at the time of her murder; she was discovered in the early morning hours by law enforcement agents. While the details of his arrest in conjunction to the alleged murder of his wife remained hazy at first notice, Edwin Valero Wife murder investigation became clearer subsequent to the events that unfolded upon Valero’s apprehension.

The Arrest Charges of Edwin Valero Wife Murder

Edwin Valero was apprehended on Sunday the 19th after reports that Valero had allegedly confessed his crime to both hotel security, and then continued to confess the murder of his wife to police undertaking the Edwin Valero wife murder investigation upon their arrival to the hotel. Upon entering the hotel room shared by Valero and his wife, the lifeless body of Jennifer Viera was discovered; the police report mentioned the identification of 3 stab wounds on various locations her body – however, despite the confession expressed by the boxer for the Edwin Valero wife murder, the weapon assumed to have taken Viera’s life was never located by investigators.

A History of Domestic Discord Revealed in the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the past events involving domestic incidents involving Valero and his wife have resulted in charges alleged to Valero, including harassment, threats, and physical violence enacted upon Jennifer Viera; only months prior, Viera was rushed to a Venezuelan hospital after suffering broken ribs and a punctured lung resulting from an incident that Viera reported as an accidental fall.

Edwin Valero Takes His Own Life in the Midst of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the morning subsequent to his apprehension, Edwin Valero was found dead due to asphyxiation from a homemade noose fashioned out of his clothing in his jail cell the Monday morning after his arrest on the previous day. Reports issued by the Venezuelan police expressed that the suicide had taken place on Monday, April 19, 2010:

Valero’s suicide was reported by a fellow inmate who had witnessed the act taking place; upon mention of the suicide, the police rushed to the aid of Valero – while Valero showed slight signs of life upon the discover by police, he was unable to be revived and died shortly afterwards

Overview of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

The filing of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce occurred on April 2nd, 2011, which marked the ending of the relationship between actor Elizabeth Hurley and Indian industrialist Arun Nayar; the couple met it 2002 and began a romantic relationship shortly thereafter – the couple wed on March 2nd, 2007. Akin to traditional, non-celebrity divorce proceedings – including the filing, settlement, and finalization process –the impact of the dissolution of a union is considered to exist in a corollary fashion within celebrity divorces – the Elizabeth Hurley divorce was certainly no exception. As a result, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

Elizabeth Hurley is an English actor who has been featured in films such as Austin Powers, Permanent Midnight, and Bedazzled; in addition to her acting fame, she was also married to actor Hugh Grant at the time of his arrest from engaging in sexual activity with a prostitute. While not an actor himself, Arun Nayar is considered to be amongst the most successful textile magnates within the global marketplace; he is currently heir to one of the largest textile companies both in India, as well as worldwide – Arun Nayar was born in India:

The couple engaged in 2 marriage ceremonies; a civil proceeding in the United Kingdom, as well as an Indian ceremony in Jodhpur, India

Reports of infidelity surfaced with regard to the Elizabeth Hurley divorce, which cited Elizabeth Hurley undertaking an extramarital affair with the Australian professional cricketer Shane Warne; although these reports have yet to be validated, she has allegedly begun a romantic relationship with Warne

The Plea within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Elizabeth Hurley divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce, if both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Emmy Rossum Divorce

The Emmy Rossum Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between music executive Justin Siegel and actor Emmy Rossum; the Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized in December of 2010, which ended the couples year-and-a-half-long marriage – the couple wed on February 17th, 2008. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement; in the case of the Emmy Rossum divorce, Justin Siegel was responsible for the filing of the divorce petition – subsequent to the filing, the couple stated that the dissolution of the marriage resulted from irreconcilable differences:

The Parties Involved in the Emmy Rossum Divorce

Acotr Emmy Rossum has been featured in such films as The Day Before Tomorrow, Poseidon, Dragonball: Evolution, and Mystic River; she also enjoys a successful musical career. Justin Siegel works within the music industry, and has been known for the development of a variety of artists – the couple shares no children together.

Legal Venue of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Hearing

The Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized before a judge in the Los Angeles branch of the California Superieor Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Emmy Rossum Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Emmy Rossum Divorce, both Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel seemed unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault. However, within the State of California, a contested – or challenged – divorce hearing allows for the release of certain details of the divorce settlement to be released into public record. Although Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel presumably did not wish to have the details of the Emmy Rossum Divorce released to the general public, the inability to arrive at a meeting of the minds earned the Emmy Rossum Divorce a large amount of publicity at the time it occurred.

The Terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of !, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Emmy Rossum Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private . However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce settlement:

The Emmy Rossum divorce settlement awarded Justin Siegel with a sum of $57,000 as per his request for spousal support as a result of the dissolution of the marriage

Emmy Rossum was awarded with the couple’s shared residence in Bevereley Hills, California in addition to her jewelry and valuables; Justin Siegel was awarded an additional $11,200 deposit from the home in addition to the couple’s shared automobile

What is the Katie Holmes Prenup?

The legal instrument known as the ‘Katie Holmes Prenup’ is officially defined as the legislative document issued by Tom Cruise upon his marriage to Katie Holmes. A Katie Holmes Prenup is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise. The goal of a prenuptial agreement is to place limitations on prospective petitions, claims, and requests furnished by Katie Holmes or Tom Cruise in the event of the dissolution of a marriage.

Who is Involved in the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Primarily, the Katie Holmes prenup involves both partners of the marriage existing between actors Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes; however, akin to the trend associated with a variety of celebrity marriages, it may presumed that both the legal counsel responsible for the legal representation of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise – respectively – suggested the enactment of the Katie Holmes:

Careers Profiles

For those unfamiliar with the individual careers belonging to Tom Cruise or Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise is considered to be one of the single-most globally-recognized, iconic actors of the 20th century; Tom Cruise has starred in countless blockbuster films such as Top Gun, The Mission Impossible Series, Rain Man, Jerry Maguire, and Days of Thunder – Katie Holmes has also enjoyed a nominal amount of success in both television acting, as well as major motion pictures

What are the Alleged Terms of the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Although a variety of alleged reports substantiating the unofficial details expressed within the Katie Holmes prenup have been released, the verification of any and all statutes cited within the Katie Holmes prenup have been confirmed neither by publicists employed by Tom Cruise nor those employed by Katie Holmes. The following claims with regard to the Katie Holmes prenup have been alleged:

For every year that Katie Holmes remains married to Tom Cruise, the Katie Holmes prenup allows her $3 million annually

In the event that the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise withstands 11-years’ time, the Katie Holmes prenup becomes void; in the event of a divorce after a period of marriage exceeding 11-years’ time, Katie Holmes will become entitled to half of the combined assets and monies accrued by the couple since the date of the marriage – within the State of California as ‘Community Property’

What is the Need for the Katie Holmes Prenup?

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage:

The statues expressed within the statutes inherent within the Katie Holms Prenup are reported to not only address the receipt of any salaries and wages subsequent to the enactment of the marriage

Wages, assets, monies, or earnings in possession of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise not addressed within the Katie Holmes Prenup will result in the classification of such finances as community – or shared – property.

Why Was Katt Williams Arrested?

The events that resulted in comedian Katt Williams Arrested in November of 2009 were subject to a vast array of media coverage upon their release shortly after rumors of Katt Williams Arrested; what was reported to have begun as a simple misunderstanding quickly escalated into legal situation in which the report of missing valuables, theft, and trespassing were quickly brought to light:

Reports expressing the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested explained that while residing in the house of Barry Hankerson in the State of Georgia – the famed record producer – a steward in the Hankerson household had reported that almost $4k of valuables had gone missing

The accuser, who was named as Daniel Paul Broach, identified the comedian as the perpetrator of the crime and had Katt Williams Arrested; yet, the arrest was only the beginning of what would be considered a bizarre turn of events and situations.

The Criminal Charges that Resulted in Katt Williams Arrested

In the midst of his stay in the home of Barry Hankerson, a variety of charges were tossed around by Broach; with regard to each of the allegations, Williams’ legal team summarily defended and absolved their client of both participation, as well as the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested:

Katt Williams Arrested for Trespassing

A trespassing allegation contributing to Katt Williams Arrested was swiftly thrown out as a result of Hankerson substantiating that Williams was permitted to reside at his home. Broach claimed that Williams has undergone the unlawful encroachment onto the private and personal property belonging to Hankerson.

Katt Williams Arrested for Theft

Broach expressed that in the enactment undertaken by Williams upon the personal property belonging to Hankerson, he unlawfully obtained almost $4k in valuables that Broach had reported to have gone missing. Although a settlement of the criminal allegations was kept under wraps between Hankerson and Williams, the charges of burglary leading to Katt Williams Arrested were discharged.

Events Following Katt Williams Arrested

Subsequent the preparation of Katt Williams’ defense, both testimony offered by Hankerson – as well as testimony redacted by Broach – has resulted in the charges filed against Williams from the State of Georgia to be dropped.

Overview of the Kenny Rogers Divorce

The Kenny Rogers Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers; the Kenny Rogers Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the 16-year long marriage. The Kenny Rogers Divorce received a massive amount of media coverage and publicity due to the singer’s expansive popularity as an acclaimed country singer. Despite the classification of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States, Kenny Rogers was reported as handling the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement with grace, respect, and class:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Kenny Rogers divorce; despite the citation of the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers described as irreconcilable differences, Kenny Rogers responded that his former wife ‘deserved every penny’ of the Kenny Rogers  divorce settlement amount

Kenny Rogers continued to thank Marriane Rogers for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Kenny Rogers divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Kenny Rogers Divorce

Kenny Rogers is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters both within the genre of country music, as well as within mainstream music; the true success and brilliance of Kenny Rogers’ career took shape as he managed to bring country music into the mainstream ‘popular’ charts; prior to the Kenny Rogers divorce, he was valued at an estimated $200 million – Kenny Rogers is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘Islands in the Stream’ and ‘The Gambler’, as well as his classification as an avid restaurateur and photographer:

Kenny Rogers met Marianne Rogers on the set of a television show in 1977 on which he was slated to perform; at the time, Marianne Rogers was an unrecognized actor on the television show ‘Hee Haw’ – however, Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers fell deeply in love and married shortly thereafter

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kenny Rogers Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kenny Rogers Divorce, both Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kenny Rogers Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement:

Marriane Rogers walked away from the Kenny Rogers divorce with an estimated $120 million, which was reported to be half of Kenny Rogers’s fortune; the Kenny Rogers divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States

Overview of the Kevin Costner Divorce

The Kevin Costner Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Kevin Costner and restaurateur Cindy Silva; the Kevin Costner Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 16-yearlong marriage. Although the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Within the reports surrounding the Kevin Costner divorce, Cindy Silva was cited for her attempts to reconcile the marriage at all costs, even despite the alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by her husband.

The Parties Involved in the Kevin Costner Divorce

Kevin Costner has enjoyed an illustrious and widely-acclaimed acting career within which he has acted in some of the most famed and beloved films in history, including Dances with Wolves, JFK, Field of Dreams, The Untouchables, and The Bodyguard; in addition to the vast critical acclaim bestowed on Kevin Costner for these roles, he amassed a large fortune over the course of his career. While both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva were students at the University of California at Fullerton, the couple embarked on a romantic relationship resulting in their marriage in 1978; the couple share 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kevin Costner Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kevin Costner Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

In contrast the presumed intentions of both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva with regard to the unchallenged file for divorce, allegation begun to fly with regard to the presumed infidelity undertaken by Kevin Costner throughout the couple marriage; however, these allegations were never substantiated –  the couple later cited irreconcilable differences with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement

The Terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The State of California implements a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage with regard to their classification as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Kevin Costner Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce settlement:

Despite reports of the efforts put forth by Cindy Silva to save their marriage, Kevin Costner furnished a payment of $80 million with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement; the amount of this payment is considered to be amongst the largest in the history of celebrity divorces occurring within the United States