A Summary of the Andre Agassi Divorce

The Andre Agassi Divorce was finalized in April of 1999, ending the nearly 2-year marriage between Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields – the couple was wed in April of 1997. Speculation surrounding the Andre Agassi Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Andre Agassi Divorce included <; for those unfamiliar with the Andre Agassi Divorce, the celebrity status of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Andre Agassi Divorce had taken place:

Andre Agassi, at the time of the Andre Agassi Divorce, was considered to be amongst the most electrifying and talented Tennis Players in the world; he had been experiencing a multitude of internationally acclaimed victories in the Olympic Games in the sport of Tennis

Brooke Shields had established herself as an acclaimed actor at a young age, starring in her first film ‘The Blue Lagoon’, which thrust her into the limelight; in addition, Brooke Shield had been modeling on a consistent basis

The Determination of Contest within the Andre Agassi Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Andre Agassi Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Andre Agassi Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple expressed that they had grown apart and no longer could retain a connection; they added that the divorce took place mutually and amicably:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Andre Agassi Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields determined that the Andre Agassi Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Terms and Conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, as well as the division of collective assets:

The Division of Assets in the Andre Agassi Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Andre Agassi Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

The terms of the prenuptial agreement were kept confidential, but details regarding the division of assets provided information suggesting that couple would split what was estimated to be upwards of $130 million in communal assets, as well as homes in Los Angeles and Las Vegas

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Summary

Armando Montelongo, who is known as one of the foremost real estate gurus in modernity was arrested in 2007 after allegations furnished by a contracting company in Austin, Texas, which claimed that the reasons for Armando Montelongo arrested including the failure to satisfy the payment of $4k worth of appraisal services undertaken by the company. The construction appraisal company who were hired on a contractual basis by Armando Montelongo claimed that between the years of 2005 and 2006, the company had undergone a variety of appraisals for which they were never paid by Armando Montelongo.

The Irony of Armando Montelongo Arrested

Armando Montelongo is most commonly recognized for his role in his reality-based television program that is aired on the A&E television network called ‘Flip this House’; the program educates its viewers on the various methodology latent within the ‘House-flipping’ subgenre of real estate:

The act of ‘Flipping Houses’ is defined as the purchase of a home considered to be in unsatisfactory conditions, ranging from structural damage or neglect; a trend within the industry of flipping houses occurs as the poor condition of the home allows for a drastically-lowered purchase price – subsequent to the purchase, the buyer renovates the home and sells it for a far-larger amount of money than for which it was originally purchased

The Austin, Texas appraisal company was named as working closely with Armando Montelongo in tandem with an individual house flipping operation undertaken by Armando Montelongo; however, it was this same appraisal company that had Armando Montelongo arrested

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Conclusion

Upon the investigation that resulted in Armando Montelongo arrested, a variety of reports were released; Armando Montelongo explained that charges set forth resulting in Armando Montelongo arrested were baseless; Armando Montelongo assured that he would dispute the charges and have them overturned. The Austin, Texas Police Department – sitting in the heart of Travis County in the State of Texas – undertook the investigation; shortly after they had Armando Montelongo arrested, the charges set forth by the Austin, Texas-based appraisal company were reported to have been overturned:

Only days after Armando Montelongo arrested, Armando Montelongo continued shooting footage for his television show; subsequent charges have been filed against Armando Montelongo – his detractors believe that he undertakes illcit business dealings

Those lobbying for Armando Montelongo – including the A&E television channel – adamantly support Armando Montelongo; his career has not appeared to have suffered from Armando Montelongo arrested

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

In February of 2011, Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz filed for divorce; the couple had been married over 2-years, officially being wed in May of 2008. Ashlee Simpson is most commonly known for both her singing career, as well as for her familial ties; she is the younger sister of celebrity singer Jessica Simpson. Pete Wentz gained his celebrity status as a result of being the bass player in the rock group Fall Out Boy. Akin to the bulk of celebrity divorces – and their respective penchant for speculation with regard to the reason for the dissolution of the marriage – the Ashlee Simpson divorce is no exception; reports released in conjunction with the Ashlee Simpson divorce range from rumors of the couple having grown apart to alleged infidelity.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake specific stipulations with regard to filing for divorce:

The Absence of a Prenuptial Agreement in the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. In the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, neither Pete Wentz nor Ashlee Simpson enacted a prenuptial agreement; in contrast to a large part of celebrity marriages undertaken after the attainment of a varying degree of fame, these types of agreements are commonly undertaken:

Despite the absence of a prenuptial agreement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for spousal support in the form of alimony from Pete Wentz subsequent to the finalization of the Ashlee Simpson divorce

The Determination of Fault

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’, which is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. The receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property; yet, the division of assets with regard to the Ashlee Simpson divorce was not disclosed to the public.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce Child Custody Settlement

In November of 2008, the couple welcomed a son named Bronx Mowgli Wentz. Although the petitioning for custody with regard to a shared child – or children – may vary in conjunction with the terms of a divorce settlement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for not only primary physical custody of their son, but also for joint legal custody:

Legal custody allows the expressed permission of guardianship over a child produced from a marriage; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement, both Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz will be permitted to act on behalf of their son

Physical custody is the granting of exclusive custody of a child to one parent; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, Ashlee Simpson retains the right to establish when or if Pete Wentz will retain the right to visit with their son

This aspect of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement will also make Ashlee Simpson eligible to receive child support payments furnished by Pete Wentz

The Background of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

Edwin Valero, who was a 28-year old Venezuelan boxer, was accused of killing his wife in a hotel room in Valencia, which is a city in Venezuela on or around the time of April 19th, 2010; Jennifer Viera, who was Edwin Valero wife was 24-years old at the time of her murder; she was discovered in the early morning hours by law enforcement agents. While the details of his arrest in conjunction to the alleged murder of his wife remained hazy at first notice, Edwin Valero Wife murder investigation became clearer subsequent to the events that unfolded upon Valero’s apprehension.

The Arrest Charges of Edwin Valero Wife Murder

Edwin Valero was apprehended on Sunday the 19th after reports that Valero had allegedly confessed his crime to both hotel security, and then continued to confess the murder of his wife to police undertaking the Edwin Valero wife murder investigation upon their arrival to the hotel. Upon entering the hotel room shared by Valero and his wife, the lifeless body of Jennifer Viera was discovered; the police report mentioned the identification of 3 stab wounds on various locations her body – however, despite the confession expressed by the boxer for the Edwin Valero wife murder, the weapon assumed to have taken Viera’s life was never located by investigators.

A History of Domestic Discord Revealed in the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the past events involving domestic incidents involving Valero and his wife have resulted in charges alleged to Valero, including harassment, threats, and physical violence enacted upon Jennifer Viera; only months prior, Viera was rushed to a Venezuelan hospital after suffering broken ribs and a punctured lung resulting from an incident that Viera reported as an accidental fall.

Edwin Valero Takes His Own Life in the Midst of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the morning subsequent to his apprehension, Edwin Valero was found dead due to asphyxiation from a homemade noose fashioned out of his clothing in his jail cell the Monday morning after his arrest on the previous day. Reports issued by the Venezuelan police expressed that the suicide had taken place on Monday, April 19, 2010:

Valero’s suicide was reported by a fellow inmate who had witnessed the act taking place; upon mention of the suicide, the police rushed to the aid of Valero – while Valero showed slight signs of life upon the discover by police, he was unable to be revived and died shortly afterwards

Overview of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

The filing of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce occurred on April 2nd, 2011, which marked the ending of the relationship between actor Elizabeth Hurley and Indian industrialist Arun Nayar; the couple met it 2002 and began a romantic relationship shortly thereafter – the couple wed on March 2nd, 2007. Akin to traditional, non-celebrity divorce proceedings – including the filing, settlement, and finalization process –the impact of the dissolution of a union is considered to exist in a corollary fashion within celebrity divorces – the Elizabeth Hurley divorce was certainly no exception. As a result, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

Elizabeth Hurley is an English actor who has been featured in films such as Austin Powers, Permanent Midnight, and Bedazzled; in addition to her acting fame, she was also married to actor Hugh Grant at the time of his arrest from engaging in sexual activity with a prostitute. While not an actor himself, Arun Nayar is considered to be amongst the most successful textile magnates within the global marketplace; he is currently heir to one of the largest textile companies both in India, as well as worldwide – Arun Nayar was born in India:

The couple engaged in 2 marriage ceremonies; a civil proceeding in the United Kingdom, as well as an Indian ceremony in Jodhpur, India

Reports of infidelity surfaced with regard to the Elizabeth Hurley divorce, which cited Elizabeth Hurley undertaking an extramarital affair with the Australian professional cricketer Shane Warne; although these reports have yet to be validated, she has allegedly begun a romantic relationship with Warne

The Plea within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Elizabeth Hurley divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce, if both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi, which was finalized in 1980, which ended the 20-year long marriage. Upon their meeting, Soraya Khashoggi’s name was Sandra Daly; although she had relocated to Saudi Arabia and changed her name, she was a native of the United Kingdom; the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce is listed as being amongst the most expensive in world history. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

Adnan Khashoggi achieved his fame as a result of his various business ventures taking place within Saudi Arabia; a multitude of his dealings were in the weapon and arms industry. Adnan Khashoggi is most widely known for his role in the ‘Iran Contra Scandal’, which took place in 1986; during this scandal, members of the Ronald Reagan administration undertook secret weapons dealings with Adnan Khashoggi with the hopes of furthering negations with regard to the release of American hostages:

The couple shared 5 children together; however, in 1999 – subsequent to a paternity test – one the couple’s daughters was determined to be fathered by British politico Jonathan Aitkens in lieu of Adnan Khashoggi

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce, both Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that couple was both wed and divorced outside of the United States of America, alternate legality is applicable with regard to the respective location; however, an uncontested divorce may also be a method in which one or both members of the couple separating cannot – or will not – divulge private affairs with regard to the dissolution of the marriage

The Terms of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce settlement included the following:

Listed as amongst the top 3 most expensive divorces in history, Soraya Khashoggi was given a lump sum of $874 million following the finalization of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce; Adnan Khashoggi had been estimated to be valued at upwards of $4 billion

A Summary of the Chris Evert Divorce

The Chris Evert Divorce was finalized in 2006, which ended the 18-year marriage between Chris Evert and Andy Mill – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Chris Evert Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Chris Evert Divorce were reported as being irreconcilable differences; for those unfamiliar with the Chris Evert Divorce, the celebrity status of Chris Evert and Andy Mill thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Chris Evert Divorce had taken place. The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Chris Evert was regarded as amongst the most sought-after and recognized professional tennis players and female athletes; furthermore, the fact that Andy Mill is also considered to be equally revered as a professional skier made the Chris Evert Divorce ripe for public consumption.

The Terms and Conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Chris Evert and Andy Mill were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and the Division of Assets in the Chris Evert Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Andy Mill petitioned for alimony payments from Chris Evert upon the finalization of the Chris Evert Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Andy Mill was awarded upwards of $7 million in monies and assets, a home that the couple had shared in Colorado valued at $4 million; Evert retained ownership of the couple’s Florida home valued at nearly $3 million

Petitions Expressed in the Chris Evert Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 3 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Chris Evert and Andy Mill; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Within the Chris Evert Divorce, Evert was able to retain primary custody of the couple’s 3 children – Alexander, Nicholas, and Colton

The Determination of Contest within the Chris Evert Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Chris Evert and Andy Mill would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Chris Evert Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Chris Evert Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Chris Evert Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Chris Evert and Andy Mill determined that the Chris Evert Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The Alex Rodriguez Divorce was finalized in 2008, which ended the nearly 6-year marriage between Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez – the couple was wed in 2002. Speculation surrounding the Alex Rodriguez Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Alex Rodriguez Divorce included extramarital affairs and infidelity undertaken by Alex Rodriguez – for those unfamiliar with Alex Rodriguez, he was and is considered to be one of the greatest professional baseball players in the history of the sport; however, according to various media sources, that degree of fame took a toll on his marriage:

Prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce, allegations of extramarital affairs with partners ranging from cocktail waitresses to pop-superstar Madonna

The couple shares 2 children; yet, the youngest of the 2 children, Ella, was born only 3 months prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce – allegations and testimony suggest that Alex Rodriguez was participating in extramarital affairs for a large part of the marriage

The Terms and Conditions of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 2 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and Asset Division in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Cynthia Rodriguez petitioned for alimony payments from Alex Rodriguez upon the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested spousal support from Alex Rodriguez in order to ensure the lifestyle that both her the couple’s 2 children had become accustomed

Although the definitive terms of the Alex Rodriguez divorce settlement were not disclosed, Alex Rodriguez’s personal worth was considered to include a $175 million salary contract granted by the New York Yankees, as well as luxurious homes in New York and Florida

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce proceedings, the contents of a prenuptial agreement were not disclosed.

Petitions Expressed in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 2 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported as both petitioning for – and receiving – primary custody of the 2 children; in tandem with the custodial settlement within the Alex Rodriguez divorce, Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested payment furnished by Alex Rodriguez both for private school tuition and undisclosed gifts

Overview of the Avril Lavigne Divorce

The Avril Lavigne Divorce marked the ending of the marriage between musicians Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley; the Avril Lavigne Divorce was finalized on November 16th, 2010 – however, Avril Lavigne had filed for divorce from Deryck Whibley in October of 2009. The finalization of the Avril Lavigne divorce marked the end of the almost-4 year marriage, which took place in July of 2006. The Avril Lavigne divorce settlement and proceedings were reported as existing amicably; following the Avril Lavigne divorce, the couple continued to sing the other’s praises – within a year since the Avril Lavigne divorce, Lavigne and Deryck Whibley collaborated on several songs on Avril Lavigne’s newest album ‘Goodby Lullabye’:

The Parties Involved in the Avril Lavigne Divorce

Avril Lavigne is considered to be amongst the most recognized and beloved female musicians; blending a rock and roll attitude and melodic songwriting, she quickly amassed millions of fans on a worldwide level; she has achieved various accolades, including several platinum albums and a multitude of hit-singles – she has performed such hits as ‘Sk8ter Boi’, I’m With You, and ‘Complicated’. Deryck Whibley has achieved his own level of fame as a result of his status as the singer and songwriter of the band ‘Sum 41’; both Canadian in origin, Lavuigne and Whibley have enjoyed global fame and stardom.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Avril Lavigne Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Avril Lavigne Divorce, both Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Avril Lavigne Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Avril Lavigne Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Avril Lavigne Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, few details were released about the specifics of the divorce settlement, prenuptial agreements undertaken, and the division of assets:

Avril Lavigne was considered to be the more wealthy of the 2; reports maintain that she neither sought alimony nor spousal support; the couple shares no children – thus eliminating the need to undertake the  determination of child support

With regard to the alleged division of the couples assets, Avril Lavigne walked away from her divorce with the couple’s home in Bevereley Hills, her songwriting and publishing catalogue, her guitars, and all of the awards and accolades from her career – Deryck Whibley walked away from the Avril Lavigne divorce with a similar settlement outside of the former couple’s home

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal Explained

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal is a series of events involving Bangladeshi Model and Actor Sadiya Jahan Prova, who has not only achieved national fame within her home country of Bangladesh, but also wide acclaim on an international level; while considered to be amongst the most recognized models, Prova is also an actor on a variety of Bangladeshi television shows. However, in August of 2010, a video of Prova engaging in sexual activity with her former boyfriend – Rajib Apurbo – was released over the Internet; although both the nature of the release, as well as the time during which the video was filmed have been subject to debate, the impact of the release gained an expanse of media coverage. The video is assumed to have been filmed in the year 2007

The Individuals Involved in the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

The following individuals have been identified as retaining primary involvement with the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal:

Prova, who is the female in the video, has gained notoriety and recognition for her acting and modeling endeavors; the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal surprised many people due the degree of Prova’s fame

Rajib Apurbo, who is named as the male in the video, was the former boyfriend of Prova; although he has never taken responsibility for the release of the video, which led to the development of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, sources claim that he undertook the release of the video as a means of revenge exacted on Prova upon the dissolution of their relationship in August of 2010

Ziaul Faruq Apurba married Prova on August 21st, 2010; this event is considered to be the catalyst for Rajib’s alleged undertaking of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal – Apurba is both an actor and a model in Bangladesh

The Conclusion of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

While Prova has not formally released any comments with regard to the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the rate of Internet users accessing the video of Prova and Rajib has been staggering; upwards of 6 months since the release of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the video is amongst the most watched and advertised within Asia