The Participants in the Kim Kardashian Video

In 2005, Kim Kardashian and her former boyfriend Willie Norwood – oftentimes referred to by his nickname ‘Ray-J’ – filmed themselves engaging in sexual activity while on vacation. Kim Kardashian, who is now 26 years old, is the daughter of Robert Kardashian – Robert Kardashian was one of the primary members of the defense team for the O.J. Simpson murder trial assisting in the acquittal of Simpson. ‘Ray-J’ is the brother of famous singer Brandy. While the credentials of both participants may not appear to render the notoriety that has been associated with the Kim Kardashian Sextape, the release of the video was one of the most talked-about within modernity.

Kim Kardashian Admitted to Filming the Sex Tape Willingly

Despite the fact that the Kim Kardashian Video portrays images and activity considered to be both private and personal, the former couple admitted to participating in the Kim Kardashian Sextape without the intention of it being released; however, subsequent to the Kim Kardashian Video being ‘leaked’ – a colloquialism used to define the unauthorized availability of a particular piece of media – its release was considered to be a highly-controversial topic.

The Controversy Surrounding the Kim Kardashian Sextape

Vivid Video, which is considered to be amongst the most prominent names in the adult film industry, maintained that they had been given access to the Kim Kardashian Video in both a legal and lawful manner; however, neither Kim Kardashian nor Ray-J have taken responsibility for the release of the video, which was filmed with the intent to remain private – as a result, Kim Kardashian undertook an injunction against the Vivid Video company in order to curtail the release of the Kim Kardashian Sextape.

The Legal Implications of the Kim Kardashian Video

Due to the fact that the details of the release of the Kim Kardashian Sextape have not been disclosed, the lawsuit brought forth by Kim Kardashian included the following:

Kim Kardashian mentioned that Vivid Video was undertaking methods of exploitation and manipulation of the assumed right to release the Kim Kardashian Video, which resulted in the offer of payment for the Kim Kardashian Video in lieu of the refusal to release it

Kim Kardashian’s legal team made mention that the release of the Kim Kardashian video would result in the slandering or unjust conveying of libelous sentiment with the expressed intention of causing harm with regard to Kim Kardashian’s persona; her reality television show ‘Keeping Up with the Kardashians’ was amongst one of the most popular on television

Finally, the release of the Kim Kardashian Video would result in the violation of her privacy; while Ray-J was never named as a codefendant, Kardashian’s legal team explained that the video was in direct violation of Kardashian’s right to privacy

The Conclusion of the Kardashian Video Scandal

Although the specifics of the lawsuit did not receive a great deal of media coverage with regard to the settlement, the Kim Kardashian Sextape was never formally released by Vivid Video; however, it did undergo an unauthorized private release over the Internet – the settlement disallows for any website to willingly host or offer the video.

A Summary of the Andre Agassi Divorce

The Andre Agassi Divorce was finalized in April of 1999, ending the nearly 2-year marriage between Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields – the couple was wed in April of 1997. Speculation surrounding the Andre Agassi Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Andre Agassi Divorce included <; for those unfamiliar with the Andre Agassi Divorce, the celebrity status of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Andre Agassi Divorce had taken place:

Andre Agassi, at the time of the Andre Agassi Divorce, was considered to be amongst the most electrifying and talented Tennis Players in the world; he had been experiencing a multitude of internationally acclaimed victories in the Olympic Games in the sport of Tennis

Brooke Shields had established herself as an acclaimed actor at a young age, starring in her first film ‘The Blue Lagoon’, which thrust her into the limelight; in addition, Brooke Shield had been modeling on a consistent basis

The Determination of Contest within the Andre Agassi Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Andre Agassi Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Andre Agassi Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple expressed that they had grown apart and no longer could retain a connection; they added that the divorce took place mutually and amicably:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Andre Agassi Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields determined that the Andre Agassi Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Terms and Conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, as well as the division of collective assets:

The Division of Assets in the Andre Agassi Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Andre Agassi Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

The terms of the prenuptial agreement were kept confidential, but details regarding the division of assets provided information suggesting that couple would split what was estimated to be upwards of $130 million in communal assets, as well as homes in Los Angeles and Las Vegas

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In 1997, and Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson filed for divorce; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources had reported that irretrievable differences with regard to each member of the couple’s career path had manifested in a contrasting fashion:

Kirstie Alley and Bob Alley wed in 1970 and divorced almost 7 years later; her marriage to Parker Stevenson was Kirstie Alley’s second marriage, which took place in 1983 – almost 14 years prior to the Kirstie Alley

Both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson are acclaimed actors, who have starred in a variety of noteworthy roles, such as ‘Look Who’s Talking’ and ‘A Separate Piece’

The couple produced 2 children from their marriage, William and Lillie; both children were adopted by the couple in a joint fashion

The Kirstie Alley Divorce in the State of California

Reports stated that Kirstie Alley wished to divorce in Maine, while Setvenson wished to divorce in California; ultimately, the Kirstie Alley divorce took place in California. The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement wass quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Kirstie Alley Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports showed both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson to have remained within good standing with each other. Yet, the parameters of the determination of ‘fault’ in the State of California require the following with regard to the determination of fault:

One or both of the parties must be deemed as mentally incompetent

Irreconcilable difference leading to the irretrievable dissolution of the union; in this case, the divergence of career paths was determined to serve as the catalyst for the Kirstie Alley divorce

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

No prenuptial agreement was formulated by the couple in order to serve as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

As per the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement, Kirstie Alley kept the couple’s home in Encino, California; she sold her home in 2010 – over 10 years following the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement

Custody and Children in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In a handwritten note located in tandem with the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement papers, Alley explains that she was requesting the right to bring her children to the set of ‘Deconstructing Harry’, which was a movie in which Kirstie Alley was slated to act.

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Summary

Armando Montelongo, who is known as one of the foremost real estate gurus in modernity was arrested in 2007 after allegations furnished by a contracting company in Austin, Texas, which claimed that the reasons for Armando Montelongo arrested including the failure to satisfy the payment of $4k worth of appraisal services undertaken by the company. The construction appraisal company who were hired on a contractual basis by Armando Montelongo claimed that between the years of 2005 and 2006, the company had undergone a variety of appraisals for which they were never paid by Armando Montelongo.

The Irony of Armando Montelongo Arrested

Armando Montelongo is most commonly recognized for his role in his reality-based television program that is aired on the A&E television network called ‘Flip this House’; the program educates its viewers on the various methodology latent within the ‘House-flipping’ subgenre of real estate:

The act of ‘Flipping Houses’ is defined as the purchase of a home considered to be in unsatisfactory conditions, ranging from structural damage or neglect; a trend within the industry of flipping houses occurs as the poor condition of the home allows for a drastically-lowered purchase price – subsequent to the purchase, the buyer renovates the home and sells it for a far-larger amount of money than for which it was originally purchased

The Austin, Texas appraisal company was named as working closely with Armando Montelongo in tandem with an individual house flipping operation undertaken by Armando Montelongo; however, it was this same appraisal company that had Armando Montelongo arrested

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Conclusion

Upon the investigation that resulted in Armando Montelongo arrested, a variety of reports were released; Armando Montelongo explained that charges set forth resulting in Armando Montelongo arrested were baseless; Armando Montelongo assured that he would dispute the charges and have them overturned. The Austin, Texas Police Department – sitting in the heart of Travis County in the State of Texas – undertook the investigation; shortly after they had Armando Montelongo arrested, the charges set forth by the Austin, Texas-based appraisal company were reported to have been overturned:

Only days after Armando Montelongo arrested, Armando Montelongo continued shooting footage for his television show; subsequent charges have been filed against Armando Montelongo – his detractors believe that he undertakes illcit business dealings

Those lobbying for Armando Montelongo – including the A&E television channel – adamantly support Armando Montelongo; his career has not appeared to have suffered from Armando Montelongo arrested

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

In February of 2011, Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz filed for divorce; the couple had been married over 2-years, officially being wed in May of 2008. Ashlee Simpson is most commonly known for both her singing career, as well as for her familial ties; she is the younger sister of celebrity singer Jessica Simpson. Pete Wentz gained his celebrity status as a result of being the bass player in the rock group Fall Out Boy. Akin to the bulk of celebrity divorces – and their respective penchant for speculation with regard to the reason for the dissolution of the marriage – the Ashlee Simpson divorce is no exception; reports released in conjunction with the Ashlee Simpson divorce range from rumors of the couple having grown apart to alleged infidelity.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake specific stipulations with regard to filing for divorce:

The Absence of a Prenuptial Agreement in the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. In the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, neither Pete Wentz nor Ashlee Simpson enacted a prenuptial agreement; in contrast to a large part of celebrity marriages undertaken after the attainment of a varying degree of fame, these types of agreements are commonly undertaken:

Despite the absence of a prenuptial agreement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for spousal support in the form of alimony from Pete Wentz subsequent to the finalization of the Ashlee Simpson divorce

The Determination of Fault

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’, which is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. The receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property; yet, the division of assets with regard to the Ashlee Simpson divorce was not disclosed to the public.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce Child Custody Settlement

In November of 2008, the couple welcomed a son named Bronx Mowgli Wentz. Although the petitioning for custody with regard to a shared child – or children – may vary in conjunction with the terms of a divorce settlement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for not only primary physical custody of their son, but also for joint legal custody:

Legal custody allows the expressed permission of guardianship over a child produced from a marriage; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement, both Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz will be permitted to act on behalf of their son

Physical custody is the granting of exclusive custody of a child to one parent; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, Ashlee Simpson retains the right to establish when or if Pete Wentz will retain the right to visit with their son

This aspect of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement will also make Ashlee Simpson eligible to receive child support payments furnished by Pete Wentz

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal Explained

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal is a series of events involving Bangladeshi Model and Actor Sadiya Jahan Prova, who has not only achieved national fame within her home country of Bangladesh, but also wide acclaim on an international level; while considered to be amongst the most recognized models, Prova is also an actor on a variety of Bangladeshi television shows. However, in August of 2010, a video of Prova engaging in sexual activity with her former boyfriend – Rajib Apurbo – was released over the Internet; although both the nature of the release, as well as the time during which the video was filmed have been subject to debate, the impact of the release gained an expanse of media coverage. The video is assumed to have been filmed in the year 2007

The Individuals Involved in the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

The following individuals have been identified as retaining primary involvement with the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal:

Prova, who is the female in the video, has gained notoriety and recognition for her acting and modeling endeavors; the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal surprised many people due the degree of Prova’s fame

Rajib Apurbo, who is named as the male in the video, was the former boyfriend of Prova; although he has never taken responsibility for the release of the video, which led to the development of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, sources claim that he undertook the release of the video as a means of revenge exacted on Prova upon the dissolution of their relationship in August of 2010

Ziaul Faruq Apurba married Prova on August 21st, 2010; this event is considered to be the catalyst for Rajib’s alleged undertaking of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal – Apurba is both an actor and a model in Bangladesh

The Conclusion of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

While Prova has not formally released any comments with regard to the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the rate of Internet users accessing the video of Prova and Rajib has been staggering; upwards of 6 months since the release of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the video is amongst the most watched and advertised within Asia

Overview of the Bruce Willis Divorce

The finalization of the Bruce Willis Divorce, which occurred on October 18th, 2000, marked the dissolution of the 13-year marriage between actors Bruce and Demi Moore; the couple was married on November 21st, 1987. The Bruce Willis Divorce was amongst one of the most talked-about in Hollywood, due to the degree of celebrity shared by both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore. Although the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement, the Bruce Willis Divorce proved to be the pinnacle of amicable and friendly; Bruce Willis stated that the wellbeing of his children – as well as Demi Moore – was of the utmost importance to him:

Shortly after the Bruce Willis Divorce, Demi Moore – then 38 – had begun a romantic relationship with fellow actor Ashton Kutcher, who was 15 years her junior; Kutcher was 23 years old at the beginning of the relationship

While Bruce Willis dated other individuals, he has not since been married; Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore wed in 2005 – reports show Bruce Willis, Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher, and the couple’s 3 children to spend holidays together

The Parties Involved in the Bruce Willis Divorce

Both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore are considered to be 2 of the most recognized and iconic actors in the world; Bruce Willis has starred in films such as The Die Hard Series, Moonlighting, 12 Monkeys, the Fifth Element, and The Get Shorty Series – Demi Moore has starred in blockbuster hits including G.I. Jane, Ghost, and Charlie’s Angels. Prior to the Bruce Willis Divorce, the union between Moore and Willis was considered to be the embodiment of a ‘power couple’:

The couple share 3 daughters; Rumer, Scout, and Tallulah

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Bruce Willis Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Bruce Willis Divorce, both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Bruce Willis Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce were kept private from the media; however, Demi Moore was estimated to have walked away from the Bruce Willis Divorce with upwards of $90 million in spousal support – Bruce Willis and Demi Moore share custody of their children.

Why was Bruno Mars Arrested?

On September 20th, 2010, 23-year old singer and songwriter Bruno Mars – whose real name is Gene Hernandez – was arrested for possession of 2.6 grams of cocaine in Las Vegas, Nevada, which resulted in Bruno Mars arrested at 2:40 am while in the bathroom of the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino – his arrest came only a month prior to the planned release of his full-length album ‘Doowops and Hooligans’:

What is Cocaine?

Cocaine is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of millions of deaths since its introduction to modern society. Cocaine can impair individuals on a multitude of level, resulting in addiction, illness, and death

The possession of Cocaine is considered to be a criminal felony; depending upon the amount discovered on an individual’s person, punitive recourse can range in severity – typically, the sentencing of cocaine possession will be contingent upon the amount in possession in conjunction with past criminal records

Although the possession of cocaine resulted in Bruno Mars arrested, the analysis of the case details – including the absence of a criminal record – allowed him to avoid incarceration

Bruno Mars Arrested: Did the Punishment Fit the Crime?

Upon the review of Bruno Mars arrested, the Clark County Judge Jesse Walsh explained that due to the fact that the events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested were without prior incident, the following punishments would be applicable to Bruno Mars’ sentencing – Bruno Mars was placed on probation, which involves the required adherence to any and all legal statutes:

The events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested will require him to meet with a probation officer and participate in random drug screenings

Bruno Mars arrested for cocaine possession will require him to pay a fine calculated at $2,000 in addition to the participation in 200 hours of court-mandated community service facilitated by a non-profit organization chosen by the court

Finally, the circumstances resulting in Bruno Mars arrested for the possession of cocaine will require him to undergo 8-hours of intensive drug counseling

Bruno Mars Arrested: Conditions and Terms

Bruno Mars’ sentencing allowed him to avoid a felony charge, which typically results in mandatory incarceration; however, in that events take place resulting in Bruno Mars arrested again, the Judge expressed that the leniency that he showed Mars will not be repeated.

The Background of the Cheryl Hines Divorce

On July 20th, 2010, actor Cheryl Hines filed for divorce from her husband of 8 years, Paul Young; the couple married on December 30th, 2002 – they currently share a 6 year old daughter. The divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Cheryl Hines Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has not yet been finalized, the supplemental details – including possible prenuptial agreements, custody settlements, or spousal challenges. However, the details that have been released state that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young have split amicably.

Who Was Involved in the Cheryl Hines Divorce Filing?

Cheryl Hines is an American actor who is most commonly recognized from her role in the hit television program ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’; Cheryl Hines has also starred in various supporting roles in major motion pictures. Paul Young is not actor, but is one of the founders of the ‘Principato-Young entertainment Management Group’, which specializes in artist management.

Legal Venue of the Cheryl Hines Divorce Hearing

The Cheryl Hines Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Cheryl Hines Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Cheryl Hines divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Cheryl Hines Divorce, if both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

Although the prospect of a contested please being set forth within the Cheryl Hines divorce seems unlikely, an uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Christina Milian Divorce

The Christina Milian Divorce settlement ended the year-and-a-half-long marriage between songwriter Terius Nash – who goes by his stage name ‘The Dream’ – and singer Christina Milian – who was born as Christine Marie Flores. The couple met in 2009 and quickly became romantically involved – shortly after the inception of the relationship, Christina Milian became pregnant with a daughter, who was born on February 26th, 2010. However, the couple was married in September of 2009 in the state of Nevada prior to the birth of their daughter. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Christina Milian Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

In 2010, photographs had surfaced portraying The Dream in what appeared to be engaging in an extramarital affair while on vacation; the female in the photograph was identified as his assistant – shortly after the release of these photographs, Christina Milian had filed for divorce

The Parties Involved in the Christina Milian Divorce

Christina Milian is an American singer, actor, and model that has enjoyed success in her singing career resulting from the various songs that she has recorded, including ‘A.M. to P.M.’, ‘Say I’, and ‘Us Against the World’; in addition, she has starred in various motion pictures and international modeling campaigns. The Dream is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful songwriters of the decade; he has been responsible for the writing or production of countless hits, including ‘Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)’, ‘Umbrella’, and Justin Bieber’s smash-hit ‘Baby’.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Christina Milian Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the determination of the reasons behind the filing for divorce; in addition, an uncontested divorce serves to classify the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Christina Milian Divorce, both Christina Milian and The Dream opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, providing them with the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Christina Milian Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Christina Milian Divorce settlement:

Christina Milian walked away from the Christina Milian divorce with what was reported as lump cash payment furnished by The Dream amounting to $4 million; in addition, she will be entitled to the receipt of a monthly child support payment of $5,000 furnished by the dream with regard to the couple’s daughter, Violet