Overview of the Kenny Rogers Divorce

The Kenny Rogers Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers; the Kenny Rogers Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the 16-year long marriage. The Kenny Rogers Divorce received a massive amount of media coverage and publicity due to the singer’s expansive popularity as an acclaimed country singer. Despite the classification of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States, Kenny Rogers was reported as handling the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement with grace, respect, and class:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Kenny Rogers divorce; despite the citation of the dissolution of the marriage between Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers described as irreconcilable differences, Kenny Rogers responded that his former wife ‘deserved every penny’ of the Kenny Rogers  divorce settlement amount

Kenny Rogers continued to thank Marriane Rogers for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Kenny Rogers divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Kenny Rogers Divorce

Kenny Rogers is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters both within the genre of country music, as well as within mainstream music; the true success and brilliance of Kenny Rogers’ career took shape as he managed to bring country music into the mainstream ‘popular’ charts; prior to the Kenny Rogers divorce, he was valued at an estimated $200 million – Kenny Rogers is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘Islands in the Stream’ and ‘The Gambler’, as well as his classification as an avid restaurateur and photographer:

Kenny Rogers met Marianne Rogers on the set of a television show in 1977 on which he was slated to perform; at the time, Marianne Rogers was an unrecognized actor on the television show ‘Hee Haw’ – however, Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers fell deeply in love and married shortly thereafter

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kenny Rogers Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kenny Rogers Divorce, both Kenny Rogers and Marianne Rogers opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kenny Rogers Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Kenny Rogers and Marriane Rogers cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kenny Rogers Divorce settlement:

Marriane Rogers walked away from the Kenny Rogers divorce with an estimated $120 million, which was reported to be half of Kenny Rogers’s fortune; the Kenny Rogers divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in the history of the United States

Overview of the Kevin Costner Divorce

The Kevin Costner Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Kevin Costner and restaurateur Cindy Silva; the Kevin Costner Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 16-yearlong marriage. Although the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Within the reports surrounding the Kevin Costner divorce, Cindy Silva was cited for her attempts to reconcile the marriage at all costs, even despite the alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by her husband.

The Parties Involved in the Kevin Costner Divorce

Kevin Costner has enjoyed an illustrious and widely-acclaimed acting career within which he has acted in some of the most famed and beloved films in history, including Dances with Wolves, JFK, Field of Dreams, The Untouchables, and The Bodyguard; in addition to the vast critical acclaim bestowed on Kevin Costner for these roles, he amassed a large fortune over the course of his career. While both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva were students at the University of California at Fullerton, the couple embarked on a romantic relationship resulting in their marriage in 1978; the couple share 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kevin Costner Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kevin Costner Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

In contrast the presumed intentions of both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva with regard to the unchallenged file for divorce, allegation begun to fly with regard to the presumed infidelity undertaken by Kevin Costner throughout the couple marriage; however, these allegations were never substantiated –  the couple later cited irreconcilable differences with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement

The Terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The State of California implements a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage with regard to their classification as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Kevin Costner Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce settlement:

Despite reports of the efforts put forth by Cindy Silva to save their marriage, Kevin Costner furnished a payment of $80 million with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement; the amount of this payment is considered to be amongst the largest in the history of celebrity divorces occurring within the United States

Kid Cudi Arrested

On June 11th, 2010, Rapper and member of the Hip-Hip community Kid Cudi – whose real name is Scott Mescudi – was arrested in New York City within the area known as ‘Chelsea’. Despite Kid Cudi arrested, he remains one of Rapper Kanye West’s prodigies in addition to undertaking vast musical collaborations and a budding acting career. Yet, upon the arrival of law enforcement agents following the report of criminal activity, Kid Cudi was reported to have torn an apartment door from its hinges and broken into that same apartment using physical force – after Kid Cudi had gained access to the apartment of the unidentified female victim later named as Kid Cudi’s girlfriend, he was reported to have forcefully obtained and destroyed her cellphone:

If these events leading to Kid Cudi arrested were not enough, law enforcement found a glass bottle with what they had believe to be an illegal substance; upon testing, the substance was reported to be liquid cocaine

However, the events surrounding Kid Cudi arrested did not mention whether the artist was intoxicated at that time

Law enforcement agents had Kid Cudi arrested, despite the fact that he had been scheduled to perform at the ‘Bonnaroo Festival’, which is considered to be one of the nation’s largest musical festival held annually in Tennessee; however, despite Kid Cudi arrested, he managed to attend the festival and perform

What Was Kid Cudi Arrested For?

Upon Kid Cudi arrested, the applicable charges filed included criminal mischief and the possession of an illegal substance. However, due to the fact that both parties – Kid Cudi and his girlfriend – allegedly reported the incident to be the result of a domestic dispute, the charges were dropped conditionally; while the criminal mischief charges would be dismissed from Kid Cudi arrested, Kid Cudi would be required to plead guilty to possession charges regarding the glass of liquid cocaine:

What is Liquid Cocaine?

Cocaine – even in its liquid form – is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of millions of deaths since its introduction to society. Cocaine can impair individuals’ behavior and demeanor, which typically results in criminal activity and violence. While the possession of Cocaine is considered to be a criminal felony; depending upon the amount discovered on an individual’s person – in addition to their individual criminal record – will determine the punishment; due to the fact that Kid Cudi was without any prior convictions, he was placed on probation.

Results of Kid Cudi Arrested

Subsequent to Kid Cudi’s arrest, he was given mandatory community service, as well as a required meeting with a drug counselor; the events leading to Kid Cudi arrested also will place Kid Cudi on probation, requiring that he adhere to all legal statutes and lawful behavior. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact West Virginia lawyers.

The Participants in the Kim Kardashian Video

In 2005, Kim Kardashian and her former boyfriend Willie Norwood – oftentimes referred to by his nickname ‘Ray-J’ – filmed themselves engaging in sexual activity while on vacation. Kim Kardashian, who is now 26 years old, is the daughter of Robert Kardashian – Robert Kardashian was one of the primary members of the defense team for the O.J. Simpson murder trial assisting in the acquittal of Simpson. ‘Ray-J’ is the brother of famous singer Brandy. While the credentials of both participants may not appear to render the notoriety that has been associated with the Kim Kardashian Sextape, the release of the video was one of the most talked-about within modernity.

Kim Kardashian Admitted to Filming the Sex Tape Willingly

Despite the fact that the Kim Kardashian Video portrays images and activity considered to be both private and personal, the former couple admitted to participating in the Kim Kardashian Sextape without the intention of it being released; however, subsequent to the Kim Kardashian Video being ‘leaked’ – a colloquialism used to define the unauthorized availability of a particular piece of media – its release was considered to be a highly-controversial topic.

The Controversy Surrounding the Kim Kardashian Sextape

Vivid Video, which is considered to be amongst the most prominent names in the adult film industry, maintained that they had been given access to the Kim Kardashian Video in both a legal and lawful manner; however, neither Kim Kardashian nor Ray-J have taken responsibility for the release of the video, which was filmed with the intent to remain private – as a result, Kim Kardashian undertook an injunction against the Vivid Video company in order to curtail the release of the Kim Kardashian Sextape.

The Legal Implications of the Kim Kardashian Video

Due to the fact that the details of the release of the Kim Kardashian Sextape have not been disclosed, the lawsuit brought forth by Kim Kardashian included the following:

Kim Kardashian mentioned that Vivid Video was undertaking methods of exploitation and manipulation of the assumed right to release the Kim Kardashian Video, which resulted in the offer of payment for the Kim Kardashian Video in lieu of the refusal to release it

Kim Kardashian’s legal team made mention that the release of the Kim Kardashian video would result in the slandering or unjust conveying of libelous sentiment with the expressed intention of causing harm with regard to Kim Kardashian’s persona; her reality television show ‘Keeping Up with the Kardashians’ was amongst one of the most popular on television

Finally, the release of the Kim Kardashian Video would result in the violation of her privacy; while Ray-J was never named as a codefendant, Kardashian’s legal team explained that the video was in direct violation of Kardashian’s right to privacy

The Conclusion of the Kardashian Video Scandal

Although the specifics of the lawsuit did not receive a great deal of media coverage with regard to the settlement, the Kim Kardashian Sextape was never formally released by Vivid Video; however, it did undergo an unauthorized private release over the Internet – the settlement disallows for any website to willingly host or offer the video.

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In 1997, and Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson filed for divorce; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources had reported that irretrievable differences with regard to each member of the couple’s career path had manifested in a contrasting fashion:

Kirstie Alley and Bob Alley wed in 1970 and divorced almost 7 years later; her marriage to Parker Stevenson was Kirstie Alley’s second marriage, which took place in 1983 – almost 14 years prior to the Kirstie Alley

Both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson are acclaimed actors, who have starred in a variety of noteworthy roles, such as ‘Look Who’s Talking’ and ‘A Separate Piece’

The couple produced 2 children from their marriage, William and Lillie; both children were adopted by the couple in a joint fashion

The Kirstie Alley Divorce in the State of California

Reports stated that Kirstie Alley wished to divorce in Maine, while Setvenson wished to divorce in California; ultimately, the Kirstie Alley divorce took place in California. The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement wass quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Kirstie Alley Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports showed both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson to have remained within good standing with each other. Yet, the parameters of the determination of ‘fault’ in the State of California require the following with regard to the determination of fault:

One or both of the parties must be deemed as mentally incompetent

Irreconcilable difference leading to the irretrievable dissolution of the union; in this case, the divergence of career paths was determined to serve as the catalyst for the Kirstie Alley divorce

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

No prenuptial agreement was formulated by the couple in order to serve as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

As per the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement, Kirstie Alley kept the couple’s home in Encino, California; she sold her home in 2010 – over 10 years following the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement

Custody and Children in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In a handwritten note located in tandem with the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement papers, Alley explains that she was requesting the right to bring her children to the set of ‘Deconstructing Harry’, which was a movie in which Kirstie Alley was slated to act.

Overview of the Craig McCaw Divorce

The Craig McCaw Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Criag McCae and Wendy McCaw; the Craig McCaw Divorce was finalized in 1997, which ended the 22-yearlong marriage – the couple met in the early 1970s during which time they were both undertaking study at Stanford University. Although the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Craig McCaw Divorce

Craig McCaw is considered to be one of the pioneers of the cellular telecommunications industry, forging the Seattle-based telecommunication company ‘McCaw Cellular’; the ingenuity and inventiveness of Craig McCaw thrust him into wealth upon the 1994 sale of the McCaw Cellular Company to the AT&T Company for what was reported as $11.5 billion. Wendy McCaw, who worked in publishing at the time of the couple’s marriage, remained married to Craig McCaw during his rise to fortune:

The Craig McCaw Divorce was heard before a judge in the King County Court, which is located in the City of Seattle in the State of Washington

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Craig McCaw Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, both Craig McCaw and Wendy McCaw opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Craig McCaw Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of Washington, the terms of a dissolved marriage will typically result in the division of assets accrued during the time of the marriage; due to the fact that Wendy McCaw was married to Craig McCaw during the time of both the development and sale of the McCaw Cellular Company, she petitioned for half of the assets in possession of the couple. Subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce settlement:

Wendy McCaw walked away from the Craig McCaw divorce settlement with $460 million, which is considered to be amongst the top 5 largest divorce settlements in history

The settlement payment granted to Wendy McCaw from her former husband – Craig McCaw – placed her in the top 400 list citing the most wealthy people in the United States at the time

Overview of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

In November of 2010, director Darren Aronofsky and actor Rachel Weisz announced that they would be filing for divorce after 6 years of marriage; the couple was married in 2005 – at the time of the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, the couple share one son. Within the reports of the Darren Aronofsky divorce, reports emerged that Rachel Weisz had engaged in a romantic relationship with fellow actor Daniel Craig in December of 2010; due to the fact that the couple had announced that they had been separated for a number of months prior to the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, allegations of infidelity followed. However – in accordance to statements furnished by both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz – the former couple undertook the dissolution of their marriage amicably and respectfully; reports claim that they are committed to each other as friends, as well as the wellbeing on their son.

The Parties Involved in the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

Darren Aronofsky is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful directors in Hollywood; he has been responsible for both the direction and writing of films including The Black Swan, The Wrestler, Requiem for a Dream, and the Fountain; Rachel Weisz is known for her work on blockbuster films, including The Fountain, The Lovely Bones, The Constant Gardener, and The Brothers Bloom:

In March of 2011, Rachel Weisz made her relationship with Daniel Craig official to the public media; reports of infidelity with regard to the Darren Aronofsky divorce have yet to be substantiated

The Plea within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Darren Aronofsky divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Darren Aronofsky divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce, if both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

The Background of the Fergie Scandal

Overview of the Chris Pontius Divorce

The Chris Pontius Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Chris Pontius and his wife of almost 7 years, Claire Nolan; the Chris Pontius Divorce was filed in March of 2011 – Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan were married on October 29th, 2004. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details are known about the impending Chris Pontius divorce settlement, the filing set forth has cited the dissolution of the marriage to result from irreconcilable differences

The Parties Involved in the Chris Pontius Divorce

Chris Pontius is perhaps most widely-known for his role in the Jackass movies, where he and his fellow cast mates engage in wild stunts that are both filmed and orchestrated by the cast members; his wife, Claire Nolan, is not reported as being employed within show business – the couple currently shares no children.

Legal Venue of the Chris Pontius Divorce Hearing

The Chris Pontius Divorce was filed before in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California; Claire Nolan is reported as having filed for the divorce.

The Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Chris Pontius divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

An Uncontested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Chris Pontius Divorce, if both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

A Contested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi, which was finalized in 1980, which ended the 20-year long marriage. Upon their meeting, Soraya Khashoggi’s name was Sandra Daly; although she had relocated to Saudi Arabia and changed her name, she was a native of the United Kingdom; the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce is listed as being amongst the most expensive in world history. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

Adnan Khashoggi achieved his fame as a result of his various business ventures taking place within Saudi Arabia; a multitude of his dealings were in the weapon and arms industry. Adnan Khashoggi is most widely known for his role in the ‘Iran Contra Scandal’, which took place in 1986; during this scandal, members of the Ronald Reagan administration undertook secret weapons dealings with Adnan Khashoggi with the hopes of furthering negations with regard to the release of American hostages:

The couple shared 5 children together; however, in 1999 – subsequent to a paternity test – one the couple’s daughters was determined to be fathered by British politico Jonathan Aitkens in lieu of Adnan Khashoggi

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce, both Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that couple was both wed and divorced outside of the United States of America, alternate legality is applicable with regard to the respective location; however, an uncontested divorce may also be a method in which one or both members of the couple separating cannot – or will not – divulge private affairs with regard to the dissolution of the marriage

The Terms of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce settlement included the following:

Listed as amongst the top 3 most expensive divorces in history, Soraya Khashoggi was given a lump sum of $874 million following the finalization of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce; Adnan Khashoggi had been estimated to be valued at upwards of $4 billion