Overview of the Bruce Willis Divorce

The finalization of the Bruce Willis Divorce, which occurred on October 18th, 2000, marked the dissolution of the 13-year marriage between actors Bruce and Demi Moore; the couple was married on November 21st, 1987. The Bruce Willis Divorce was amongst one of the most talked-about in Hollywood, due to the degree of celebrity shared by both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore. Although the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement, the Bruce Willis Divorce proved to be the pinnacle of amicable and friendly; Bruce Willis stated that the wellbeing of his children – as well as Demi Moore – was of the utmost importance to him:

Shortly after the Bruce Willis Divorce, Demi Moore – then 38 – had begun a romantic relationship with fellow actor Ashton Kutcher, who was 15 years her junior; Kutcher was 23 years old at the beginning of the relationship

While Bruce Willis dated other individuals, he has not since been married; Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore wed in 2005 – reports show Bruce Willis, Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher, and the couple’s 3 children to spend holidays together

The Parties Involved in the Bruce Willis Divorce

Both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore are considered to be 2 of the most recognized and iconic actors in the world; Bruce Willis has starred in films such as The Die Hard Series, Moonlighting, 12 Monkeys, the Fifth Element, and The Get Shorty Series – Demi Moore has starred in blockbuster hits including G.I. Jane, Ghost, and Charlie’s Angels. Prior to the Bruce Willis Divorce, the union between Moore and Willis was considered to be the embodiment of a ‘power couple’:

The couple share 3 daughters; Rumer, Scout, and Tallulah

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Bruce Willis Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Bruce Willis Divorce, both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Bruce Willis Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce were kept private from the media; however, Demi Moore was estimated to have walked away from the Bruce Willis Divorce with upwards of $90 million in spousal support – Bruce Willis and Demi Moore share custody of their children.

Why was Bruno Mars Arrested?

On September 20th, 2010, 23-year old singer and songwriter Bruno Mars – whose real name is Gene Hernandez – was arrested for possession of 2.6 grams of cocaine in Las Vegas, Nevada, which resulted in Bruno Mars arrested at 2:40 am while in the bathroom of the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino – his arrest came only a month prior to the planned release of his full-length album ‘Doowops and Hooligans’:

What is Cocaine?

Cocaine is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of millions of deaths since its introduction to modern society. Cocaine can impair individuals on a multitude of level, resulting in addiction, illness, and death

The possession of Cocaine is considered to be a criminal felony; depending upon the amount discovered on an individual’s person, punitive recourse can range in severity – typically, the sentencing of cocaine possession will be contingent upon the amount in possession in conjunction with past criminal records

Although the possession of cocaine resulted in Bruno Mars arrested, the analysis of the case details – including the absence of a criminal record – allowed him to avoid incarceration

Bruno Mars Arrested: Did the Punishment Fit the Crime?

Upon the review of Bruno Mars arrested, the Clark County Judge Jesse Walsh explained that due to the fact that the events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested were without prior incident, the following punishments would be applicable to Bruno Mars’ sentencing – Bruno Mars was placed on probation, which involves the required adherence to any and all legal statutes:

The events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested will require him to meet with a probation officer and participate in random drug screenings

Bruno Mars arrested for cocaine possession will require him to pay a fine calculated at $2,000 in addition to the participation in 200 hours of court-mandated community service facilitated by a non-profit organization chosen by the court

Finally, the circumstances resulting in Bruno Mars arrested for the possession of cocaine will require him to undergo 8-hours of intensive drug counseling

Bruno Mars Arrested: Conditions and Terms

Bruno Mars’ sentencing allowed him to avoid a felony charge, which typically results in mandatory incarceration; however, in that events take place resulting in Bruno Mars arrested again, the Judge expressed that the leniency that he showed Mars will not be repeated.

The Background of the Cheryl Hines Divorce

On July 20th, 2010, actor Cheryl Hines filed for divorce from her husband of 8 years, Paul Young; the couple married on December 30th, 2002 – they currently share a 6 year old daughter. The divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Cheryl Hines Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has not yet been finalized, the supplemental details – including possible prenuptial agreements, custody settlements, or spousal challenges. However, the details that have been released state that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young have split amicably.

Who Was Involved in the Cheryl Hines Divorce Filing?

Cheryl Hines is an American actor who is most commonly recognized from her role in the hit television program ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’; Cheryl Hines has also starred in various supporting roles in major motion pictures. Paul Young is not actor, but is one of the founders of the ‘Principato-Young entertainment Management Group’, which specializes in artist management.

Legal Venue of the Cheryl Hines Divorce Hearing

The Cheryl Hines Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Cheryl Hines Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Cheryl Hines divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Cheryl Hines Divorce, if both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

Although the prospect of a contested please being set forth within the Cheryl Hines divorce seems unlikely, an uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Christina Milian Divorce

The Christina Milian Divorce settlement ended the year-and-a-half-long marriage between songwriter Terius Nash – who goes by his stage name ‘The Dream’ – and singer Christina Milian – who was born as Christine Marie Flores. The couple met in 2009 and quickly became romantically involved – shortly after the inception of the relationship, Christina Milian became pregnant with a daughter, who was born on February 26th, 2010. However, the couple was married in September of 2009 in the state of Nevada prior to the birth of their daughter. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Christina Milian Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

In 2010, photographs had surfaced portraying The Dream in what appeared to be engaging in an extramarital affair while on vacation; the female in the photograph was identified as his assistant – shortly after the release of these photographs, Christina Milian had filed for divorce

The Parties Involved in the Christina Milian Divorce

Christina Milian is an American singer, actor, and model that has enjoyed success in her singing career resulting from the various songs that she has recorded, including ‘A.M. to P.M.’, ‘Say I’, and ‘Us Against the World’; in addition, she has starred in various motion pictures and international modeling campaigns. The Dream is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful songwriters of the decade; he has been responsible for the writing or production of countless hits, including ‘Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)’, ‘Umbrella’, and Justin Bieber’s smash-hit ‘Baby’.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Christina Milian Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the determination of the reasons behind the filing for divorce; in addition, an uncontested divorce serves to classify the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Christina Milian Divorce, both Christina Milian and The Dream opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, providing them with the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Christina Milian Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Christina Milian Divorce settlement:

Christina Milian walked away from the Christina Milian divorce with what was reported as lump cash payment furnished by The Dream amounting to $4 million; in addition, she will be entitled to the receipt of a monthly child support payment of $5,000 furnished by the dream with regard to the couple’s daughter, Violet

Overview of the Craig McCaw Divorce

The Craig McCaw Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Criag McCae and Wendy McCaw; the Craig McCaw Divorce was finalized in 1997, which ended the 22-yearlong marriage – the couple met in the early 1970s during which time they were both undertaking study at Stanford University. Although the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Craig McCaw Divorce

Craig McCaw is considered to be one of the pioneers of the cellular telecommunications industry, forging the Seattle-based telecommunication company ‘McCaw Cellular’; the ingenuity and inventiveness of Craig McCaw thrust him into wealth upon the 1994 sale of the McCaw Cellular Company to the AT&T Company for what was reported as $11.5 billion. Wendy McCaw, who worked in publishing at the time of the couple’s marriage, remained married to Craig McCaw during his rise to fortune:

The Craig McCaw Divorce was heard before a judge in the King County Court, which is located in the City of Seattle in the State of Washington

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Craig McCaw Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, both Craig McCaw and Wendy McCaw opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Craig McCaw Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of Washington, the terms of a dissolved marriage will typically result in the division of assets accrued during the time of the marriage; due to the fact that Wendy McCaw was married to Craig McCaw during the time of both the development and sale of the McCaw Cellular Company, she petitioned for half of the assets in possession of the couple. Subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce settlement:

Wendy McCaw walked away from the Craig McCaw divorce settlement with $460 million, which is considered to be amongst the top 5 largest divorce settlements in history

The settlement payment granted to Wendy McCaw from her former husband – Craig McCaw – placed her in the top 400 list citing the most wealthy people in the United States at the time

Overview of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

In November of 2010, director Darren Aronofsky and actor Rachel Weisz announced that they would be filing for divorce after 6 years of marriage; the couple was married in 2005 – at the time of the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, the couple share one son. Within the reports of the Darren Aronofsky divorce, reports emerged that Rachel Weisz had engaged in a romantic relationship with fellow actor Daniel Craig in December of 2010; due to the fact that the couple had announced that they had been separated for a number of months prior to the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, allegations of infidelity followed. However – in accordance to statements furnished by both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz – the former couple undertook the dissolution of their marriage amicably and respectfully; reports claim that they are committed to each other as friends, as well as the wellbeing on their son.

The Parties Involved in the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

Darren Aronofsky is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful directors in Hollywood; he has been responsible for both the direction and writing of films including The Black Swan, The Wrestler, Requiem for a Dream, and the Fountain; Rachel Weisz is known for her work on blockbuster films, including The Fountain, The Lovely Bones, The Constant Gardener, and The Brothers Bloom:

In March of 2011, Rachel Weisz made her relationship with Daniel Craig official to the public media; reports of infidelity with regard to the Darren Aronofsky divorce have yet to be substantiated

The Plea within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Darren Aronofsky divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Darren Aronofsky divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce, if both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

The Background of the Fergie Scandal

Overview of the Chris Pontius Divorce

The Chris Pontius Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Chris Pontius and his wife of almost 7 years, Claire Nolan; the Chris Pontius Divorce was filed in March of 2011 – Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan were married on October 29th, 2004. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details are known about the impending Chris Pontius divorce settlement, the filing set forth has cited the dissolution of the marriage to result from irreconcilable differences

The Parties Involved in the Chris Pontius Divorce

Chris Pontius is perhaps most widely-known for his role in the Jackass movies, where he and his fellow cast mates engage in wild stunts that are both filmed and orchestrated by the cast members; his wife, Claire Nolan, is not reported as being employed within show business – the couple currently shares no children.

Legal Venue of the Chris Pontius Divorce Hearing

The Chris Pontius Divorce was filed before in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California; Claire Nolan is reported as having filed for the divorce.

The Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Chris Pontius divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

An Uncontested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Chris Pontius Divorce, if both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

A Contested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Brad Pitt Divorce

The Brad Pitt Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between ^; the Brad Pitt Divorce was finalized in October 2nd, 2005, which ended the 5-year marriage – Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were married on July 29th, 2000. Despite the celebrity status undertaken by both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, the details of both the couple’s marriage – as well as the subsequent Brad Pitt divorce – managed to find their way to public media:

The Parties Involved in the Brad Pitt Divorce

Brad Pitt, both currently, as well as at the time of his divorce from former wife Jennifer Aniston, was amongst the most widely-recognized American actors in the world; Brad Pitt has starred in such blockbuster hits as Fight Club, Se7en, Burn After Reading, and The Oceans’ Eleven Series – Pitt is amongst the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Jennifer Aniston received her celebrity notoriety as a result of starring in the sitcom Friends, which is touted as amongst the most successful sitcoms in television history. The couple met in 1998 and did not have any children prior to the Brad Pitt Divorce.

Legal Venue of the Brad Pitt Divorce Hearing

The Brad Pitt Divorce was heard before a judge in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Brad Pitt Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Brad Pitt Divorce, both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Brad Pitt Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Brad Pitt Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce settlement:

The Brad Pitt Divorce was filed under a claim of ‘irreconcilable differences’ set forth by Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston; Jennifer Aniston’s maiden name was reinstated in August of 2005

Although there has never been any substantiation of infidelity on the part of Brad Pitt, rumors of extramarital affairs with fellow actor Angelina Jolie surfaced; Jennifer Aniston was reported as claiming that her own parent’s divorce had set the precedent for a heightened sense of fear and mistrust within her own marriage

The couple engaged in months of marriage counseling in order to avoid an impending Brad Pitt Divorce; however, the marriage was not salvaged, and the couple’s assets – including a $28 million home – was divided as per the statutes within the prenuptial agreement

What is the Background of the Brittany Murphy Death?

On December 20th, 2009 in her Los Angeles home, an emergency call was placed in the evening requesting immediate medical assistance with regard to actress Brittany Murphy, who had collapsed in her bathroom; at the time, Brittany Murphy was living with husband Simon Monjack. Upon the arrival of emergency crews, which included emergency medical technicians and firefighters, the actor was unable to be revived after a multitude of attempts conducted by firefighters; prior to Brittany Murphy death, she was transported to the hospital in Los Angeles and declared to have died upon arrival on hospital grounds.

What Was Brittany Murphy Cause of Death?

The devastation on the part of both her fans and her family upon the release of the news of Brittany Murphy death was due in part to her esteemed acting career, in addition to various reports and testimonies of her wonderful character; her celebrity status made the need for answers furnished to friends, family, and fans that much more urgent:

Upon the release of her autopsy report, the chief coroner at Cedar-Sinai hospital in Los Angeles, California recorded that she had died from pneumonia; however, the release of the autopsy of Brittany Murphy death was primarily classified as ‘differed’ – this may have resulted in a wide range of factors contributing to Brittany Murphy cause of death

What Were the Factors of Brittany Murphy Death?

The primary ruling by the coroner with regard to Brittany Murphy death was pneumonia, however, supplanted factors were reported as a fatal iron deficiency that may have been heightened through the usage of both over-the-counter, as well as prescription medication; the medication listed in her system at the time of Brittany Murphy death included a variety of cold medicine, as well as painkillers – yet, the Brittany Murphy cause of death was confirmed to be accidental in nature.

Why Was There Cold Medicine in Her System at the Time of Brittany Murphy Death?

The Los Angeles County of Health Department maintained that there was an ongoing investigation with regard to the suspicion that toxic mold was found in her home at the time of her death, which is also known  by its moniker ‘black mold’. This type of mold is regarded as an organism that may have contributed to chronic congestion suffered by Brittany Murphy, which may have served as the catalyst for the consumption of cold medicine; however, friends and family of Brittany Murphy have dismissed such claims.