A Summary of the Chris Evert Divorce

The Chris Evert Divorce was finalized in 2006, which ended the 18-year marriage between Chris Evert and Andy Mill – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Chris Evert Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Chris Evert Divorce were reported as being irreconcilable differences; for those unfamiliar with the Chris Evert Divorce, the celebrity status of Chris Evert and Andy Mill thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Chris Evert Divorce had taken place. The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Chris Evert was regarded as amongst the most sought-after and recognized professional tennis players and female athletes; furthermore, the fact that Andy Mill is also considered to be equally revered as a professional skier made the Chris Evert Divorce ripe for public consumption.

The Terms and Conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Chris Evert and Andy Mill were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and the Division of Assets in the Chris Evert Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Andy Mill petitioned for alimony payments from Chris Evert upon the finalization of the Chris Evert Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Andy Mill was awarded upwards of $7 million in monies and assets, a home that the couple had shared in Colorado valued at $4 million; Evert retained ownership of the couple’s Florida home valued at nearly $3 million

Petitions Expressed in the Chris Evert Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 3 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Chris Evert and Andy Mill; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Within the Chris Evert Divorce, Evert was able to retain primary custody of the couple’s 3 children – Alexander, Nicholas, and Colton

The Determination of Contest within the Chris Evert Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Chris Evert and Andy Mill would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Chris Evert Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Chris Evert Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Chris Evert Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Chris Evert and Andy Mill determined that the Chris Evert Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The Alex Rodriguez Divorce was finalized in 2008, which ended the nearly 6-year marriage between Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez – the couple was wed in 2002. Speculation surrounding the Alex Rodriguez Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Alex Rodriguez Divorce included extramarital affairs and infidelity undertaken by Alex Rodriguez – for those unfamiliar with Alex Rodriguez, he was and is considered to be one of the greatest professional baseball players in the history of the sport; however, according to various media sources, that degree of fame took a toll on his marriage:

Prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce, allegations of extramarital affairs with partners ranging from cocktail waitresses to pop-superstar Madonna

The couple shares 2 children; yet, the youngest of the 2 children, Ella, was born only 3 months prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce – allegations and testimony suggest that Alex Rodriguez was participating in extramarital affairs for a large part of the marriage

The Terms and Conditions of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 2 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and Asset Division in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Cynthia Rodriguez petitioned for alimony payments from Alex Rodriguez upon the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested spousal support from Alex Rodriguez in order to ensure the lifestyle that both her the couple’s 2 children had become accustomed

Although the definitive terms of the Alex Rodriguez divorce settlement were not disclosed, Alex Rodriguez’s personal worth was considered to include a $175 million salary contract granted by the New York Yankees, as well as luxurious homes in New York and Florida

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce proceedings, the contents of a prenuptial agreement were not disclosed.

Petitions Expressed in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 2 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported as both petitioning for – and receiving – primary custody of the 2 children; in tandem with the custodial settlement within the Alex Rodriguez divorce, Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested payment furnished by Alex Rodriguez both for private school tuition and undisclosed gifts

Overview of the Avril Lavigne Divorce

The Avril Lavigne Divorce marked the ending of the marriage between musicians Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley; the Avril Lavigne Divorce was finalized on November 16th, 2010 – however, Avril Lavigne had filed for divorce from Deryck Whibley in October of 2009. The finalization of the Avril Lavigne divorce marked the end of the almost-4 year marriage, which took place in July of 2006. The Avril Lavigne divorce settlement and proceedings were reported as existing amicably; following the Avril Lavigne divorce, the couple continued to sing the other’s praises – within a year since the Avril Lavigne divorce, Lavigne and Deryck Whibley collaborated on several songs on Avril Lavigne’s newest album ‘Goodby Lullabye’:

The Parties Involved in the Avril Lavigne Divorce

Avril Lavigne is considered to be amongst the most recognized and beloved female musicians; blending a rock and roll attitude and melodic songwriting, she quickly amassed millions of fans on a worldwide level; she has achieved various accolades, including several platinum albums and a multitude of hit-singles – she has performed such hits as ‘Sk8ter Boi’, I’m With You, and ‘Complicated’. Deryck Whibley has achieved his own level of fame as a result of his status as the singer and songwriter of the band ‘Sum 41’; both Canadian in origin, Lavuigne and Whibley have enjoyed global fame and stardom.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Avril Lavigne Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Avril Lavigne Divorce, both Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Avril Lavigne Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Avril Lavigne Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Avril Lavigne Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, few details were released about the specifics of the divorce settlement, prenuptial agreements undertaken, and the division of assets:

Avril Lavigne was considered to be the more wealthy of the 2; reports maintain that she neither sought alimony nor spousal support; the couple shares no children – thus eliminating the need to undertake the  determination of child support

With regard to the alleged division of the couples assets, Avril Lavigne walked away from her divorce with the couple’s home in Bevereley Hills, her songwriting and publishing catalogue, her guitars, and all of the awards and accolades from her career – Deryck Whibley walked away from the Avril Lavigne divorce with a similar settlement outside of the former couple’s home

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal Explained

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal is a series of events involving Bangladeshi Model and Actor Sadiya Jahan Prova, who has not only achieved national fame within her home country of Bangladesh, but also wide acclaim on an international level; while considered to be amongst the most recognized models, Prova is also an actor on a variety of Bangladeshi television shows. However, in August of 2010, a video of Prova engaging in sexual activity with her former boyfriend – Rajib Apurbo – was released over the Internet; although both the nature of the release, as well as the time during which the video was filmed have been subject to debate, the impact of the release gained an expanse of media coverage. The video is assumed to have been filmed in the year 2007

The Individuals Involved in the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

The following individuals have been identified as retaining primary involvement with the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal:

Prova, who is the female in the video, has gained notoriety and recognition for her acting and modeling endeavors; the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal surprised many people due the degree of Prova’s fame

Rajib Apurbo, who is named as the male in the video, was the former boyfriend of Prova; although he has never taken responsibility for the release of the video, which led to the development of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, sources claim that he undertook the release of the video as a means of revenge exacted on Prova upon the dissolution of their relationship in August of 2010

Ziaul Faruq Apurba married Prova on August 21st, 2010; this event is considered to be the catalyst for Rajib’s alleged undertaking of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal – Apurba is both an actor and a model in Bangladesh

The Conclusion of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

While Prova has not formally released any comments with regard to the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the rate of Internet users accessing the video of Prova and Rajib has been staggering; upwards of 6 months since the release of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the video is amongst the most watched and advertised within Asia

Overview of the Bruce Willis Divorce

The finalization of the Bruce Willis Divorce, which occurred on October 18th, 2000, marked the dissolution of the 13-year marriage between actors Bruce and Demi Moore; the couple was married on November 21st, 1987. The Bruce Willis Divorce was amongst one of the most talked-about in Hollywood, due to the degree of celebrity shared by both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore. Although the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement, the Bruce Willis Divorce proved to be the pinnacle of amicable and friendly; Bruce Willis stated that the wellbeing of his children – as well as Demi Moore – was of the utmost importance to him:

Shortly after the Bruce Willis Divorce, Demi Moore – then 38 – had begun a romantic relationship with fellow actor Ashton Kutcher, who was 15 years her junior; Kutcher was 23 years old at the beginning of the relationship

While Bruce Willis dated other individuals, he has not since been married; Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore wed in 2005 – reports show Bruce Willis, Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher, and the couple’s 3 children to spend holidays together

The Parties Involved in the Bruce Willis Divorce

Both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore are considered to be 2 of the most recognized and iconic actors in the world; Bruce Willis has starred in films such as The Die Hard Series, Moonlighting, 12 Monkeys, the Fifth Element, and The Get Shorty Series – Demi Moore has starred in blockbuster hits including G.I. Jane, Ghost, and Charlie’s Angels. Prior to the Bruce Willis Divorce, the union between Moore and Willis was considered to be the embodiment of a ‘power couple’:

The couple share 3 daughters; Rumer, Scout, and Tallulah

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Bruce Willis Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Bruce Willis Divorce, both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Bruce Willis Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce were kept private from the media; however, Demi Moore was estimated to have walked away from the Bruce Willis Divorce with upwards of $90 million in spousal support – Bruce Willis and Demi Moore share custody of their children.

Why was Bruno Mars Arrested?

On September 20th, 2010, 23-year old singer and songwriter Bruno Mars – whose real name is Gene Hernandez – was arrested for possession of 2.6 grams of cocaine in Las Vegas, Nevada, which resulted in Bruno Mars arrested at 2:40 am while in the bathroom of the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino – his arrest came only a month prior to the planned release of his full-length album ‘Doowops and Hooligans’:

What is Cocaine?

Cocaine is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of millions of deaths since its introduction to modern society. Cocaine can impair individuals on a multitude of level, resulting in addiction, illness, and death

The possession of Cocaine is considered to be a criminal felony; depending upon the amount discovered on an individual’s person, punitive recourse can range in severity – typically, the sentencing of cocaine possession will be contingent upon the amount in possession in conjunction with past criminal records

Although the possession of cocaine resulted in Bruno Mars arrested, the analysis of the case details – including the absence of a criminal record – allowed him to avoid incarceration

Bruno Mars Arrested: Did the Punishment Fit the Crime?

Upon the review of Bruno Mars arrested, the Clark County Judge Jesse Walsh explained that due to the fact that the events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested were without prior incident, the following punishments would be applicable to Bruno Mars’ sentencing – Bruno Mars was placed on probation, which involves the required adherence to any and all legal statutes:

The events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested will require him to meet with a probation officer and participate in random drug screenings

Bruno Mars arrested for cocaine possession will require him to pay a fine calculated at $2,000 in addition to the participation in 200 hours of court-mandated community service facilitated by a non-profit organization chosen by the court

Finally, the circumstances resulting in Bruno Mars arrested for the possession of cocaine will require him to undergo 8-hours of intensive drug counseling

Bruno Mars Arrested: Conditions and Terms

Bruno Mars’ sentencing allowed him to avoid a felony charge, which typically results in mandatory incarceration; however, in that events take place resulting in Bruno Mars arrested again, the Judge expressed that the leniency that he showed Mars will not be repeated.

The Background of the Cheryl Hines Divorce

On July 20th, 2010, actor Cheryl Hines filed for divorce from her husband of 8 years, Paul Young; the couple married on December 30th, 2002 – they currently share a 6 year old daughter. The divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Cheryl Hines Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has not yet been finalized, the supplemental details – including possible prenuptial agreements, custody settlements, or spousal challenges. However, the details that have been released state that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young have split amicably.

Who Was Involved in the Cheryl Hines Divorce Filing?

Cheryl Hines is an American actor who is most commonly recognized from her role in the hit television program ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’; Cheryl Hines has also starred in various supporting roles in major motion pictures. Paul Young is not actor, but is one of the founders of the ‘Principato-Young entertainment Management Group’, which specializes in artist management.

Legal Venue of the Cheryl Hines Divorce Hearing

The Cheryl Hines Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Cheryl Hines Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Cheryl Hines divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Cheryl Hines Divorce, if both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

Although the prospect of a contested please being set forth within the Cheryl Hines divorce seems unlikely, an uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Christina Milian Divorce

The Christina Milian Divorce settlement ended the year-and-a-half-long marriage between songwriter Terius Nash – who goes by his stage name ‘The Dream’ – and singer Christina Milian – who was born as Christine Marie Flores. The couple met in 2009 and quickly became romantically involved – shortly after the inception of the relationship, Christina Milian became pregnant with a daughter, who was born on February 26th, 2010. However, the couple was married in September of 2009 in the state of Nevada prior to the birth of their daughter. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Christina Milian Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

In 2010, photographs had surfaced portraying The Dream in what appeared to be engaging in an extramarital affair while on vacation; the female in the photograph was identified as his assistant – shortly after the release of these photographs, Christina Milian had filed for divorce

The Parties Involved in the Christina Milian Divorce

Christina Milian is an American singer, actor, and model that has enjoyed success in her singing career resulting from the various songs that she has recorded, including ‘A.M. to P.M.’, ‘Say I’, and ‘Us Against the World’; in addition, she has starred in various motion pictures and international modeling campaigns. The Dream is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful songwriters of the decade; he has been responsible for the writing or production of countless hits, including ‘Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)’, ‘Umbrella’, and Justin Bieber’s smash-hit ‘Baby’.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Christina Milian Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the determination of the reasons behind the filing for divorce; in addition, an uncontested divorce serves to classify the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Christina Milian Divorce, both Christina Milian and The Dream opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, providing them with the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Christina Milian Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Christina Milian Divorce settlement:

Christina Milian walked away from the Christina Milian divorce with what was reported as lump cash payment furnished by The Dream amounting to $4 million; in addition, she will be entitled to the receipt of a monthly child support payment of $5,000 furnished by the dream with regard to the couple’s daughter, Violet

A Summary of the Sarkozy Divorce

The Sarkozy Divorce was finalized in October of 2007, which ended the 11 year marriage between Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Sarkozy Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Sarkozy Divorce included alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by Sarkozy; for those unfamiliar with the Sarkozy Divorce, the celebrity status of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Sarkozy Divorce had taken place:

The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy has garnered international status as a result of serving as France’s current – and 23rd President; if Sarkozy’s position was not enough to thrust the Sarkozy divorce into the limelight, Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz notoriety as a fashion model did not help to quell public curiosity with regard to the couple’s divorce

The couple shares 1 son named Louis, who was born in 1997

The Terms and Conditions of the Sarkozy Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s son, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Sarkozy Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Nicolas Sarkozy petitioned for alimony payments from Cécilia upon the finalization of the Sarkozy Divorce.

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Sarkozy Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Sarkozy Divorce proceedings, the details of a prenuptial agreement were not released.

Petitions Expressed in the Sarkozy Divorce

Custody of the couple’s son Louis would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. The award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments; no such details with regard to the custody settlement with regard to Louis were released.

The Division of Assets in the Sarkozy Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies.

The Aftereffects of the Sarkozy Divorce

Since the divorce, Sarkozy has since been remarried to Italian songstress Carla Bruni; the marriage took place in 2008, although the couple is said to have begun a relationship only a month following the Sarkozy divorce.

The Background of the Sebastian Bach Divorce

Singer Sebastian Bach and his wife of almost 20 years, Maria Beirk filed for divorce at the close of the year 2011; the finalization of a Sebastian Bach divorce stands to end the couple’s marriage, which was enacted in 1992. Currently, the couple maintains that after a variety of measures undertaken in order to reconcile the marriage, the event referred to as the Sebastian Bach is the recourse determined to be best for Sebastian Bach, Maria Bierk, and their respective family. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Sebastian Bach Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Who Was Involved in the Sebastian Bach Divorce Filing?

Sebastian Bach was one of the most famous rock and roll singers in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a result of the success of Skid Row, which was the musical group that he fronted; after almost a decade-long hiatus, the band has only recently begun to perform together again.

Legal Venue of the Sebastian Bach Divorce Hearing

The Sebastian Bach Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Sebastian Bach Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Sebastian Bach divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Sebastian Bach divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Sebastian Bach Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Sebastian Bach Divorce, if both Sebastian Bach and Maria Bierk opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Sebastian Bach Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Sebastian Bach and Maria Bierk seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.