The Background of the Fergie Scandal

Overview of the Craig McCaw Divorce

The Craig McCaw Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Criag McCae and Wendy McCaw; the Craig McCaw Divorce was finalized in 1997, which ended the 22-yearlong marriage – the couple met in the early 1970s during which time they were both undertaking study at Stanford University. Although the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Craig McCaw Divorce

Craig McCaw is considered to be one of the pioneers of the cellular telecommunications industry, forging the Seattle-based telecommunication company ‘McCaw Cellular’; the ingenuity and inventiveness of Craig McCaw thrust him into wealth upon the 1994 sale of the McCaw Cellular Company to the AT&T Company for what was reported as $11.5 billion. Wendy McCaw, who worked in publishing at the time of the couple’s marriage, remained married to Craig McCaw during his rise to fortune:

The Craig McCaw Divorce was heard before a judge in the King County Court, which is located in the City of Seattle in the State of Washington

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Craig McCaw Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, both Craig McCaw and Wendy McCaw opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Craig McCaw Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of Washington, the terms of a dissolved marriage will typically result in the division of assets accrued during the time of the marriage; due to the fact that Wendy McCaw was married to Craig McCaw during the time of both the development and sale of the McCaw Cellular Company, she petitioned for half of the assets in possession of the couple. Subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce settlement:

Wendy McCaw walked away from the Craig McCaw divorce settlement with $460 million, which is considered to be amongst the top 5 largest divorce settlements in history

The settlement payment granted to Wendy McCaw from her former husband – Craig McCaw – placed her in the top 400 list citing the most wealthy people in the United States at the time

Overview of the Chris Pontius Divorce

The Chris Pontius Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Chris Pontius and his wife of almost 7 years, Claire Nolan; the Chris Pontius Divorce was filed in March of 2011 – Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan were married on October 29th, 2004. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details are known about the impending Chris Pontius divorce settlement, the filing set forth has cited the dissolution of the marriage to result from irreconcilable differences

The Parties Involved in the Chris Pontius Divorce

Chris Pontius is perhaps most widely-known for his role in the Jackass movies, where he and his fellow cast mates engage in wild stunts that are both filmed and orchestrated by the cast members; his wife, Claire Nolan, is not reported as being employed within show business – the couple currently shares no children.

Legal Venue of the Chris Pontius Divorce Hearing

The Chris Pontius Divorce was filed before in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California; Claire Nolan is reported as having filed for the divorce.

The Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Chris Pontius divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

An Uncontested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Chris Pontius Divorce, if both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

A Contested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

In November of 2010, director Darren Aronofsky and actor Rachel Weisz announced that they would be filing for divorce after 6 years of marriage; the couple was married in 2005 – at the time of the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, the couple share one son. Within the reports of the Darren Aronofsky divorce, reports emerged that Rachel Weisz had engaged in a romantic relationship with fellow actor Daniel Craig in December of 2010; due to the fact that the couple had announced that they had been separated for a number of months prior to the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, allegations of infidelity followed. However – in accordance to statements furnished by both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz – the former couple undertook the dissolution of their marriage amicably and respectfully; reports claim that they are committed to each other as friends, as well as the wellbeing on their son.

The Parties Involved in the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

Darren Aronofsky is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful directors in Hollywood; he has been responsible for both the direction and writing of films including The Black Swan, The Wrestler, Requiem for a Dream, and the Fountain; Rachel Weisz is known for her work on blockbuster films, including The Fountain, The Lovely Bones, The Constant Gardener, and The Brothers Bloom:

In March of 2011, Rachel Weisz made her relationship with Daniel Craig official to the public media; reports of infidelity with regard to the Darren Aronofsky divorce have yet to be substantiated

The Plea within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Darren Aronofsky divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Darren Aronofsky divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce, if both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi, which was finalized in 1980, which ended the 20-year long marriage. Upon their meeting, Soraya Khashoggi’s name was Sandra Daly; although she had relocated to Saudi Arabia and changed her name, she was a native of the United Kingdom; the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce is listed as being amongst the most expensive in world history. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

Adnan Khashoggi achieved his fame as a result of his various business ventures taking place within Saudi Arabia; a multitude of his dealings were in the weapon and arms industry. Adnan Khashoggi is most widely known for his role in the ‘Iran Contra Scandal’, which took place in 1986; during this scandal, members of the Ronald Reagan administration undertook secret weapons dealings with Adnan Khashoggi with the hopes of furthering negations with regard to the release of American hostages:

The couple shared 5 children together; however, in 1999 – subsequent to a paternity test – one the couple’s daughters was determined to be fathered by British politico Jonathan Aitkens in lieu of Adnan Khashoggi

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce, both Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that couple was both wed and divorced outside of the United States of America, alternate legality is applicable with regard to the respective location; however, an uncontested divorce may also be a method in which one or both members of the couple separating cannot – or will not – divulge private affairs with regard to the dissolution of the marriage

The Terms of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce settlement included the following:

Listed as amongst the top 3 most expensive divorces in history, Soraya Khashoggi was given a lump sum of $874 million following the finalization of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce; Adnan Khashoggi had been estimated to be valued at upwards of $4 billion

A Summary of the Chris Evert Divorce

The Chris Evert Divorce was finalized in 2006, which ended the 18-year marriage between Chris Evert and Andy Mill – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Chris Evert Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Chris Evert Divorce were reported as being irreconcilable differences; for those unfamiliar with the Chris Evert Divorce, the celebrity status of Chris Evert and Andy Mill thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Chris Evert Divorce had taken place. The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Chris Evert was regarded as amongst the most sought-after and recognized professional tennis players and female athletes; furthermore, the fact that Andy Mill is also considered to be equally revered as a professional skier made the Chris Evert Divorce ripe for public consumption.

The Terms and Conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Chris Evert and Andy Mill were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and the Division of Assets in the Chris Evert Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Andy Mill petitioned for alimony payments from Chris Evert upon the finalization of the Chris Evert Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Andy Mill was awarded upwards of $7 million in monies and assets, a home that the couple had shared in Colorado valued at $4 million; Evert retained ownership of the couple’s Florida home valued at nearly $3 million

Petitions Expressed in the Chris Evert Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 3 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Chris Evert and Andy Mill; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Within the Chris Evert Divorce, Evert was able to retain primary custody of the couple’s 3 children – Alexander, Nicholas, and Colton

The Determination of Contest within the Chris Evert Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Chris Evert and Andy Mill would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Chris Evert Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Chris Evert Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Chris Evert Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Chris Evert and Andy Mill determined that the Chris Evert Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The Alex Rodriguez Divorce was finalized in 2008, which ended the nearly 6-year marriage between Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez – the couple was wed in 2002. Speculation surrounding the Alex Rodriguez Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Alex Rodriguez Divorce included extramarital affairs and infidelity undertaken by Alex Rodriguez – for those unfamiliar with Alex Rodriguez, he was and is considered to be one of the greatest professional baseball players in the history of the sport; however, according to various media sources, that degree of fame took a toll on his marriage:

Prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce, allegations of extramarital affairs with partners ranging from cocktail waitresses to pop-superstar Madonna

The couple shares 2 children; yet, the youngest of the 2 children, Ella, was born only 3 months prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce – allegations and testimony suggest that Alex Rodriguez was participating in extramarital affairs for a large part of the marriage

The Terms and Conditions of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 2 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and Asset Division in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Cynthia Rodriguez petitioned for alimony payments from Alex Rodriguez upon the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested spousal support from Alex Rodriguez in order to ensure the lifestyle that both her the couple’s 2 children had become accustomed

Although the definitive terms of the Alex Rodriguez divorce settlement were not disclosed, Alex Rodriguez’s personal worth was considered to include a $175 million salary contract granted by the New York Yankees, as well as luxurious homes in New York and Florida

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce proceedings, the contents of a prenuptial agreement were not disclosed.

Petitions Expressed in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 2 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported as both petitioning for – and receiving – primary custody of the 2 children; in tandem with the custodial settlement within the Alex Rodriguez divorce, Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested payment furnished by Alex Rodriguez both for private school tuition and undisclosed gifts

Overview of the Avril Lavigne Divorce

The Avril Lavigne Divorce marked the ending of the marriage between musicians Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley; the Avril Lavigne Divorce was finalized on November 16th, 2010 – however, Avril Lavigne had filed for divorce from Deryck Whibley in October of 2009. The finalization of the Avril Lavigne divorce marked the end of the almost-4 year marriage, which took place in July of 2006. The Avril Lavigne divorce settlement and proceedings were reported as existing amicably; following the Avril Lavigne divorce, the couple continued to sing the other’s praises – within a year since the Avril Lavigne divorce, Lavigne and Deryck Whibley collaborated on several songs on Avril Lavigne’s newest album ‘Goodby Lullabye’:

The Parties Involved in the Avril Lavigne Divorce

Avril Lavigne is considered to be amongst the most recognized and beloved female musicians; blending a rock and roll attitude and melodic songwriting, she quickly amassed millions of fans on a worldwide level; she has achieved various accolades, including several platinum albums and a multitude of hit-singles – she has performed such hits as ‘Sk8ter Boi’, I’m With You, and ‘Complicated’. Deryck Whibley has achieved his own level of fame as a result of his status as the singer and songwriter of the band ‘Sum 41’; both Canadian in origin, Lavuigne and Whibley have enjoyed global fame and stardom.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Avril Lavigne Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Avril Lavigne Divorce, both Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Avril Lavigne Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Avril Lavigne Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Avril Lavigne Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, few details were released about the specifics of the divorce settlement, prenuptial agreements undertaken, and the division of assets:

Avril Lavigne was considered to be the more wealthy of the 2; reports maintain that she neither sought alimony nor spousal support; the couple shares no children – thus eliminating the need to undertake the  determination of child support

With regard to the alleged division of the couples assets, Avril Lavigne walked away from her divorce with the couple’s home in Bevereley Hills, her songwriting and publishing catalogue, her guitars, and all of the awards and accolades from her career – Deryck Whibley walked away from the Avril Lavigne divorce with a similar settlement outside of the former couple’s home

Matt Barnes Arrested

On September 9th, 2010, the newly-acquired basketball player by the Los Angeles Lakers – a franchise of the National Basketball Association (NBA) – Matt Barnes was arrested for what was described as a domestic incident. Acquired over the summer from the Orlando Magic – a Florida franchise of the NBA, the events that landed Matt Barnes Arrested have been considered to become increasingly confusing as they surface:

A call was placed from the household shared by Govan and Barnes reporting that there was a domestic incident taking place; during the phone call, the emergency operator had noticed that the call had been disconnected from the residence and opted to proceed with issuing law enforcement agents to the Barnes’ household

Upon the arrival of law enforcement agents – prior to Matt Barnes Arrested – Gloria Govan, her sister, and Matt Barnes all denied that any domestic violence had taken place; however, the law enforcement agents that had arrived to the home had noticed that both Govan and Barnes showed signs that a physical altercation had taken place

Prior to Matt Barnes Arrested, the police report set forth by the Los Angeles Police Department cited that both Govan and Barnes had cuts, scrapes, and bruises about their bodies; in the mug shot taken following Matt Barnes Arrested, the viewer will notice a scratch on the left-hand side of Barnes’ neck

Why Was Matt Barnes Arrested?

Matt Barnes was not only arrested with regard to the alleged suspicion of committing domestic violence, but the arresting officers set forth additional charges citing him with the unlawful obstruction of a telephone connection with emergency law enforcement services; once arrested, Barnes furnished a $50k bond for conditional release.

Why Did Gloria Govan Have Matt Barnes Arrested?

Gloria Govan, who is featured on the VH-1 television reality-based show ‘Basketball Wives’, was responsible for placing the emergency telephone call to law enforcement, which resulted in Matt Barnes Arrested; Barnes and Govan are reported as engaged, and due to her husband’s employ as a professional basketball player, Govan was invited to become a cast member of the television show on which she is featured – the couple have twin sons together:

Upon police questioning, Gloria Govan and her sister who was present at the time – as well as Matt Barnes – were adamant that no abuse had taken place

Reports citing a statement made by Govan upon Matt Barnes Arrested allegedly portrayed Govan’s expression as playful and joking in nature, addressing the entirety of the events resulting in Matt Barnes Arrested as a misunderstanding

During the 2010 – 2011 season of ‘Basketball Wives’, the altercation that took place between Govan and Barnes is expected to be featured

The Results of Matt Barnes Arrested

Subsequent to Matt Barnes Arrested, Govan and her sister – as well as Barnes – refused to press charges are set forth testimony suggesting that any nature of domestic violence had taken place.

Overview of the Brad Pitt Divorce

The Brad Pitt Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between ^; the Brad Pitt Divorce was finalized in October 2nd, 2005, which ended the 5-year marriage – Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were married on July 29th, 2000. Despite the celebrity status undertaken by both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, the details of both the couple’s marriage – as well as the subsequent Brad Pitt divorce – managed to find their way to public media:

The Parties Involved in the Brad Pitt Divorce

Brad Pitt, both currently, as well as at the time of his divorce from former wife Jennifer Aniston, was amongst the most widely-recognized American actors in the world; Brad Pitt has starred in such blockbuster hits as Fight Club, Se7en, Burn After Reading, and The Oceans’ Eleven Series – Pitt is amongst the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Jennifer Aniston received her celebrity notoriety as a result of starring in the sitcom Friends, which is touted as amongst the most successful sitcoms in television history. The couple met in 1998 and did not have any children prior to the Brad Pitt Divorce.

Legal Venue of the Brad Pitt Divorce Hearing

The Brad Pitt Divorce was heard before a judge in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Brad Pitt Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Brad Pitt Divorce, both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Brad Pitt Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Brad Pitt Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce settlement:

The Brad Pitt Divorce was filed under a claim of ‘irreconcilable differences’ set forth by Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston; Jennifer Aniston’s maiden name was reinstated in August of 2005

Although there has never been any substantiation of infidelity on the part of Brad Pitt, rumors of extramarital affairs with fellow actor Angelina Jolie surfaced; Jennifer Aniston was reported as claiming that her own parent’s divorce had set the precedent for a heightened sense of fear and mistrust within her own marriage

The couple engaged in months of marriage counseling in order to avoid an impending Brad Pitt Divorce; however, the marriage was not salvaged, and the couple’s assets – including a $28 million home – was divided as per the statutes within the prenuptial agreement