Overview of the Bruce Willis Divorce

The finalization of the Bruce Willis Divorce, which occurred on October 18th, 2000, marked the dissolution of the 13-year marriage between actors Bruce and Demi Moore; the couple was married on November 21st, 1987. The Bruce Willis Divorce was amongst one of the most talked-about in Hollywood, due to the degree of celebrity shared by both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore. Although the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement, the Bruce Willis Divorce proved to be the pinnacle of amicable and friendly; Bruce Willis stated that the wellbeing of his children – as well as Demi Moore – was of the utmost importance to him:

Shortly after the Bruce Willis Divorce, Demi Moore – then 38 – had begun a romantic relationship with fellow actor Ashton Kutcher, who was 15 years her junior; Kutcher was 23 years old at the beginning of the relationship

While Bruce Willis dated other individuals, he has not since been married; Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore wed in 2005 – reports show Bruce Willis, Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher, and the couple’s 3 children to spend holidays together

The Parties Involved in the Bruce Willis Divorce

Both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore are considered to be 2 of the most recognized and iconic actors in the world; Bruce Willis has starred in films such as The Die Hard Series, Moonlighting, 12 Monkeys, the Fifth Element, and The Get Shorty Series – Demi Moore has starred in blockbuster hits including G.I. Jane, Ghost, and Charlie’s Angels. Prior to the Bruce Willis Divorce, the union between Moore and Willis was considered to be the embodiment of a ‘power couple’:

The couple share 3 daughters; Rumer, Scout, and Tallulah

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Bruce Willis Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Bruce Willis Divorce, both Bruce Willis and Demi Moore opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Bruce Willis Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The terms of the Bruce Willis Divorce were kept private from the media; however, Demi Moore was estimated to have walked away from the Bruce Willis Divorce with upwards of $90 million in spousal support – Bruce Willis and Demi Moore share custody of their children.

Why was Bruno Mars Arrested?

On September 20th, 2010, 23-year old singer and songwriter Bruno Mars – whose real name is Gene Hernandez – was arrested for possession of 2.6 grams of cocaine in Las Vegas, Nevada, which resulted in Bruno Mars arrested at 2:40 am while in the bathroom of the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino – his arrest came only a month prior to the planned release of his full-length album ‘Doowops and Hooligans’:

What is Cocaine?

Cocaine is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of millions of deaths since its introduction to modern society. Cocaine can impair individuals on a multitude of level, resulting in addiction, illness, and death

The possession of Cocaine is considered to be a criminal felony; depending upon the amount discovered on an individual’s person, punitive recourse can range in severity – typically, the sentencing of cocaine possession will be contingent upon the amount in possession in conjunction with past criminal records

Although the possession of cocaine resulted in Bruno Mars arrested, the analysis of the case details – including the absence of a criminal record – allowed him to avoid incarceration

Bruno Mars Arrested: Did the Punishment Fit the Crime?

Upon the review of Bruno Mars arrested, the Clark County Judge Jesse Walsh explained that due to the fact that the events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested were without prior incident, the following punishments would be applicable to Bruno Mars’ sentencing – Bruno Mars was placed on probation, which involves the required adherence to any and all legal statutes:

The events resulting in Bruno Mars arrested will require him to meet with a probation officer and participate in random drug screenings

Bruno Mars arrested for cocaine possession will require him to pay a fine calculated at $2,000 in addition to the participation in 200 hours of court-mandated community service facilitated by a non-profit organization chosen by the court

Finally, the circumstances resulting in Bruno Mars arrested for the possession of cocaine will require him to undergo 8-hours of intensive drug counseling

Bruno Mars Arrested: Conditions and Terms

Bruno Mars’ sentencing allowed him to avoid a felony charge, which typically results in mandatory incarceration; however, in that events take place resulting in Bruno Mars arrested again, the Judge expressed that the leniency that he showed Mars will not be repeated.

The Background of the Cheryl Hines Divorce

On July 20th, 2010, actor Cheryl Hines filed for divorce from her husband of 8 years, Paul Young; the couple married on December 30th, 2002 – they currently share a 6 year old daughter. The divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Cheryl Hines Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has not yet been finalized, the supplemental details – including possible prenuptial agreements, custody settlements, or spousal challenges. However, the details that have been released state that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young have split amicably.

Who Was Involved in the Cheryl Hines Divorce Filing?

Cheryl Hines is an American actor who is most commonly recognized from her role in the hit television program ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’; Cheryl Hines has also starred in various supporting roles in major motion pictures. Paul Young is not actor, but is one of the founders of the ‘Principato-Young entertainment Management Group’, which specializes in artist management.

Legal Venue of the Cheryl Hines Divorce Hearing

The Cheryl Hines Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Cheryl Hines Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Cheryl Hines divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Cheryl Hines divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Cheryl Hines Divorce, if both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Cheryl Hines Divorce

Although the prospect of a contested please being set forth within the Cheryl Hines divorce seems unlikely, an uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Cheryl Hines and Paul Young seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Christina Milian Divorce

The Christina Milian Divorce settlement ended the year-and-a-half-long marriage between songwriter Terius Nash – who goes by his stage name ‘The Dream’ – and singer Christina Milian – who was born as Christine Marie Flores. The couple met in 2009 and quickly became romantically involved – shortly after the inception of the relationship, Christina Milian became pregnant with a daughter, who was born on February 26th, 2010. However, the couple was married in September of 2009 in the state of Nevada prior to the birth of their daughter. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Christina Milian Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

In 2010, photographs had surfaced portraying The Dream in what appeared to be engaging in an extramarital affair while on vacation; the female in the photograph was identified as his assistant – shortly after the release of these photographs, Christina Milian had filed for divorce

The Parties Involved in the Christina Milian Divorce

Christina Milian is an American singer, actor, and model that has enjoyed success in her singing career resulting from the various songs that she has recorded, including ‘A.M. to P.M.’, ‘Say I’, and ‘Us Against the World’; in addition, she has starred in various motion pictures and international modeling campaigns. The Dream is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful songwriters of the decade; he has been responsible for the writing or production of countless hits, including ‘Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)’, ‘Umbrella’, and Justin Bieber’s smash-hit ‘Baby’.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Christina Milian Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the determination of the reasons behind the filing for divorce; in addition, an uncontested divorce serves to classify the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Christina Milian Divorce, both Christina Milian and The Dream opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, providing them with the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Christina Milian Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Christina Milian Divorce settlement:

Christina Milian walked away from the Christina Milian divorce with what was reported as lump cash payment furnished by The Dream amounting to $4 million; in addition, she will be entitled to the receipt of a monthly child support payment of $5,000 furnished by the dream with regard to the couple’s daughter, Violet

The Background of the Fergie Scandal

Overview of the Craig McCaw Divorce

The Craig McCaw Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Criag McCae and Wendy McCaw; the Craig McCaw Divorce was finalized in 1997, which ended the 22-yearlong marriage – the couple met in the early 1970s during which time they were both undertaking study at Stanford University. Although the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Craig McCaw Divorce

Craig McCaw is considered to be one of the pioneers of the cellular telecommunications industry, forging the Seattle-based telecommunication company ‘McCaw Cellular’; the ingenuity and inventiveness of Craig McCaw thrust him into wealth upon the 1994 sale of the McCaw Cellular Company to the AT&T Company for what was reported as $11.5 billion. Wendy McCaw, who worked in publishing at the time of the couple’s marriage, remained married to Craig McCaw during his rise to fortune:

The Craig McCaw Divorce was heard before a judge in the King County Court, which is located in the City of Seattle in the State of Washington

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Craig McCaw Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Craig McCaw Divorce, both Craig McCaw and Wendy McCaw opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Craig McCaw Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of Washington, the terms of a dissolved marriage will typically result in the division of assets accrued during the time of the marriage; due to the fact that Wendy McCaw was married to Craig McCaw during the time of both the development and sale of the McCaw Cellular Company, she petitioned for half of the assets in possession of the couple. Subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Craig McCaw Divorce settlement:

Wendy McCaw walked away from the Craig McCaw divorce settlement with $460 million, which is considered to be amongst the top 5 largest divorce settlements in history

The settlement payment granted to Wendy McCaw from her former husband – Craig McCaw – placed her in the top 400 list citing the most wealthy people in the United States at the time

Overview of the Chris Pontius Divorce

The Chris Pontius Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Chris Pontius and his wife of almost 7 years, Claire Nolan; the Chris Pontius Divorce was filed in March of 2011 – Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan were married on October 29th, 2004. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details are known about the impending Chris Pontius divorce settlement, the filing set forth has cited the dissolution of the marriage to result from irreconcilable differences

The Parties Involved in the Chris Pontius Divorce

Chris Pontius is perhaps most widely-known for his role in the Jackass movies, where he and his fellow cast mates engage in wild stunts that are both filmed and orchestrated by the cast members; his wife, Claire Nolan, is not reported as being employed within show business – the couple currently shares no children.

Legal Venue of the Chris Pontius Divorce Hearing

The Chris Pontius Divorce was filed before in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California; Claire Nolan is reported as having filed for the divorce.

The Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Chris Pontius divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

An Uncontested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Chris Pontius Divorce, if both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

A Contested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

In November of 2010, director Darren Aronofsky and actor Rachel Weisz announced that they would be filing for divorce after 6 years of marriage; the couple was married in 2005 – at the time of the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, the couple share one son. Within the reports of the Darren Aronofsky divorce, reports emerged that Rachel Weisz had engaged in a romantic relationship with fellow actor Daniel Craig in December of 2010; due to the fact that the couple had announced that they had been separated for a number of months prior to the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, allegations of infidelity followed. However – in accordance to statements furnished by both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz – the former couple undertook the dissolution of their marriage amicably and respectfully; reports claim that they are committed to each other as friends, as well as the wellbeing on their son.

The Parties Involved in the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

Darren Aronofsky is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful directors in Hollywood; he has been responsible for both the direction and writing of films including The Black Swan, The Wrestler, Requiem for a Dream, and the Fountain; Rachel Weisz is known for her work on blockbuster films, including The Fountain, The Lovely Bones, The Constant Gardener, and The Brothers Bloom:

In March of 2011, Rachel Weisz made her relationship with Daniel Craig official to the public media; reports of infidelity with regard to the Darren Aronofsky divorce have yet to be substantiated

The Plea within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Darren Aronofsky divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Darren Aronofsky divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce, if both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Background of the Roman Polanski Arrest

The following details took place during the issuance of criminal charges against Roman Polanski, as well as the identification and question of the Roman Polanski victim, Samantha Geimer:

Who is Roman Polanski?

Polish-born Roman Polanski is one of the world’s most acclaimed directors, responsible for the production of films classified as the height of influential within the motion picture industry; with films such as Rosemary’s Baby and Macbeth under his belt, at the time of his arrest, his celebrity had preceded him. However, Roman Polanski underwent a personal tragedy almost 10 years prior to his arrest as his pregnant wife – actress Sharon Tate – was brutally murdered by the Charles Manson Family.

Date of the Roman Polanski Arrest: The Roman Polanski arrest took place in March of 1977

Location of the Roman Polanski: The criminal activity undertaken by Roman Polanski took place in Los Angeles, California; allegedly, fellow actor Jack Nicholson had allowed for Roman Polanski the use of his home – charges were never filed against Nicholson

Criminal Charges Associated with the Roman Polanski Arrest

The French publication of the fashion magazine ‘Vogue’ had requested that Roman Polanski edit an upcoming issue; upon this request, allegations filed suggest that Roman Polanski photographed a 13-year old girl without clothing for the magazine – additional charges surfaced suggesting that the 13-year old Roman Polanski victim Samantha Geimer had been drugged and sexually-assaulted by the famed director. Subsequent to the police apprehension of Roman Polanski, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

The statutory rape within the Roman Polanski arrest involved a legally-defined minor – the Roman Polanski victim – 13 years of age. Regardless of any expressed consent or acknowledgement on the part of the 16-year old in question, the legal classification of the Roman Polanksi victim as a minor prevented her from engaging in any sexual activity

The Punitive Recourse of the Roman Polanski Arrest

Prior to his trial, claiming that the charges were false, Roman Polanski fled the United States in fear that we would not be granted a fair trial – rumors of the judge sentencing Polanski with 50 years’ time incarceration prompted this decision.

The Notion of Celebrity within the Roman Polanski Arrest

The prospective Roman Polanski trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – ran the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial – similar to the manner in which the public was during the Roman Polanski – the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion. However, Roman Polanski feared that the trial had become somewhat of a ‘witch hunt’, and fled to Switzerland.

Overview of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The Rupert Murdoch Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Rupert Murdoch and Anna Torv; the Rupert Murdoch Divorce was finalized in 1999, ending the 32-year long marriage. Although the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The consideration of Rupert Murdoch – both at the time of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, as well as currently – as one of the wealthiest individuals in the world paved the way for the dissolution of the Murdoch marriage to be thrust into the media spotlight; upon inheriting his father’s Australian newspaper company, Rupert Murdoch went on to found the international company ‘News Corporation’ – this venture earned Rupert Murdoch an estimated value of $6.3 billion according to Forbes Magazine. His former wife, Anna Torv, was a news-media journalist at the time of their marriage. The couple shares 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, both Rupert Murdoch and Anna Murdoch opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Rupert Murdoch Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that Anna Torv discovered her husband to have been engaging in extramarital affairs with a female executive employed by Star TV – a faction of News Corporation – in 1998, Anna Torv filed for divorce

The plea of an uncontested divorce within the parameters of the Rupert Murdoch divorce were presumed to be set forth in order to disallow for the disclosure of the affair from the public media

Rupert Murdoch married the woman with whom he was having an affair nearly 7 days following the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce

The Terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce settlement:

The Rupert Murdoch divorce settlement is considered to be the largest divorce settlement in world history; the reasoning behind this is consider to exist as a result of Rupert Murdoch’s vast fortunes in conjunction with the discovery of infidelity

Upon the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, Anna Torv reportedly walked away with almost $2 billion worth of the couple’s shared assets, as well as a lump cash payment furnished by Rupert Murdoch amounting to an estimated $110 million