Overview of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

In November of 2010, director Darren Aronofsky and actor Rachel Weisz announced that they would be filing for divorce after 6 years of marriage; the couple was married in 2005 – at the time of the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, the couple share one son. Within the reports of the Darren Aronofsky divorce, reports emerged that Rachel Weisz had engaged in a romantic relationship with fellow actor Daniel Craig in December of 2010; due to the fact that the couple had announced that they had been separated for a number of months prior to the Darren Aronofsky divorce filing, allegations of infidelity followed. However – in accordance to statements furnished by both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz – the former couple undertook the dissolution of their marriage amicably and respectfully; reports claim that they are committed to each other as friends, as well as the wellbeing on their son.

The Parties Involved in the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

Darren Aronofsky is considered to be amongst the most prolific and successful directors in Hollywood; he has been responsible for both the direction and writing of films including The Black Swan, The Wrestler, Requiem for a Dream, and the Fountain; Rachel Weisz is known for her work on blockbuster films, including The Fountain, The Lovely Bones, The Constant Gardener, and The Brothers Bloom:

In March of 2011, Rachel Weisz made her relationship with Daniel Craig official to the public media; reports of infidelity with regard to the Darren Aronofsky divorce have yet to be substantiated

The Plea within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Darren Aronofsky divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Darren Aronofsky divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Darren Aronofsky Divorce, if both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Darren Aronofsky Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

The Background of the Fergie Scandal

Overview of the Chris Pontius Divorce

The Chris Pontius Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Chris Pontius and his wife of almost 7 years, Claire Nolan; the Chris Pontius Divorce was filed in March of 2011 – Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan were married on October 29th, 2004. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details are known about the impending Chris Pontius divorce settlement, the filing set forth has cited the dissolution of the marriage to result from irreconcilable differences

The Parties Involved in the Chris Pontius Divorce

Chris Pontius is perhaps most widely-known for his role in the Jackass movies, where he and his fellow cast mates engage in wild stunts that are both filmed and orchestrated by the cast members; his wife, Claire Nolan, is not reported as being employed within show business – the couple currently shares no children.

Legal Venue of the Chris Pontius Divorce Hearing

The Chris Pontius Divorce was filed before in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California; Claire Nolan is reported as having filed for the divorce.

The Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Chris Pontius divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

An Uncontested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Chris Pontius Divorce, if both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

A Contested Plea within the Chris Pontius Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Chris Pontius and Claire Nolan seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi, which was finalized in 1980, which ended the 20-year long marriage. Upon their meeting, Soraya Khashoggi’s name was Sandra Daly; although she had relocated to Saudi Arabia and changed her name, she was a native of the United Kingdom; the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce is listed as being amongst the most expensive in world history. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

Adnan Khashoggi achieved his fame as a result of his various business ventures taking place within Saudi Arabia; a multitude of his dealings were in the weapon and arms industry. Adnan Khashoggi is most widely known for his role in the ‘Iran Contra Scandal’, which took place in 1986; during this scandal, members of the Ronald Reagan administration undertook secret weapons dealings with Adnan Khashoggi with the hopes of furthering negations with regard to the release of American hostages:

The couple shared 5 children together; however, in 1999 – subsequent to a paternity test – one the couple’s daughters was determined to be fathered by British politico Jonathan Aitkens in lieu of Adnan Khashoggi

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce, both Adnan Khashoggi and Soraya Khashoggi opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that couple was both wed and divorced outside of the United States of America, alternate legality is applicable with regard to the respective location; however, an uncontested divorce may also be a method in which one or both members of the couple separating cannot – or will not – divulge private affairs with regard to the dissolution of the marriage

The Terms of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The Adnan Khashoggi Divorce settlement included the following:

Listed as amongst the top 3 most expensive divorces in history, Soraya Khashoggi was given a lump sum of $874 million following the finalization of the Adnan Khashoggi Divorce; Adnan Khashoggi had been estimated to be valued at upwards of $4 billion

A Summary of the Chris Evert Divorce

The Chris Evert Divorce was finalized in 2006, which ended the 18-year marriage between Chris Evert and Andy Mill – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Chris Evert Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Chris Evert Divorce were reported as being irreconcilable differences; for those unfamiliar with the Chris Evert Divorce, the celebrity status of Chris Evert and Andy Mill thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Chris Evert Divorce had taken place. The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Chris Evert was regarded as amongst the most sought-after and recognized professional tennis players and female athletes; furthermore, the fact that Andy Mill is also considered to be equally revered as a professional skier made the Chris Evert Divorce ripe for public consumption.

The Terms and Conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Chris Evert and Andy Mill were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and the Division of Assets in the Chris Evert Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Andy Mill petitioned for alimony payments from Chris Evert upon the finalization of the Chris Evert Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Andy Mill was awarded upwards of $7 million in monies and assets, a home that the couple had shared in Colorado valued at $4 million; Evert retained ownership of the couple’s Florida home valued at nearly $3 million

Petitions Expressed in the Chris Evert Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 3 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Chris Evert and Andy Mill; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Chris Evert Divorce:

Within the Chris Evert Divorce, Evert was able to retain primary custody of the couple’s 3 children – Alexander, Nicholas, and Colton

The Determination of Contest within the Chris Evert Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Chris Evert and Andy Mill would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Chris Evert Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Chris Evert Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Chris Evert Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Chris Evert Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Chris Evert and Andy Mill determined that the Chris Evert Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The Alex Rodriguez Divorce was finalized in 2008, which ended the nearly 6-year marriage between Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez – the couple was wed in 2002. Speculation surrounding the Alex Rodriguez Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Alex Rodriguez Divorce included extramarital affairs and infidelity undertaken by Alex Rodriguez – for those unfamiliar with Alex Rodriguez, he was and is considered to be one of the greatest professional baseball players in the history of the sport; however, according to various media sources, that degree of fame took a toll on his marriage:

Prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce, allegations of extramarital affairs with partners ranging from cocktail waitresses to pop-superstar Madonna

The couple shares 2 children; yet, the youngest of the 2 children, Ella, was born only 3 months prior to the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez divorce – allegations and testimony suggest that Alex Rodriguez was participating in extramarital affairs for a large part of the marriage

The Terms and Conditions of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 2 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony and Asset Division in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Cynthia Rodriguez petitioned for alimony payments from Alex Rodriguez upon the finalization of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested spousal support from Alex Rodriguez in order to ensure the lifestyle that both her the couple’s 2 children had become accustomed

Although the definitive terms of the Alex Rodriguez divorce settlement were not disclosed, Alex Rodriguez’s personal worth was considered to include a $175 million salary contract granted by the New York Yankees, as well as luxurious homes in New York and Florida

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Alex Rodriguez Divorce proceedings, the contents of a prenuptial agreement were not disclosed.

Petitions Expressed in the Alex Rodriguez Divorce

Custody of the couple’s 2 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Alex Rodriguez and Cynthia Rodriguez; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Alex Rodriguez Divorce:

Cynthia Rodriguez was reported as both petitioning for – and receiving – primary custody of the 2 children; in tandem with the custodial settlement within the Alex Rodriguez divorce, Cynthia Rodriguez was reported to have requested payment furnished by Alex Rodriguez both for private school tuition and undisclosed gifts

Overview of the Avril Lavigne Divorce

The Avril Lavigne Divorce marked the ending of the marriage between musicians Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley; the Avril Lavigne Divorce was finalized on November 16th, 2010 – however, Avril Lavigne had filed for divorce from Deryck Whibley in October of 2009. The finalization of the Avril Lavigne divorce marked the end of the almost-4 year marriage, which took place in July of 2006. The Avril Lavigne divorce settlement and proceedings were reported as existing amicably; following the Avril Lavigne divorce, the couple continued to sing the other’s praises – within a year since the Avril Lavigne divorce, Lavigne and Deryck Whibley collaborated on several songs on Avril Lavigne’s newest album ‘Goodby Lullabye’:

The Parties Involved in the Avril Lavigne Divorce

Avril Lavigne is considered to be amongst the most recognized and beloved female musicians; blending a rock and roll attitude and melodic songwriting, she quickly amassed millions of fans on a worldwide level; she has achieved various accolades, including several platinum albums and a multitude of hit-singles – she has performed such hits as ‘Sk8ter Boi’, I’m With You, and ‘Complicated’. Deryck Whibley has achieved his own level of fame as a result of his status as the singer and songwriter of the band ‘Sum 41’; both Canadian in origin, Lavuigne and Whibley have enjoyed global fame and stardom.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Avril Lavigne Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Avril Lavigne Divorce, both Avril Lavigne and Deryck Whibley opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Avril Lavigne Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Avril Lavigne Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Avril Lavigne Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, few details were released about the specifics of the divorce settlement, prenuptial agreements undertaken, and the division of assets:

Avril Lavigne was considered to be the more wealthy of the 2; reports maintain that she neither sought alimony nor spousal support; the couple shares no children – thus eliminating the need to undertake the  determination of child support

With regard to the alleged division of the couples assets, Avril Lavigne walked away from her divorce with the couple’s home in Bevereley Hills, her songwriting and publishing catalogue, her guitars, and all of the awards and accolades from her career – Deryck Whibley walked away from the Avril Lavigne divorce with a similar settlement outside of the former couple’s home

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal Explained

The Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal is a series of events involving Bangladeshi Model and Actor Sadiya Jahan Prova, who has not only achieved national fame within her home country of Bangladesh, but also wide acclaim on an international level; while considered to be amongst the most recognized models, Prova is also an actor on a variety of Bangladeshi television shows. However, in August of 2010, a video of Prova engaging in sexual activity with her former boyfriend – Rajib Apurbo – was released over the Internet; although both the nature of the release, as well as the time during which the video was filmed have been subject to debate, the impact of the release gained an expanse of media coverage. The video is assumed to have been filmed in the year 2007

The Individuals Involved in the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

The following individuals have been identified as retaining primary involvement with the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal:

Prova, who is the female in the video, has gained notoriety and recognition for her acting and modeling endeavors; the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal surprised many people due the degree of Prova’s fame

Rajib Apurbo, who is named as the male in the video, was the former boyfriend of Prova; although he has never taken responsibility for the release of the video, which led to the development of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, sources claim that he undertook the release of the video as a means of revenge exacted on Prova upon the dissolution of their relationship in August of 2010

Ziaul Faruq Apurba married Prova on August 21st, 2010; this event is considered to be the catalyst for Rajib’s alleged undertaking of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal – Apurba is both an actor and a model in Bangladesh

The Conclusion of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal

While Prova has not formally released any comments with regard to the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the rate of Internet users accessing the video of Prova and Rajib has been staggering; upwards of 6 months since the release of the Bangladeshi Model Prova Scandal, the video is amongst the most watched and advertised within Asia

Overview of the Roman Abramovich Divorce

The Roman Abramovich Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich and his wife Irina Abramovich; the Roman Abramovich Divorce was finalized in 2007 which ended the 17-yearlong marriage – Roman Abramovich and Irina Abramovich wed in 1990. The Roman Abramovich divorce settlement was in contention to become the most expensive settlement within the world’s history; at the time of the Abramovich divorce, the Rupert Murdoch divorce – estimated to exceed $1 billion in value furnished to his wife, Anna Murdoch.

The Details of the Roman Abramovich Divorce as they were Reported

The events taking place during the Roman Abramovich divorce with regard to suspected infidelity only heightened the degree of media coverage placed onto the proceedings:

In 2006 – only a year prior to the Roman Abramovich Divorce – Irina suspected that Roman Abramovich was engaging in an extramarital affair; as a result, she hired a private investigation team located within the United Kingdom in order to validate her suspicions

The findings rendered from the investigation of Roman Abramovich cited that he had indeed been involved with a 20-year old debutante named Daria Zhukova; incidentally, Zhukova was the daughter of Russian business magnate Alexander Borisovich Radkin Zhukov

Upon these findings, Irina Abramovich filed for divorce, petitioning for a settlement estimated at $6 billion, which would have been the most expensive divorce settlement in history; however, she did not receive that amount

The Parties Involved in the Roman Abramovich Divorce

Roman Abramovich is considered to be amongst the wealthiest and private individuals in the world; employing an astounding 40-person security team to protect him at all times, the Russian businessman amassed a fortune as a result of his entrepreneurial endeavors within the industry of finance. He met his former wife Irina Abramovich in 1990, whom at the time, was employed as a flight attendant. The couple shares five children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Roman Abramovich Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Roman Abramovich Divorce, both Roman Abramovich and Irina Abramovich opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Roman Abramovich Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Roman Abramovich Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Roman Abramovich Divorce settlement:

In lieu of the requested $6 billion settlement, Irina Abramovich received $300 billion as a result of the Roman Abramovich divorce; although the details were kept highly under wraps, the breakdown of the division of assets was reported to be a lump sum of cash, a plane, a yacht, and several residences owned by the couple during their marriage

Background of the Roman Polanski Arrest

The following details took place during the issuance of criminal charges against Roman Polanski, as well as the identification and question of the Roman Polanski victim, Samantha Geimer:

Who is Roman Polanski?

Polish-born Roman Polanski is one of the world’s most acclaimed directors, responsible for the production of films classified as the height of influential within the motion picture industry; with films such as Rosemary’s Baby and Macbeth under his belt, at the time of his arrest, his celebrity had preceded him. However, Roman Polanski underwent a personal tragedy almost 10 years prior to his arrest as his pregnant wife – actress Sharon Tate – was brutally murdered by the Charles Manson Family.

Date of the Roman Polanski Arrest: The Roman Polanski arrest took place in March of 1977

Location of the Roman Polanski: The criminal activity undertaken by Roman Polanski took place in Los Angeles, California; allegedly, fellow actor Jack Nicholson had allowed for Roman Polanski the use of his home – charges were never filed against Nicholson

Criminal Charges Associated with the Roman Polanski Arrest

The French publication of the fashion magazine ‘Vogue’ had requested that Roman Polanski edit an upcoming issue; upon this request, allegations filed suggest that Roman Polanski photographed a 13-year old girl without clothing for the magazine – additional charges surfaced suggesting that the 13-year old Roman Polanski victim Samantha Geimer had been drugged and sexually-assaulted by the famed director. Subsequent to the police apprehension of Roman Polanski, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

The statutory rape within the Roman Polanski arrest involved a legally-defined minor – the Roman Polanski victim – 13 years of age. Regardless of any expressed consent or acknowledgement on the part of the 16-year old in question, the legal classification of the Roman Polanksi victim as a minor prevented her from engaging in any sexual activity

The Punitive Recourse of the Roman Polanski Arrest

Prior to his trial, claiming that the charges were false, Roman Polanski fled the United States in fear that we would not be granted a fair trial – rumors of the judge sentencing Polanski with 50 years’ time incarceration prompted this decision.

The Notion of Celebrity within the Roman Polanski Arrest

The prospective Roman Polanski trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – ran the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial – similar to the manner in which the public was during the Roman Polanski – the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion. However, Roman Polanski feared that the trial had become somewhat of a ‘witch hunt’, and fled to Switzerland.