Can You Summarize the Reggie Bush Scandal?

The Reggie Bush Scandal can be summarized as a violation of the terms, conditions, and legality instilled within the National College Athletic Association (NCAA) by athlete Reggie Bush, who currently fills the position of running back on the New Orleans’ Saints – a franchise team within the National Football League (NFL). The allegations within the Reggie Bush Scandal state that while a student and football player at the University of Southern California (USC), Reggie Bush violated the strict rules upheld by the NCAA mandating that college athletes refrain from both offers and acceptance of preferential treatment from any entity existing both internally or externally with regard to that individual academic institution.

What Rules Were Broken in the Reggie Bush Scandal?

Due to the fact that the athletics programs existing within academic institutions are considered to be secondary to the academic and pedagogical integrity of that facility, any student of an academic institution is considered to be just that – a student first and foremost. However, due to a variety of factors existing within collegiate sports – including, competition, revenue, popularity, future enrollment, scholarships, and notoriety – a multitude of circumstances have existed in which student athletes were given preferential treatment with regard to their statuses as athletes; such was the case within the Reggie Bush Scandal:

Reggie Bush was reported to have accepted gifts, perks, and benefits valued upwards of thousands of dollars; these gifts were issued both to Reggie Bush, as well as to the family of Reggie Bush; in addition, these gifts – which are in strict violation of NCAA regulations – ranged from cash to limousine rides furnished by the University

What is the Heisman Trophy?

The Heisman Trophy is amongst the most prestigious accolades granted to one college athlete participating in the football program, which takes place on an annual basis; the trophy signifies excellence in the sport of college football – in 2005, Reggie Bush was the recipient of the Heisman Trophy, which contributed to the developments within the Reggie Bush Scandal investigation:

Reports have been released stating that the University furnished a limousine to transport Reggie Bush to the ceremony in which he received the Heisman Trophy; outside of a limited expense stipend allowed to athletes, the provision for extraneous – and frivolous – payments or gifts is strictly prohibited, which includes limousine rides

What Happened After the Discovery of the Reggie Bush Scandal?

The development and subsequent release of the Reggie Bush Scandal resulted in massive media scrutiny; debates surfaces questioning whether Reggie Bush should have his Heisman Trophy stripped from him as result of his violation of the very regulations set forth by the organization responsible for the awarding of the trophy itself – the NCAA. However, the punitive recourse to which Bush was subjected as a result of the Reggie Bush Scandal was the removal of his Football jersey and number from the entrance to the Football Stadium at the University of Southern California

Overview of the Richie Sambora Divorce

The Richie Sambora Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between musician Richie Sambora and actor Heather Locklear. The petition for the Richie Sambora divorce was filed by Heather Locklear in February of 2006 citing irreconcilable difference as the catalyst for the dissolution of the marriage; the Richie Sambora divorce was finalized on April 11th, 2007 – the couple shares one daughter, who was born in October of 1997. Although the details of the Richie Sambora divorce were kept reasonably private, rumors swirled following the release of allegations that Richie Sambora was due to enter an alcohol rehabilitation facility in June of 2007 – 3 months following Heather Locklear’s filing.

The Parties Involved in the Richie Sambora Divorce

Richie Sambora is amongst the most widely-lauded and recognized guitarist and rock and roll musicians in the world; in 1982 – alongside band mate Jon Bon Jovi – Richie Sambora was an instrumental factor in the creation – and subsequent international success – of the musical group Bon Jovi. Heather Locklear enjoyed years of television success resulting from her roles on such hit television programs, including ‘Spin City’, ‘T.J. Hooker’, ‘Dynasty’, and ‘Melrose Place’.

Legal Venue of the Richie Sambora Divorce Hearing

The Richie Sambora Divorce was heard before a judge within the Los Angeles County branch of the Superior Court of California Court.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Richie Sambora Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Richie Sambora Divorce, both Richie Sambora and Heather Locklear opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Richie Sambora Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Richie Sambora Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Reports surfacing speculating the division of assets following the finalization of the Richie Sambora divorce substantiated a prenuptial agreement enacted by the couple; however the details of the prenuptial agreement were kept from the media. Within the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Richie Sambora Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms o
f the Richie Sambora Divorce settlement:

The only details revealed with regard to the Richie Sambora divorce settlement were the determination of joint custody with regard to the couple’s daughter

In addition, both Richie Sambora and Heather Locklear were reported to have mutually agreed to comply with the terms expressed with regard to the prenuptial agreement

Overview of the Roman Abramovich Divorce

The Roman Abramovich Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich and his wife Irina Abramovich; the Roman Abramovich Divorce was finalized in 2007 which ended the 17-yearlong marriage – Roman Abramovich and Irina Abramovich wed in 1990. The Roman Abramovich divorce settlement was in contention to become the most expensive settlement within the world’s history; at the time of the Abramovich divorce, the Rupert Murdoch divorce – estimated to exceed $1 billion in value furnished to his wife, Anna Murdoch.

The Details of the Roman Abramovich Divorce as they were Reported

The events taking place during the Roman Abramovich divorce with regard to suspected infidelity only heightened the degree of media coverage placed onto the proceedings:

In 2006 – only a year prior to the Roman Abramovich Divorce – Irina suspected that Roman Abramovich was engaging in an extramarital affair; as a result, she hired a private investigation team located within the United Kingdom in order to validate her suspicions

The findings rendered from the investigation of Roman Abramovich cited that he had indeed been involved with a 20-year old debutante named Daria Zhukova; incidentally, Zhukova was the daughter of Russian business magnate Alexander Borisovich Radkin Zhukov

Upon these findings, Irina Abramovich filed for divorce, petitioning for a settlement estimated at $6 billion, which would have been the most expensive divorce settlement in history; however, she did not receive that amount

The Parties Involved in the Roman Abramovich Divorce

Roman Abramovich is considered to be amongst the wealthiest and private individuals in the world; employing an astounding 40-person security team to protect him at all times, the Russian businessman amassed a fortune as a result of his entrepreneurial endeavors within the industry of finance. He met his former wife Irina Abramovich in 1990, whom at the time, was employed as a flight attendant. The couple shares five children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Roman Abramovich Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Roman Abramovich Divorce, both Roman Abramovich and Irina Abramovich opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Roman Abramovich Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Roman Abramovich Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Roman Abramovich Divorce settlement:

In lieu of the requested $6 billion settlement, Irina Abramovich received $300 billion as a result of the Roman Abramovich divorce; although the details were kept highly under wraps, the breakdown of the division of assets was reported to be a lump sum of cash, a plane, a yacht, and several residences owned by the couple during their marriage

A Summary of the Tonya Harding Divorce

The Tonya Harding Divorce was finalized in 1993, a near 3-year marriage between Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly – the couple was wed in 1990; at the time of the marriage, Tanya Harding was a mere 19 years of age. Speculation surrounding the Tonya Harding Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Tonya Harding Divorce included allegations of an erratic and tumultuous marriage:

For those unfamiliar with the Tonya Harding Divorce, at the time of her divorce, Tonya Harding remained in the news for both her undertaking as a professional ice skater, as well as a variety of allegations by the media of erratic behavior and unsportsmanlike conduct within competitions

Perhaps the most common incident involving Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly was their planned attack on fellow figure skater Nancy Kerrigan in 1994; despite the Tonya Harding Divorce, the couple still maintained a shared residence. However, Tonya Harding expressed through a variety of interviews that Jeff Gillooly was an abusive partner, oftentimes threatening her with physical violence, as well as aggravated assault with a deadly weapon

Although the terms of the Tonya Harding Divorce were not released, Jeff Gillooly was sentenced to a 6-month prison sentence subsequent to the Tonya Harding Divorce as a result of his role in the assault on Nancy Kerrigan

The Determination of Contest within the Tonya Harding Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Tonya Harding Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Tonya Harding Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Tonya Harding Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Tonya Harding Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly determined that the Tonya Harding Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Tonya Harding Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly – within the Tonya Harding Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly to be released into public record. Yet, the terms of the Tonya Harding Divorce were not released:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review.

Background of the Roman Polanski Arrest

The following details took place during the issuance of criminal charges against Roman Polanski, as well as the identification and question of the Roman Polanski victim, Samantha Geimer:

Who is Roman Polanski?

Polish-born Roman Polanski is one of the world’s most acclaimed directors, responsible for the production of films classified as the height of influential within the motion picture industry; with films such as Rosemary’s Baby and Macbeth under his belt, at the time of his arrest, his celebrity had preceded him. However, Roman Polanski underwent a personal tragedy almost 10 years prior to his arrest as his pregnant wife – actress Sharon Tate – was brutally murdered by the Charles Manson Family.

Date of the Roman Polanski Arrest: The Roman Polanski arrest took place in March of 1977

Location of the Roman Polanski: The criminal activity undertaken by Roman Polanski took place in Los Angeles, California; allegedly, fellow actor Jack Nicholson had allowed for Roman Polanski the use of his home – charges were never filed against Nicholson

Criminal Charges Associated with the Roman Polanski Arrest

The French publication of the fashion magazine ‘Vogue’ had requested that Roman Polanski edit an upcoming issue; upon this request, allegations filed suggest that Roman Polanski photographed a 13-year old girl without clothing for the magazine – additional charges surfaced suggesting that the 13-year old Roman Polanski victim Samantha Geimer had been drugged and sexually-assaulted by the famed director. Subsequent to the police apprehension of Roman Polanski, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

The statutory rape within the Roman Polanski arrest involved a legally-defined minor – the Roman Polanski victim – 13 years of age. Regardless of any expressed consent or acknowledgement on the part of the 16-year old in question, the legal classification of the Roman Polanksi victim as a minor prevented her from engaging in any sexual activity

The Punitive Recourse of the Roman Polanski Arrest

Prior to his trial, claiming that the charges were false, Roman Polanski fled the United States in fear that we would not be granted a fair trial – rumors of the judge sentencing Polanski with 50 years’ time incarceration prompted this decision.

The Notion of Celebrity within the Roman Polanski Arrest

The prospective Roman Polanski trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – ran the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial – similar to the manner in which the public was during the Roman Polanski – the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion. However, Roman Polanski feared that the trial had become somewhat of a ‘witch hunt’, and fled to Switzerland.

Overview of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The Rupert Murdoch Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Rupert Murdoch and Anna Torv; the Rupert Murdoch Divorce was finalized in 1999, ending the 32-year long marriage. Although the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The consideration of Rupert Murdoch – both at the time of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, as well as currently – as one of the wealthiest individuals in the world paved the way for the dissolution of the Murdoch marriage to be thrust into the media spotlight; upon inheriting his father’s Australian newspaper company, Rupert Murdoch went on to found the international company ‘News Corporation’ – this venture earned Rupert Murdoch an estimated value of $6.3 billion according to Forbes Magazine. His former wife, Anna Torv, was a news-media journalist at the time of their marriage. The couple shares 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, both Rupert Murdoch and Anna Murdoch opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Rupert Murdoch Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that Anna Torv discovered her husband to have been engaging in extramarital affairs with a female executive employed by Star TV – a faction of News Corporation – in 1998, Anna Torv filed for divorce

The plea of an uncontested divorce within the parameters of the Rupert Murdoch divorce were presumed to be set forth in order to disallow for the disclosure of the affair from the public media

Rupert Murdoch married the woman with whom he was having an affair nearly 7 days following the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce

The Terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce settlement:

The Rupert Murdoch divorce settlement is considered to be the largest divorce settlement in world history; the reasoning behind this is consider to exist as a result of Rupert Murdoch’s vast fortunes in conjunction with the discovery of infidelity

Upon the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, Anna Torv reportedly walked away with almost $2 billion worth of the couple’s shared assets, as well as a lump cash payment furnished by Rupert Murdoch amounting to an estimated $110 million

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce

In 2010, Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds had made the determination that that their respective marriage was no longer viable; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources have reported irreconcilable differences as being amongst the primary reasons for the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce. The couple is reported to remain within good standing with each other:

Who are Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds?

The parties involved within the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce are both considered to be A-list celebrity actors who are amongst the most-paid, as well as the most sought-after.

The couple was wed in 2008

The couple currently shares no children

The Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement is quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports have shown the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce to have taken place in an amicable fashion.

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

Reports show that the bulk of the assets earned by both Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds took place subsequent to their marriage; as a result, the bulk of the couple’s assets are legally-considered to be community property – the couple has agreed to split the community property in half

Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce Waiting Period

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation. Reports released from various media sources expressed that the couple were alternating with regard to their respective residence in the couple’s shared home. Only until the divorce is finalized within the State of California will either Scarlett Johansson or Ryan Reynolds be permitted to remarry:

Subsequent to the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, Scarlett Johansson has been linked romantically with actor Sean Penn, while Ryan Reynolds has been alleged to be romantically-involved with actor Sandra Bullock

A Summary of the Sarkozy Divorce

The Sarkozy Divorce was finalized in October of 2007, which ended the 11 year marriage between Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Sarkozy Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Sarkozy Divorce included alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by Sarkozy; for those unfamiliar with the Sarkozy Divorce, the celebrity status of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Sarkozy Divorce had taken place:

The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy has garnered international status as a result of serving as France’s current – and 23rd President; if Sarkozy’s position was not enough to thrust the Sarkozy divorce into the limelight, Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz notoriety as a fashion model did not help to quell public curiosity with regard to the couple’s divorce

The couple shares 1 son named Louis, who was born in 1997

The Terms and Conditions of the Sarkozy Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s son, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Sarkozy Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Nicolas Sarkozy petitioned for alimony payments from Cécilia upon the finalization of the Sarkozy Divorce.

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Sarkozy Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Sarkozy Divorce proceedings, the details of a prenuptial agreement were not released.

Petitions Expressed in the Sarkozy Divorce

Custody of the couple’s son Louis would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. The award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments; no such details with regard to the custody settlement with regard to Louis were released.

The Division of Assets in the Sarkozy Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies.

The Aftereffects of the Sarkozy Divorce

Since the divorce, Sarkozy has since been remarried to Italian songstress Carla Bruni; the marriage took place in 2008, although the couple is said to have begun a relationship only a month following the Sarkozy divorce.

The Background of the Sebastian Bach Divorce

Singer Sebastian Bach and his wife of almost 20 years, Maria Beirk filed for divorce at the close of the year 2011; the finalization of a Sebastian Bach divorce stands to end the couple’s marriage, which was enacted in 1992. Currently, the couple maintains that after a variety of measures undertaken in order to reconcile the marriage, the event referred to as the Sebastian Bach is the recourse determined to be best for Sebastian Bach, Maria Bierk, and their respective family. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Sebastian Bach Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Who Was Involved in the Sebastian Bach Divorce Filing?

Sebastian Bach was one of the most famous rock and roll singers in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a result of the success of Skid Row, which was the musical group that he fronted; after almost a decade-long hiatus, the band has only recently begun to perform together again.

Legal Venue of the Sebastian Bach Divorce Hearing

The Sebastian Bach Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Sebastian Bach Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Sebastian Bach divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Sebastian Bach divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Sebastian Bach Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Sebastian Bach Divorce, if both Sebastian Bach and Maria Bierk opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Sebastian Bach Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Sebastian Bach and Maria Bierk seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Shania Twain Divorce

The Shania Twain Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between famed country singer Shania Twain and English music producer Robert John Lange, who is most commonly referred to in accordance to his nickname ‘Mutt’. After a separation undertaken by the couple, a petition for the Shania Twain divorce was filed May 15th, 2008; the finalization of the Shania Twain divorce took place on June 9th, 2010, which ended the 15 year marriage – the couple was wed on December 28th, 1993. However, the Shania Twain divorce was not without its share of scandals; in a bizarre turn of events, Mutt Lange was reported to have undertaken an extramarital affair with one of Shania Twain’s best friends, Marie-Anne Thiebaud. Yet, just in case this was not sufficient for a celebrity divorce scandal, following the Shania Twain divorce, Shania Twain was reported as undertaking a romantic relationship with the former husband of Marie-Anne Thiebaud – the woman with whom Mutt Lange had undertaken an extramarital affair:

Shania Twain married her best friend’s the former husband, Frederic Thiebaud on January 1st, 2011; however, reports surfacing with regard to the Shania Twain divorce settlement expressed a vast amount of confusion with actions of both Shania Twain and Mutt Lange – this confusion was in conjunction to the behavior of both Frederic and Marie-Anne Thiebaud

The Parties Involved in the Shania Twain Divorce

Shania Twain is considered to be one of country music’s most prolific and iconic artists; since 1993, the Canadian songstress has been responsible for international acclaim with regard to her vast song catalog, including ‘Whose Bed Have Your Boots Been Under?’, ‘That Don’t Impress Me Much’, ‘Man! I Feel Like a Woman!’, and ‘I’m Gonna Getcha Good!’ However was not the only musical success story within the former couple; famed producer Mutt Lange has been responsible for his collaboration with famed artists including Britney Spears, Lady Gaga, The Backstreet Boys, Bryan Adams, and Def Leppard:

At the time of the Shania Twain divorce, the couple shared one son, Eja D’Angelo – born on August 21st, 2001; subsequent to the finalization of the Shania Twain  divorce, there was no mention regarding either the respective requesting or awarding of custody to Shania Twain or Mutt Lange

The Terms of the Shania Twain Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The heightened level of privacy within the Shania Twain divorce settlement ensured that the bulk of the proceedings and details were kept from the public; supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private – furthermore, the details of a prenuptial agreement was also kept hidden from the media.