Overview of the Brad Pitt Divorce

The Brad Pitt Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between ^; the Brad Pitt Divorce was finalized in October 2nd, 2005, which ended the 5-year marriage – Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were married on July 29th, 2000. Despite the celebrity status undertaken by both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, the details of both the couple’s marriage – as well as the subsequent Brad Pitt divorce – managed to find their way to public media:

The Parties Involved in the Brad Pitt Divorce

Brad Pitt, both currently, as well as at the time of his divorce from former wife Jennifer Aniston, was amongst the most widely-recognized American actors in the world; Brad Pitt has starred in such blockbuster hits as Fight Club, Se7en, Burn After Reading, and The Oceans’ Eleven Series – Pitt is amongst the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Jennifer Aniston received her celebrity notoriety as a result of starring in the sitcom Friends, which is touted as amongst the most successful sitcoms in television history. The couple met in 1998 and did not have any children prior to the Brad Pitt Divorce.

Legal Venue of the Brad Pitt Divorce Hearing

The Brad Pitt Divorce was heard before a judge in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Brad Pitt Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Brad Pitt Divorce, both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Brad Pitt Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Brad Pitt Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce settlement:

The Brad Pitt Divorce was filed under a claim of ‘irreconcilable differences’ set forth by Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston; Jennifer Aniston’s maiden name was reinstated in August of 2005

Although there has never been any substantiation of infidelity on the part of Brad Pitt, rumors of extramarital affairs with fellow actor Angelina Jolie surfaced; Jennifer Aniston was reported as claiming that her own parent’s divorce had set the precedent for a heightened sense of fear and mistrust within her own marriage

The couple engaged in months of marriage counseling in order to avoid an impending Brad Pitt Divorce; however, the marriage was not salvaged, and the couple’s assets – including a $28 million home – was divided as per the statutes within the prenuptial agreement

What is the Background of the Brittany Murphy Death?

On December 20th, 2009 in her Los Angeles home, an emergency call was placed in the evening requesting immediate medical assistance with regard to actress Brittany Murphy, who had collapsed in her bathroom; at the time, Brittany Murphy was living with husband Simon Monjack. Upon the arrival of emergency crews, which included emergency medical technicians and firefighters, the actor was unable to be revived after a multitude of attempts conducted by firefighters; prior to Brittany Murphy death, she was transported to the hospital in Los Angeles and declared to have died upon arrival on hospital grounds.

What Was Brittany Murphy Cause of Death?

The devastation on the part of both her fans and her family upon the release of the news of Brittany Murphy death was due in part to her esteemed acting career, in addition to various reports and testimonies of her wonderful character; her celebrity status made the need for answers furnished to friends, family, and fans that much more urgent:

Upon the release of her autopsy report, the chief coroner at Cedar-Sinai hospital in Los Angeles, California recorded that she had died from pneumonia; however, the release of the autopsy of Brittany Murphy death was primarily classified as ‘differed’ – this may have resulted in a wide range of factors contributing to Brittany Murphy cause of death

What Were the Factors of Brittany Murphy Death?

The primary ruling by the coroner with regard to Brittany Murphy death was pneumonia, however, supplanted factors were reported as a fatal iron deficiency that may have been heightened through the usage of both over-the-counter, as well as prescription medication; the medication listed in her system at the time of Brittany Murphy death included a variety of cold medicine, as well as painkillers – yet, the Brittany Murphy cause of death was confirmed to be accidental in nature.

Why Was There Cold Medicine in Her System at the Time of Brittany Murphy Death?

The Los Angeles County of Health Department maintained that there was an ongoing investigation with regard to the suspicion that toxic mold was found in her home at the time of her death, which is also known  by its moniker ‘black mold’. This type of mold is regarded as an organism that may have contributed to chronic congestion suffered by Brittany Murphy, which may have served as the catalyst for the consumption of cold medicine; however, friends and family of Brittany Murphy have dismissed such claims.

Can You Summarize the Reggie Bush Scandal?

The Reggie Bush Scandal can be summarized as a violation of the terms, conditions, and legality instilled within the National College Athletic Association (NCAA) by athlete Reggie Bush, who currently fills the position of running back on the New Orleans’ Saints – a franchise team within the National Football League (NFL). The allegations within the Reggie Bush Scandal state that while a student and football player at the University of Southern California (USC), Reggie Bush violated the strict rules upheld by the NCAA mandating that college athletes refrain from both offers and acceptance of preferential treatment from any entity existing both internally or externally with regard to that individual academic institution.

What Rules Were Broken in the Reggie Bush Scandal?

Due to the fact that the athletics programs existing within academic institutions are considered to be secondary to the academic and pedagogical integrity of that facility, any student of an academic institution is considered to be just that – a student first and foremost. However, due to a variety of factors existing within collegiate sports – including, competition, revenue, popularity, future enrollment, scholarships, and notoriety – a multitude of circumstances have existed in which student athletes were given preferential treatment with regard to their statuses as athletes; such was the case within the Reggie Bush Scandal:

Reggie Bush was reported to have accepted gifts, perks, and benefits valued upwards of thousands of dollars; these gifts were issued both to Reggie Bush, as well as to the family of Reggie Bush; in addition, these gifts – which are in strict violation of NCAA regulations – ranged from cash to limousine rides furnished by the University

What is the Heisman Trophy?

The Heisman Trophy is amongst the most prestigious accolades granted to one college athlete participating in the football program, which takes place on an annual basis; the trophy signifies excellence in the sport of college football – in 2005, Reggie Bush was the recipient of the Heisman Trophy, which contributed to the developments within the Reggie Bush Scandal investigation:

Reports have been released stating that the University furnished a limousine to transport Reggie Bush to the ceremony in which he received the Heisman Trophy; outside of a limited expense stipend allowed to athletes, the provision for extraneous – and frivolous – payments or gifts is strictly prohibited, which includes limousine rides

What Happened After the Discovery of the Reggie Bush Scandal?

The development and subsequent release of the Reggie Bush Scandal resulted in massive media scrutiny; debates surfaces questioning whether Reggie Bush should have his Heisman Trophy stripped from him as result of his violation of the very regulations set forth by the organization responsible for the awarding of the trophy itself – the NCAA. However, the punitive recourse to which Bush was subjected as a result of the Reggie Bush Scandal was the removal of his Football jersey and number from the entrance to the Football Stadium at the University of Southern California

Overview of the Richie Sambora Divorce

The Richie Sambora Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between musician Richie Sambora and actor Heather Locklear. The petition for the Richie Sambora divorce was filed by Heather Locklear in February of 2006 citing irreconcilable difference as the catalyst for the dissolution of the marriage; the Richie Sambora divorce was finalized on April 11th, 2007 – the couple shares one daughter, who was born in October of 1997. Although the details of the Richie Sambora divorce were kept reasonably private, rumors swirled following the release of allegations that Richie Sambora was due to enter an alcohol rehabilitation facility in June of 2007 – 3 months following Heather Locklear’s filing.

The Parties Involved in the Richie Sambora Divorce

Richie Sambora is amongst the most widely-lauded and recognized guitarist and rock and roll musicians in the world; in 1982 – alongside band mate Jon Bon Jovi – Richie Sambora was an instrumental factor in the creation – and subsequent international success – of the musical group Bon Jovi. Heather Locklear enjoyed years of television success resulting from her roles on such hit television programs, including ‘Spin City’, ‘T.J. Hooker’, ‘Dynasty’, and ‘Melrose Place’.

Legal Venue of the Richie Sambora Divorce Hearing

The Richie Sambora Divorce was heard before a judge within the Los Angeles County branch of the Superior Court of California Court.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Richie Sambora Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Richie Sambora Divorce, both Richie Sambora and Heather Locklear opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Richie Sambora Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Richie Sambora Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Reports surfacing speculating the division of assets following the finalization of the Richie Sambora divorce substantiated a prenuptial agreement enacted by the couple; however the details of the prenuptial agreement were kept from the media. Within the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Richie Sambora Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms o
f the Richie Sambora Divorce settlement:

The only details revealed with regard to the Richie Sambora divorce settlement were the determination of joint custody with regard to the couple’s daughter

In addition, both Richie Sambora and Heather Locklear were reported to have mutually agreed to comply with the terms expressed with regard to the prenuptial agreement

Overview of the Roman Abramovich Divorce

The Roman Abramovich Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich and his wife Irina Abramovich; the Roman Abramovich Divorce was finalized in 2007 which ended the 17-yearlong marriage – Roman Abramovich and Irina Abramovich wed in 1990. The Roman Abramovich divorce settlement was in contention to become the most expensive settlement within the world’s history; at the time of the Abramovich divorce, the Rupert Murdoch divorce – estimated to exceed $1 billion in value furnished to his wife, Anna Murdoch.

The Details of the Roman Abramovich Divorce as they were Reported

The events taking place during the Roman Abramovich divorce with regard to suspected infidelity only heightened the degree of media coverage placed onto the proceedings:

In 2006 – only a year prior to the Roman Abramovich Divorce – Irina suspected that Roman Abramovich was engaging in an extramarital affair; as a result, she hired a private investigation team located within the United Kingdom in order to validate her suspicions

The findings rendered from the investigation of Roman Abramovich cited that he had indeed been involved with a 20-year old debutante named Daria Zhukova; incidentally, Zhukova was the daughter of Russian business magnate Alexander Borisovich Radkin Zhukov

Upon these findings, Irina Abramovich filed for divorce, petitioning for a settlement estimated at $6 billion, which would have been the most expensive divorce settlement in history; however, she did not receive that amount

The Parties Involved in the Roman Abramovich Divorce

Roman Abramovich is considered to be amongst the wealthiest and private individuals in the world; employing an astounding 40-person security team to protect him at all times, the Russian businessman amassed a fortune as a result of his entrepreneurial endeavors within the industry of finance. He met his former wife Irina Abramovich in 1990, whom at the time, was employed as a flight attendant. The couple shares five children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Roman Abramovich Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Roman Abramovich Divorce, both Roman Abramovich and Irina Abramovich opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Roman Abramovich Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Roman Abramovich Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Roman Abramovich Divorce settlement:

In lieu of the requested $6 billion settlement, Irina Abramovich received $300 billion as a result of the Roman Abramovich divorce; although the details were kept highly under wraps, the breakdown of the division of assets was reported to be a lump sum of cash, a plane, a yacht, and several residences owned by the couple during their marriage

A Summary of the Tonya Harding Divorce

The Tonya Harding Divorce was finalized in 1993, a near 3-year marriage between Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly – the couple was wed in 1990; at the time of the marriage, Tanya Harding was a mere 19 years of age. Speculation surrounding the Tonya Harding Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Tonya Harding Divorce included allegations of an erratic and tumultuous marriage:

For those unfamiliar with the Tonya Harding Divorce, at the time of her divorce, Tonya Harding remained in the news for both her undertaking as a professional ice skater, as well as a variety of allegations by the media of erratic behavior and unsportsmanlike conduct within competitions

Perhaps the most common incident involving Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly was their planned attack on fellow figure skater Nancy Kerrigan in 1994; despite the Tonya Harding Divorce, the couple still maintained a shared residence. However, Tonya Harding expressed through a variety of interviews that Jeff Gillooly was an abusive partner, oftentimes threatening her with physical violence, as well as aggravated assault with a deadly weapon

Although the terms of the Tonya Harding Divorce were not released, Jeff Gillooly was sentenced to a 6-month prison sentence subsequent to the Tonya Harding Divorce as a result of his role in the assault on Nancy Kerrigan

The Determination of Contest within the Tonya Harding Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Tonya Harding Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Tonya Harding Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Tonya Harding Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Tonya Harding Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly determined that the Tonya Harding Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Tonya Harding Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly – within the Tonya Harding Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly to be released into public record. Yet, the terms of the Tonya Harding Divorce were not released:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review.

Background of the Roman Polanski Arrest

The following details took place during the issuance of criminal charges against Roman Polanski, as well as the identification and question of the Roman Polanski victim, Samantha Geimer:

Who is Roman Polanski?

Polish-born Roman Polanski is one of the world’s most acclaimed directors, responsible for the production of films classified as the height of influential within the motion picture industry; with films such as Rosemary’s Baby and Macbeth under his belt, at the time of his arrest, his celebrity had preceded him. However, Roman Polanski underwent a personal tragedy almost 10 years prior to his arrest as his pregnant wife – actress Sharon Tate – was brutally murdered by the Charles Manson Family.

Date of the Roman Polanski Arrest: The Roman Polanski arrest took place in March of 1977

Location of the Roman Polanski: The criminal activity undertaken by Roman Polanski took place in Los Angeles, California; allegedly, fellow actor Jack Nicholson had allowed for Roman Polanski the use of his home – charges were never filed against Nicholson

Criminal Charges Associated with the Roman Polanski Arrest

The French publication of the fashion magazine ‘Vogue’ had requested that Roman Polanski edit an upcoming issue; upon this request, allegations filed suggest that Roman Polanski photographed a 13-year old girl without clothing for the magazine – additional charges surfaced suggesting that the 13-year old Roman Polanski victim Samantha Geimer had been drugged and sexually-assaulted by the famed director. Subsequent to the police apprehension of Roman Polanski, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

The statutory rape within the Roman Polanski arrest involved a legally-defined minor – the Roman Polanski victim – 13 years of age. Regardless of any expressed consent or acknowledgement on the part of the 16-year old in question, the legal classification of the Roman Polanksi victim as a minor prevented her from engaging in any sexual activity

The Punitive Recourse of the Roman Polanski Arrest

Prior to his trial, claiming that the charges were false, Roman Polanski fled the United States in fear that we would not be granted a fair trial – rumors of the judge sentencing Polanski with 50 years’ time incarceration prompted this decision.

The Notion of Celebrity within the Roman Polanski Arrest

The prospective Roman Polanski trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – ran the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial – similar to the manner in which the public was during the Roman Polanski – the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion. However, Roman Polanski feared that the trial had become somewhat of a ‘witch hunt’, and fled to Switzerland.

Overview of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The Rupert Murdoch Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Rupert Murdoch and Anna Torv; the Rupert Murdoch Divorce was finalized in 1999, ending the 32-year long marriage. Although the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The consideration of Rupert Murdoch – both at the time of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, as well as currently – as one of the wealthiest individuals in the world paved the way for the dissolution of the Murdoch marriage to be thrust into the media spotlight; upon inheriting his father’s Australian newspaper company, Rupert Murdoch went on to found the international company ‘News Corporation’ – this venture earned Rupert Murdoch an estimated value of $6.3 billion according to Forbes Magazine. His former wife, Anna Torv, was a news-media journalist at the time of their marriage. The couple shares 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, both Rupert Murdoch and Anna Murdoch opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Rupert Murdoch Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that Anna Torv discovered her husband to have been engaging in extramarital affairs with a female executive employed by Star TV – a faction of News Corporation – in 1998, Anna Torv filed for divorce

The plea of an uncontested divorce within the parameters of the Rupert Murdoch divorce were presumed to be set forth in order to disallow for the disclosure of the affair from the public media

Rupert Murdoch married the woman with whom he was having an affair nearly 7 days following the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce

The Terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce settlement:

The Rupert Murdoch divorce settlement is considered to be the largest divorce settlement in world history; the reasoning behind this is consider to exist as a result of Rupert Murdoch’s vast fortunes in conjunction with the discovery of infidelity

Upon the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, Anna Torv reportedly walked away with almost $2 billion worth of the couple’s shared assets, as well as a lump cash payment furnished by Rupert Murdoch amounting to an estimated $110 million

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce

In 2010, Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds had made the determination that that their respective marriage was no longer viable; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources have reported irreconcilable differences as being amongst the primary reasons for the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce. The couple is reported to remain within good standing with each other:

Who are Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds?

The parties involved within the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce are both considered to be A-list celebrity actors who are amongst the most-paid, as well as the most sought-after.

The couple was wed in 2008

The couple currently shares no children

The Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement is quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports have shown the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce to have taken place in an amicable fashion.

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

Reports show that the bulk of the assets earned by both Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds took place subsequent to their marriage; as a result, the bulk of the couple’s assets are legally-considered to be community property – the couple has agreed to split the community property in half

Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce Waiting Period

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation. Reports released from various media sources expressed that the couple were alternating with regard to their respective residence in the couple’s shared home. Only until the divorce is finalized within the State of California will either Scarlett Johansson or Ryan Reynolds be permitted to remarry:

Subsequent to the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, Scarlett Johansson has been linked romantically with actor Sean Penn, while Ryan Reynolds has been alleged to be romantically-involved with actor Sandra Bullock

A Summary of the Sarkozy Divorce

The Sarkozy Divorce was finalized in October of 2007, which ended the 11 year marriage between Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Sarkozy Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Sarkozy Divorce included alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by Sarkozy; for those unfamiliar with the Sarkozy Divorce, the celebrity status of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Sarkozy Divorce had taken place:

The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy has garnered international status as a result of serving as France’s current – and 23rd President; if Sarkozy’s position was not enough to thrust the Sarkozy divorce into the limelight, Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz notoriety as a fashion model did not help to quell public curiosity with regard to the couple’s divorce

The couple shares 1 son named Louis, who was born in 1997

The Terms and Conditions of the Sarkozy Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s son, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Sarkozy Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Nicolas Sarkozy petitioned for alimony payments from Cécilia upon the finalization of the Sarkozy Divorce.

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Sarkozy Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Sarkozy Divorce proceedings, the details of a prenuptial agreement were not released.

Petitions Expressed in the Sarkozy Divorce

Custody of the couple’s son Louis would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. The award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments; no such details with regard to the custody settlement with regard to Louis were released.

The Division of Assets in the Sarkozy Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies.

The Aftereffects of the Sarkozy Divorce

Since the divorce, Sarkozy has since been remarried to Italian songstress Carla Bruni; the marriage took place in 2008, although the couple is said to have begun a relationship only a month following the Sarkozy divorce.