Background of the Roman Polanski Arrest

The following details took place during the issuance of criminal charges against Roman Polanski, as well as the identification and question of the Roman Polanski victim, Samantha Geimer:

Who is Roman Polanski?

Polish-born Roman Polanski is one of the world’s most acclaimed directors, responsible for the production of films classified as the height of influential within the motion picture industry; with films such as Rosemary’s Baby and Macbeth under his belt, at the time of his arrest, his celebrity had preceded him. However, Roman Polanski underwent a personal tragedy almost 10 years prior to his arrest as his pregnant wife – actress Sharon Tate – was brutally murdered by the Charles Manson Family.

Date of the Roman Polanski Arrest: The Roman Polanski arrest took place in March of 1977

Location of the Roman Polanski: The criminal activity undertaken by Roman Polanski took place in Los Angeles, California; allegedly, fellow actor Jack Nicholson had allowed for Roman Polanski the use of his home – charges were never filed against Nicholson

Criminal Charges Associated with the Roman Polanski Arrest

The French publication of the fashion magazine ‘Vogue’ had requested that Roman Polanski edit an upcoming issue; upon this request, allegations filed suggest that Roman Polanski photographed a 13-year old girl without clothing for the magazine – additional charges surfaced suggesting that the 13-year old Roman Polanski victim Samantha Geimer had been drugged and sexually-assaulted by the famed director. Subsequent to the police apprehension of Roman Polanski, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

The statutory rape within the Roman Polanski arrest involved a legally-defined minor – the Roman Polanski victim – 13 years of age. Regardless of any expressed consent or acknowledgement on the part of the 16-year old in question, the legal classification of the Roman Polanksi victim as a minor prevented her from engaging in any sexual activity

The Punitive Recourse of the Roman Polanski Arrest

Prior to his trial, claiming that the charges were false, Roman Polanski fled the United States in fear that we would not be granted a fair trial – rumors of the judge sentencing Polanski with 50 years’ time incarceration prompted this decision.

The Notion of Celebrity within the Roman Polanski Arrest

The prospective Roman Polanski trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – ran the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial – similar to the manner in which the public was during the Roman Polanski – the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion. However, Roman Polanski feared that the trial had become somewhat of a ‘witch hunt’, and fled to Switzerland.

Overview of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The Rupert Murdoch Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Rupert Murdoch and Anna Torv; the Rupert Murdoch Divorce was finalized in 1999, ending the 32-year long marriage. Although the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

The consideration of Rupert Murdoch – both at the time of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, as well as currently – as one of the wealthiest individuals in the world paved the way for the dissolution of the Murdoch marriage to be thrust into the media spotlight; upon inheriting his father’s Australian newspaper company, Rupert Murdoch went on to found the international company ‘News Corporation’ – this venture earned Rupert Murdoch an estimated value of $6.3 billion according to Forbes Magazine. His former wife, Anna Torv, was a news-media journalist at the time of their marriage. The couple shares 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Rupert Murdoch Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce, both Rupert Murdoch and Anna Murdoch opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Rupert Murdoch Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

Due to the fact that Anna Torv discovered her husband to have been engaging in extramarital affairs with a female executive employed by Star TV – a faction of News Corporation – in 1998, Anna Torv filed for divorce

The plea of an uncontested divorce within the parameters of the Rupert Murdoch divorce were presumed to be set forth in order to disallow for the disclosure of the affair from the public media

Rupert Murdoch married the woman with whom he was having an affair nearly 7 days following the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce

The Terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Rupert Murdoch Divorce settlement:

The Rupert Murdoch divorce settlement is considered to be the largest divorce settlement in world history; the reasoning behind this is consider to exist as a result of Rupert Murdoch’s vast fortunes in conjunction with the discovery of infidelity

Upon the finalization of the Rupert Murdoch divorce, Anna Torv reportedly walked away with almost $2 billion worth of the couple’s shared assets, as well as a lump cash payment furnished by Rupert Murdoch amounting to an estimated $110 million

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce

In 2010, Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds had made the determination that that their respective marriage was no longer viable; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources have reported irreconcilable differences as being amongst the primary reasons for the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce. The couple is reported to remain within good standing with each other:

Who are Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds?

The parties involved within the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce are both considered to be A-list celebrity actors who are amongst the most-paid, as well as the most sought-after.

The couple was wed in 2008

The couple currently shares no children

The Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement is quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports have shown the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce to have taken place in an amicable fashion.

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

Reports show that the bulk of the assets earned by both Scarlett Johansson and Ryan Reynolds took place subsequent to their marriage; as a result, the bulk of the couple’s assets are legally-considered to be community property – the couple has agreed to split the community property in half

Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce Waiting Period

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation. Reports released from various media sources expressed that the couple were alternating with regard to their respective residence in the couple’s shared home. Only until the divorce is finalized within the State of California will either Scarlett Johansson or Ryan Reynolds be permitted to remarry:

Subsequent to the Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson Divorce, Scarlett Johansson has been linked romantically with actor Sean Penn, while Ryan Reynolds has been alleged to be romantically-involved with actor Sandra Bullock

A Summary of the Sarkozy Divorce

The Sarkozy Divorce was finalized in October of 2007, which ended the 11 year marriage between Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz – the couple was wed in 1988. Speculation surrounding the Sarkozy Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Sarkozy Divorce included alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by Sarkozy; for those unfamiliar with the Sarkozy Divorce, the celebrity status of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Sarkozy Divorce had taken place:

The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy has garnered international status as a result of serving as France’s current – and 23rd President; if Sarkozy’s position was not enough to thrust the Sarkozy divorce into the limelight, Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz notoriety as a fashion model did not help to quell public curiosity with regard to the couple’s divorce

The couple shares 1 son named Louis, who was born in 1997

The Terms and Conditions of the Sarkozy Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s son, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Sarkozy Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Nicolas Sarkozy petitioned for alimony payments from Cécilia upon the finalization of the Sarkozy Divorce.

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Sarkozy Divorce

The undertaking of a prenuptial agreement will allow for awards – ranging from monetary to custodial in nature – prearranged prior to a couple’s marriage; at the time of the Sarkozy Divorce proceedings, the details of a prenuptial agreement were not released.

Petitions Expressed in the Sarkozy Divorce

Custody of the couple’s son Louis would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. The award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments; no such details with regard to the custody settlement with regard to Louis were released.

The Division of Assets in the Sarkozy Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Nicolas Sarkozy and Cécilia. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies.

The Aftereffects of the Sarkozy Divorce

Since the divorce, Sarkozy has since been remarried to Italian songstress Carla Bruni; the marriage took place in 2008, although the couple is said to have begun a relationship only a month following the Sarkozy divorce.

The Background of the Sebastian Bach Divorce

Singer Sebastian Bach and his wife of almost 20 years, Maria Beirk filed for divorce at the close of the year 2011; the finalization of a Sebastian Bach divorce stands to end the couple’s marriage, which was enacted in 1992. Currently, the couple maintains that after a variety of measures undertaken in order to reconcile the marriage, the event referred to as the Sebastian Bach is the recourse determined to be best for Sebastian Bach, Maria Bierk, and their respective family. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Sebastian Bach Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Who Was Involved in the Sebastian Bach Divorce Filing?

Sebastian Bach was one of the most famous rock and roll singers in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a result of the success of Skid Row, which was the musical group that he fronted; after almost a decade-long hiatus, the band has only recently begun to perform together again.

Legal Venue of the Sebastian Bach Divorce Hearing

The Sebastian Bach Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Sebastian Bach Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Sebastian Bach divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Sebastian Bach divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Sebastian Bach Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Sebastian Bach Divorce, if both Sebastian Bach and Maria Bierk opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Sebastian Bach Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Sebastian Bach and Maria Bierk seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Shania Twain Divorce

The Shania Twain Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between famed country singer Shania Twain and English music producer Robert John Lange, who is most commonly referred to in accordance to his nickname ‘Mutt’. After a separation undertaken by the couple, a petition for the Shania Twain divorce was filed May 15th, 2008; the finalization of the Shania Twain divorce took place on June 9th, 2010, which ended the 15 year marriage – the couple was wed on December 28th, 1993. However, the Shania Twain divorce was not without its share of scandals; in a bizarre turn of events, Mutt Lange was reported to have undertaken an extramarital affair with one of Shania Twain’s best friends, Marie-Anne Thiebaud. Yet, just in case this was not sufficient for a celebrity divorce scandal, following the Shania Twain divorce, Shania Twain was reported as undertaking a romantic relationship with the former husband of Marie-Anne Thiebaud – the woman with whom Mutt Lange had undertaken an extramarital affair:

Shania Twain married her best friend’s the former husband, Frederic Thiebaud on January 1st, 2011; however, reports surfacing with regard to the Shania Twain divorce settlement expressed a vast amount of confusion with actions of both Shania Twain and Mutt Lange – this confusion was in conjunction to the behavior of both Frederic and Marie-Anne Thiebaud

The Parties Involved in the Shania Twain Divorce

Shania Twain is considered to be one of country music’s most prolific and iconic artists; since 1993, the Canadian songstress has been responsible for international acclaim with regard to her vast song catalog, including ‘Whose Bed Have Your Boots Been Under?’, ‘That Don’t Impress Me Much’, ‘Man! I Feel Like a Woman!’, and ‘I’m Gonna Getcha Good!’ However was not the only musical success story within the former couple; famed producer Mutt Lange has been responsible for his collaboration with famed artists including Britney Spears, Lady Gaga, The Backstreet Boys, Bryan Adams, and Def Leppard:

At the time of the Shania Twain divorce, the couple shared one son, Eja D’Angelo – born on August 21st, 2001; subsequent to the finalization of the Shania Twain  divorce, there was no mention regarding either the respective requesting or awarding of custody to Shania Twain or Mutt Lange

The Terms of the Shania Twain Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The heightened level of privacy within the Shania Twain divorce settlement ensured that the bulk of the proceedings and details were kept from the public; supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private – furthermore, the details of a prenuptial agreement was also kept hidden from the media.

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Landon Donovan Divorce

In 2009, Landon Donovan and Bianca Kajlich had made the determination that that their respective marriage was no longer viable and underwent legal separation; the couple finally split at the close of December of 2010. As a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources have reported that the Bianca Kajlich and Landon Donovan Divorce was undertaken in amicable terms:

Who are Landon Donovan and Bianca Kajlich?

The parties involved within the Landon Donovan Divorce are Landon Donovan and Bianca Kajlich; Donovan is considered to be amongst the most valuable soccer players both within the professional soccer league in the United States, as well as on his team – the Los Angeles Galaxy. Bianca Kajlich is known for her role on the television program ‘Rules of Engagement’:

The couple was wed in 2006

The couple currently has no children

The Landon Donovan Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Landon Donovan Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement is quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. Reports show that Donovan may have requested spousal support – or alimony – from Kajlich in addition to compensation for his attorney’s fees. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Landon Donovan Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Landon Donovan Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports have shown both Donovan and Kajlich to remain within good standing with each other. Yet, the parameters of the determination of ‘fault’ in the State of California require the following with regard to the determination of fault – with regard to the Landon Donovan Divorce, fault was not claimed.

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Landon Donovan Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Landon Donovan Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

Due to the fact that both Landon Donovan and Bianca Kajlich are considered to be higher profiled celebrities – Kajlich as an actor, and Donovan as a professional althlete, their prenuptial agreement was reported to have been drafted to allow them both retain their individual earnings

Landon Donovan Divorce Waiting Period

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation.

Matt Barnes Arrested

On September 9th, 2010, the newly-acquired basketball player by the Los Angeles Lakers – a franchise of the National Basketball Association (NBA) – Matt Barnes was arrested for what was described as a domestic incident. Acquired over the summer from the Orlando Magic – a Florida franchise of the NBA, the events that landed Matt Barnes Arrested have been considered to become increasingly confusing as they surface:

A call was placed from the household shared by Govan and Barnes reporting that there was a domestic incident taking place; during the phone call, the emergency operator had noticed that the call had been disconnected from the residence and opted to proceed with issuing law enforcement agents to the Barnes’ household

Upon the arrival of law enforcement agents – prior to Matt Barnes Arrested – Gloria Govan, her sister, and Matt Barnes all denied that any domestic violence had taken place; however, the law enforcement agents that had arrived to the home had noticed that both Govan and Barnes showed signs that a physical altercation had taken place

Prior to Matt Barnes Arrested, the police report set forth by the Los Angeles Police Department cited that both Govan and Barnes had cuts, scrapes, and bruises about their bodies; in the mug shot taken following Matt Barnes Arrested, the viewer will notice a scratch on the left-hand side of Barnes’ neck

Why Was Matt Barnes Arrested?

Matt Barnes was not only arrested with regard to the alleged suspicion of committing domestic violence, but the arresting officers set forth additional charges citing him with the unlawful obstruction of a telephone connection with emergency law enforcement services; once arrested, Barnes furnished a $50k bond for conditional release.

Why Did Gloria Govan Have Matt Barnes Arrested?

Gloria Govan, who is featured on the VH-1 television reality-based show ‘Basketball Wives’, was responsible for placing the emergency telephone call to law enforcement, which resulted in Matt Barnes Arrested; Barnes and Govan are reported as engaged, and due to her husband’s employ as a professional basketball player, Govan was invited to become a cast member of the television show on which she is featured – the couple have twin sons together:

Upon police questioning, Gloria Govan and her sister who was present at the time – as well as Matt Barnes – were adamant that no abuse had taken place

Reports citing a statement made by Govan upon Matt Barnes Arrested allegedly portrayed Govan’s expression as playful and joking in nature, addressing the entirety of the events resulting in Matt Barnes Arrested as a misunderstanding

During the 2010 – 2011 season of ‘Basketball Wives’, the altercation that took place between Govan and Barnes is expected to be featured

The Results of Matt Barnes Arrested

Subsequent to Matt Barnes Arrested, Govan and her sister – as well as Barnes – refused to press charges are set forth testimony suggesting that any nature of domestic violence had taken place.

Overview of the Brad Pitt Divorce

The Brad Pitt Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between ^; the Brad Pitt Divorce was finalized in October 2nd, 2005, which ended the 5-year marriage – Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were married on July 29th, 2000. Despite the celebrity status undertaken by both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, the details of both the couple’s marriage – as well as the subsequent Brad Pitt divorce – managed to find their way to public media:

The Parties Involved in the Brad Pitt Divorce

Brad Pitt, both currently, as well as at the time of his divorce from former wife Jennifer Aniston, was amongst the most widely-recognized American actors in the world; Brad Pitt has starred in such blockbuster hits as Fight Club, Se7en, Burn After Reading, and The Oceans’ Eleven Series – Pitt is amongst the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Jennifer Aniston received her celebrity notoriety as a result of starring in the sitcom Friends, which is touted as amongst the most successful sitcoms in television history. The couple met in 1998 and did not have any children prior to the Brad Pitt Divorce.

Legal Venue of the Brad Pitt Divorce Hearing

The Brad Pitt Divorce was heard before a judge in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Brad Pitt Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Brad Pitt Divorce, both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Brad Pitt Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Brad Pitt Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce settlement:

The Brad Pitt Divorce was filed under a claim of ‘irreconcilable differences’ set forth by Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston; Jennifer Aniston’s maiden name was reinstated in August of 2005

Although there has never been any substantiation of infidelity on the part of Brad Pitt, rumors of extramarital affairs with fellow actor Angelina Jolie surfaced; Jennifer Aniston was reported as claiming that her own parent’s divorce had set the precedent for a heightened sense of fear and mistrust within her own marriage

The couple engaged in months of marriage counseling in order to avoid an impending Brad Pitt Divorce; however, the marriage was not salvaged, and the couple’s assets – including a $28 million home – was divided as per the statutes within the prenuptial agreement

What is the Background of the Brittany Murphy Death?

On December 20th, 2009 in her Los Angeles home, an emergency call was placed in the evening requesting immediate medical assistance with regard to actress Brittany Murphy, who had collapsed in her bathroom; at the time, Brittany Murphy was living with husband Simon Monjack. Upon the arrival of emergency crews, which included emergency medical technicians and firefighters, the actor was unable to be revived after a multitude of attempts conducted by firefighters; prior to Brittany Murphy death, she was transported to the hospital in Los Angeles and declared to have died upon arrival on hospital grounds.

What Was Brittany Murphy Cause of Death?

The devastation on the part of both her fans and her family upon the release of the news of Brittany Murphy death was due in part to her esteemed acting career, in addition to various reports and testimonies of her wonderful character; her celebrity status made the need for answers furnished to friends, family, and fans that much more urgent:

Upon the release of her autopsy report, the chief coroner at Cedar-Sinai hospital in Los Angeles, California recorded that she had died from pneumonia; however, the release of the autopsy of Brittany Murphy death was primarily classified as ‘differed’ – this may have resulted in a wide range of factors contributing to Brittany Murphy cause of death

What Were the Factors of Brittany Murphy Death?

The primary ruling by the coroner with regard to Brittany Murphy death was pneumonia, however, supplanted factors were reported as a fatal iron deficiency that may have been heightened through the usage of both over-the-counter, as well as prescription medication; the medication listed in her system at the time of Brittany Murphy death included a variety of cold medicine, as well as painkillers – yet, the Brittany Murphy cause of death was confirmed to be accidental in nature.

Why Was There Cold Medicine in Her System at the Time of Brittany Murphy Death?

The Los Angeles County of Health Department maintained that there was an ongoing investigation with regard to the suspicion that toxic mold was found in her home at the time of her death, which is also known  by its moniker ‘black mold’. This type of mold is regarded as an organism that may have contributed to chronic congestion suffered by Brittany Murphy, which may have served as the catalyst for the consumption of cold medicine; however, friends and family of Brittany Murphy have dismissed such claims.