A Summary of the Tonya Harding Divorce

The Tonya Harding Divorce was finalized in 1993, a near 3-year marriage between Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly – the couple was wed in 1990; at the time of the marriage, Tanya Harding was a mere 19 years of age. Speculation surrounding the Tonya Harding Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Tonya Harding Divorce included allegations of an erratic and tumultuous marriage:

For those unfamiliar with the Tonya Harding Divorce, at the time of her divorce, Tonya Harding remained in the news for both her undertaking as a professional ice skater, as well as a variety of allegations by the media of erratic behavior and unsportsmanlike conduct within competitions

Perhaps the most common incident involving Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly was their planned attack on fellow figure skater Nancy Kerrigan in 1994; despite the Tonya Harding Divorce, the couple still maintained a shared residence. However, Tonya Harding expressed through a variety of interviews that Jeff Gillooly was an abusive partner, oftentimes threatening her with physical violence, as well as aggravated assault with a deadly weapon

Although the terms of the Tonya Harding Divorce were not released, Jeff Gillooly was sentenced to a 6-month prison sentence subsequent to the Tonya Harding Divorce as a result of his role in the assault on Nancy Kerrigan

The Determination of Contest within the Tonya Harding Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Tonya Harding Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Tonya Harding Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Tonya Harding Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Tonya Harding Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly determined that the Tonya Harding Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Tonya Harding Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly – within the Tonya Harding Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Tonya Harding and Jeff Gillooly to be released into public record. Yet, the terms of the Tonya Harding Divorce were not released:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review.

Matt Barnes Arrested

On September 9th, 2010, the newly-acquired basketball player by the Los Angeles Lakers – a franchise of the National Basketball Association (NBA) – Matt Barnes was arrested for what was described as a domestic incident. Acquired over the summer from the Orlando Magic – a Florida franchise of the NBA, the events that landed Matt Barnes Arrested have been considered to become increasingly confusing as they surface:

A call was placed from the household shared by Govan and Barnes reporting that there was a domestic incident taking place; during the phone call, the emergency operator had noticed that the call had been disconnected from the residence and opted to proceed with issuing law enforcement agents to the Barnes’ household

Upon the arrival of law enforcement agents – prior to Matt Barnes Arrested – Gloria Govan, her sister, and Matt Barnes all denied that any domestic violence had taken place; however, the law enforcement agents that had arrived to the home had noticed that both Govan and Barnes showed signs that a physical altercation had taken place

Prior to Matt Barnes Arrested, the police report set forth by the Los Angeles Police Department cited that both Govan and Barnes had cuts, scrapes, and bruises about their bodies; in the mug shot taken following Matt Barnes Arrested, the viewer will notice a scratch on the left-hand side of Barnes’ neck

Why Was Matt Barnes Arrested?

Matt Barnes was not only arrested with regard to the alleged suspicion of committing domestic violence, but the arresting officers set forth additional charges citing him with the unlawful obstruction of a telephone connection with emergency law enforcement services; once arrested, Barnes furnished a $50k bond for conditional release.

Why Did Gloria Govan Have Matt Barnes Arrested?

Gloria Govan, who is featured on the VH-1 television reality-based show ‘Basketball Wives’, was responsible for placing the emergency telephone call to law enforcement, which resulted in Matt Barnes Arrested; Barnes and Govan are reported as engaged, and due to her husband’s employ as a professional basketball player, Govan was invited to become a cast member of the television show on which she is featured – the couple have twin sons together:

Upon police questioning, Gloria Govan and her sister who was present at the time – as well as Matt Barnes – were adamant that no abuse had taken place

Reports citing a statement made by Govan upon Matt Barnes Arrested allegedly portrayed Govan’s expression as playful and joking in nature, addressing the entirety of the events resulting in Matt Barnes Arrested as a misunderstanding

During the 2010 – 2011 season of ‘Basketball Wives’, the altercation that took place between Govan and Barnes is expected to be featured

The Results of Matt Barnes Arrested

Subsequent to Matt Barnes Arrested, Govan and her sister – as well as Barnes – refused to press charges are set forth testimony suggesting that any nature of domestic violence had taken place.

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Michael C. Hall Divorce

In 2008, Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter had filed for divorce; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources have only released possible speculation for the causes of the divorce:

The Michael C. Hall Divorce settlement occurred at the close of December of 2010

The couple met on the set of the television program ‘Dexter’, within which both Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter star; despite the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the couple has stated that they will continue to perform on ‘Dexter’ and the show will continue as planned

Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter do not have any children

The Michael C. Hall Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement is quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Michael C. Hall Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports have shown both the couple to remain on amicable terms in addition to their respective willingness to continue working with one another – the determination of fault has not been released.

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Michael C. Hall Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Michael C. Hall Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property.

Michael C. Hall Divorce Waiting Period

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation. Reports released from various media sources expressed that the couple had been separated for a substantial period of time even prior to filing for divorce; however, neither Michael C. Hall nor Jennifer Carpenter will be permitted to remarry until the Michael C. Hall Divorce is finalized.

Background of the Peewee Herman Arrest

The following details took place upon Paul Reubens Arrested; due to his television persona named ‘Peewee Herman’, this event is sometimes referred to as the ‘Peewee Herman Arrest’:

Who is Paul Reubens?

Paul Reubens is an American actor who is most commonly recognized for his character persona ‘Peewee Herman’; at the time that Paul Reubens was arrested, Peewee Herman was amongst the most beloved television personas. However, the true controversy occurred at the time of the Peewee Herman arrest due to the fact that the Peewee Herman television program was considered to be a children’s television program, but also, Paul Reubens was arrested for masturbating in a public movie theatre.

Date of the Peewee Herman Arrest: The Peewee Herman arrest took place in July of 2006

Location of the Peewee Herman Arrest: The criminal activity undertaken by Paul Reubens took place in Sarasota, Florida

Criminal Charges Associated with the Peewee Herman Arrest

Paul Reubens arrested took place as a result of a call to local law enforcement claiming that in individual was reported to have been publically masturbating within a theatre that was screening pornographic films. Subsequent to the police apprehension of Paul Reubens, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

The Public Indecency charge resulted from the illicit and inappropriate sexual activity in a public place; public indecency is a legal, catchall term used to classify activity determined to be appropriate within the public sector

The indecent exposure charge arose as Paul Reubens was reported as exposing himself

The Punitive Recourse of the Peewee Herman Trial

Subsequent to the findings by the presiding judge with regard to the Peewee Herman trial, the sentencing, which resulted from Paul Reubens arrested involved Paul Reubens to undergo the following:

A probationary period in which he was be unable to be arrested, as well as a restriction from attending certain institutions screening pornographic movies

A court-imposed fine for an undisclosed amount

The Notion of Celebrity within the Peewee Herman Arrest

Due to the fact that Paul Reubens was widely recognized a celebrity at the time of the arrest – in conjunction with his audience being recognized as children – the media scrutiny surrounding the events inherent in Paul Reubens arrested were exponentially higher with regard to the coverage of the details of the event described as the Peewee Herman:

Uniform Sentencing with the Peewee Herman Arrest Trial

The Peewee Herman trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – run the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial, much like that public was during the Peewee Herman, the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion:

Outcomes of the Peewee Herman Arrest Trial

Due to the fact that celebrities typically possess higher earnings and greater fortunes than individuals considered to account for the median members of society, the implementation of financial recourse – in the form of fines or fees – is considered by many legal professionals to be subject to inefficiency with regard to punitive recourse; within the Peewee Herman trial, many individuals suspected that the enforcement of a median monetary payment furnished by Paul Reubens would neither affect her finances nor serve as an effective punishment

A Summary of the Petr Nedved Divorce

The Petr Nedved Divorce was finalized in the summer of 2006, which ended the 2-year marriage between Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova – the couple was wed in July of 2004. For those unfamiliar with the Petr Nedved Divorce, the celebrity status of Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Petr Nedved Divorce had taken place:

Professional Hockey Player Petr Nedved was one of the most revered hockey players within the National Hockey League – playing for the Phoenix Coyotes; however, after his marriage to Varekova, he requested a trade to the New York Rangers in order to be stationed closer to her

Petr Nedved’s request was not confusing at all; Varekova was an international supermodel who appeared in a variety of noteworthy shoots, such as the Sport’s Illustrated Swimsuit Issue, as well as a variety of Victoria’s Secret advertisement campaigns

Although allegations flew with regard to the Petr Nedved Divorce, the only statement offered by Nedved himself was “I want to keep my personal life personal”

The Determination of Contest within the Petr Nedved Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Petr Nedved Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Petr Nedved Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple maintained the utmost secrecy with regard to the terms, settlement, and caused for the Peter Nedved Divorce:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Petr Nedved Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Petr Nedved Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova determined that the Petr Nedved Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Petr Nedved Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova – within the Petr Nedved Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova to be released into public record:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review.

A Summary of the Prospective Rachel Ray Divorce

The allegation surrounding a possible ‘Rachel Ray Divorce’, which involves celebrity television personality Rachel Ray, who is widely-acclaimed and beloved for her cooking shows – and her husband since 2005 John Cusimano – have been a topic of discussion in a variety of media outlets. Allegations surrounding the stasis of the couple’s marriage – in tandem with suggestions that the marriage is undergoing dissolution, the dispute of those same rumors are swiftly falsified seemingly just as soon as they arise on the part of Rachel Ray’s publicists.

The Rumors Surrounding the Rachel Ray Divorce

Rachel Ray and husband John Cusimano were wed in 2005. Due to the candid nature of Rachel Ray’s television program, she would oftentimes divulge nuances and details about her marriage in passing; the nature of these details struck her adoring fans as illustrative of a picture-perfect marriage. As a result, the rumors surrounding a prospective Rachel Ray divorce were that much more alarming subsequent to their release within the public media – reports surfaced suggesting the following:

Rachel Ray and her husband John had come to an agreement that both her celebrity status and her seemingly non-stop scheduling had put a strain on the couple’s marriage; as a result, she had found herself unable to fulfill the role of wife that she had originally promised during her wedding vows – within these reports, Rachel Ray claimed that the split would be amicable and both she and her husband would part ways on good terms

Following the release of the aforementioned statement, which had yet to be verified, reports surfaces illustrating that the mother of Rachel Ray had arrived to Ray’s home city of New York in order to assist her in both finding and decorating an apartment in which she would presumably reside without John – these allegations only stoked the rumors surrounding a potential Rachel Ray divorce

The Validity of the Rachel Ray Divorce Rumors

As of April of 2011, both Rachel Ray and John Cusimano are reported as happily married; their relationship has been described of being absent of any signs or suggestions that the marriage will be in anyway terminated by what the media had donned a ‘Rachel Ray divorce’. However, certain media outlets and sources continue to dispute these allegations, claiming that Rachel Ray divorce would result in a public backlash of her television persona, as well as create a forum in which suspected allegations may come forth. Yet, despite the detractors of Rachel Ray’s marriage being in current good standing, there has been no mention – neither on behalf of Rachel Ray nor her publicists – suggesting otherwise:

Furthermore, Rachel Ray has not been reported as filing any defamation or libel charges against the various media outlets suggesting a potential Rachel Ray; while this fact does strike some individuals as odd, as of 2011, the Rachel Ray divorce rumors seemed to have quieted substantially within public media circles

A Summary of the Shaq Divorce

The Shaq Divorce, which involved the marriage of basketball superstar Shaquille O’Neal and his wife Shaunie O’Neal, was finalized in 2010, ending a 5-year marriage forged in 2002. The couple maintained custody over a total of 6 children; both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal shared 4 natural children, while each of them arrived into the relationship with one child from previous relationships:

The Shaq Divorce was amongst the most tumultuous to have taken place within the realm of celebrity divorces, due to the fact that while the couple have filed for divorce in 2007, it was recanted only months following. Furthermore, the couple’s unwillingness to file the Shaq Divorce outside of a court resigned them to be subject to a variety of terms of the Shaq divorce to be released

Although there existed various speculation with regard to the reasons for the divorce were cited as irreconcilable differences with regard to the strain of marriage in conjunction to what Shaunie O’Neal cited as Shaquille O’Neal’s celebrity status

The Shaq Divorce in the State of Florida

Within the State of Florida – in tandem with a contested divorce – the court will retain the authorization to determine the terms of a divorce settlement; as was the case with the Shaq Divorce, the divorce settlement included the following procedures:

The Determination of Fault in the Shaq Divorce

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion – which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage – the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record; however both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal were unable to settle the Shaq Divorce outside of court, and as a result, certain details of the Shaq Divorce settlement became available on public record.

Challenge in the Shaq Divorce

The challenge facilitated Shaquille O’Neal was set forth in order to determine the surmise and itemization of the collective assets in possession of both himself and Shaunie O’Neal; these details latent within the Shaq Divorce challenge were comprised of the petition set forth by Shaunie O’Neal with regard from the spousal support, division of assets, and custody from which she had petitioned from Shaquille O’Neal.

The Finalization of the Shaq Divorce

The finalization of the Shaq divorce required a decision by a trial judge, which was set forth by the presiding judge overseeing the trial. Upon the dissolution of the marriage between Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal expressed the following in conjunction with the petitions filed:

Although none of the definitive details were released with regard to the monies, assets, and prenuptial agreement, Shaquille O’Neal’s estimated value at the time of the Shaq divorce included a $20 million annual salary, $10 million worth of wages earned from endorsements, a home estimated at $32 million in Miami, Florida, as well as any communal property in possession of the couple

Overview of the Steven Spielberg Divorce

The Steven Spielberg Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between film director Steven Spielberg and actor Amy Irving; the Steven Spielberg Divorce was finalized in 1989, which ended the 4-yearlong marriage – the couple was wed in 1985:

The Parties Involved in the Steven Spielberg Divorce

The identification of Steven Spielberg – both at the time of the Steven Spielberg divorce, as well as within modernity – as being amongst the most influential and successful film directors of the 20th century created a media feeding frenzy surrounding the coverage of the Steven Spielberg divorce settlement; Steven Spielberg is responsible for timeless films such as The Indiana Jones Series, Jaws, E.T., as well as The Back to the Future Series – this is just to name a few. Amy Irving also earned her celebrity status within the media as a result of her film career including Yentl and Carrie.

2 Shocking Facts within the Steven Spielberg Divorce Settlement

Within the exploration of the Steven Spielberg divorce settlement, 2 primary details thrust the proceedings into the public media without regard of the celebrity statuses of both Steven Spielberg and Amy Irving:

The Steven Spielberg divorce settlement is considered to be amongst the most expensive within the history of the United States; due to the fact that Steven Spielberg’s net worth was estimated to exceed $1 billion at the time of the finalization of the divorce, Amy Irving was reported to have received anywhere between $95 million and $105 million upon walking away from the Steven Spielberg divorce

Secondly, the Steven Spielberg gained notoriety due to the fact that Steven Spielberg penned a prenuptial agreement on a napkin in lieu of drafting an official contract under the counsel of an attorney; although the ad-hoc prenuptial agreement expressed the limitations to what Amy Irving would be entitled upon the dissolution of marriage, the presiding judge dismissed the validity of the makeshift agreement

The Terms of the Steven Spielberg Divorce Settlement

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Steven Spielberg Divorce, both Steven Spielberg and Amy Irving opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Steven Spielberg Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Steven Spielberg Divorce settlement:

Due to the dismissal of the prenuptial agreement presented and drafted by Steven Spielberg on a napkin, Amy Irving was entitled to half of the couple’s combined, earned assets accrued during the time of their marriage; within the State of California, this is known as ‘Community Property’

Overview of the Ted Danson Divorce

The Ted Danson Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Ted Danson and Casey Coates; the Ted Danson Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the nearly-16 year marriage, which took place on July 30th, 1977. Akin to traditional divorce proceedings – meaning, those undertaken by non-celebrity couples – the nature of the divorce settlement can range from amicable to scandalous; unfortunately, the Ted Danson Divorce from Casey Coates was classified as the latter. Not only was the Ted Danson Divorce considered to be amongst the most discussed, but it is considered to be amongst the costliest divorces to ever have taken place in Hollywood:

The Parties Involved in the Ted Danson Divorce

Ted Danson gained his celebrity status as a result of his role on the sitcom Cheers, which is considered to be amongst the top-rated and most popular television programs to ever have aired; Ted Danson’s beloved character ‘Sam’, who was the bartender of the fictitious drinking establishment ‘Cheers’, thrust him into international fame and celebrity. Ted Danson met Casey Coates in 1976 – prior to his rise to fame; Casey Coates was employed as a fashion designer.

The Controversy of the Ted Danson Divorce

The controversy arose as Casey Coates suffered a stroke in 1979 upon birthing the couple’s first child; subsequent to Coates’ stroke, Ted Danson took a sabbatical from acting in order to tend to his ailing wife; however, the stroke left Casey Coates debilitated, and the couple adopted a daughter years later. In 1992, rumors of an extramarital affair with fellow actor Whoopie Goldberg on the set of the film ‘Made in America’ – in which both Danson and Goldberg were featured; however, the rumors were soon validated, leading the Ted Danson Divorce finalized in 1993.

The Terms of the Ted Danson Divorce Settlement

The Ted Danson Divorce was filed as ‘uncontested’ with regard to the placement of fault; an uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, due to Ted Danson’s infidelity, reports were released showing that he had agreed to an uncontested divorce in lieu of the details of his affair being released; the terms of the settlement took place as follows:

Casey Coates walked away from the Ted Danson Divorce with upwards of $30 million, in addition to an undisclosed settlement with regard to supplemental assets in possession of the former couple, as well as custody of the former-couple’s 2 children

The nature of the uncontested settlement allowed for few details to be released with regard to additional undertakings and events within the marriage

Overview of the Terrence Howard Divorce Filing

The February 2nd, 2011 filing for the Terrence Howard Divorce – a title given to the dissolution of the marriage of actor Terrence Howard and his wife Michelle Ghent – would mark the end of a year-long marriage undertaken upon finalization. Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent were married in January of 2010 in a secret ceremony in the State of California. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Terrence Howard Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details have emerged with regard to the filing of the Terrence Howard divorce, various reports cite that Michelle Ghent will be seeking to collect spousal support in the form of alimony; however, the presence of a prenuptial agreement has not been confirmed

The Parties Involved in the Terrence Howard Divorce

Within the last decade, Terrence Howard has quickly emerged as one of the most sought-after actors in Hollywood; he has starred in such blockbuster hits including The Frog and the Prince, Iron Man, Hustle & Flow, Crash, and Ray. Terrence Howard met Michelle Ghent in 2010 while she was employed in the field of commercial production – the couple shares no children:

In the event that the Terrence Howard divorce becomes finalized, it will serve as the end of Terrence Howard’s second marriage

Legal Venue of the Terrence Howard Divorce Hearing

The Terrence Howard Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Terrence Howard Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Terrence Howard divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Terrence Howard divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Terrence Howard Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Terrence Howard Divorce, if both Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Terrence Howard Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.