Overview of the Brad Pitt Divorce

The Brad Pitt Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between ^; the Brad Pitt Divorce was finalized in October 2nd, 2005, which ended the 5-year marriage – Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were married on July 29th, 2000. Despite the celebrity status undertaken by both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, the details of both the couple’s marriage – as well as the subsequent Brad Pitt divorce – managed to find their way to public media:

The Parties Involved in the Brad Pitt Divorce

Brad Pitt, both currently, as well as at the time of his divorce from former wife Jennifer Aniston, was amongst the most widely-recognized American actors in the world; Brad Pitt has starred in such blockbuster hits as Fight Club, Se7en, Burn After Reading, and The Oceans’ Eleven Series – Pitt is amongst the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Jennifer Aniston received her celebrity notoriety as a result of starring in the sitcom Friends, which is touted as amongst the most successful sitcoms in television history. The couple met in 1998 and did not have any children prior to the Brad Pitt Divorce.

Legal Venue of the Brad Pitt Divorce Hearing

The Brad Pitt Divorce was heard before a judge in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Brad Pitt Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Brad Pitt Divorce, both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Brad Pitt Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Brad Pitt Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce settlement:

The Brad Pitt Divorce was filed under a claim of ‘irreconcilable differences’ set forth by Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston; Jennifer Aniston’s maiden name was reinstated in August of 2005

Although there has never been any substantiation of infidelity on the part of Brad Pitt, rumors of extramarital affairs with fellow actor Angelina Jolie surfaced; Jennifer Aniston was reported as claiming that her own parent’s divorce had set the precedent for a heightened sense of fear and mistrust within her own marriage

The couple engaged in months of marriage counseling in order to avoid an impending Brad Pitt Divorce; however, the marriage was not salvaged, and the couple’s assets – including a $28 million home – was divided as per the statutes within the prenuptial agreement

What is the Background of the Brittany Murphy Death?

On December 20th, 2009 in her Los Angeles home, an emergency call was placed in the evening requesting immediate medical assistance with regard to actress Brittany Murphy, who had collapsed in her bathroom; at the time, Brittany Murphy was living with husband Simon Monjack. Upon the arrival of emergency crews, which included emergency medical technicians and firefighters, the actor was unable to be revived after a multitude of attempts conducted by firefighters; prior to Brittany Murphy death, she was transported to the hospital in Los Angeles and declared to have died upon arrival on hospital grounds.

What Was Brittany Murphy Cause of Death?

The devastation on the part of both her fans and her family upon the release of the news of Brittany Murphy death was due in part to her esteemed acting career, in addition to various reports and testimonies of her wonderful character; her celebrity status made the need for answers furnished to friends, family, and fans that much more urgent:

Upon the release of her autopsy report, the chief coroner at Cedar-Sinai hospital in Los Angeles, California recorded that she had died from pneumonia; however, the release of the autopsy of Brittany Murphy death was primarily classified as ‘differed’ – this may have resulted in a wide range of factors contributing to Brittany Murphy cause of death

What Were the Factors of Brittany Murphy Death?

The primary ruling by the coroner with regard to Brittany Murphy death was pneumonia, however, supplanted factors were reported as a fatal iron deficiency that may have been heightened through the usage of both over-the-counter, as well as prescription medication; the medication listed in her system at the time of Brittany Murphy death included a variety of cold medicine, as well as painkillers – yet, the Brittany Murphy cause of death was confirmed to be accidental in nature.

Why Was There Cold Medicine in Her System at the Time of Brittany Murphy Death?

The Los Angeles County of Health Department maintained that there was an ongoing investigation with regard to the suspicion that toxic mold was found in her home at the time of her death, which is also known  by its moniker ‘black mold’. This type of mold is regarded as an organism that may have contributed to chronic congestion suffered by Brittany Murphy, which may have served as the catalyst for the consumption of cold medicine; however, friends and family of Brittany Murphy have dismissed such claims.

A Summary of the Petr Nedved Divorce

The Petr Nedved Divorce was finalized in the summer of 2006, which ended the 2-year marriage between Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova – the couple was wed in July of 2004. For those unfamiliar with the Petr Nedved Divorce, the celebrity status of Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Petr Nedved Divorce had taken place:

Professional Hockey Player Petr Nedved was one of the most revered hockey players within the National Hockey League – playing for the Phoenix Coyotes; however, after his marriage to Varekova, he requested a trade to the New York Rangers in order to be stationed closer to her

Petr Nedved’s request was not confusing at all; Varekova was an international supermodel who appeared in a variety of noteworthy shoots, such as the Sport’s Illustrated Swimsuit Issue, as well as a variety of Victoria’s Secret advertisement campaigns

Although allegations flew with regard to the Petr Nedved Divorce, the only statement offered by Nedved himself was “I want to keep my personal life personal”

The Determination of Contest within the Petr Nedved Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Petr Nedved Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Petr Nedved Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple maintained the utmost secrecy with regard to the terms, settlement, and caused for the Peter Nedved Divorce:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Petr Nedved Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Petr Nedved Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova determined that the Petr Nedved Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Petr Nedved Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova – within the Petr Nedved Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova to be released into public record:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review.

The Secrets Leading Up to the Tiger Woods Scandal

The ‘Tiger Woods Affair’ or the ‘Tiger Woods Scandal’ is a moniker given to the events surrounding the infidelity, extramarital affair, and eventual divorce experienced by professional golfer Tiger Woods and his former wife Elin Nordgren. The Tiger Woods Scandal is considered by many individuals to be amongst the most widely-publicized and publically-investigated events of the 21st century; the reasons for this phenomenon are considered to be rooted with a variety of facts applicable to Tiger Woods’ status as a celebrity icon:

In November of 2009, reports began to surface regarding alleged infidelity and extramarital affairs undertaken by Tiger Woods; at the close of November of 2009, a car accident involving Tiger Woods outside of his home was alleged to have taken place as a result of Nordegren’s discovery of the Tiger Woods Affair

While adamant about maintaining his innocence with regard to the Tiger Woods Affair, eventually, the allegations of infidelity began to surface at a staggering rate, ranging from the number of Woods’ extramarital partners to the rate at which he engaged in such behavior

In December of 2010, Woods admitted his involvement in what was dubbed the ‘Tiger Woods Scandal’ and issued a public apology to both his fans, as well as to his wife – Tiger Woods expressed that he and his wife would attempt to salvage the marriage subsequent to the public’s exposure to Tiger Woods Affair

The Backlash of the Tiger Woods Scandal

While Woods and Nordegren attempted to salvage their marriage, the divorce settlement expressed that the couple’s bond was irretrievably broken; however, the dissolution of his marriage due to Tiger Woods Affair was only a fraction of his problems – at an alarming rate, his corporate sponsorships began to withdraw their association with Woods following the Tiger Woods Scandal:

On December 12th, 2010, the Gillette Company was the first to withdraw their sponsorship of Tiger Woods; the period between Gillette’s withdrawal into the middle of 2011 resulted in supplemental corporate withdrawals from sponsorships including TAG Heuer, General Motors, and Gatorade

Economists studying the financial loss expected from the withdrawal of sponsorships following the Tiger Woods Affair to exist within the realm of $4 billion and $17 billion

Prior to their divorce of August 23rd, 2010, Woods had confessed to upwards of 120 extramarital affairs; the couple split and both Woods and Nordegren maintain joint custody over their 2 children

The Public Reaction to the Tiger Woods Scandal

At the time of the Tiger Woods Affair, Tiger Woods was listed as amongst the most popular athletes on a global level; he has been identified as the athlete retaining the largest salary in tandem with the largest net worth. The Tiger Woods Scandal was dually-shocking as a result that Tiger Woods was considered to be an iconic figure, not only renowned for his golfing acumen, but also his wide range of sponsorships and publicity. His 2005 marriage to Elin Nordegren – a former Swedish model – was considered to be the depiction of a power couple; many social scientists and professionals in media studies have set forth theories gauging the degree of which society as a whole enjoys the success of celebrities in contrast with the enjoyment derived in the event that a celebrity ‘falls from grace’.

A Summary of the Prospective Rachel Ray Divorce

The allegation surrounding a possible ‘Rachel Ray Divorce’, which involves celebrity television personality Rachel Ray, who is widely-acclaimed and beloved for her cooking shows – and her husband since 2005 John Cusimano – have been a topic of discussion in a variety of media outlets. Allegations surrounding the stasis of the couple’s marriage – in tandem with suggestions that the marriage is undergoing dissolution, the dispute of those same rumors are swiftly falsified seemingly just as soon as they arise on the part of Rachel Ray’s publicists.

The Rumors Surrounding the Rachel Ray Divorce

Rachel Ray and husband John Cusimano were wed in 2005. Due to the candid nature of Rachel Ray’s television program, she would oftentimes divulge nuances and details about her marriage in passing; the nature of these details struck her adoring fans as illustrative of a picture-perfect marriage. As a result, the rumors surrounding a prospective Rachel Ray divorce were that much more alarming subsequent to their release within the public media – reports surfaced suggesting the following:

Rachel Ray and her husband John had come to an agreement that both her celebrity status and her seemingly non-stop scheduling had put a strain on the couple’s marriage; as a result, she had found herself unable to fulfill the role of wife that she had originally promised during her wedding vows – within these reports, Rachel Ray claimed that the split would be amicable and both she and her husband would part ways on good terms

Following the release of the aforementioned statement, which had yet to be verified, reports surfaces illustrating that the mother of Rachel Ray had arrived to Ray’s home city of New York in order to assist her in both finding and decorating an apartment in which she would presumably reside without John – these allegations only stoked the rumors surrounding a potential Rachel Ray divorce

The Validity of the Rachel Ray Divorce Rumors

As of April of 2011, both Rachel Ray and John Cusimano are reported as happily married; their relationship has been described of being absent of any signs or suggestions that the marriage will be in anyway terminated by what the media had donned a ‘Rachel Ray divorce’. However, certain media outlets and sources continue to dispute these allegations, claiming that Rachel Ray divorce would result in a public backlash of her television persona, as well as create a forum in which suspected allegations may come forth. Yet, despite the detractors of Rachel Ray’s marriage being in current good standing, there has been no mention – neither on behalf of Rachel Ray nor her publicists – suggesting otherwise:

Furthermore, Rachel Ray has not been reported as filing any defamation or libel charges against the various media outlets suggesting a potential Rachel Ray; while this fact does strike some individuals as odd, as of 2011, the Rachel Ray divorce rumors seemed to have quieted substantially within public media circles

Overview of the Tim Robbins Divorce

The Tim Robbins Divorce was not really a divorce at all; due to the fact that actors Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon had never officially wed – despite engaging in a 20-year romantic relationship – within their 20-year relationship, the couple birthed 2 sons. In December of 2009, the general public witnessed the dissolution of the partnership undertaken by 2 of Hollywood’s most iconic and beloved actors – the couple met while on the set of the 1988 film Bull Durham. Interviews furnished by both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon rejected the institution of marriage with regard to the couple’s partnership; they maintained that they shared a deep love and commitment for one another, and collectively, did not feel as though a marriage certificate should – or would – be able to define or validate that.

The Parties Involved in the Tim Robbins Split

Tim Robbins is an American actor who has gained his iconic celebrity status as a result of his various – and beloved roles, which include High Fidelity, The Shawshank Redemption, Mystic River, as well as the upcoming summer blockbuster Green Lantern. Similarly, Susan Sarandon has graced the screen with her acclaimed roles in films including Thelma & Louise, The Client, Dead Man Walking, and Leaves of Grass.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Tim Robbins Split

The dissolution of a romantic partnership enacted through cohabitation is very similar to the proceeding latent within an uncontested divorce; these circumstances involve a situation in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Tim Robbins Split, both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Tim Robbins Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Tim Robbins Separation Settlement

A settlement undertaken subsequent to the dissolution of a romantic relationship enacted by cohabitation and commitment is similar – at least within a legal fashion – to a divorce settlement, which typically includes 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. A bulk of the terms and conditions latent within the Tim Robbins split – including supplemental agreements, such as prenuptial agreements and custodial arrangements in tandem with the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Tim Robbins separation settlement:

The implementation of a domestic partnership enabled both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon to keep the terms, conditions, and arrangements of their respective settlement private; this is due to the fact that that proceeding was kept out of the courts

However, both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon share joint custody of their son Miles, who is below the age of 18 – this legally classifies him as a minor

Overview of the Tony Hawk Divorce

On February 7th, 2011, professional skateboarder Tony Hawk filed for his 3rd divorce from his wife of 5 years, Lhotse Merriam; the couple was wed on January 12, 2006 in Fiji – despite the international location of the wedding between Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam, the Tony Hawk was filed in the state of California. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Tony Hawk Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Tony Hawk Divorce

Tony Hawk is considered to be the icon of professional skateboarding; Hawk is cited as being responsible for the thrust of skateboarding into popular culture as a result of his production of skateboarding videogame franchises, skateboarding events, and skateboarding-inspired clothing line. The couple shares one daughter who was born in June of 2008.

The Controversy within the Tony Hawk Divorce

The Tony Hawk divorce filing is not without its share of scandal as per the reports released by the public media; reports have surfaced explaining that Tony Hawk has filed for divorce as a result of an extramarital affair undertaken by Hawk with Cathy Goodman – the wife of Tony Hawk’s business partner, Matt Goodman. While the details of the Tony Hawk Divorce have been kept private, reports have cited Matt Goodman as explaining that he supports the relationship between Tony Hawk and his former wife.

Legal Venue of the Tony Hawk Divorce Hearing

Filing for the Tony Hawk Divorce was set forth before the Northern San Diego branch of the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of San Diego.

The Plea within the Tony Hawk Divorce Settlement

A plea with regard to the Tony Hawk Divorce has yet to be released with regard to a divorce settlement. A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Tony Hawk divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Tony Hawk divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Tony Hawk Divorce, if both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

A Summary of the Tony Robbins Divorce

The Tony Robbins Divorce was finalized in 1997, ending the 14-year marriage between Tony Robbins and Becky Robbins – the couple was wed in 1984. Tony Robbins married Becky Robbins at the age of 24 – although the couple had no children together, Tony Robbins acted as a father for the 3 children belonging to Becky Robbins from a former marriage. Tony Robbins is considered to be amongst the most recognized, iconic, and esteemed motivational speakers in the world; he has authored countless publications and resources with regard to self-help and self-empowerment – furthermore, attendance to his seminars are widely-sought after. As a result, the prospect of the Tony Robbins divorce retained the potential to affect his career as something of a ‘guru’; speculations were set forth that his divorce from his wife of 14 years would be problematic.

How Tony Robbins Broke the News of his Divorce

The details surrounding the Tony Robbins divorce were primarily kept from the press; neither Tony Robbins nor Becky Robbins issued comments with regard to any or all possible reasoning for the Tony Robbins divorce. While in many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by an icon such as Tony Robbins may be viewed as being without a downside, the reliance on Tony Robbins from his millions of clients created the potential for a backlash; as a result, it is assumed that both Becky Robbins and Tony Robbins settled outside of court:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

Did Tony Robbins Acknowledge the Dissolution of his Marriage?

With regard to his clients – both existing in private and public domains – he explained that he had felt as though he and Becky Robbins had undergone individual changes with regard to their union. He added that within his teachings, he advocates for a strong and action-based lifestyle in which an individual is prompted to live a powerful and meaningful lifestyle, citing that his marriage no longer provided him with that sentiment. Closing his statement, he maintained that he was by no means without flaw, and the Tony Robbins divorce stood to prove that – despite the initial shock of the announcement of the Tony Robbins divorce, the bulk of his clients and fans remain loyal to him and his seminars to this day.

Developments Following the Tony Robbins Divorce

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation; only until the divorce is finalized within the State of California was either Tony Robbins or Becky Robbins permitted to remarry:

Subsequent to the Tony Robbins Divorce, Tony Robbins married Sage Robbins in 2001; the couple remains married as of April of 2011

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Michael C. Hall Divorce

In 2008, Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter had filed for divorce; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources have only released possible speculation for the causes of the divorce:

The Michael C. Hall Divorce settlement occurred at the close of December of 2010

The couple met on the set of the television program ‘Dexter’, within which both Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter star; despite the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the couple has stated that they will continue to perform on ‘Dexter’ and the show will continue as planned

Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter do not have any children

The Michael C. Hall Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement is quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Michael C. Hall Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports have shown both the couple to remain on amicable terms in addition to their respective willingness to continue working with one another – the determination of fault has not been released.

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Michael C. Hall Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Michael C. Hall Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property.

Michael C. Hall Divorce Waiting Period

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation. Reports released from various media sources expressed that the couple had been separated for a substantial period of time even prior to filing for divorce; however, neither Michael C. Hall nor Jennifer Carpenter will be permitted to remarry until the Michael C. Hall Divorce is finalized.

A Summary of the Shaq Divorce

The Shaq Divorce, which involved the marriage of basketball superstar Shaquille O’Neal and his wife Shaunie O’Neal, was finalized in 2010, ending a 5-year marriage forged in 2002. The couple maintained custody over a total of 6 children; both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal shared 4 natural children, while each of them arrived into the relationship with one child from previous relationships:

The Shaq Divorce was amongst the most tumultuous to have taken place within the realm of celebrity divorces, due to the fact that while the couple have filed for divorce in 2007, it was recanted only months following. Furthermore, the couple’s unwillingness to file the Shaq Divorce outside of a court resigned them to be subject to a variety of terms of the Shaq divorce to be released

Although there existed various speculation with regard to the reasons for the divorce were cited as irreconcilable differences with regard to the strain of marriage in conjunction to what Shaunie O’Neal cited as Shaquille O’Neal’s celebrity status

The Shaq Divorce in the State of Florida

Within the State of Florida – in tandem with a contested divorce – the court will retain the authorization to determine the terms of a divorce settlement; as was the case with the Shaq Divorce, the divorce settlement included the following procedures:

The Determination of Fault in the Shaq Divorce

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion – which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage – the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record; however both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal were unable to settle the Shaq Divorce outside of court, and as a result, certain details of the Shaq Divorce settlement became available on public record.

Challenge in the Shaq Divorce

The challenge facilitated Shaquille O’Neal was set forth in order to determine the surmise and itemization of the collective assets in possession of both himself and Shaunie O’Neal; these details latent within the Shaq Divorce challenge were comprised of the petition set forth by Shaunie O’Neal with regard from the spousal support, division of assets, and custody from which she had petitioned from Shaquille O’Neal.

The Finalization of the Shaq Divorce

The finalization of the Shaq divorce required a decision by a trial judge, which was set forth by the presiding judge overseeing the trial. Upon the dissolution of the marriage between Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal expressed the following in conjunction with the petitions filed:

Although none of the definitive details were released with regard to the monies, assets, and prenuptial agreement, Shaquille O’Neal’s estimated value at the time of the Shaq divorce included a $20 million annual salary, $10 million worth of wages earned from endorsements, a home estimated at $32 million in Miami, Florida, as well as any communal property in possession of the couple