Overview of the Brad Pitt Divorce

The Brad Pitt Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between ^; the Brad Pitt Divorce was finalized in October 2nd, 2005, which ended the 5-year marriage – Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston were married on July 29th, 2000. Despite the celebrity status undertaken by both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, the details of both the couple’s marriage – as well as the subsequent Brad Pitt divorce – managed to find their way to public media:

The Parties Involved in the Brad Pitt Divorce

Brad Pitt, both currently, as well as at the time of his divorce from former wife Jennifer Aniston, was amongst the most widely-recognized American actors in the world; Brad Pitt has starred in such blockbuster hits as Fight Club, Se7en, Burn After Reading, and The Oceans’ Eleven Series – Pitt is amongst the highest-paid actors in Hollywood. Jennifer Aniston received her celebrity notoriety as a result of starring in the sitcom Friends, which is touted as amongst the most successful sitcoms in television history. The couple met in 1998 and did not have any children prior to the Brad Pitt Divorce.

Legal Venue of the Brad Pitt Divorce Hearing

The Brad Pitt Divorce was heard before a judge in the California Superior Court in Los Angeles County.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Brad Pitt Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Brad Pitt Divorce, both Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Brad Pitt Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Brad Pitt Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Brad Pitt Divorce settlement:

The Brad Pitt Divorce was filed under a claim of ‘irreconcilable differences’ set forth by Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston; Jennifer Aniston’s maiden name was reinstated in August of 2005

Although there has never been any substantiation of infidelity on the part of Brad Pitt, rumors of extramarital affairs with fellow actor Angelina Jolie surfaced; Jennifer Aniston was reported as claiming that her own parent’s divorce had set the precedent for a heightened sense of fear and mistrust within her own marriage

The couple engaged in months of marriage counseling in order to avoid an impending Brad Pitt Divorce; however, the marriage was not salvaged, and the couple’s assets – including a $28 million home – was divided as per the statutes within the prenuptial agreement

What is the Background of the Brittany Murphy Death?

On December 20th, 2009 in her Los Angeles home, an emergency call was placed in the evening requesting immediate medical assistance with regard to actress Brittany Murphy, who had collapsed in her bathroom; at the time, Brittany Murphy was living with husband Simon Monjack. Upon the arrival of emergency crews, which included emergency medical technicians and firefighters, the actor was unable to be revived after a multitude of attempts conducted by firefighters; prior to Brittany Murphy death, she was transported to the hospital in Los Angeles and declared to have died upon arrival on hospital grounds.

What Was Brittany Murphy Cause of Death?

The devastation on the part of both her fans and her family upon the release of the news of Brittany Murphy death was due in part to her esteemed acting career, in addition to various reports and testimonies of her wonderful character; her celebrity status made the need for answers furnished to friends, family, and fans that much more urgent:

Upon the release of her autopsy report, the chief coroner at Cedar-Sinai hospital in Los Angeles, California recorded that she had died from pneumonia; however, the release of the autopsy of Brittany Murphy death was primarily classified as ‘differed’ – this may have resulted in a wide range of factors contributing to Brittany Murphy cause of death

What Were the Factors of Brittany Murphy Death?

The primary ruling by the coroner with regard to Brittany Murphy death was pneumonia, however, supplanted factors were reported as a fatal iron deficiency that may have been heightened through the usage of both over-the-counter, as well as prescription medication; the medication listed in her system at the time of Brittany Murphy death included a variety of cold medicine, as well as painkillers – yet, the Brittany Murphy cause of death was confirmed to be accidental in nature.

Why Was There Cold Medicine in Her System at the Time of Brittany Murphy Death?

The Los Angeles County of Health Department maintained that there was an ongoing investigation with regard to the suspicion that toxic mold was found in her home at the time of her death, which is also known  by its moniker ‘black mold’. This type of mold is regarded as an organism that may have contributed to chronic congestion suffered by Brittany Murphy, which may have served as the catalyst for the consumption of cold medicine; however, friends and family of Brittany Murphy have dismissed such claims.

Overview of the Tony Hawk Divorce

On February 7th, 2011, professional skateboarder Tony Hawk filed for his 3rd divorce from his wife of 5 years, Lhotse Merriam; the couple was wed on January 12, 2006 in Fiji – despite the international location of the wedding between Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam, the Tony Hawk was filed in the state of California. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Tony Hawk Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Tony Hawk Divorce

Tony Hawk is considered to be the icon of professional skateboarding; Hawk is cited as being responsible for the thrust of skateboarding into popular culture as a result of his production of skateboarding videogame franchises, skateboarding events, and skateboarding-inspired clothing line. The couple shares one daughter who was born in June of 2008.

The Controversy within the Tony Hawk Divorce

The Tony Hawk divorce filing is not without its share of scandal as per the reports released by the public media; reports have surfaced explaining that Tony Hawk has filed for divorce as a result of an extramarital affair undertaken by Hawk with Cathy Goodman – the wife of Tony Hawk’s business partner, Matt Goodman. While the details of the Tony Hawk Divorce have been kept private, reports have cited Matt Goodman as explaining that he supports the relationship between Tony Hawk and his former wife.

Legal Venue of the Tony Hawk Divorce Hearing

Filing for the Tony Hawk Divorce was set forth before the Northern San Diego branch of the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of San Diego.

The Plea within the Tony Hawk Divorce Settlement

A plea with regard to the Tony Hawk Divorce has yet to be released with regard to a divorce settlement. A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Tony Hawk divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Tony Hawk divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Tony Hawk Divorce, if both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

A Summary of the Tony Robbins Divorce

The Tony Robbins Divorce was finalized in 1997, ending the 14-year marriage between Tony Robbins and Becky Robbins – the couple was wed in 1984. Tony Robbins married Becky Robbins at the age of 24 – although the couple had no children together, Tony Robbins acted as a father for the 3 children belonging to Becky Robbins from a former marriage. Tony Robbins is considered to be amongst the most recognized, iconic, and esteemed motivational speakers in the world; he has authored countless publications and resources with regard to self-help and self-empowerment – furthermore, attendance to his seminars are widely-sought after. As a result, the prospect of the Tony Robbins divorce retained the potential to affect his career as something of a ‘guru’; speculations were set forth that his divorce from his wife of 14 years would be problematic.

How Tony Robbins Broke the News of his Divorce

The details surrounding the Tony Robbins divorce were primarily kept from the press; neither Tony Robbins nor Becky Robbins issued comments with regard to any or all possible reasoning for the Tony Robbins divorce. While in many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by an icon such as Tony Robbins may be viewed as being without a downside, the reliance on Tony Robbins from his millions of clients created the potential for a backlash; as a result, it is assumed that both Becky Robbins and Tony Robbins settled outside of court:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

Did Tony Robbins Acknowledge the Dissolution of his Marriage?

With regard to his clients – both existing in private and public domains – he explained that he had felt as though he and Becky Robbins had undergone individual changes with regard to their union. He added that within his teachings, he advocates for a strong and action-based lifestyle in which an individual is prompted to live a powerful and meaningful lifestyle, citing that his marriage no longer provided him with that sentiment. Closing his statement, he maintained that he was by no means without flaw, and the Tony Robbins divorce stood to prove that – despite the initial shock of the announcement of the Tony Robbins divorce, the bulk of his clients and fans remain loyal to him and his seminars to this day.

Developments Following the Tony Robbins Divorce

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation; only until the divorce is finalized within the State of California was either Tony Robbins or Becky Robbins permitted to remarry:

Subsequent to the Tony Robbins Divorce, Tony Robbins married Sage Robbins in 2001; the couple remains married as of April of 2011

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Michael C. Hall Divorce

In 2008, Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter had filed for divorce; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources have only released possible speculation for the causes of the divorce:

The Michael C. Hall Divorce settlement occurred at the close of December of 2010

The couple met on the set of the television program ‘Dexter’, within which both Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter star; despite the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the couple has stated that they will continue to perform on ‘Dexter’ and the show will continue as planned

Michael C. Hall and Jennifer Carpenter do not have any children

The Michael C. Hall Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement is quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Michael C. Hall Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Michael C. Hall Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports have shown both the couple to remain on amicable terms in addition to their respective willingness to continue working with one another – the determination of fault has not been released.

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Michael C. Hall Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Michael C. Hall Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property.

Michael C. Hall Divorce Waiting Period

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation. Reports released from various media sources expressed that the couple had been separated for a substantial period of time even prior to filing for divorce; however, neither Michael C. Hall nor Jennifer Carpenter will be permitted to remarry until the Michael C. Hall Divorce is finalized.

A Summary of the Shaq Divorce

The Shaq Divorce, which involved the marriage of basketball superstar Shaquille O’Neal and his wife Shaunie O’Neal, was finalized in 2010, ending a 5-year marriage forged in 2002. The couple maintained custody over a total of 6 children; both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal shared 4 natural children, while each of them arrived into the relationship with one child from previous relationships:

The Shaq Divorce was amongst the most tumultuous to have taken place within the realm of celebrity divorces, due to the fact that while the couple have filed for divorce in 2007, it was recanted only months following. Furthermore, the couple’s unwillingness to file the Shaq Divorce outside of a court resigned them to be subject to a variety of terms of the Shaq divorce to be released

Although there existed various speculation with regard to the reasons for the divorce were cited as irreconcilable differences with regard to the strain of marriage in conjunction to what Shaunie O’Neal cited as Shaquille O’Neal’s celebrity status

The Shaq Divorce in the State of Florida

Within the State of Florida – in tandem with a contested divorce – the court will retain the authorization to determine the terms of a divorce settlement; as was the case with the Shaq Divorce, the divorce settlement included the following procedures:

The Determination of Fault in the Shaq Divorce

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion – which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage – the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record; however both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal were unable to settle the Shaq Divorce outside of court, and as a result, certain details of the Shaq Divorce settlement became available on public record.

Challenge in the Shaq Divorce

The challenge facilitated Shaquille O’Neal was set forth in order to determine the surmise and itemization of the collective assets in possession of both himself and Shaunie O’Neal; these details latent within the Shaq Divorce challenge were comprised of the petition set forth by Shaunie O’Neal with regard from the spousal support, division of assets, and custody from which she had petitioned from Shaquille O’Neal.

The Finalization of the Shaq Divorce

The finalization of the Shaq divorce required a decision by a trial judge, which was set forth by the presiding judge overseeing the trial. Upon the dissolution of the marriage between Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal expressed the following in conjunction with the petitions filed:

Although none of the definitive details were released with regard to the monies, assets, and prenuptial agreement, Shaquille O’Neal’s estimated value at the time of the Shaq divorce included a $20 million annual salary, $10 million worth of wages earned from endorsements, a home estimated at $32 million in Miami, Florida, as well as any communal property in possession of the couple

Overview of the Steven Spielberg Divorce

The Steven Spielberg Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between film director Steven Spielberg and actor Amy Irving; the Steven Spielberg Divorce was finalized in 1989, which ended the 4-yearlong marriage – the couple was wed in 1985:

The Parties Involved in the Steven Spielberg Divorce

The identification of Steven Spielberg – both at the time of the Steven Spielberg divorce, as well as within modernity – as being amongst the most influential and successful film directors of the 20th century created a media feeding frenzy surrounding the coverage of the Steven Spielberg divorce settlement; Steven Spielberg is responsible for timeless films such as The Indiana Jones Series, Jaws, E.T., as well as The Back to the Future Series – this is just to name a few. Amy Irving also earned her celebrity status within the media as a result of her film career including Yentl and Carrie.

2 Shocking Facts within the Steven Spielberg Divorce Settlement

Within the exploration of the Steven Spielberg divorce settlement, 2 primary details thrust the proceedings into the public media without regard of the celebrity statuses of both Steven Spielberg and Amy Irving:

The Steven Spielberg divorce settlement is considered to be amongst the most expensive within the history of the United States; due to the fact that Steven Spielberg’s net worth was estimated to exceed $1 billion at the time of the finalization of the divorce, Amy Irving was reported to have received anywhere between $95 million and $105 million upon walking away from the Steven Spielberg divorce

Secondly, the Steven Spielberg gained notoriety due to the fact that Steven Spielberg penned a prenuptial agreement on a napkin in lieu of drafting an official contract under the counsel of an attorney; although the ad-hoc prenuptial agreement expressed the limitations to what Amy Irving would be entitled upon the dissolution of marriage, the presiding judge dismissed the validity of the makeshift agreement

The Terms of the Steven Spielberg Divorce Settlement

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Steven Spielberg Divorce, both Steven Spielberg and Amy Irving opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Steven Spielberg Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Steven Spielberg Divorce settlement:

Due to the dismissal of the prenuptial agreement presented and drafted by Steven Spielberg on a napkin, Amy Irving was entitled to half of the couple’s combined, earned assets accrued during the time of their marriage; within the State of California, this is known as ‘Community Property’

Overview of the Ted Danson Divorce

The Ted Danson Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Ted Danson and Casey Coates; the Ted Danson Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the nearly-16 year marriage, which took place on July 30th, 1977. Akin to traditional divorce proceedings – meaning, those undertaken by non-celebrity couples – the nature of the divorce settlement can range from amicable to scandalous; unfortunately, the Ted Danson Divorce from Casey Coates was classified as the latter. Not only was the Ted Danson Divorce considered to be amongst the most discussed, but it is considered to be amongst the costliest divorces to ever have taken place in Hollywood:

The Parties Involved in the Ted Danson Divorce

Ted Danson gained his celebrity status as a result of his role on the sitcom Cheers, which is considered to be amongst the top-rated and most popular television programs to ever have aired; Ted Danson’s beloved character ‘Sam’, who was the bartender of the fictitious drinking establishment ‘Cheers’, thrust him into international fame and celebrity. Ted Danson met Casey Coates in 1976 – prior to his rise to fame; Casey Coates was employed as a fashion designer.

The Controversy of the Ted Danson Divorce

The controversy arose as Casey Coates suffered a stroke in 1979 upon birthing the couple’s first child; subsequent to Coates’ stroke, Ted Danson took a sabbatical from acting in order to tend to his ailing wife; however, the stroke left Casey Coates debilitated, and the couple adopted a daughter years later. In 1992, rumors of an extramarital affair with fellow actor Whoopie Goldberg on the set of the film ‘Made in America’ – in which both Danson and Goldberg were featured; however, the rumors were soon validated, leading the Ted Danson Divorce finalized in 1993.

The Terms of the Ted Danson Divorce Settlement

The Ted Danson Divorce was filed as ‘uncontested’ with regard to the placement of fault; an uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, due to Ted Danson’s infidelity, reports were released showing that he had agreed to an uncontested divorce in lieu of the details of his affair being released; the terms of the settlement took place as follows:

Casey Coates walked away from the Ted Danson Divorce with upwards of $30 million, in addition to an undisclosed settlement with regard to supplemental assets in possession of the former couple, as well as custody of the former-couple’s 2 children

The nature of the uncontested settlement allowed for few details to be released with regard to additional undertakings and events within the marriage

Overview of the Terrence Howard Divorce Filing

The February 2nd, 2011 filing for the Terrence Howard Divorce – a title given to the dissolution of the marriage of actor Terrence Howard and his wife Michelle Ghent – would mark the end of a year-long marriage undertaken upon finalization. Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent were married in January of 2010 in a secret ceremony in the State of California. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Terrence Howard Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details have emerged with regard to the filing of the Terrence Howard divorce, various reports cite that Michelle Ghent will be seeking to collect spousal support in the form of alimony; however, the presence of a prenuptial agreement has not been confirmed

The Parties Involved in the Terrence Howard Divorce

Within the last decade, Terrence Howard has quickly emerged as one of the most sought-after actors in Hollywood; he has starred in such blockbuster hits including The Frog and the Prince, Iron Man, Hustle & Flow, Crash, and Ray. Terrence Howard met Michelle Ghent in 2010 while she was employed in the field of commercial production – the couple shares no children:

In the event that the Terrence Howard divorce becomes finalized, it will serve as the end of Terrence Howard’s second marriage

Legal Venue of the Terrence Howard Divorce Hearing

The Terrence Howard Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Terrence Howard Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Terrence Howard divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Terrence Howard divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Terrence Howard Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Terrence Howard Divorce, if both Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Terrence Howard Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Background of the Peewee Herman Arrest

The following details took place upon Paul Reubens Arrested; due to his television persona named ‘Peewee Herman’, this event is sometimes referred to as the ‘Peewee Herman Arrest’:

Who is Paul Reubens?

Paul Reubens is an American actor who is most commonly recognized for his character persona ‘Peewee Herman’; at the time that Paul Reubens was arrested, Peewee Herman was amongst the most beloved television personas. However, the true controversy occurred at the time of the Peewee Herman arrest due to the fact that the Peewee Herman television program was considered to be a children’s television program, but also, Paul Reubens was arrested for masturbating in a public movie theatre.

Date of the Peewee Herman Arrest: The Peewee Herman arrest took place in July of 2006

Location of the Peewee Herman Arrest: The criminal activity undertaken by Paul Reubens took place in Sarasota, Florida

Criminal Charges Associated with the Peewee Herman Arrest

Paul Reubens arrested took place as a result of a call to local law enforcement claiming that in individual was reported to have been publically masturbating within a theatre that was screening pornographic films. Subsequent to the police apprehension of Paul Reubens, the following criminal charges were furnished by the arresting officers:

The Public Indecency charge resulted from the illicit and inappropriate sexual activity in a public place; public indecency is a legal, catchall term used to classify activity determined to be appropriate within the public sector

The indecent exposure charge arose as Paul Reubens was reported as exposing himself

The Punitive Recourse of the Peewee Herman Trial

Subsequent to the findings by the presiding judge with regard to the Peewee Herman trial, the sentencing, which resulted from Paul Reubens arrested involved Paul Reubens to undergo the following:

A probationary period in which he was be unable to be arrested, as well as a restriction from attending certain institutions screening pornographic movies

A court-imposed fine for an undisclosed amount

The Notion of Celebrity within the Peewee Herman Arrest

Due to the fact that Paul Reubens was widely recognized a celebrity at the time of the arrest – in conjunction with his audience being recognized as children – the media scrutiny surrounding the events inherent in Paul Reubens arrested were exponentially higher with regard to the coverage of the details of the event described as the Peewee Herman:

Uniform Sentencing with the Peewee Herman Arrest Trial

The Peewee Herman trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – run the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial, much like that public was during the Peewee Herman, the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion:

Outcomes of the Peewee Herman Arrest Trial

Due to the fact that celebrities typically possess higher earnings and greater fortunes than individuals considered to account for the median members of society, the implementation of financial recourse – in the form of fines or fees – is considered by many legal professionals to be subject to inefficiency with regard to punitive recourse; within the Peewee Herman trial, many individuals suspected that the enforcement of a median monetary payment furnished by Paul Reubens would neither affect her finances nor serve as an effective punishment