A Summary of the Prospective Rachel Ray Divorce

The allegation surrounding a possible ‘Rachel Ray Divorce’, which involves celebrity television personality Rachel Ray, who is widely-acclaimed and beloved for her cooking shows – and her husband since 2005 John Cusimano – have been a topic of discussion in a variety of media outlets. Allegations surrounding the stasis of the couple’s marriage – in tandem with suggestions that the marriage is undergoing dissolution, the dispute of those same rumors are swiftly falsified seemingly just as soon as they arise on the part of Rachel Ray’s publicists.

The Rumors Surrounding the Rachel Ray Divorce

Rachel Ray and husband John Cusimano were wed in 2005. Due to the candid nature of Rachel Ray’s television program, she would oftentimes divulge nuances and details about her marriage in passing; the nature of these details struck her adoring fans as illustrative of a picture-perfect marriage. As a result, the rumors surrounding a prospective Rachel Ray divorce were that much more alarming subsequent to their release within the public media – reports surfaced suggesting the following:

Rachel Ray and her husband John had come to an agreement that both her celebrity status and her seemingly non-stop scheduling had put a strain on the couple’s marriage; as a result, she had found herself unable to fulfill the role of wife that she had originally promised during her wedding vows – within these reports, Rachel Ray claimed that the split would be amicable and both she and her husband would part ways on good terms

Following the release of the aforementioned statement, which had yet to be verified, reports surfaces illustrating that the mother of Rachel Ray had arrived to Ray’s home city of New York in order to assist her in both finding and decorating an apartment in which she would presumably reside without John – these allegations only stoked the rumors surrounding a potential Rachel Ray divorce

The Validity of the Rachel Ray Divorce Rumors

As of April of 2011, both Rachel Ray and John Cusimano are reported as happily married; their relationship has been described of being absent of any signs or suggestions that the marriage will be in anyway terminated by what the media had donned a ‘Rachel Ray divorce’. However, certain media outlets and sources continue to dispute these allegations, claiming that Rachel Ray divorce would result in a public backlash of her television persona, as well as create a forum in which suspected allegations may come forth. Yet, despite the detractors of Rachel Ray’s marriage being in current good standing, there has been no mention – neither on behalf of Rachel Ray nor her publicists – suggesting otherwise:

Furthermore, Rachel Ray has not been reported as filing any defamation or libel charges against the various media outlets suggesting a potential Rachel Ray; while this fact does strike some individuals as odd, as of 2011, the Rachel Ray divorce rumors seemed to have quieted substantially within public media circles

A Summary of the Shaq Divorce

The Shaq Divorce, which involved the marriage of basketball superstar Shaquille O’Neal and his wife Shaunie O’Neal, was finalized in 2010, ending a 5-year marriage forged in 2002. The couple maintained custody over a total of 6 children; both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal shared 4 natural children, while each of them arrived into the relationship with one child from previous relationships:

The Shaq Divorce was amongst the most tumultuous to have taken place within the realm of celebrity divorces, due to the fact that while the couple have filed for divorce in 2007, it was recanted only months following. Furthermore, the couple’s unwillingness to file the Shaq Divorce outside of a court resigned them to be subject to a variety of terms of the Shaq divorce to be released

Although there existed various speculation with regard to the reasons for the divorce were cited as irreconcilable differences with regard to the strain of marriage in conjunction to what Shaunie O’Neal cited as Shaquille O’Neal’s celebrity status

The Shaq Divorce in the State of Florida

Within the State of Florida – in tandem with a contested divorce – the court will retain the authorization to determine the terms of a divorce settlement; as was the case with the Shaq Divorce, the divorce settlement included the following procedures:

The Determination of Fault in the Shaq Divorce

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion – which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage – the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record; however both Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal were unable to settle the Shaq Divorce outside of court, and as a result, certain details of the Shaq Divorce settlement became available on public record.

Challenge in the Shaq Divorce

The challenge facilitated Shaquille O’Neal was set forth in order to determine the surmise and itemization of the collective assets in possession of both himself and Shaunie O’Neal; these details latent within the Shaq Divorce challenge were comprised of the petition set forth by Shaunie O’Neal with regard from the spousal support, division of assets, and custody from which she had petitioned from Shaquille O’Neal.

The Finalization of the Shaq Divorce

The finalization of the Shaq divorce required a decision by a trial judge, which was set forth by the presiding judge overseeing the trial. Upon the dissolution of the marriage between Shaquille O’Neal and Shaunie O’Neal expressed the following in conjunction with the petitions filed:

Although none of the definitive details were released with regard to the monies, assets, and prenuptial agreement, Shaquille O’Neal’s estimated value at the time of the Shaq divorce included a $20 million annual salary, $10 million worth of wages earned from endorsements, a home estimated at $32 million in Miami, Florida, as well as any communal property in possession of the couple

Overview of the Steven Spielberg Divorce

The Steven Spielberg Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between film director Steven Spielberg and actor Amy Irving; the Steven Spielberg Divorce was finalized in 1989, which ended the 4-yearlong marriage – the couple was wed in 1985:

The Parties Involved in the Steven Spielberg Divorce

The identification of Steven Spielberg – both at the time of the Steven Spielberg divorce, as well as within modernity – as being amongst the most influential and successful film directors of the 20th century created a media feeding frenzy surrounding the coverage of the Steven Spielberg divorce settlement; Steven Spielberg is responsible for timeless films such as The Indiana Jones Series, Jaws, E.T., as well as The Back to the Future Series – this is just to name a few. Amy Irving also earned her celebrity status within the media as a result of her film career including Yentl and Carrie.

2 Shocking Facts within the Steven Spielberg Divorce Settlement

Within the exploration of the Steven Spielberg divorce settlement, 2 primary details thrust the proceedings into the public media without regard of the celebrity statuses of both Steven Spielberg and Amy Irving:

The Steven Spielberg divorce settlement is considered to be amongst the most expensive within the history of the United States; due to the fact that Steven Spielberg’s net worth was estimated to exceed $1 billion at the time of the finalization of the divorce, Amy Irving was reported to have received anywhere between $95 million and $105 million upon walking away from the Steven Spielberg divorce

Secondly, the Steven Spielberg gained notoriety due to the fact that Steven Spielberg penned a prenuptial agreement on a napkin in lieu of drafting an official contract under the counsel of an attorney; although the ad-hoc prenuptial agreement expressed the limitations to what Amy Irving would be entitled upon the dissolution of marriage, the presiding judge dismissed the validity of the makeshift agreement

The Terms of the Steven Spielberg Divorce Settlement

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Steven Spielberg Divorce, both Steven Spielberg and Amy Irving opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Steven Spielberg Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Steven Spielberg Divorce settlement:

Due to the dismissal of the prenuptial agreement presented and drafted by Steven Spielberg on a napkin, Amy Irving was entitled to half of the couple’s combined, earned assets accrued during the time of their marriage; within the State of California, this is known as ‘Community Property’

Overview of the Ted Danson Divorce

The Ted Danson Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Ted Danson and Casey Coates; the Ted Danson Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the nearly-16 year marriage, which took place on July 30th, 1977. Akin to traditional divorce proceedings – meaning, those undertaken by non-celebrity couples – the nature of the divorce settlement can range from amicable to scandalous; unfortunately, the Ted Danson Divorce from Casey Coates was classified as the latter. Not only was the Ted Danson Divorce considered to be amongst the most discussed, but it is considered to be amongst the costliest divorces to ever have taken place in Hollywood:

The Parties Involved in the Ted Danson Divorce

Ted Danson gained his celebrity status as a result of his role on the sitcom Cheers, which is considered to be amongst the top-rated and most popular television programs to ever have aired; Ted Danson’s beloved character ‘Sam’, who was the bartender of the fictitious drinking establishment ‘Cheers’, thrust him into international fame and celebrity. Ted Danson met Casey Coates in 1976 – prior to his rise to fame; Casey Coates was employed as a fashion designer.

The Controversy of the Ted Danson Divorce

The controversy arose as Casey Coates suffered a stroke in 1979 upon birthing the couple’s first child; subsequent to Coates’ stroke, Ted Danson took a sabbatical from acting in order to tend to his ailing wife; however, the stroke left Casey Coates debilitated, and the couple adopted a daughter years later. In 1992, rumors of an extramarital affair with fellow actor Whoopie Goldberg on the set of the film ‘Made in America’ – in which both Danson and Goldberg were featured; however, the rumors were soon validated, leading the Ted Danson Divorce finalized in 1993.

The Terms of the Ted Danson Divorce Settlement

The Ted Danson Divorce was filed as ‘uncontested’ with regard to the placement of fault; an uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, due to Ted Danson’s infidelity, reports were released showing that he had agreed to an uncontested divorce in lieu of the details of his affair being released; the terms of the settlement took place as follows:

Casey Coates walked away from the Ted Danson Divorce with upwards of $30 million, in addition to an undisclosed settlement with regard to supplemental assets in possession of the former couple, as well as custody of the former-couple’s 2 children

The nature of the uncontested settlement allowed for few details to be released with regard to additional undertakings and events within the marriage

Overview of the Terrence Howard Divorce Filing

The February 2nd, 2011 filing for the Terrence Howard Divorce – a title given to the dissolution of the marriage of actor Terrence Howard and his wife Michelle Ghent – would mark the end of a year-long marriage undertaken upon finalization. Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent were married in January of 2010 in a secret ceremony in the State of California. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Terrence Howard Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although few details have emerged with regard to the filing of the Terrence Howard divorce, various reports cite that Michelle Ghent will be seeking to collect spousal support in the form of alimony; however, the presence of a prenuptial agreement has not been confirmed

The Parties Involved in the Terrence Howard Divorce

Within the last decade, Terrence Howard has quickly emerged as one of the most sought-after actors in Hollywood; he has starred in such blockbuster hits including The Frog and the Prince, Iron Man, Hustle & Flow, Crash, and Ray. Terrence Howard met Michelle Ghent in 2010 while she was employed in the field of commercial production – the couple shares no children:

In the event that the Terrence Howard divorce becomes finalized, it will serve as the end of Terrence Howard’s second marriage

Legal Venue of the Terrence Howard Divorce Hearing

The Terrence Howard Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Terrence Howard Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Terrence Howard divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Terrence Howard divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Terrence Howard Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Terrence Howard Divorce, if both Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Terrence Howard Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Terrence Howard and Michelle Ghent seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

The Background of the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

On April 15th, 2010, same-sex couple Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michael announced a separation, in addition to a prospective Melissa Etheridge divorce settlement in the event that a divorce is finalized; due to the fact that same-sex marriage was not considered to be legal at the time of the couple’s union, both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels undertook a commitment ceremony in the State of California. A finalized Melissa Etheridge divorce would end a 7 year marriage between the couple who wed on April of 2003; in 2006, Melissa Etheridge announced that Tammy Lynne Michaels was pregnant with the couple’s child – subsequent to undertaking an artificial insemination procedure:

With regard to the Melissa Etheridge divorce, she has stated that the couple had undergone irreconcilable differences; legislation addressing domestic partnerships – akin to those enacted by same-sex couples – mandate the determination of 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court

These facts are the determination of spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; since the fact that the Melissa Etheridge divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named

The only details that have surfaced include Tammy Lynn Michaels requested spousal support from a potential Melissa Etheridge divorce settlement, as well as joint custody of the couple’s twins

Who Was Involved in the Melissa Etheridge Divorce Filing?

Singer Melissa Etheridge has been responsible for both the composition and performance of such massive hits including ‘Come to My Window’, I’m the Only One’, and ‘The Weakness in Me’; in addition to her prolific musical career, Melissa Etheridge has served as a public advocate and staunch lobbyist for gay rights – Melissa Etheridge is an openly-gay performer and icon who has served as an inspiration for countless activist groups.

The Plea within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce Settlement

The following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Melissa Etheridge divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Melissa Etheridge Divorce, if both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Facts about the Michael Douglas Divorce

Michael Douglas is an American actor who met Diandra Luker at an inauguration ceremony for the upcoming presidential elect Jimmy Carter in March of 1977; at the time of their meeting Michael Douglas was 33 years old and Diandra Luker was 19 years old – the Michael Douglas divorce took place in 1998. While at the time of their marriage, Michael Douglas was not considered to have reached the height of celebrity that he would experience within forthcoming years; over the course of the marriage – prior to the Michael Douglas divorce – Michael Douglas became one of the highest-paid and most sought-after actors of his time:

Michael Douglas has graced the screen in a multitude of films; amongst the films for which he considered to be the renowned include Wall Street, Fatal Attraction, The War of the Roses, The Jewel of the Nile, Wonderboys, and Traffic

Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas share one child named Cameron, who was born in 1978; due to his age at the time of the Michael Douglas divorce, the need to establish custody for Cameron was unnecessary

Throughout the marriage of Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas, the couple was not without their share of domestic difficulty; in 1992, Michael Douglas confessed to an addiction to both drugs and alcohol and underwent treatment in a rehabilitation facility

Michael Douglas was also rumored to have undertaken extramarital partners; however, his alleged infidelity was never substantiated

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce

The Michael Douglas divorce – in conjunction with the respective calculations of alimony payments, the division of assets, and supplementary spousal support offered to Diandra Douglas from Michael Douglas – is considered to be amongst the most expensive in history. Although the terms of the Michael Douglas divorce settlement were kept highly-private, the following details were released:

Diandra Douglas walked away with an alleged sum of $45 million subsequent to the Michael Douglas divorce

Diandra Douglas was also awarded the couple’s formerly-shared homes in Beverley Hills, California and the island of Majorca

The Determination of Contest within the Michael Douglas Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Michael Douglas Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Michael Douglas Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Douglas Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas determined that the Michael Douglas Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Basketball icon Michael Jordan and his wife Juanita Jordan filed for divorce in 2006 after 17 years of marriage; the couple was married in 1989. Prior to this particular Michael Jordan divorce, the couple underwent a close-call with a divorce in 2002 subsequent to rumors of infidelity surfacing with regard to Michael Jordan; yet, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan managed to stay together until 2006. The couple shares 3 children. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Jordan Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan determined that the Michael Jordan Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature. However, the allegations of Jordan’s infidelity became a reality during the Michael Jordan divorce; reports stated that Michael Jordan had paid extramarital partners for their respective silence in conjunc
tion with affairs he had undertaken.

Why Was the Michael Jordan Divorce the Most Expensive?

Basketball superstar Michael Jordan earned his fame and notoriety both within the realm of athletics, as well as within the realm of marketing, entertainment, and endorsements. Both prior and subsequent to the Michael Jordan divorce, the basketball icon has been the face of Gatorade, Nike, and Hanes; Jordan’s value is reported to exceed an estimated $500 million.

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Michael Jordan Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Juanita Jordan petitioned for alimony payments from Michael Jordan upon the finalization of the Michael Jordan Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Michael Jordan Divorce:

Juanita Jordan received a sum of $168 million in spousal support

Due to the fact the couple’s 3 children exceeded 18 years of age, the determination of custody within the Michael Jordan divorce was not applicable

The Division of Assets in the Michael Jordan Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Michael Jordan Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

In addition to the $168 million payment furnished to Juanita Jordan following the Michael Jordan settlement, she was also given ownership of the couple’s luxury home in Chicago, Illinois

Overview of the Neil Diamond Divorce

The Neil Diamond Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy; the Neil Diamond Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 33-year long marriage. Although the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Neil Diamond divorce; despite the suspicion of extramarital affairs undertaken by Neil Diamond, which resulted in Marsha Murphy petitioning for half of his fortune, Neil Diamond responded that his former wife deserved the settlement amount and ‘was worth every penny’

Neil Diamond continued to thank Marsha Murphy for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Neil Diamond divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Neil Diamond Divorce

Neil Diamond is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters in world history; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, he was valued at an estimated $300 million – Diamond is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘I Write the Songs’ and ‘Sweet Caroline’. He met Marsha Murphy in 1965, where at the time, Murphy was employed as a production assistant; the couple shares 2 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Neil Diamond Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, both Neil Diamond and Marcia Murphy opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Neil Diamond Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

The nature of the Neil Diamond divorce resulting in an uncontested settlement has been presumed to have taken place as a result of the couple’s desire to keep the details of the Neil Diamond divorce secretive; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, Marsha Murphy discovered that he had undertaken various extramarital affairs – in many cases, these events of infidelity were highly-publicized by the media

Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce settlement:

Marsha Murphy walked away from the Neil Diamond divorce settlement with an estimated $150 million, which was reported to be half of Neil Diamond’s fortune; the Neil Diamond divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in history

Background of the Nick Hogan Arrest

The following details outline the shocking details of the 2007 Nick Hogan arrest and sentencing of Nick Hogan subsequent to his involvement in an automobile accident resulting in the passenger in the vehicle, John Graziano, withstanding life-changing injuries; the accident took place in Clearwater, Florida. Although Nick Hogan was not considered to have earned his celebrity status, he is the son of famed wrestler Terry Bollea, who is known as ‘Hulk Hogan’ to fans of professional wrestling on a worldwide basis. The cause of the accident in which Nick Hogan and John Graziano were involved was determined to be the result of both intoxicated driving, as well as reckless endangerment in the form of ‘drag racing’:

Who Was Involved?

Reports released with regard to the details of the car accident involving the vehicle that Nick Hogan was driving – in tandem with the injuries resulting from the accident itself – included 3 individuals driving one of Hulk Hogan’s cars, while Nick Hogan, 17, and John Graziano, 22, were reported as occupying the other vehicle. As previously mentioned, Nick Hogan – whose birthname is Nick Bollea – is the son of wrestling legend Hulk Hogan; John Graziano was a friend of Nick Hogan’s and a marine.

What Happened?

While the 5 individuals were en route to their destination, both Nick Hogan and the driver of the other vehicle belonging to Hulk Hogan began to race; reports submitted by fellow motorists and witnesses reported the cars to be traveling anywhere between 70 and 90 miles per hour – these reports alleged that Nick Hogan had been doubling the expressed speed limitations of that particular roadway. In the midst of driving, Nick Hogan began to drive outside of the lane as the vehicle spun around and sustained a massive impact against a concrete divider on the highway; reports state that the car also impacted a tree. Although Nick Hogan was wearing a seatbelt at the time of the impact, John Graziano was not – as a result, Graziano suffered irrevocable and debilitating injuries.

The Consequences of Nick Hogan’s Actions

After being airlifted to the nearest hospital within the area of Tamp, Florida, Nick Hogan was discharged later that day; however, John Graziano had suffered irreversible damage to his neurological system, which resulted in what would be determined to ensure that he would be in the care of assisted living specialists for the duration of his life.

Criminal Charges Filed Against Nick Hogan

The trial of Nick Hogan was a fairly simple one; the case details surfacing after the accident had revealed that Nick Hogan had a blood alcohol level of 0.05 at the time of the accident; although not above the legal limit, Nick Hogan was a minor at the time of the accident – in the State of Florida, a blood alcohol level exceeding 0.02 displayed by a minor is a criminal offense:

Nick Hogan was charged with a felony, which resulted from injuries sustained through the undertaking of reckless operation of a motor vehicle

Nick Hogan was charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol, which contributed to damage or injury; while Nick Hogan’s attorney attempted to substantiate that john Graziano’s injuries resulted from his failure to wear a seatbelt in lieu of Nick Hogan’s intoxication, the judge quickly dismissed them

Nick Hogan was sentenced to 8 months of incarceration, the loss of his license for 3 years, 500 hours of court-ordered community service, and a 5-year term of probation