A Summary of the Petr Nedved Divorce

The Petr Nedved Divorce was finalized in the summer of 2006, which ended the 2-year marriage between Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova – the couple was wed in July of 2004. For those unfamiliar with the Petr Nedved Divorce, the celebrity status of Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Petr Nedved Divorce had taken place:

Professional Hockey Player Petr Nedved was one of the most revered hockey players within the National Hockey League – playing for the Phoenix Coyotes; however, after his marriage to Varekova, he requested a trade to the New York Rangers in order to be stationed closer to her

Petr Nedved’s request was not confusing at all; Varekova was an international supermodel who appeared in a variety of noteworthy shoots, such as the Sport’s Illustrated Swimsuit Issue, as well as a variety of Victoria’s Secret advertisement campaigns

Although allegations flew with regard to the Petr Nedved Divorce, the only statement offered by Nedved himself was “I want to keep my personal life personal”

The Determination of Contest within the Petr Nedved Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Petr Nedved Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Petr Nedved Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple maintained the utmost secrecy with regard to the terms, settlement, and caused for the Peter Nedved Divorce:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Petr Nedved Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Petr Nedved Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova determined that the Petr Nedved Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Petr Nedved Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova – within the Petr Nedved Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Petr Nedved and Veronika Varekova to be released into public record:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review.

The Secrets Leading Up to the Tiger Woods Scandal

The ‘Tiger Woods Affair’ or the ‘Tiger Woods Scandal’ is a moniker given to the events surrounding the infidelity, extramarital affair, and eventual divorce experienced by professional golfer Tiger Woods and his former wife Elin Nordgren. The Tiger Woods Scandal is considered by many individuals to be amongst the most widely-publicized and publically-investigated events of the 21st century; the reasons for this phenomenon are considered to be rooted with a variety of facts applicable to Tiger Woods’ status as a celebrity icon:

In November of 2009, reports began to surface regarding alleged infidelity and extramarital affairs undertaken by Tiger Woods; at the close of November of 2009, a car accident involving Tiger Woods outside of his home was alleged to have taken place as a result of Nordegren’s discovery of the Tiger Woods Affair

While adamant about maintaining his innocence with regard to the Tiger Woods Affair, eventually, the allegations of infidelity began to surface at a staggering rate, ranging from the number of Woods’ extramarital partners to the rate at which he engaged in such behavior

In December of 2010, Woods admitted his involvement in what was dubbed the ‘Tiger Woods Scandal’ and issued a public apology to both his fans, as well as to his wife – Tiger Woods expressed that he and his wife would attempt to salvage the marriage subsequent to the public’s exposure to Tiger Woods Affair

The Backlash of the Tiger Woods Scandal

While Woods and Nordegren attempted to salvage their marriage, the divorce settlement expressed that the couple’s bond was irretrievably broken; however, the dissolution of his marriage due to Tiger Woods Affair was only a fraction of his problems – at an alarming rate, his corporate sponsorships began to withdraw their association with Woods following the Tiger Woods Scandal:

On December 12th, 2010, the Gillette Company was the first to withdraw their sponsorship of Tiger Woods; the period between Gillette’s withdrawal into the middle of 2011 resulted in supplemental corporate withdrawals from sponsorships including TAG Heuer, General Motors, and Gatorade

Economists studying the financial loss expected from the withdrawal of sponsorships following the Tiger Woods Affair to exist within the realm of $4 billion and $17 billion

Prior to their divorce of August 23rd, 2010, Woods had confessed to upwards of 120 extramarital affairs; the couple split and both Woods and Nordegren maintain joint custody over their 2 children

The Public Reaction to the Tiger Woods Scandal

At the time of the Tiger Woods Affair, Tiger Woods was listed as amongst the most popular athletes on a global level; he has been identified as the athlete retaining the largest salary in tandem with the largest net worth. The Tiger Woods Scandal was dually-shocking as a result that Tiger Woods was considered to be an iconic figure, not only renowned for his golfing acumen, but also his wide range of sponsorships and publicity. His 2005 marriage to Elin Nordegren – a former Swedish model – was considered to be the depiction of a power couple; many social scientists and professionals in media studies have set forth theories gauging the degree of which society as a whole enjoys the success of celebrities in contrast with the enjoyment derived in the event that a celebrity ‘falls from grace’.

A Summary of the Prospective Rachel Ray Divorce

The allegation surrounding a possible ‘Rachel Ray Divorce’, which involves celebrity television personality Rachel Ray, who is widely-acclaimed and beloved for her cooking shows – and her husband since 2005 John Cusimano – have been a topic of discussion in a variety of media outlets. Allegations surrounding the stasis of the couple’s marriage – in tandem with suggestions that the marriage is undergoing dissolution, the dispute of those same rumors are swiftly falsified seemingly just as soon as they arise on the part of Rachel Ray’s publicists.

The Rumors Surrounding the Rachel Ray Divorce

Rachel Ray and husband John Cusimano were wed in 2005. Due to the candid nature of Rachel Ray’s television program, she would oftentimes divulge nuances and details about her marriage in passing; the nature of these details struck her adoring fans as illustrative of a picture-perfect marriage. As a result, the rumors surrounding a prospective Rachel Ray divorce were that much more alarming subsequent to their release within the public media – reports surfaced suggesting the following:

Rachel Ray and her husband John had come to an agreement that both her celebrity status and her seemingly non-stop scheduling had put a strain on the couple’s marriage; as a result, she had found herself unable to fulfill the role of wife that she had originally promised during her wedding vows – within these reports, Rachel Ray claimed that the split would be amicable and both she and her husband would part ways on good terms

Following the release of the aforementioned statement, which had yet to be verified, reports surfaces illustrating that the mother of Rachel Ray had arrived to Ray’s home city of New York in order to assist her in both finding and decorating an apartment in which she would presumably reside without John – these allegations only stoked the rumors surrounding a potential Rachel Ray divorce

The Validity of the Rachel Ray Divorce Rumors

As of April of 2011, both Rachel Ray and John Cusimano are reported as happily married; their relationship has been described of being absent of any signs or suggestions that the marriage will be in anyway terminated by what the media had donned a ‘Rachel Ray divorce’. However, certain media outlets and sources continue to dispute these allegations, claiming that Rachel Ray divorce would result in a public backlash of her television persona, as well as create a forum in which suspected allegations may come forth. Yet, despite the detractors of Rachel Ray’s marriage being in current good standing, there has been no mention – neither on behalf of Rachel Ray nor her publicists – suggesting otherwise:

Furthermore, Rachel Ray has not been reported as filing any defamation or libel charges against the various media outlets suggesting a potential Rachel Ray; while this fact does strike some individuals as odd, as of 2011, the Rachel Ray divorce rumors seemed to have quieted substantially within public media circles

Overview of the Tim Robbins Divorce

The Tim Robbins Divorce was not really a divorce at all; due to the fact that actors Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon had never officially wed – despite engaging in a 20-year romantic relationship – within their 20-year relationship, the couple birthed 2 sons. In December of 2009, the general public witnessed the dissolution of the partnership undertaken by 2 of Hollywood’s most iconic and beloved actors – the couple met while on the set of the 1988 film Bull Durham. Interviews furnished by both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon rejected the institution of marriage with regard to the couple’s partnership; they maintained that they shared a deep love and commitment for one another, and collectively, did not feel as though a marriage certificate should – or would – be able to define or validate that.

The Parties Involved in the Tim Robbins Split

Tim Robbins is an American actor who has gained his iconic celebrity status as a result of his various – and beloved roles, which include High Fidelity, The Shawshank Redemption, Mystic River, as well as the upcoming summer blockbuster Green Lantern. Similarly, Susan Sarandon has graced the screen with her acclaimed roles in films including Thelma & Louise, The Client, Dead Man Walking, and Leaves of Grass.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Tim Robbins Split

The dissolution of a romantic partnership enacted through cohabitation is very similar to the proceeding latent within an uncontested divorce; these circumstances involve a situation in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Tim Robbins Split, both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Tim Robbins Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Tim Robbins Separation Settlement

A settlement undertaken subsequent to the dissolution of a romantic relationship enacted by cohabitation and commitment is similar – at least within a legal fashion – to a divorce settlement, which typically includes 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. A bulk of the terms and conditions latent within the Tim Robbins split – including supplemental agreements, such as prenuptial agreements and custodial arrangements in tandem with the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Tim Robbins separation settlement:

The implementation of a domestic partnership enabled both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon to keep the terms, conditions, and arrangements of their respective settlement private; this is due to the fact that that proceeding was kept out of the courts

However, both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon share joint custody of their son Miles, who is below the age of 18 – this legally classifies him as a minor

Overview of the Tony Hawk Divorce

On February 7th, 2011, professional skateboarder Tony Hawk filed for his 3rd divorce from his wife of 5 years, Lhotse Merriam; the couple was wed on January 12, 2006 in Fiji – despite the international location of the wedding between Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam, the Tony Hawk was filed in the state of California. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Tony Hawk Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Tony Hawk Divorce

Tony Hawk is considered to be the icon of professional skateboarding; Hawk is cited as being responsible for the thrust of skateboarding into popular culture as a result of his production of skateboarding videogame franchises, skateboarding events, and skateboarding-inspired clothing line. The couple shares one daughter who was born in June of 2008.

The Controversy within the Tony Hawk Divorce

The Tony Hawk divorce filing is not without its share of scandal as per the reports released by the public media; reports have surfaced explaining that Tony Hawk has filed for divorce as a result of an extramarital affair undertaken by Hawk with Cathy Goodman – the wife of Tony Hawk’s business partner, Matt Goodman. While the details of the Tony Hawk Divorce have been kept private, reports have cited Matt Goodman as explaining that he supports the relationship between Tony Hawk and his former wife.

Legal Venue of the Tony Hawk Divorce Hearing

Filing for the Tony Hawk Divorce was set forth before the Northern San Diego branch of the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of San Diego.

The Plea within the Tony Hawk Divorce Settlement

A plea with regard to the Tony Hawk Divorce has yet to be released with regard to a divorce settlement. A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Tony Hawk divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Tony Hawk divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Tony Hawk Divorce, if both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

The Background of the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

On April 15th, 2010, same-sex couple Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michael announced a separation, in addition to a prospective Melissa Etheridge divorce settlement in the event that a divorce is finalized; due to the fact that same-sex marriage was not considered to be legal at the time of the couple’s union, both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels undertook a commitment ceremony in the State of California. A finalized Melissa Etheridge divorce would end a 7 year marriage between the couple who wed on April of 2003; in 2006, Melissa Etheridge announced that Tammy Lynne Michaels was pregnant with the couple’s child – subsequent to undertaking an artificial insemination procedure:

With regard to the Melissa Etheridge divorce, she has stated that the couple had undergone irreconcilable differences; legislation addressing domestic partnerships – akin to those enacted by same-sex couples – mandate the determination of 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court

These facts are the determination of spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; since the fact that the Melissa Etheridge divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named

The only details that have surfaced include Tammy Lynn Michaels requested spousal support from a potential Melissa Etheridge divorce settlement, as well as joint custody of the couple’s twins

Who Was Involved in the Melissa Etheridge Divorce Filing?

Singer Melissa Etheridge has been responsible for both the composition and performance of such massive hits including ‘Come to My Window’, I’m the Only One’, and ‘The Weakness in Me’; in addition to her prolific musical career, Melissa Etheridge has served as a public advocate and staunch lobbyist for gay rights – Melissa Etheridge is an openly-gay performer and icon who has served as an inspiration for countless activist groups.

The Plea within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce Settlement

The following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Melissa Etheridge divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Melissa Etheridge Divorce, if both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Facts about the Michael Douglas Divorce

Michael Douglas is an American actor who met Diandra Luker at an inauguration ceremony for the upcoming presidential elect Jimmy Carter in March of 1977; at the time of their meeting Michael Douglas was 33 years old and Diandra Luker was 19 years old – the Michael Douglas divorce took place in 1998. While at the time of their marriage, Michael Douglas was not considered to have reached the height of celebrity that he would experience within forthcoming years; over the course of the marriage – prior to the Michael Douglas divorce – Michael Douglas became one of the highest-paid and most sought-after actors of his time:

Michael Douglas has graced the screen in a multitude of films; amongst the films for which he considered to be the renowned include Wall Street, Fatal Attraction, The War of the Roses, The Jewel of the Nile, Wonderboys, and Traffic

Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas share one child named Cameron, who was born in 1978; due to his age at the time of the Michael Douglas divorce, the need to establish custody for Cameron was unnecessary

Throughout the marriage of Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas, the couple was not without their share of domestic difficulty; in 1992, Michael Douglas confessed to an addiction to both drugs and alcohol and underwent treatment in a rehabilitation facility

Michael Douglas was also rumored to have undertaken extramarital partners; however, his alleged infidelity was never substantiated

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce

The Michael Douglas divorce – in conjunction with the respective calculations of alimony payments, the division of assets, and supplementary spousal support offered to Diandra Douglas from Michael Douglas – is considered to be amongst the most expensive in history. Although the terms of the Michael Douglas divorce settlement were kept highly-private, the following details were released:

Diandra Douglas walked away with an alleged sum of $45 million subsequent to the Michael Douglas divorce

Diandra Douglas was also awarded the couple’s formerly-shared homes in Beverley Hills, California and the island of Majorca

The Determination of Contest within the Michael Douglas Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Michael Douglas Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Michael Douglas Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Douglas Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas determined that the Michael Douglas Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Basketball icon Michael Jordan and his wife Juanita Jordan filed for divorce in 2006 after 17 years of marriage; the couple was married in 1989. Prior to this particular Michael Jordan divorce, the couple underwent a close-call with a divorce in 2002 subsequent to rumors of infidelity surfacing with regard to Michael Jordan; yet, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan managed to stay together until 2006. The couple shares 3 children. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Jordan Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan determined that the Michael Jordan Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature. However, the allegations of Jordan’s infidelity became a reality during the Michael Jordan divorce; reports stated that Michael Jordan had paid extramarital partners for their respective silence in conjunc
tion with affairs he had undertaken.

Why Was the Michael Jordan Divorce the Most Expensive?

Basketball superstar Michael Jordan earned his fame and notoriety both within the realm of athletics, as well as within the realm of marketing, entertainment, and endorsements. Both prior and subsequent to the Michael Jordan divorce, the basketball icon has been the face of Gatorade, Nike, and Hanes; Jordan’s value is reported to exceed an estimated $500 million.

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Michael Jordan Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Juanita Jordan petitioned for alimony payments from Michael Jordan upon the finalization of the Michael Jordan Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Michael Jordan Divorce:

Juanita Jordan received a sum of $168 million in spousal support

Due to the fact the couple’s 3 children exceeded 18 years of age, the determination of custody within the Michael Jordan divorce was not applicable

The Division of Assets in the Michael Jordan Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Michael Jordan Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

In addition to the $168 million payment furnished to Juanita Jordan following the Michael Jordan settlement, she was also given ownership of the couple’s luxury home in Chicago, Illinois

Overview of the Neil Diamond Divorce

The Neil Diamond Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy; the Neil Diamond Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 33-year long marriage. Although the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Neil Diamond divorce; despite the suspicion of extramarital affairs undertaken by Neil Diamond, which resulted in Marsha Murphy petitioning for half of his fortune, Neil Diamond responded that his former wife deserved the settlement amount and ‘was worth every penny’

Neil Diamond continued to thank Marsha Murphy for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Neil Diamond divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Neil Diamond Divorce

Neil Diamond is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters in world history; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, he was valued at an estimated $300 million – Diamond is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘I Write the Songs’ and ‘Sweet Caroline’. He met Marsha Murphy in 1965, where at the time, Murphy was employed as a production assistant; the couple shares 2 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Neil Diamond Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, both Neil Diamond and Marcia Murphy opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Neil Diamond Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

The nature of the Neil Diamond divorce resulting in an uncontested settlement has been presumed to have taken place as a result of the couple’s desire to keep the details of the Neil Diamond divorce secretive; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, Marsha Murphy discovered that he had undertaken various extramarital affairs – in many cases, these events of infidelity were highly-publicized by the media

Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce settlement:

Marsha Murphy walked away from the Neil Diamond divorce settlement with an estimated $150 million, which was reported to be half of Neil Diamond’s fortune; the Neil Diamond divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in history

Background of the Nick Hogan Arrest

The following details outline the shocking details of the 2007 Nick Hogan arrest and sentencing of Nick Hogan subsequent to his involvement in an automobile accident resulting in the passenger in the vehicle, John Graziano, withstanding life-changing injuries; the accident took place in Clearwater, Florida. Although Nick Hogan was not considered to have earned his celebrity status, he is the son of famed wrestler Terry Bollea, who is known as ‘Hulk Hogan’ to fans of professional wrestling on a worldwide basis. The cause of the accident in which Nick Hogan and John Graziano were involved was determined to be the result of both intoxicated driving, as well as reckless endangerment in the form of ‘drag racing’:

Who Was Involved?

Reports released with regard to the details of the car accident involving the vehicle that Nick Hogan was driving – in tandem with the injuries resulting from the accident itself – included 3 individuals driving one of Hulk Hogan’s cars, while Nick Hogan, 17, and John Graziano, 22, were reported as occupying the other vehicle. As previously mentioned, Nick Hogan – whose birthname is Nick Bollea – is the son of wrestling legend Hulk Hogan; John Graziano was a friend of Nick Hogan’s and a marine.

What Happened?

While the 5 individuals were en route to their destination, both Nick Hogan and the driver of the other vehicle belonging to Hulk Hogan began to race; reports submitted by fellow motorists and witnesses reported the cars to be traveling anywhere between 70 and 90 miles per hour – these reports alleged that Nick Hogan had been doubling the expressed speed limitations of that particular roadway. In the midst of driving, Nick Hogan began to drive outside of the lane as the vehicle spun around and sustained a massive impact against a concrete divider on the highway; reports state that the car also impacted a tree. Although Nick Hogan was wearing a seatbelt at the time of the impact, John Graziano was not – as a result, Graziano suffered irrevocable and debilitating injuries.

The Consequences of Nick Hogan’s Actions

After being airlifted to the nearest hospital within the area of Tamp, Florida, Nick Hogan was discharged later that day; however, John Graziano had suffered irreversible damage to his neurological system, which resulted in what would be determined to ensure that he would be in the care of assisted living specialists for the duration of his life.

Criminal Charges Filed Against Nick Hogan

The trial of Nick Hogan was a fairly simple one; the case details surfacing after the accident had revealed that Nick Hogan had a blood alcohol level of 0.05 at the time of the accident; although not above the legal limit, Nick Hogan was a minor at the time of the accident – in the State of Florida, a blood alcohol level exceeding 0.02 displayed by a minor is a criminal offense:

Nick Hogan was charged with a felony, which resulted from injuries sustained through the undertaking of reckless operation of a motor vehicle

Nick Hogan was charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol, which contributed to damage or injury; while Nick Hogan’s attorney attempted to substantiate that john Graziano’s injuries resulted from his failure to wear a seatbelt in lieu of Nick Hogan’s intoxication, the judge quickly dismissed them

Nick Hogan was sentenced to 8 months of incarceration, the loss of his license for 3 years, 500 hours of court-ordered community service, and a 5-year term of probation