A Summary of the Tiger Woods Divorce

The Tiger Woods Divorce is a moniker given the divorce proceedings that resulted in the dissolution of the marriage between Professional Golfer Tiger Woods and his wife Elin Nordegren, who is a Swedish model; the couple was wed on October 5th, 2004 – the Tiger Woods Divorce was finalized on August 23rd, 2010. The events that were reported to have not only comprised the Tiger Woods Divorce, but also served as a catalyst for the Tiger Woods Divorce included a multitude of extramarital affairs undertaken by Tiger Woods; the latest on Tiger Woods – with regard to what the media dubbed ‘The Tiger Woods Scandal’ – reveals that Woods has admitted to upwards of 120 engagement in infidelity.

The Calm Before the Tiger Woods Divorce Storm

Although reports of his alleged infidelity began to surface at the close of 2009, Woods had never formally confessed to any extramarital affairs. The first report of infidelity came from the National Enquirer, which is highly-regarded as a tabloid publication; this publication made mention of an alleged affair taking place in November of 2009 – the story ran on November 25th, 2009. The release of this story is credited as contributing to the eventual events of the Tiger Woods Divorce.

The Famed Car Accident and Tiger Woods Divorce

At the close of November of 2009, at approximately 2:30 am outside of their home in an Orlando suburb, Nordegren contacted emergency medical services, explaining that Woods had been involved in a car accident outside of their home; Nordegren had stated that Woods was injured and requested immediate medical attention

Upon the arrival of emergency medical technicians, the reports issued stated a bruised Woods who had been removed from his vehicle presumably by Nordegren; the rear windshield of the vehicle had been smashed with what was reported to be a golf club – upon Woods’ admittance to the hospital, Tiger Woods had refused to provide the police with an explanation for the accident

While rumors began to swirl, the accident report had stated that Woods’ vehicle had stuck a fire hydrant; reports given by Woods – then considered to be the latest on Tiger Woods – expressed appreciation for his wife’s assistance in removing him from the vehicle

The latest on Tiger Woods theories with regard to the car accident prior to the Tiger Woods Divorce range from a domestic incident in which Nordegren discovered Woods’ infidelity and assaulted him while he was driving to the alleged influence of prescription medication; none of these theories with regard to the Tiger Woods Divorce have even been substantiated

Following the car accident, Woods’ was cited with a traffic violation and removed himself from entry in the remainder of golf tournaments for the year of 2009 in which he was expected to participate; this included his eponymous charity golf tournament, as well as the World Challenge tournament that was sponsored by Chevron

The Tiger Woods Divorce Settlement

The terms and conditions with regard to both the settlement, as well as the arrangements latent within the Tiger Woods Divorce were kept confidential, the latest on Tiger Woods reports stated that Nordegren would stand to earn upwards of $100 million from alimony for the Tiger Woods Divorce; in addition, both Nordegren and Woods would undertake the joint custody of the couple’s 2 children.

The Secrets Leading Up to the Tiger Woods Scandal

The ‘Tiger Woods Affair’ or the ‘Tiger Woods Scandal’ is a moniker given to the events surrounding the infidelity, extramarital affair, and eventual divorce experienced by professional golfer Tiger Woods and his former wife Elin Nordgren. The Tiger Woods Scandal is considered by many individuals to be amongst the most widely-publicized and publically-investigated events of the 21st century; the reasons for this phenomenon are considered to be rooted with a variety of facts applicable to Tiger Woods’ status as a celebrity icon:

In November of 2009, reports began to surface regarding alleged infidelity and extramarital affairs undertaken by Tiger Woods; at the close of November of 2009, a car accident involving Tiger Woods outside of his home was alleged to have taken place as a result of Nordegren’s discovery of the Tiger Woods Affair

While adamant about maintaining his innocence with regard to the Tiger Woods Affair, eventually, the allegations of infidelity began to surface at a staggering rate, ranging from the number of Woods’ extramarital partners to the rate at which he engaged in such behavior

In December of 2010, Woods admitted his involvement in what was dubbed the ‘Tiger Woods Scandal’ and issued a public apology to both his fans, as well as to his wife – Tiger Woods expressed that he and his wife would attempt to salvage the marriage subsequent to the public’s exposure to Tiger Woods Affair

The Backlash of the Tiger Woods Scandal

While Woods and Nordegren attempted to salvage their marriage, the divorce settlement expressed that the couple’s bond was irretrievably broken; however, the dissolution of his marriage due to Tiger Woods Affair was only a fraction of his problems – at an alarming rate, his corporate sponsorships began to withdraw their association with Woods following the Tiger Woods Scandal:

On December 12th, 2010, the Gillette Company was the first to withdraw their sponsorship of Tiger Woods; the period between Gillette’s withdrawal into the middle of 2011 resulted in supplemental corporate withdrawals from sponsorships including TAG Heuer, General Motors, and Gatorade

Economists studying the financial loss expected from the withdrawal of sponsorships following the Tiger Woods Affair to exist within the realm of $4 billion and $17 billion

Prior to their divorce of August 23rd, 2010, Woods had confessed to upwards of 120 extramarital affairs; the couple split and both Woods and Nordegren maintain joint custody over their 2 children

The Public Reaction to the Tiger Woods Scandal

At the time of the Tiger Woods Affair, Tiger Woods was listed as amongst the most popular athletes on a global level; he has been identified as the athlete retaining the largest salary in tandem with the largest net worth. The Tiger Woods Scandal was dually-shocking as a result that Tiger Woods was considered to be an iconic figure, not only renowned for his golfing acumen, but also his wide range of sponsorships and publicity. His 2005 marriage to Elin Nordegren – a former Swedish model – was considered to be the depiction of a power couple; many social scientists and professionals in media studies have set forth theories gauging the degree of which society as a whole enjoys the success of celebrities in contrast with the enjoyment derived in the event that a celebrity ‘falls from grace’.

Overview of the Tim Robbins Divorce

The Tim Robbins Divorce was not really a divorce at all; due to the fact that actors Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon had never officially wed – despite engaging in a 20-year romantic relationship – within their 20-year relationship, the couple birthed 2 sons. In December of 2009, the general public witnessed the dissolution of the partnership undertaken by 2 of Hollywood’s most iconic and beloved actors – the couple met while on the set of the 1988 film Bull Durham. Interviews furnished by both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon rejected the institution of marriage with regard to the couple’s partnership; they maintained that they shared a deep love and commitment for one another, and collectively, did not feel as though a marriage certificate should – or would – be able to define or validate that.

The Parties Involved in the Tim Robbins Split

Tim Robbins is an American actor who has gained his iconic celebrity status as a result of his various – and beloved roles, which include High Fidelity, The Shawshank Redemption, Mystic River, as well as the upcoming summer blockbuster Green Lantern. Similarly, Susan Sarandon has graced the screen with her acclaimed roles in films including Thelma & Louise, The Client, Dead Man Walking, and Leaves of Grass.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Tim Robbins Split

The dissolution of a romantic partnership enacted through cohabitation is very similar to the proceeding latent within an uncontested divorce; these circumstances involve a situation in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Tim Robbins Split, both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Tim Robbins Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Tim Robbins Separation Settlement

A settlement undertaken subsequent to the dissolution of a romantic relationship enacted by cohabitation and commitment is similar – at least within a legal fashion – to a divorce settlement, which typically includes 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. A bulk of the terms and conditions latent within the Tim Robbins split – including supplemental agreements, such as prenuptial agreements and custodial arrangements in tandem with the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Tim Robbins separation settlement:

The implementation of a domestic partnership enabled both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon to keep the terms, conditions, and arrangements of their respective settlement private; this is due to the fact that that proceeding was kept out of the courts

However, both Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon share joint custody of their son Miles, who is below the age of 18 – this legally classifies him as a minor

Overview of the Tony Hawk Divorce

On February 7th, 2011, professional skateboarder Tony Hawk filed for his 3rd divorce from his wife of 5 years, Lhotse Merriam; the couple was wed on January 12, 2006 in Fiji – despite the international location of the wedding between Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam, the Tony Hawk was filed in the state of California. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Tony Hawk Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Tony Hawk Divorce

Tony Hawk is considered to be the icon of professional skateboarding; Hawk is cited as being responsible for the thrust of skateboarding into popular culture as a result of his production of skateboarding videogame franchises, skateboarding events, and skateboarding-inspired clothing line. The couple shares one daughter who was born in June of 2008.

The Controversy within the Tony Hawk Divorce

The Tony Hawk divorce filing is not without its share of scandal as per the reports released by the public media; reports have surfaced explaining that Tony Hawk has filed for divorce as a result of an extramarital affair undertaken by Hawk with Cathy Goodman – the wife of Tony Hawk’s business partner, Matt Goodman. While the details of the Tony Hawk Divorce have been kept private, reports have cited Matt Goodman as explaining that he supports the relationship between Tony Hawk and his former wife.

Legal Venue of the Tony Hawk Divorce Hearing

Filing for the Tony Hawk Divorce was set forth before the Northern San Diego branch of the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of San Diego.

The Plea within the Tony Hawk Divorce Settlement

A plea with regard to the Tony Hawk Divorce has yet to be released with regard to a divorce settlement. A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Tony Hawk divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Tony Hawk divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Tony Hawk Divorce, if both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Tony Hawk Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Tony Hawk and Lhotse Merriam seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

A Summary of the Tony Robbins Divorce

The Tony Robbins Divorce was finalized in 1997, ending the 14-year marriage between Tony Robbins and Becky Robbins – the couple was wed in 1984. Tony Robbins married Becky Robbins at the age of 24 – although the couple had no children together, Tony Robbins acted as a father for the 3 children belonging to Becky Robbins from a former marriage. Tony Robbins is considered to be amongst the most recognized, iconic, and esteemed motivational speakers in the world; he has authored countless publications and resources with regard to self-help and self-empowerment – furthermore, attendance to his seminars are widely-sought after. As a result, the prospect of the Tony Robbins divorce retained the potential to affect his career as something of a ‘guru’; speculations were set forth that his divorce from his wife of 14 years would be problematic.

How Tony Robbins Broke the News of his Divorce

The details surrounding the Tony Robbins divorce were primarily kept from the press; neither Tony Robbins nor Becky Robbins issued comments with regard to any or all possible reasoning for the Tony Robbins divorce. While in many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by an icon such as Tony Robbins may be viewed as being without a downside, the reliance on Tony Robbins from his millions of clients created the potential for a backlash; as a result, it is assumed that both Becky Robbins and Tony Robbins settled outside of court:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

Did Tony Robbins Acknowledge the Dissolution of his Marriage?

With regard to his clients – both existing in private and public domains – he explained that he had felt as though he and Becky Robbins had undergone individual changes with regard to their union. He added that within his teachings, he advocates for a strong and action-based lifestyle in which an individual is prompted to live a powerful and meaningful lifestyle, citing that his marriage no longer provided him with that sentiment. Closing his statement, he maintained that he was by no means without flaw, and the Tony Robbins divorce stood to prove that – despite the initial shock of the announcement of the Tony Robbins divorce, the bulk of his clients and fans remain loyal to him and his seminars to this day.

Developments Following the Tony Robbins Divorce

The State of California requires a 6-month long waiting period subsequent to the submission of the divorce petition. Within this time, a variety of options are available to the couples facing divorce, which range from possible reconciliation to separation; only until the divorce is finalized within the State of California was either Tony Robbins or Becky Robbins permitted to remarry:

Subsequent to the Tony Robbins Divorce, Tony Robbins married Sage Robbins in 2001; the couple remains married as of April of 2011

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Paul McCartney Divorce

In 2008, the Paul McCartney Divorce was finalized, which symbolized the termination of the marriage of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills; the couple had been married since 2002. Paul McCartney was married once before his marriage to Heather Mills; his late wife Linda McCartney had died from breast cancer in 1998. While the couple attempted to refrain from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the Paul McCartney divorce, various expressions of dissatisfaction surfaced both from Mills, as well as from Paul McCartney:

Paul McCartney is considered to be amongst the most influential musicians in history with regard to his membership in the seminal music group, The Beatles; in addition, Paul McCartney is considered to be amongst the most valuable human being son Earth, with an estimated value ranging from $135 million to $400 million

Heather Mills is a former model who lost one of her legs in the midst of her modeling career; however, she continued to model despite her tragic accident

The couple birthed a daughter in 2003, named Beatrice McCartney; Paul McCartney and his late wife Linda birthed a daughter named Stella

The Paul McCartney Divorce Before the Royal Courts of Justice in the United Kingdom

The Paul McCartney divorce was considered to be amongst one of the most publicized and expensive divorce not only in the history of the United Kingdom, but also within the collective world. Within the Paul McCartney divorce settlement, various statements reflecting the couple’s growing dissatisfaction for one another was made public, in addition to attacks and defaming remarks set forth by Heather Mills:

Within the Paul McCartney divorce, statements released by Heather Mills included such allegations of substance abuse and mania exuded by Paul McCartney; in one report, she referred to him as ‘boring’ and ‘old’

Paul McCartney – upon the finalization of the Paul McCartney divorce – explained that he finally experienced as sense of ‘peace’ subsequent his divorce from Heather Mills

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Paul McCartney Divorce

A prenuptial agreement did not exist within the Paul McCartney divorce, which is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the United Kingdom, the female spouse within a marriage is entitled to half of the entirety of the net worth belonging to the male spouse. This statute exists in contrast of the divorce statutes applicable in the United States, which may include a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place resulting in the even split of ‘community property’ – a legal classification defined as assets attained subsequent to the marriage in a collective fashion:

The spousal support settlement within the Paul McCartney was considered to be amongst the largest in history, in which Heather Mills walked away with $50 million

There were contrasting claims set forth by the legal teams of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills with regard to Paul McCartney’s net worth – Paul McCartney maintained that his net worth was $125 million, while Mills maintained that his net worth was upwards of $400 million

Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail in 2011?

During his vast existence within the limelight of celebrity, many people – at many times – have wondered ‘Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?’ The reasons for such questions are considered to stem from Lil Wayne’s prolific personality, including his penchant for recreational drug use, sexual escapades, and possession of firearms – a multitude of these activities are commonly depicted within the lyrics of his music:

Lil Wayne is considered to be amongst the most loved – and most popular stars within modernity. However, the price of fame and public adoration will typically result in one’s personal matters being available for public consumption; both the private life of Lil Wayne, as well as the activities within which he engages is no exception

On March 8th, 2010, a verdict delivered by the State Court of New York mandated Lil Wayne going to jail for a prison sentence of 1-years’ time; he was charged with both the possession of firearms, as well as illegal narcotics

Why is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?

Lil Wayne has been charged with 2 separate offenses involving both firearms, as well as drug possession; the results of both of these instances have resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail – once in the state of Arizona, and the other in the State of New York. However, while the sentence mandated within the Arizona State Court resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail, he was already serving a prison sentence within the State of New York; as a result, the sentencing of Lil Wayne going to jail was permitted to be served ‘concurrently’ – this ideology means that the sentences would be able to be served at the same time:

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in Arizona

Although Lil Wayne was sentenced to prison time in the State of Arizona, he was able to serve his sentence while incarcerated in the State of New York; he was charged for the illegal possession of narcotics – the following are the details of the case that resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail:

On January 23rd, 2008, Lil Wayne’s tour bus was pulled over in Yuma, Arizona by law enforcement agents who discovered Lil Wayne to be in possession of a variety of amounts of MDMA – the drug known as ‘Ecstasy’, Cocaine, and Marijuana; in addition, a variety of drug paraphernalia was discovered by the arresting agents

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in New York

On July 22nd, 2007, Lil Wayne was arrested in the State of New York following a performance; the arresting officers discovered both firearms and Marijuana on his tour bus; during his 2009 hearing, Lil Wayne pleaded guilty to the charges set forth, which resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail for a year’s time:

While in prison, Lil Wayne was reported to be a model inmate, who oftentimes corresponded with his fans, wrote music, and spend time writing music and publications

The Latest Crime That Could Land Lindsay Lohan in Jail

Actress Lindsay Lohan’s participation in an alleged jewelry theft occurring on February 9th, 2011 could land Lindsay Lohan in jail if she is found guilty. In the Lindsay Lohan Court appearance, she rejected a plea deal in a offered by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Keith Schwartz offering Lohan between 60 to 90 days in jail upon pleading guilty to the alleged jewelry theft, a new trial before a Grand Jury in Los Angeles County will begin on April 22nd, 2011 – a guilty verdict within the Lindsay Lohan Court appearance and Grand Jury Trial is expected to result in jail time:

The Details of the Crime

On February 9th, 2011, Lindsay Lohan and a friend – who would later be named to be her stylist – entered the Los Angeles jewelry store ‘Kamofie & Co.’. The store’s surveillance footage shows Lohan admiring a necklace valued at $2,500 and subsequently obtaining it without paying:

The staff of Kamofie & Co. maintains that Lindsay Lohan obtained the necklace without any prior consent expressed to her that she would be able to do so without payment – this is a charge of theft

However, Lindsay Lohan maintains that the store allowed her to borrow the necklace upon the promise that her stylist would return it promptly

Yet, this claim is not only disputed by the staff of the jewelry store, but Lindsay Lohan’s stylist failed to return the necklace at the date on which she had allegedly promised to do so

The April 22nd, 2011 Lindsay Lohan Court Appearance

The Lindsay Lohan Court hearing scheduled for April 22nd, 2011 will be overseen by a new judge and grand jury; although Lindsay Lohan was offered a plea deal allowing her to remain incarcerated for a period between 60 and 90 days offered by a March 22nd, 2011 Lindsay Lohan court appearance, she rejected it. The reasons stated for this rejection are considered to be rooted within Lindsay Lohan’s refusal to submit a guilty plea for the alleged theft of the necklace:

Judge Schwartz showed neither consideration nor favoritism with regard to her celebrity within the Lindsay Lohan court appearance, reaffirming that she was required to adhere to legislation akin to every other citizen of the United States of America; during the Lindsay Lohan court appearance, he affirmed that another slip-up would result in her expedited return to prison without hesitation

A Criminal History Fit to Put Lindsay Lohan in Jail

Even prior to her February 9th, 2011 arrest for the alleged theft of jewelry, actress Lindsay Lohan has found herself in a variety of compromising legal situations; in conjunction with a number of criminal charges aimed at Lohan – ranging from driving while intoxicated to the possession of narcotics. The following is a profile of additional crimes charged to Lohan almost resulting in the placement of Lindsay Lohan in Jail:

May 2007

Subsequent to a drunk-driving arrest, the arresting officers find cocaine in the possession of Lindsay Lohan

July 2007

Lindsay Lohan satisfies the required substance abuse counseling mandated by the court in the ‘Promises’ rehabilitation center – the conditions of her release require that she wear a monitoring bracelet regulating the consumption of drugs or alcohol

Late-July 2007

Lindsay Lohan is arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol only a mere 10 days after her completion of her rehabilitation program – upon her arrest, the arresting officers discover cocaine in her possession

August 2007

Prior to an impending trial and the possibility of the placement of Lindsay Lohan in jail, a judge allows Lindsay Lohan to attend another rehabilitation facility in Utah, which is called ‘Cirque Lodge’

November 2007

The hearing for Lindsay Lohan’s drunk-driving and drug possession charges takes place in Los Angeles, California – the judge orders a ruling placing Lindsay Lohan in jail for 24-hours, 10 days of court-ordered community service, court-ordered probation for 3-years’ time, and the mandatory wearing of an alcohol and substance monitoring system

Late-November 2007

Due to overcrowding in the Los Angeles County prison, all non-violent offenders are allowed relocation or conditional release – in conjunction with the verdict, upwards of 80 minutes were considered to amount to the time spent by Lindsay Lohan in jail

January 2008

While in attendance at a private function hosted by 22-year old socialite Masha Markova, Markova’s prized fur coat was discovered to have gone missing; the fur coat was valued at an estimated $11,000. Markova, along with many of her guests, had suspected Lindsay Lohan to be the perpetrator of this theft; days later, the fur coat was returned anonymously to Markova – charges were never filed.

June 2009

While participating in photography shoot for the cover of ‘Elle UK’, one of the United Kingdom’s most prominent fashion magazines, Lindsay Lohan was allowed the opportunity to wear almost $400k worth of jewelry from fashion designer Christian Dior. After the shoot, the set director had noticed that two diamond earrings worn by Lindsay Lohan had gone missing; rumors and allegations alleging that Lindsay Lohan was responsible for this left were set forth, but Lindsay Lohan was never formally charged

May 2010

Upon a mandatory bench warrant set forth by the Los Angeles County Court with regard to the review Lindsay Lohan’s past criminal convictions, Lohan’s presence was required in the hearing; however, at the time of the hearing, Lindsay Lohan was not present – investigations revealed that Lindsay Lohan was in Cannes, France at the Internationally-renowned film festival:

Reports and rumors expressing that Lindsay Lohan was indulging in alcohol and parties began to surface; upon question by the court as to why she had failed to report to her hearing, Lohan alleged that her passport had been stolen and she was unable to board a flight back to California

Upon her failure to appear before the court, an arrest warrant was set forth that would mandate the placement of Lindsay Lohan in jail; however, she obtained a temporary passport – and upon her return to California – she posted $100k bond in lieu of incarceration

At her second trial resulting from the bench warrant issued by the Los Angeles Court, Lindsay Lohan was mandated by the court to wear an alcohol monitoring device regulating her consumption of alcohol; the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) alerts authorities if any trace of alcohol appears in the wearers bodily system

June 2010

While at a party following the ‘MTV Movie Awards’, Lindsay Lohan’s SCRAM monitor was triggered and she was subsequently issued an additional bench warrant for arrest by the court; although this warrant would have placed Lindsay Lohan in jail, she furnished a $200k bond in order to avoid incarceration.

July 2010

Upon her appearance before Judge Marsha Revel and the Los Angeles Superior Court, Lohan is mandated to attend a rehabilitation facility.

September 2010

Lindsay Lohan fails a drug test and is ordered to attend another rehabilitation facility until the close of October 2010

Overview of the Marie Osmond Divorce

The Marie Osmond Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil; the Marie Osmond Divorce was finalized in 2007, which ended the 20-yearlong marriage, which took place in 1986:

Although the case of the Marie Osmond Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss

Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement.

Background of the Marie Osmond Divorce

Marie Osmond is perhaps most commonly recognized for her participation in the eponymously-named television shows in which and her family – the Osmonds – were featured as stars. While the television program ‘The Osmonds’ propelled Marie Osmond into the realm of celebrity, her 1976 variety show – ‘Donny and Marie’ starring both herself and her brother Donny Osmond solidified her status as a celebrity. In addition, Marie Osmond also enjoyed a career as a country music singer spanning from the 1970s to the 1980s:

Following a prior divorce taking place in 1985, Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil married in 1986; the couple shares 2 natural children and 5 adopted children

Although the couple separated within 1998, both Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil had managed to reconcile their difference and preserve their respective union in lieu of a Marie Osmond divorce

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Marie Osmond Divorce

The Marie Osmond divorce settlement was publicized as an amicable one; both Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil maintained that although they felt the utmost respect for one another, the couple’s marriage had reached a point of irreconcilable differences – as a result, the couple underwent the filing for the Marie Osmond divorce under within an uncontested nature:

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage

In the case of the Marie Osmond Divorce, both Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Marie Osmond Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity

The Terms of the Marie Osmond Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, the Marie Osmond divorce settlement was kept under wraps and the details were not released to the public.