The Origins of the Mel Gibson Divorce Case

Actor Mel Gibson has been considered to be amongst the most recognized and sought-after talents in Hollywood; oftentimes credited with dashing good looks in conjunction with his inspirational character portrayals, the Mel Gibson divorce hearings involving the actor and wife Oksana Grigorieva – a Russian model and aspiring singer – have been classified as anything but attractive. From harassing and abusive phone calls to alleged bouts of domestic violence, the Mel Gibson divorce case has allowed concerned and curious spectators the opportunity to witness the complete and utter dissolution of a marriage.

Mel Gibson Divorce Telephone Calls

In July of 2010 Oksana Grigorieva released the audio of multiple telephone calls that she had taped, which involved her conversing with Mel Gibson; the audio of these telephone calls are considered to be extremely vulgar, abusive, cruel, racist, violent, and defamatory – many resources offering the audio of these telephone calls for visitors to access express a variety of warning s with regard to the nature of the content. Oksana Grigorieva, whose release of these telephone calls has allowed her to enter them as evidence and testimony with regard to the Mel Gibson divorce hearing.

Possible Entrapment in the Melgibson Divorce Case

Oksana Grigorieva has been criticized by Mel Gibson, as well as various individuals advocating for Gibson in the Mel Gibson divorce case, as baiting him to respond angrily and harshly:

Many reports surfacing with regard to the Mel Gibson divorce have revealed that Gibson displays signs of both rage and substance abuse; advocates for Gibson accuse Oksana Grigorieva of exploiting the aforementioned ailments

However, upon listening to the telephone calls, many individuals – including the Judge of the Mel Gibson divorce case – have mandated that regardless of the nature of the release of the audio, the sentiments expressed by Gibson cannot be excused

Domestic Violence and the Mel Gibson Divorce Case

Within the Mel Gibson divorce case, Oksana Grigorieva maintained that Gibson struck her on various occasions; amongst the most shocking accusations with in the Mel Gibson divorce case, Oksana Grigorieva expressed that Gibson had physically abused her while she was holding their child. Although the claim of Gibson striking Oksana Grigorieva while holding their child was never substantiated, the recorded telephone calls show Gibson admitting to striking Oksana Grigorieva with little to remorse with regard to his actions.

The Plea Agreement for the Mel Gibson Divorce Case

The terms of the Mel Gibson Divorce Case have allowed for Oksana Grigorieva to remain in custody of the couple’s child; Gibson is allowed supervised visits conditional upon his behavior by Court officers. Furthermore, the following stipulations are required of Gibson within the Mel Gibson Divorce Case:

Gibson is permitted to enter a ‘West Plea’ for domestic abuse; the terms of a West Plea allow Gibson to enter a guilty plea in tandem with allowing him to maintain his innocence

Gibson is required to engage in 16 hours of court-mandated community service, as well as a year-long program of anger management and substance abuse counseling

Gibson was placed on probation for a year and half, as well; in the event that he and Oksana Grigorieva are required to interact over the telephone – due to the fact that he is not permitted near her – she is legally-allowed to record the telephone conversations

The Background of the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

On April 15th, 2010, same-sex couple Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michael announced a separation, in addition to a prospective Melissa Etheridge divorce settlement in the event that a divorce is finalized; due to the fact that same-sex marriage was not considered to be legal at the time of the couple’s union, both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels undertook a commitment ceremony in the State of California. A finalized Melissa Etheridge divorce would end a 7 year marriage between the couple who wed on April of 2003; in 2006, Melissa Etheridge announced that Tammy Lynne Michaels was pregnant with the couple’s child – subsequent to undertaking an artificial insemination procedure:

With regard to the Melissa Etheridge divorce, she has stated that the couple had undergone irreconcilable differences; legislation addressing domestic partnerships – akin to those enacted by same-sex couples – mandate the determination of 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court

These facts are the determination of spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets; since the fact that the Melissa Etheridge divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named

The only details that have surfaced include Tammy Lynn Michaels requested spousal support from a potential Melissa Etheridge divorce settlement, as well as joint custody of the couple’s twins

Who Was Involved in the Melissa Etheridge Divorce Filing?

Singer Melissa Etheridge has been responsible for both the composition and performance of such massive hits including ‘Come to My Window’, I’m the Only One’, and ‘The Weakness in Me’; in addition to her prolific musical career, Melissa Etheridge has served as a public advocate and staunch lobbyist for gay rights – Melissa Etheridge is an openly-gay performer and icon who has served as an inspiration for countless activist groups.

The Plea within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce Settlement

The following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Melissa Etheridge divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Melissa Etheridge Divorce, if both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Melissa Etheridge Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Facts about the Michael Douglas Divorce

Michael Douglas is an American actor who met Diandra Luker at an inauguration ceremony for the upcoming presidential elect Jimmy Carter in March of 1977; at the time of their meeting Michael Douglas was 33 years old and Diandra Luker was 19 years old – the Michael Douglas divorce took place in 1998. While at the time of their marriage, Michael Douglas was not considered to have reached the height of celebrity that he would experience within forthcoming years; over the course of the marriage – prior to the Michael Douglas divorce – Michael Douglas became one of the highest-paid and most sought-after actors of his time:

Michael Douglas has graced the screen in a multitude of films; amongst the films for which he considered to be the renowned include Wall Street, Fatal Attraction, The War of the Roses, The Jewel of the Nile, Wonderboys, and Traffic

Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas share one child named Cameron, who was born in 1978; due to his age at the time of the Michael Douglas divorce, the need to establish custody for Cameron was unnecessary

Throughout the marriage of Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas, the couple was not without their share of domestic difficulty; in 1992, Michael Douglas confessed to an addiction to both drugs and alcohol and underwent treatment in a rehabilitation facility

Michael Douglas was also rumored to have undertaken extramarital partners; however, his alleged infidelity was never substantiated

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce

The Michael Douglas divorce – in conjunction with the respective calculations of alimony payments, the division of assets, and supplementary spousal support offered to Diandra Douglas from Michael Douglas – is considered to be amongst the most expensive in history. Although the terms of the Michael Douglas divorce settlement were kept highly-private, the following details were released:

Diandra Douglas walked away with an alleged sum of $45 million subsequent to the Michael Douglas divorce

Diandra Douglas was also awarded the couple’s formerly-shared homes in Beverley Hills, California and the island of Majorca

The Determination of Contest within the Michael Douglas Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Michael Douglas Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Michael Douglas Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Douglas Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Douglas Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Douglas and Diandra Douglas determined that the Michael Douglas Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

A Summary of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Basketball icon Michael Jordan and his wife Juanita Jordan filed for divorce in 2006 after 17 years of marriage; the couple was married in 1989. Prior to this particular Michael Jordan divorce, the couple underwent a close-call with a divorce in 2002 subsequent to rumors of infidelity surfacing with regard to Michael Jordan; yet, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan managed to stay together until 2006. The couple shares 3 children. In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Michael Jordan Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan determined that the Michael Jordan Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature. However, the allegations of Jordan’s infidelity became a reality during the Michael Jordan divorce; reports stated that Michael Jordan had paid extramarital partners for their respective silence in conjunc
tion with affairs he had undertaken.

Why Was the Michael Jordan Divorce the Most Expensive?

Basketball superstar Michael Jordan earned his fame and notoriety both within the realm of athletics, as well as within the realm of marketing, entertainment, and endorsements. Both prior and subsequent to the Michael Jordan divorce, the basketball icon has been the face of Gatorade, Nike, and Hanes; Jordan’s value is reported to exceed an estimated $500 million.

The Terms and Conditions of the Michael Jordan Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 3 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Michael Jordan Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Juanita Jordan petitioned for alimony payments from Michael Jordan upon the finalization of the Michael Jordan Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Michael Jordan Divorce:

Juanita Jordan received a sum of $168 million in spousal support

Due to the fact the couple’s 3 children exceeded 18 years of age, the determination of custody within the Michael Jordan divorce was not applicable

The Division of Assets in the Michael Jordan Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Michael Jordan and Juanita Jordan. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Michael Jordan Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

In addition to the $168 million payment furnished to Juanita Jordan following the Michael Jordan settlement, she was also given ownership of the couple’s luxury home in Chicago, Illinois

Overview of the Neil Diamond Divorce

The Neil Diamond Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy; the Neil Diamond Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 33-year long marriage. Although the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss:

Although many celebrity divorces may tend to retain hostility or anger, such was not the case in the Neil Diamond divorce; despite the suspicion of extramarital affairs undertaken by Neil Diamond, which resulted in Marsha Murphy petitioning for half of his fortune, Neil Diamond responded that his former wife deserved the settlement amount and ‘was worth every penny’

Neil Diamond continued to thank Marsha Murphy for what he had described as unwavering and undying support undertaken by her throughout the couple’s marriage; he maintains this claim long after the finalization of the Neil Diamond divorce took place

The Parties Involved in the Neil Diamond Divorce

Neil Diamond is considered to be amongst the most successful singers and songwriters in world history; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, he was valued at an estimated $300 million – Diamond is responsible for the composition of seminal songs, such as ‘I Write the Songs’ and ‘Sweet Caroline’. He met Marsha Murphy in 1965, where at the time, Murphy was employed as a production assistant; the couple shares 2 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Neil Diamond Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Neil Diamond Divorce, both Neil Diamond and Marcia Murphy opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Neil Diamond Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

The nature of the Neil Diamond divorce resulting in an uncontested settlement has been presumed to have taken place as a result of the couple’s desire to keep the details of the Neil Diamond divorce secretive; prior to the Neil Diamond divorce, Marsha Murphy discovered that he had undertaken various extramarital affairs – in many cases, these events of infidelity were highly-publicized by the media

Neil Diamond and Marsha Murphy cited irreconcilable differences as the reasoning behind the dissolution of their marriage

The Terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Neil Diamond Divorce settlement:

Marsha Murphy walked away from the Neil Diamond divorce settlement with an estimated $150 million, which was reported to be half of Neil Diamond’s fortune; the Neil Diamond divorce settlement has been cited as one of the most expensive in history

Background of the Nick Hogan Arrest

The following details outline the shocking details of the 2007 Nick Hogan arrest and sentencing of Nick Hogan subsequent to his involvement in an automobile accident resulting in the passenger in the vehicle, John Graziano, withstanding life-changing injuries; the accident took place in Clearwater, Florida. Although Nick Hogan was not considered to have earned his celebrity status, he is the son of famed wrestler Terry Bollea, who is known as ‘Hulk Hogan’ to fans of professional wrestling on a worldwide basis. The cause of the accident in which Nick Hogan and John Graziano were involved was determined to be the result of both intoxicated driving, as well as reckless endangerment in the form of ‘drag racing’:

Who Was Involved?

Reports released with regard to the details of the car accident involving the vehicle that Nick Hogan was driving – in tandem with the injuries resulting from the accident itself – included 3 individuals driving one of Hulk Hogan’s cars, while Nick Hogan, 17, and John Graziano, 22, were reported as occupying the other vehicle. As previously mentioned, Nick Hogan – whose birthname is Nick Bollea – is the son of wrestling legend Hulk Hogan; John Graziano was a friend of Nick Hogan’s and a marine.

What Happened?

While the 5 individuals were en route to their destination, both Nick Hogan and the driver of the other vehicle belonging to Hulk Hogan began to race; reports submitted by fellow motorists and witnesses reported the cars to be traveling anywhere between 70 and 90 miles per hour – these reports alleged that Nick Hogan had been doubling the expressed speed limitations of that particular roadway. In the midst of driving, Nick Hogan began to drive outside of the lane as the vehicle spun around and sustained a massive impact against a concrete divider on the highway; reports state that the car also impacted a tree. Although Nick Hogan was wearing a seatbelt at the time of the impact, John Graziano was not – as a result, Graziano suffered irrevocable and debilitating injuries.

The Consequences of Nick Hogan’s Actions

After being airlifted to the nearest hospital within the area of Tamp, Florida, Nick Hogan was discharged later that day; however, John Graziano had suffered irreversible damage to his neurological system, which resulted in what would be determined to ensure that he would be in the care of assisted living specialists for the duration of his life.

Criminal Charges Filed Against Nick Hogan

The trial of Nick Hogan was a fairly simple one; the case details surfacing after the accident had revealed that Nick Hogan had a blood alcohol level of 0.05 at the time of the accident; although not above the legal limit, Nick Hogan was a minor at the time of the accident – in the State of Florida, a blood alcohol level exceeding 0.02 displayed by a minor is a criminal offense:

Nick Hogan was charged with a felony, which resulted from injuries sustained through the undertaking of reckless operation of a motor vehicle

Nick Hogan was charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol, which contributed to damage or injury; while Nick Hogan’s attorney attempted to substantiate that john Graziano’s injuries resulted from his failure to wear a seatbelt in lieu of Nick Hogan’s intoxication, the judge quickly dismissed them

Nick Hogan was sentenced to 8 months of incarceration, the loss of his license for 3 years, 500 hours of court-ordered community service, and a 5-year term of probation

Overview of the Olivia Wilde Divorce

In the event that the Olivia Wilde Divorce filing becomes finalized – which took place on February 8th, 2011 – it could mark the end of the marriage between actor Olivia Wilde and Italian filmmaker and Prince Tao Ruspoli. The couple was married on June 7th, 2003 – the marriage was enacted as a private ceremony that had taken place in an abandoned school bus in order to maintain privacy. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Olivia Wilde Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Olivia Wilde Divorce

Olivia Wilde has starred in various television and motion pictures, including the feature film of Tron, as well as a consistent role on the television drama House; Tao Ruspoli has not only directed a multitude of Italian documentary films, but he has also been responsible for the direction of documentaries that have received international acclaim, such as Behind the Wheel and Being in the World. Both Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli are renowned for the maintenance of their privacy, and as a result, few details have emerged with regard to the Olivia Wilde divorce filing; the details that have been made available are as follows:

The Olivia Wilde divorce filing was set forth on the grounds of irreconcilable differences; although the couple had been separated prior to the filing of the Olivia Wilde divorce, neither Olivia Wilde nor Tao Ruspoli were able to salvage their marriage

The couple currently share no children

Legal Venue of the Olivia Wilde Divorce Filing

The Olivia Wilde Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Olivia Wilde Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Olivia Wilde divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Olivia Wilde divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Olivia Wilde Divorce Filing

Due to the fact the couple filed for the Olivia Wilde divorce under the terms of irreconcilable differences, the nature of the divorce is considered to be uncontested. An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Olivia Wilde Divorce, if both Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail in 2011?

During his vast existence within the limelight of celebrity, many people – at many times – have wondered ‘Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?’ The reasons for such questions are considered to stem from Lil Wayne’s prolific personality, including his penchant for recreational drug use, sexual escapades, and possession of firearms – a multitude of these activities are commonly depicted within the lyrics of his music:

Lil Wayne is considered to be amongst the most loved – and most popular stars within modernity. However, the price of fame and public adoration will typically result in one’s personal matters being available for public consumption; both the private life of Lil Wayne, as well as the activities within which he engages is no exception

On March 8th, 2010, a verdict delivered by the State Court of New York mandated Lil Wayne going to jail for a prison sentence of 1-years’ time; he was charged with both the possession of firearms, as well as illegal narcotics

Why is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?

Lil Wayne has been charged with 2 separate offenses involving both firearms, as well as drug possession; the results of both of these instances have resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail – once in the state of Arizona, and the other in the State of New York. However, while the sentence mandated within the Arizona State Court resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail, he was already serving a prison sentence within the State of New York; as a result, the sentencing of Lil Wayne going to jail was permitted to be served ‘concurrently’ – this ideology means that the sentences would be able to be served at the same time:

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in Arizona

Although Lil Wayne was sentenced to prison time in the State of Arizona, he was able to serve his sentence while incarcerated in the State of New York; he was charged for the illegal possession of narcotics – the following are the details of the case that resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail:

On January 23rd, 2008, Lil Wayne’s tour bus was pulled over in Yuma, Arizona by law enforcement agents who discovered Lil Wayne to be in possession of a variety of amounts of MDMA – the drug known as ‘Ecstasy’, Cocaine, and Marijuana; in addition, a variety of drug paraphernalia was discovered by the arresting agents

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in New York

On July 22nd, 2007, Lil Wayne was arrested in the State of New York following a performance; the arresting officers discovered both firearms and Marijuana on his tour bus; during his 2009 hearing, Lil Wayne pleaded guilty to the charges set forth, which resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail for a year’s time:

While in prison, Lil Wayne was reported to be a model inmate, who oftentimes corresponded with his fans, wrote music, and spend time writing music and publications

Paris Hilton Arrested

Although socialite and heiress to the Hilton fortune from her great grandfather – hotel mogul Conrad Hilton – Paris Hilton has been no stranger to run-ins with law enforcement agents. Paris Hilton has undergone many arrests and criminal charges, including the possession and usage of drugs, as well as drunk driving. Akin to her fellow celebrities, who seem to have knack for escaping the punishments intended for crimes for average, non-celebrity citizens, the punishments for Paris Hilton arrested have resulted in mere day-long stints in prison, fines, and probation. However, due to her latest arrest that took place on August 28th, 2010 in the state of Nevada, the Clark County District Attorney assured that the past preferential treatment she may have enjoyed will not be repeated in future sentencing.

Why Was Paris Hilton Arrested For in 2010?

Although most commonly known for her drunk-driving arrests and alleged drug possession, Las Vegas law enforcement agents had Paris Hilton arrested on the evening of August 28th, 2010 when they discovered approximately .08 grams of cocaine on her person; she was pulled over while driving with her boyfriend and arrested:

Upon Paris Hilton arrested, she had claimed that many of the articles found in her purse were not hers; Paris Hilton claimed that someone had not only placed the cocaine in her purse, but also other items discovered – however, upon further investigation with regard to Paris Hilton arrested, she acknowledged that the purse was indeed hers

Cocaine is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of both addiction and death since its introduction to society; cocaine use and possession is considered to be a felony due to the fact that it can impair individuals in behavior, demeanor, and activity

The Punishments for Paris Hilton Arrested

The terms of Paris Hilton arrested were initially considered to be a felony resulting from the possession of cocaine; however, on September 17th, 2010, she struck a plea deal within the Clark County Court in the State of Las Vegas. The terms of her plea deal resulted in the felony charge being split into 2 separate misdemeanor charges including the possession of an illegal substance, as well as the use of an illegal substance. However, upon the striking of a plea deal subsequent to Paris Hilton arrested, the court ensured that Paris Hilton understood the gravity of her actions; the following are applicable to Paris Hilton’s sentencing:

Paris Hilton arrested resulted in a mandatory participation of 200 hours of community service, the furnishing of a $2,000 fine, and the mandatory entry into a drug counseling program; all of these requirement exist with regard to her probation

In any events that land Paris Hilton arrested during her probation, she will be required to serve 1-year of incarceration

The Background of the Mick Jagger Divorce

Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall began their romantic relationship in 1977 subsequent to their initial meeting in London, England in 1976. The couple ended their marriage in 1999; Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall share 4 children – Elizabeth, James, Georgia May, and Gabriel.

The Annulment of Marriage

After nearly 2 decades without being married, the 2 underwent a marriage ceremony in in Bali that was enacted in Hindu fashion; as a result, the marriage between Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall permitted to be annulled in lieu of a divorce. Upon discovering that Mick Jagger had engaged in an extramarital affair that resulted in him fathering the child of another woman, she petitioned for a divorce.

Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall

Michael Philip Jagger – more commonly known as ‘Mick Jagger’ – is considered to be one of the most prolific and prominent musicians of the 20th and 21st centuries; as the singer of the seminal rock and roll group ‘The Rolling Stones’, Mick Jagger has been responsible for the performance and composition of some of the most widely-recognized and profitable songs in history. As if Mick Jagger’s fame would not cause any news relating to him to be thrust into public consumption, his former wife Jerry Hall was an American supermodel – it was certainly no surprise that that Mick Jagger divorce was both one of the most highly publicized and expensive in history.

The Terms and Conditions of the Mick Jagger Divorce Settlement

Due to the annulment of the couple’s marriage in lieu of a divorce, the proceeding inherent within the Mick Jagger divorce settlement, which is legally defined as an annulment settlement, the following illustrates the manner in which the dissolution of the couple’s marriage took place:

The estimated net worth of Mick Jagger at the time of the Mick Jagger divorce was alleged to be $325 million

Due in part to both the nature of allegations of infidelity in tandem with Mick Jagger’s dispute with regard to the viability of the marriage ceremony, Jerry Hall was given an alimony payment ranging between $15 million and $25 million – the details of the Mick Jagger divorce settlement were kept secret

The Determination of Legality within the Mick Jagger Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Mick Jagger Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Mick Jagger Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record; in the case of the Mick Jagger divorce – or annulment, the couple was able to be privy to extenuating circumstances due to the disputable nature of their initial marriage