Background of the Nick Hogan Arrest

The following details outline the shocking details of the 2007 Nick Hogan arrest and sentencing of Nick Hogan subsequent to his involvement in an automobile accident resulting in the passenger in the vehicle, John Graziano, withstanding life-changing injuries; the accident took place in Clearwater, Florida. Although Nick Hogan was not considered to have earned his celebrity status, he is the son of famed wrestler Terry Bollea, who is known as ‘Hulk Hogan’ to fans of professional wrestling on a worldwide basis. The cause of the accident in which Nick Hogan and John Graziano were involved was determined to be the result of both intoxicated driving, as well as reckless endangerment in the form of ‘drag racing’:

Who Was Involved?

Reports released with regard to the details of the car accident involving the vehicle that Nick Hogan was driving – in tandem with the injuries resulting from the accident itself – included 3 individuals driving one of Hulk Hogan’s cars, while Nick Hogan, 17, and John Graziano, 22, were reported as occupying the other vehicle. As previously mentioned, Nick Hogan – whose birthname is Nick Bollea – is the son of wrestling legend Hulk Hogan; John Graziano was a friend of Nick Hogan’s and a marine.

What Happened?

While the 5 individuals were en route to their destination, both Nick Hogan and the driver of the other vehicle belonging to Hulk Hogan began to race; reports submitted by fellow motorists and witnesses reported the cars to be traveling anywhere between 70 and 90 miles per hour – these reports alleged that Nick Hogan had been doubling the expressed speed limitations of that particular roadway. In the midst of driving, Nick Hogan began to drive outside of the lane as the vehicle spun around and sustained a massive impact against a concrete divider on the highway; reports state that the car also impacted a tree. Although Nick Hogan was wearing a seatbelt at the time of the impact, John Graziano was not – as a result, Graziano suffered irrevocable and debilitating injuries.

The Consequences of Nick Hogan’s Actions

After being airlifted to the nearest hospital within the area of Tamp, Florida, Nick Hogan was discharged later that day; however, John Graziano had suffered irreversible damage to his neurological system, which resulted in what would be determined to ensure that he would be in the care of assisted living specialists for the duration of his life.

Criminal Charges Filed Against Nick Hogan

The trial of Nick Hogan was a fairly simple one; the case details surfacing after the accident had revealed that Nick Hogan had a blood alcohol level of 0.05 at the time of the accident; although not above the legal limit, Nick Hogan was a minor at the time of the accident – in the State of Florida, a blood alcohol level exceeding 0.02 displayed by a minor is a criminal offense:

Nick Hogan was charged with a felony, which resulted from injuries sustained through the undertaking of reckless operation of a motor vehicle

Nick Hogan was charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol, which contributed to damage or injury; while Nick Hogan’s attorney attempted to substantiate that john Graziano’s injuries resulted from his failure to wear a seatbelt in lieu of Nick Hogan’s intoxication, the judge quickly dismissed them

Nick Hogan was sentenced to 8 months of incarceration, the loss of his license for 3 years, 500 hours of court-ordered community service, and a 5-year term of probation

Overview of the Olivia Wilde Divorce

In the event that the Olivia Wilde Divorce filing becomes finalized – which took place on February 8th, 2011 – it could mark the end of the marriage between actor Olivia Wilde and Italian filmmaker and Prince Tao Ruspoli. The couple was married on June 7th, 2003 – the marriage was enacted as a private ceremony that had taken place in an abandoned school bus in order to maintain privacy. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Olivia Wilde Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Olivia Wilde Divorce

Olivia Wilde has starred in various television and motion pictures, including the feature film of Tron, as well as a consistent role on the television drama House; Tao Ruspoli has not only directed a multitude of Italian documentary films, but he has also been responsible for the direction of documentaries that have received international acclaim, such as Behind the Wheel and Being in the World. Both Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli are renowned for the maintenance of their privacy, and as a result, few details have emerged with regard to the Olivia Wilde divorce filing; the details that have been made available are as follows:

The Olivia Wilde divorce filing was set forth on the grounds of irreconcilable differences; although the couple had been separated prior to the filing of the Olivia Wilde divorce, neither Olivia Wilde nor Tao Ruspoli were able to salvage their marriage

The couple currently share no children

Legal Venue of the Olivia Wilde Divorce Filing

The Olivia Wilde Divorce was set forth before the Superior Court of California, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

The Plea within the Olivia Wilde Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Olivia Wilde divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Olivia Wilde divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Olivia Wilde Divorce Filing

Due to the fact the couple filed for the Olivia Wilde divorce under the terms of irreconcilable differences, the nature of the divorce is considered to be uncontested. An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Olivia Wilde Divorce, if both Olivia Wilde and Tao Ruspoli opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail in 2011?

During his vast existence within the limelight of celebrity, many people – at many times – have wondered ‘Is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?’ The reasons for such questions are considered to stem from Lil Wayne’s prolific personality, including his penchant for recreational drug use, sexual escapades, and possession of firearms – a multitude of these activities are commonly depicted within the lyrics of his music:

Lil Wayne is considered to be amongst the most loved – and most popular stars within modernity. However, the price of fame and public adoration will typically result in one’s personal matters being available for public consumption; both the private life of Lil Wayne, as well as the activities within which he engages is no exception

On March 8th, 2010, a verdict delivered by the State Court of New York mandated Lil Wayne going to jail for a prison sentence of 1-years’ time; he was charged with both the possession of firearms, as well as illegal narcotics

Why is Lil Wayne Going to Jail?

Lil Wayne has been charged with 2 separate offenses involving both firearms, as well as drug possession; the results of both of these instances have resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail – once in the state of Arizona, and the other in the State of New York. However, while the sentence mandated within the Arizona State Court resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail, he was already serving a prison sentence within the State of New York; as a result, the sentencing of Lil Wayne going to jail was permitted to be served ‘concurrently’ – this ideology means that the sentences would be able to be served at the same time:

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in Arizona

Although Lil Wayne was sentenced to prison time in the State of Arizona, he was able to serve his sentence while incarcerated in the State of New York; he was charged for the illegal possession of narcotics – the following are the details of the case that resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail:

On January 23rd, 2008, Lil Wayne’s tour bus was pulled over in Yuma, Arizona by law enforcement agents who discovered Lil Wayne to be in possession of a variety of amounts of MDMA – the drug known as ‘Ecstasy’, Cocaine, and Marijuana; in addition, a variety of drug paraphernalia was discovered by the arresting agents

Lil Wayne Going to Jail in New York

On July 22nd, 2007, Lil Wayne was arrested in the State of New York following a performance; the arresting officers discovered both firearms and Marijuana on his tour bus; during his 2009 hearing, Lil Wayne pleaded guilty to the charges set forth, which resulted in Lil Wayne going to jail for a year’s time:

While in prison, Lil Wayne was reported to be a model inmate, who oftentimes corresponded with his fans, wrote music, and spend time writing music and publications

Paris Hilton Arrested

Although socialite and heiress to the Hilton fortune from her great grandfather – hotel mogul Conrad Hilton – Paris Hilton has been no stranger to run-ins with law enforcement agents. Paris Hilton has undergone many arrests and criminal charges, including the possession and usage of drugs, as well as drunk driving. Akin to her fellow celebrities, who seem to have knack for escaping the punishments intended for crimes for average, non-celebrity citizens, the punishments for Paris Hilton arrested have resulted in mere day-long stints in prison, fines, and probation. However, due to her latest arrest that took place on August 28th, 2010 in the state of Nevada, the Clark County District Attorney assured that the past preferential treatment she may have enjoyed will not be repeated in future sentencing.

Why Was Paris Hilton Arrested For in 2010?

Although most commonly known for her drunk-driving arrests and alleged drug possession, Las Vegas law enforcement agents had Paris Hilton arrested on the evening of August 28th, 2010 when they discovered approximately .08 grams of cocaine on her person; she was pulled over while driving with her boyfriend and arrested:

Upon Paris Hilton arrested, she had claimed that many of the articles found in her purse were not hers; Paris Hilton claimed that someone had not only placed the cocaine in her purse, but also other items discovered – however, upon further investigation with regard to Paris Hilton arrested, she acknowledged that the purse was indeed hers

Cocaine is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of both addiction and death since its introduction to society; cocaine use and possession is considered to be a felony due to the fact that it can impair individuals in behavior, demeanor, and activity

The Punishments for Paris Hilton Arrested

The terms of Paris Hilton arrested were initially considered to be a felony resulting from the possession of cocaine; however, on September 17th, 2010, she struck a plea deal within the Clark County Court in the State of Las Vegas. The terms of her plea deal resulted in the felony charge being split into 2 separate misdemeanor charges including the possession of an illegal substance, as well as the use of an illegal substance. However, upon the striking of a plea deal subsequent to Paris Hilton arrested, the court ensured that Paris Hilton understood the gravity of her actions; the following are applicable to Paris Hilton’s sentencing:

Paris Hilton arrested resulted in a mandatory participation of 200 hours of community service, the furnishing of a $2,000 fine, and the mandatory entry into a drug counseling program; all of these requirement exist with regard to her probation

In any events that land Paris Hilton arrested during her probation, she will be required to serve 1-year of incarceration

The Latest Crime That Could Land Lindsay Lohan in Jail

Actress Lindsay Lohan’s participation in an alleged jewelry theft occurring on February 9th, 2011 could land Lindsay Lohan in jail if she is found guilty. In the Lindsay Lohan Court appearance, she rejected a plea deal in a offered by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Keith Schwartz offering Lohan between 60 to 90 days in jail upon pleading guilty to the alleged jewelry theft, a new trial before a Grand Jury in Los Angeles County will begin on April 22nd, 2011 – a guilty verdict within the Lindsay Lohan Court appearance and Grand Jury Trial is expected to result in jail time:

The Details of the Crime

On February 9th, 2011, Lindsay Lohan and a friend – who would later be named to be her stylist – entered the Los Angeles jewelry store ‘Kamofie & Co.’. The store’s surveillance footage shows Lohan admiring a necklace valued at $2,500 and subsequently obtaining it without paying:

The staff of Kamofie & Co. maintains that Lindsay Lohan obtained the necklace without any prior consent expressed to her that she would be able to do so without payment – this is a charge of theft

However, Lindsay Lohan maintains that the store allowed her to borrow the necklace upon the promise that her stylist would return it promptly

Yet, this claim is not only disputed by the staff of the jewelry store, but Lindsay Lohan’s stylist failed to return the necklace at the date on which she had allegedly promised to do so

The April 22nd, 2011 Lindsay Lohan Court Appearance

The Lindsay Lohan Court hearing scheduled for April 22nd, 2011 will be overseen by a new judge and grand jury; although Lindsay Lohan was offered a plea deal allowing her to remain incarcerated for a period between 60 and 90 days offered by a March 22nd, 2011 Lindsay Lohan court appearance, she rejected it. The reasons stated for this rejection are considered to be rooted within Lindsay Lohan’s refusal to submit a guilty plea for the alleged theft of the necklace:

Judge Schwartz showed neither consideration nor favoritism with regard to her celebrity within the Lindsay Lohan court appearance, reaffirming that she was required to adhere to legislation akin to every other citizen of the United States of America; during the Lindsay Lohan court appearance, he affirmed that another slip-up would result in her expedited return to prison without hesitation

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Paul McCartney Divorce

In 2008, the Paul McCartney Divorce was finalized, which symbolized the termination of the marriage of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills; the couple had been married since 2002. Paul McCartney was married once before his marriage to Heather Mills; his late wife Linda McCartney had died from breast cancer in 1998. While the couple attempted to refrain from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the Paul McCartney divorce, various expressions of dissatisfaction surfaced both from Mills, as well as from Paul McCartney:

Paul McCartney is considered to be amongst the most influential musicians in history with regard to his membership in the seminal music group, The Beatles; in addition, Paul McCartney is considered to be amongst the most valuable human being son Earth, with an estimated value ranging from $135 million to $400 million

Heather Mills is a former model who lost one of her legs in the midst of her modeling career; however, she continued to model despite her tragic accident

The couple birthed a daughter in 2003, named Beatrice McCartney; Paul McCartney and his late wife Linda birthed a daughter named Stella

The Paul McCartney Divorce Before the Royal Courts of Justice in the United Kingdom

The Paul McCartney divorce was considered to be amongst one of the most publicized and expensive divorce not only in the history of the United Kingdom, but also within the collective world. Within the Paul McCartney divorce settlement, various statements reflecting the couple’s growing dissatisfaction for one another was made public, in addition to attacks and defaming remarks set forth by Heather Mills:

Within the Paul McCartney divorce, statements released by Heather Mills included such allegations of substance abuse and mania exuded by Paul McCartney; in one report, she referred to him as ‘boring’ and ‘old’

Paul McCartney – upon the finalization of the Paul McCartney divorce – explained that he finally experienced as sense of ‘peace’ subsequent his divorce from Heather Mills

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Paul McCartney Divorce

A prenuptial agreement did not exist within the Paul McCartney divorce, which is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the United Kingdom, the female spouse within a marriage is entitled to half of the entirety of the net worth belonging to the male spouse. This statute exists in contrast of the divorce statutes applicable in the United States, which may include a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place resulting in the even split of ‘community property’ – a legal classification defined as assets attained subsequent to the marriage in a collective fashion:

The spousal support settlement within the Paul McCartney was considered to be amongst the largest in history, in which Heather Mills walked away with $50 million

There were contrasting claims set forth by the legal teams of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills with regard to Paul McCartney’s net worth – Paul McCartney maintained that his net worth was $125 million, while Mills maintained that his net worth was upwards of $400 million

A Criminal History Fit to Put Lindsay Lohan in Jail

Even prior to her February 9th, 2011 arrest for the alleged theft of jewelry, actress Lindsay Lohan has found herself in a variety of compromising legal situations; in conjunction with a number of criminal charges aimed at Lohan – ranging from driving while intoxicated to the possession of narcotics. The following is a profile of additional crimes charged to Lohan almost resulting in the placement of Lindsay Lohan in Jail:

May 2007

Subsequent to a drunk-driving arrest, the arresting officers find cocaine in the possession of Lindsay Lohan

July 2007

Lindsay Lohan satisfies the required substance abuse counseling mandated by the court in the ‘Promises’ rehabilitation center – the conditions of her release require that she wear a monitoring bracelet regulating the consumption of drugs or alcohol

Late-July 2007

Lindsay Lohan is arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol only a mere 10 days after her completion of her rehabilitation program – upon her arrest, the arresting officers discover cocaine in her possession

August 2007

Prior to an impending trial and the possibility of the placement of Lindsay Lohan in jail, a judge allows Lindsay Lohan to attend another rehabilitation facility in Utah, which is called ‘Cirque Lodge’

November 2007

The hearing for Lindsay Lohan’s drunk-driving and drug possession charges takes place in Los Angeles, California – the judge orders a ruling placing Lindsay Lohan in jail for 24-hours, 10 days of court-ordered community service, court-ordered probation for 3-years’ time, and the mandatory wearing of an alcohol and substance monitoring system

Late-November 2007

Due to overcrowding in the Los Angeles County prison, all non-violent offenders are allowed relocation or conditional release – in conjunction with the verdict, upwards of 80 minutes were considered to amount to the time spent by Lindsay Lohan in jail

January 2008

While in attendance at a private function hosted by 22-year old socialite Masha Markova, Markova’s prized fur coat was discovered to have gone missing; the fur coat was valued at an estimated $11,000. Markova, along with many of her guests, had suspected Lindsay Lohan to be the perpetrator of this theft; days later, the fur coat was returned anonymously to Markova – charges were never filed.

June 2009

While participating in photography shoot for the cover of ‘Elle UK’, one of the United Kingdom’s most prominent fashion magazines, Lindsay Lohan was allowed the opportunity to wear almost $400k worth of jewelry from fashion designer Christian Dior. After the shoot, the set director had noticed that two diamond earrings worn by Lindsay Lohan had gone missing; rumors and allegations alleging that Lindsay Lohan was responsible for this left were set forth, but Lindsay Lohan was never formally charged

May 2010

Upon a mandatory bench warrant set forth by the Los Angeles County Court with regard to the review Lindsay Lohan’s past criminal convictions, Lohan’s presence was required in the hearing; however, at the time of the hearing, Lindsay Lohan was not present – investigations revealed that Lindsay Lohan was in Cannes, France at the Internationally-renowned film festival:

Reports and rumors expressing that Lindsay Lohan was indulging in alcohol and parties began to surface; upon question by the court as to why she had failed to report to her hearing, Lohan alleged that her passport had been stolen and she was unable to board a flight back to California

Upon her failure to appear before the court, an arrest warrant was set forth that would mandate the placement of Lindsay Lohan in jail; however, she obtained a temporary passport – and upon her return to California – she posted $100k bond in lieu of incarceration

At her second trial resulting from the bench warrant issued by the Los Angeles Court, Lindsay Lohan was mandated by the court to wear an alcohol monitoring device regulating her consumption of alcohol; the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) alerts authorities if any trace of alcohol appears in the wearers bodily system

June 2010

While at a party following the ‘MTV Movie Awards’, Lindsay Lohan’s SCRAM monitor was triggered and she was subsequently issued an additional bench warrant for arrest by the court; although this warrant would have placed Lindsay Lohan in jail, she furnished a $200k bond in order to avoid incarceration.

July 2010

Upon her appearance before Judge Marsha Revel and the Los Angeles Superior Court, Lohan is mandated to attend a rehabilitation facility.

September 2010

Lindsay Lohan fails a drug test and is ordered to attend another rehabilitation facility until the close of October 2010

Overview of the Marie Osmond Divorce

The Marie Osmond Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil; the Marie Osmond Divorce was finalized in 2007, which ended the 20-yearlong marriage, which took place in 1986:

Although the case of the Marie Osmond Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss

Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement.

Background of the Marie Osmond Divorce

Marie Osmond is perhaps most commonly recognized for her participation in the eponymously-named television shows in which and her family – the Osmonds – were featured as stars. While the television program ‘The Osmonds’ propelled Marie Osmond into the realm of celebrity, her 1976 variety show – ‘Donny and Marie’ starring both herself and her brother Donny Osmond solidified her status as a celebrity. In addition, Marie Osmond also enjoyed a career as a country music singer spanning from the 1970s to the 1980s:

Following a prior divorce taking place in 1985, Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil married in 1986; the couple shares 2 natural children and 5 adopted children

Although the couple separated within 1998, both Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil had managed to reconcile their difference and preserve their respective union in lieu of a Marie Osmond divorce

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Marie Osmond Divorce

The Marie Osmond divorce settlement was publicized as an amicable one; both Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil maintained that although they felt the utmost respect for one another, the couple’s marriage had reached a point of irreconcilable differences – as a result, the couple underwent the filing for the Marie Osmond divorce under within an uncontested nature:

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage

In the case of the Marie Osmond Divorce, both Marie Osmond and Brian Blosil opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Marie Osmond Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity

The Terms of the Marie Osmond Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. However, the Marie Osmond divorce settlement was kept under wraps and the details were not released to the public.

Background of the Martha Stewart Insider Trading Arrest

Taking place in 2004, the Martha Stewart Insider trading hearing was one of the most prominent and notorious of its kind within the realm of celebrity involvement with securities fraud, in which the beloved television personality and home décor expert was made aware of unauthorized and privileged information with regards to an investment in which she had made under the counsel of her friend Sam Waskal – Sam Waskal was the owner of the company whose shares Martha Stweart had purchased.

The Details of the Martha Stewart Insider Trading Charges

Sam Waskal owned the ‘ImClone pharmaceutical company who had been planning on releasing a revolutionary drug to treat cancer; due to the fact that the drug was considered to be highly-anticipated, Martha Stewart – who was in ownership of 4,000 shares – anticipated a large return. However, Sam Waskal had discovered that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – the regulatory body maintained by the Federal Government – was not going to allow for the release of the drug:

Presumably, the drug did not meet the FDA’s regulatory standards for medication. Subsequent to learning this, Sam Waskal conveyed this information to Martha Stewart, who quickly sold her ImClone shares in the fear of a huge financial loss as a result of the rejection being released

However, the information furnished to Martha Stewart was considered to be not only unavailable to the general public, but is indicative of potential increases or decreases with regard to that company’s stocks – insider trading is classified as privileged individuals party to information involving the trade and exchange of stocks outside of the knowledge of the general populace

Martha Stewart Insider Trading Sentencing

Subsequent to her trial, the following punitive recourse was sentenced with regard to Martha Stewart and her criminal activity:

Martha Stewart was incarcerated from October of 2008 to March of 2005

She was mandated to undergo a 2-year probationary period within which she would be subject to supervision

Martha Stewart would be unable to serve as either Chief Financial Officer (CFO) or Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of any publically-traded company for a period of 5-years’ time

The Notion of Celebrity within the Martha Stewart Insider Trading Arrest

The Martha Stewart Insider Trading trial – akin to the vast expanse of celebrity hearings – run the risk for heightened notoriety for both the presiding judge – as well as for the legal venue – there exists supplemental considerations that are undertaken within any celebrity trial. Due to the fact that the public eye will be fixated on a celebrity trial, much like that public was during the Martha Stewart Insider Trading, the legal obligation of a judge is to exact justice in accordance to the precepts upon which the United States’ legal system was founded – in an unbiased and objective fashion:

Due to the fact that celebrities typically possess higher earnings and greater fortunes than individuals considered to account for the median members of society, the implementation of financial recourse – in the form of fines or fees – is considered by many legal professionals to be subject to inefficiency with regard to punitive recourse; within the Martha Stewart Insider Trading trial, many individuals suspected that the enforcement of a median monetary payment furnished by Martha Stewart would neither affect her finances nor serve as an effective punishment

However, since justice must be exacted in an objective fashion, other individuals claimed that prejudiced enacted with regard to the sentencing of celebrities – in the form of fines or fees that exceed those that would be exacted onto the median citizen of the United States – would be equally ineffective

The Background of the Mick Jagger Divorce

Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall began their romantic relationship in 1977 subsequent to their initial meeting in London, England in 1976. The couple ended their marriage in 1999; Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall share 4 children – Elizabeth, James, Georgia May, and Gabriel.

The Annulment of Marriage

After nearly 2 decades without being married, the 2 underwent a marriage ceremony in in Bali that was enacted in Hindu fashion; as a result, the marriage between Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall permitted to be annulled in lieu of a divorce. Upon discovering that Mick Jagger had engaged in an extramarital affair that resulted in him fathering the child of another woman, she petitioned for a divorce.

Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall

Michael Philip Jagger – more commonly known as ‘Mick Jagger’ – is considered to be one of the most prolific and prominent musicians of the 20th and 21st centuries; as the singer of the seminal rock and roll group ‘The Rolling Stones’, Mick Jagger has been responsible for the performance and composition of some of the most widely-recognized and profitable songs in history. As if Mick Jagger’s fame would not cause any news relating to him to be thrust into public consumption, his former wife Jerry Hall was an American supermodel – it was certainly no surprise that that Mick Jagger divorce was both one of the most highly publicized and expensive in history.

The Terms and Conditions of the Mick Jagger Divorce Settlement

Due to the annulment of the couple’s marriage in lieu of a divorce, the proceeding inherent within the Mick Jagger divorce settlement, which is legally defined as an annulment settlement, the following illustrates the manner in which the dissolution of the couple’s marriage took place:

The estimated net worth of Mick Jagger at the time of the Mick Jagger divorce was alleged to be $325 million

Due in part to both the nature of allegations of infidelity in tandem with Mick Jagger’s dispute with regard to the viability of the marriage ceremony, Jerry Hall was given an alimony payment ranging between $15 million and $25 million – the details of the Mick Jagger divorce settlement were kept secret

The Determination of Legality within the Mick Jagger Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Mick Jagger Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Mick Jagger Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record; in the case of the Mick Jagger divorce – or annulment, the couple was able to be privy to extenuating circumstances due to the disputable nature of their initial marriage