The Inside Scoop on the Mike Tyson Divorce

The Inside Scoop on the Mike Tyson Divorce

Share
The Inside Scoop on the Mike Tyson DivorceA Summary of the Mike Tyson Divorce
The Mike Tyson Divorce was finalized in February of 1989, which ended the yearlong marriage between Mike Tyson and Robin Givens - the couple was wed in February of 1988. Speculation surrounding the Mike Tyson Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Mike Tyson Divorce included Givens explaining on Barbara Walter’s television program ‘20/20’ that she was both sexually and physically abused by Tyson; perhaps the most famous sentiment expressed by Givens was her description of her marriage to Mike Tyson as a “Living  Hell”. For those unfamiliar with the Mike Tyson Divorce, the celebrity status of Mike Tyson and Robin Givens thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Mike Tyson Divorce had taken place:
Mike Tyson’s celebrity fame earned as a result of his notoriety as a professional boxer was only furthered in the public eye as a result of his electrifying and oftentimes bizarre personality
Robin Givens was amongst one of the most widely-recognized television actors, resulting from her role on the television show ‘Head of the Class’
The Terms and Conditions of the Mike Tyson Divorce
Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Mike Tyson and Robin Givens were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the following:
The Terms of Alimony in the Mike Tyson Divorce
Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Robin Givens had petitioned for alimony payments from Mike Tyson upon the finalization of the Mike Tyson Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Mike Tyson Divorce:
Prior to the dissolution of the marriage, reports were released stating that Tyson had accused Givens of stealing his money and lying to him; subsequent to the Mike Tyson Divorce, Givens sued Tyson for libel to the tune of $125 million – however, she shortly recanted the lawsuit and expressed that she did not wish to receive spousal support from him
The Determination of Contest within the Mike Tyson Divorce
In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Mike Tyson and Robin Givens would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Mike Tyson Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Mike Tyson Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution:
In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record
In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Mike Tyson Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Mike Tyson Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Mike Tyson and Robin Givens determined that the Mike Tyson Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature
The Mike Tyson Divorce and the Public Record
The respective celebrity status shared by both Mike Tyson and Robin Givens - within the Mike Tyson Divorce settlement - would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Mike Tyson and Robin Givens to be released into public record:
The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record
The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review.

Comments

comments

Share

Related Articles