A Summary of the Greg Norman Divorce

The Greg Norman Divorce was finalized in September of 2007, which ended the 25-year marriage between Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy – the couple was wed in July of 1981. for those unfamiliar with the Greg Norman Divorce, the celebrity status of Greg Norman as an electrifying professional golfer thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event at the time that the Greg Norman Divorce had taken place:

Speculation surrounding the Greg Norman Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Greg Norman Divorce included allegations that Greg Norman had undertaken an affair with former tennis professional Chris Evert

In an ironic turn of events, Chris Evert had endured a costly divorce ten years prior, which was classified as amongst the most expensive with regard to spousal support furnished by a female spouse to a male spouse – her former husband, Andy Mill, was reported to have received upwards of $10 million in assets and monies

Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy share 2 children, both of whom were legal adults at the time of the Greg Norman divorce, which resulted in the determination of custody to be moot

The Terms and Conditions of the Greg Norman Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

The Terms of Alimony in the Greg Norman Divorce

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Greg Norman petitioned for alimony payments from Laura Andrassy upon the finalization of the Greg Norman Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Greg Norman Divorce:

Due to the fact that a confidentiality agreements – also known as a ‘gag order’ was required of Andrassy within the Greg Norman divorce settlement, Andrassy made public comments with regard to Chris Evert’s behavior; she claimed that Evert actively pursued her husband in plain sight

Although Greg Norman petitioned that Andrassy had violated the terms of the confidentiality agreement, Andrassy was awarded a lump sum of $107 million

Subsequent to the finalization of the Greg Norman divorce, Norman and Evert wed in 2008

The Greg Norman Divorce and the Public Record

The respective celebrity status shared by both Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy – within the Greg Norman Divorce settlement – would allow for personal and privileged details latent within the personal relationship shared by Greg Norman and Laura Andrassy to be released into public record:

The legal stipulations undertaken within a celebrity divorce – akin to those inherent within traditional divorces – express strict parameters with regard to the release of the specific divorce settlement to public record

The realm of public record allows the terms of a divorce settlement to be accessed within the realm of common law – a primary tenet of common law allows past cases to serve as legislative parameters taken into consideration by specific judicial review

Overview of the Harrison Ford Divorce

The Harrison Ford Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Harrison Ford and Melissa Matheson; the Harrison Ford Divorce was finalized in 2004, which ended the 20-yearlong marriage. Although the case of the Harrison Ford Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness, loss, and humiliation:

This was indeed the case within the Harrison Ford divorce, as reports illustrated that couple had been separated 4 years prior to the finalization of the Harrison Ford divorce; however, within this time, Harrison Ford was cited as undertaking a relationship with fellow actor Calista Flockhart – reports surfaced stating that Harrison Ford had even gone so far as to adopt Flockhart’s 1-year old son

Harrison Ford and Melissa Matheson share 2 children from their marriage

The Parties Involved in the Harrison Ford Divorce

Harrison Ford is perhaps one of the most iconic, beloved, and revered American actors within the realm of the motion picture industry; over the span of his long and illustrious career, he has graced the screen in highly-acclaimed films such as The Indiana Jones Series, Star Wars, American Graffiti, and the Fugitive. Harrison Ford met Melissa Mathison, who was – and still is a movie screenwriter – in the early 1980s. The couple shares 2 children

Legal Venue of the Harrison Ford Divorce Hearing

The Harrison Ford Divorce was heard before a judge in the Los Angeles County Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles in the State of California

The Terms of the Harrison Ford Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the case of the Harrison Ford Divorce, Harrison Ford and Melissa Mathison undertook a divorce settlement hearing. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Harrison Ford Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Harrison Ford Divorce settlement:

Melissa Mathison walked away from the Harrison Ford divorce with $118 million, which has been cited as amongst the most expensive divorce settlements in history

Due to what was considered an amalgamation of Harrison Ford’s behavior prior to the finalization of the Harrison Ford divorce – involving his engagement in a romantic relationship – the assets accrued by the couple, and the reported despair that the Harrison Ford divorce elicited within Melissa Mathison, she petitioned for a considerable amount of money

A Summary of the Andre Agassi Divorce

The Andre Agassi Divorce was finalized in April of 1999, ending the nearly 2-year marriage between Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields – the couple was wed in April of 1997. Speculation surrounding the Andre Agassi Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Andre Agassi Divorce included <; for those unfamiliar with the Andre Agassi Divorce, the celebrity status of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Andre Agassi Divorce had taken place:

Andre Agassi, at the time of the Andre Agassi Divorce, was considered to be amongst the most electrifying and talented Tennis Players in the world; he had been experiencing a multitude of internationally acclaimed victories in the Olympic Games in the sport of Tennis

Brooke Shields had established herself as an acclaimed actor at a young age, starring in her first film ‘The Blue Lagoon’, which thrust her into the limelight; in addition, Brooke Shield had been modeling on a consistent basis

The Determination of Contest within the Andre Agassi Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Andre Agassi Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Andre Agassi Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple expressed that they had grown apart and no longer could retain a connection; they added that the divorce took place mutually and amicably:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Andre Agassi Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields determined that the Andre Agassi Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Terms and Conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, as well as the division of collective assets:

The Division of Assets in the Andre Agassi Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Andre Agassi Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

The terms of the prenuptial agreement were kept confidential, but details regarding the division of assets provided information suggesting that couple would split what was estimated to be upwards of $130 million in communal assets, as well as homes in Los Angeles and Las Vegas

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Summary

Armando Montelongo, who is known as one of the foremost real estate gurus in modernity was arrested in 2007 after allegations furnished by a contracting company in Austin, Texas, which claimed that the reasons for Armando Montelongo arrested including the failure to satisfy the payment of $4k worth of appraisal services undertaken by the company. The construction appraisal company who were hired on a contractual basis by Armando Montelongo claimed that between the years of 2005 and 2006, the company had undergone a variety of appraisals for which they were never paid by Armando Montelongo.

The Irony of Armando Montelongo Arrested

Armando Montelongo is most commonly recognized for his role in his reality-based television program that is aired on the A&E television network called ‘Flip this House’; the program educates its viewers on the various methodology latent within the ‘House-flipping’ subgenre of real estate:

The act of ‘Flipping Houses’ is defined as the purchase of a home considered to be in unsatisfactory conditions, ranging from structural damage or neglect; a trend within the industry of flipping houses occurs as the poor condition of the home allows for a drastically-lowered purchase price – subsequent to the purchase, the buyer renovates the home and sells it for a far-larger amount of money than for which it was originally purchased

The Austin, Texas appraisal company was named as working closely with Armando Montelongo in tandem with an individual house flipping operation undertaken by Armando Montelongo; however, it was this same appraisal company that had Armando Montelongo arrested

Armando Montelongo Arrested: The Conclusion

Upon the investigation that resulted in Armando Montelongo arrested, a variety of reports were released; Armando Montelongo explained that charges set forth resulting in Armando Montelongo arrested were baseless; Armando Montelongo assured that he would dispute the charges and have them overturned. The Austin, Texas Police Department – sitting in the heart of Travis County in the State of Texas – undertook the investigation; shortly after they had Armando Montelongo arrested, the charges set forth by the Austin, Texas-based appraisal company were reported to have been overturned:

Only days after Armando Montelongo arrested, Armando Montelongo continued shooting footage for his television show; subsequent charges have been filed against Armando Montelongo – his detractors believe that he undertakes illcit business dealings

Those lobbying for Armando Montelongo – including the A&E television channel – adamantly support Armando Montelongo; his career has not appeared to have suffered from Armando Montelongo arrested

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

In February of 2011, Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz filed for divorce; the couple had been married over 2-years, officially being wed in May of 2008. Ashlee Simpson is most commonly known for both her singing career, as well as for her familial ties; she is the younger sister of celebrity singer Jessica Simpson. Pete Wentz gained his celebrity status as a result of being the bass player in the rock group Fall Out Boy. Akin to the bulk of celebrity divorces – and their respective penchant for speculation with regard to the reason for the dissolution of the marriage – the Ashlee Simpson divorce is no exception; reports released in conjunction with the Ashlee Simpson divorce range from rumors of the couple having grown apart to alleged infidelity.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce in the State of California

The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake specific stipulations with regard to filing for divorce:

The Absence of a Prenuptial Agreement in the Ashlee Simpson Divorce

A prenuptial agreement is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place. In the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, neither Pete Wentz nor Ashlee Simpson enacted a prenuptial agreement; in contrast to a large part of celebrity marriages undertaken after the attainment of a varying degree of fame, these types of agreements are commonly undertaken:

Despite the absence of a prenuptial agreement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for spousal support in the form of alimony from Pete Wentz subsequent to the finalization of the Ashlee Simpson divorce

The Determination of Fault

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’, which is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. The receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property; yet, the division of assets with regard to the Ashlee Simpson divorce was not disclosed to the public.

The Ashlee Simpson Divorce Child Custody Settlement

In November of 2008, the couple welcomed a son named Bronx Mowgli Wentz. Although the petitioning for custody with regard to a shared child – or children – may vary in conjunction with the terms of a divorce settlement, Ashlee Simpson is reported to have petitioned for not only primary physical custody of their son, but also for joint legal custody:

Legal custody allows the expressed permission of guardianship over a child produced from a marriage; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement, both Ashlee Simpson and Pete Wentz will be permitted to act on behalf of their son

Physical custody is the granting of exclusive custody of a child to one parent; in the case of the Ashlee Simpson Divorce, Ashlee Simpson retains the right to establish when or if Pete Wentz will retain the right to visit with their son

This aspect of the Ashlee Simpson divorce settlement will also make Ashlee Simpson eligible to receive child support payments furnished by Pete Wentz

The Background of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

Edwin Valero, who was a 28-year old Venezuelan boxer, was accused of killing his wife in a hotel room in Valencia, which is a city in Venezuela on or around the time of April 19th, 2010; Jennifer Viera, who was Edwin Valero wife was 24-years old at the time of her murder; she was discovered in the early morning hours by law enforcement agents. While the details of his arrest in conjunction to the alleged murder of his wife remained hazy at first notice, Edwin Valero Wife murder investigation became clearer subsequent to the events that unfolded upon Valero’s apprehension.

The Arrest Charges of Edwin Valero Wife Murder

Edwin Valero was apprehended on Sunday the 19th after reports that Valero had allegedly confessed his crime to both hotel security, and then continued to confess the murder of his wife to police undertaking the Edwin Valero wife murder investigation upon their arrival to the hotel. Upon entering the hotel room shared by Valero and his wife, the lifeless body of Jennifer Viera was discovered; the police report mentioned the identification of 3 stab wounds on various locations her body – however, despite the confession expressed by the boxer for the Edwin Valero wife murder, the weapon assumed to have taken Viera’s life was never located by investigators.

A History of Domestic Discord Revealed in the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the past events involving domestic incidents involving Valero and his wife have resulted in charges alleged to Valero, including harassment, threats, and physical violence enacted upon Jennifer Viera; only months prior, Viera was rushed to a Venezuelan hospital after suffering broken ribs and a punctured lung resulting from an incident that Viera reported as an accidental fall.

Edwin Valero Takes His Own Life in the Midst of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the morning subsequent to his apprehension, Edwin Valero was found dead due to asphyxiation from a homemade noose fashioned out of his clothing in his jail cell the Monday morning after his arrest on the previous day. Reports issued by the Venezuelan police expressed that the suicide had taken place on Monday, April 19, 2010:

Valero’s suicide was reported by a fellow inmate who had witnessed the act taking place; upon mention of the suicide, the police rushed to the aid of Valero – while Valero showed slight signs of life upon the discover by police, he was unable to be revived and died shortly afterwards

Overview of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

The filing of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce occurred on April 2nd, 2011, which marked the ending of the relationship between actor Elizabeth Hurley and Indian industrialist Arun Nayar; the couple met it 2002 and began a romantic relationship shortly thereafter – the couple wed on March 2nd, 2007. Akin to traditional, non-celebrity divorce proceedings – including the filing, settlement, and finalization process –the impact of the dissolution of a union is considered to exist in a corollary fashion within celebrity divorces – the Elizabeth Hurley divorce was certainly no exception. As a result, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

Elizabeth Hurley is an English actor who has been featured in films such as Austin Powers, Permanent Midnight, and Bedazzled; in addition to her acting fame, she was also married to actor Hugh Grant at the time of his arrest from engaging in sexual activity with a prostitute. While not an actor himself, Arun Nayar is considered to be amongst the most successful textile magnates within the global marketplace; he is currently heir to one of the largest textile companies both in India, as well as worldwide – Arun Nayar was born in India:

The couple engaged in 2 marriage ceremonies; a civil proceeding in the United Kingdom, as well as an Indian ceremony in Jodhpur, India

Reports of infidelity surfaced with regard to the Elizabeth Hurley divorce, which cited Elizabeth Hurley undertaking an extramarital affair with the Australian professional cricketer Shane Warne; although these reports have yet to be validated, she has allegedly begun a romantic relationship with Warne

The Plea within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Elizabeth Hurley divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce, if both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Overview of the Emmy Rossum Divorce

The Emmy Rossum Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between music executive Justin Siegel and actor Emmy Rossum; the Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized in December of 2010, which ended the couples year-and-a-half-long marriage – the couple wed on February 17th, 2008. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement; in the case of the Emmy Rossum divorce, Justin Siegel was responsible for the filing of the divorce petition – subsequent to the filing, the couple stated that the dissolution of the marriage resulted from irreconcilable differences:

The Parties Involved in the Emmy Rossum Divorce

Acotr Emmy Rossum has been featured in such films as The Day Before Tomorrow, Poseidon, Dragonball: Evolution, and Mystic River; she also enjoys a successful musical career. Justin Siegel works within the music industry, and has been known for the development of a variety of artists – the couple shares no children together.

Legal Venue of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Hearing

The Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized before a judge in the Los Angeles branch of the California Superieor Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Emmy Rossum Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Emmy Rossum Divorce, both Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel seemed unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault. However, within the State of California, a contested – or challenged – divorce hearing allows for the release of certain details of the divorce settlement to be released into public record. Although Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel presumably did not wish to have the details of the Emmy Rossum Divorce released to the general public, the inability to arrive at a meeting of the minds earned the Emmy Rossum Divorce a large amount of publicity at the time it occurred.

The Terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of !, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Emmy Rossum Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private . However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce settlement:

The Emmy Rossum divorce settlement awarded Justin Siegel with a sum of $57,000 as per his request for spousal support as a result of the dissolution of the marriage

Emmy Rossum was awarded with the couple’s shared residence in Bevereley Hills, California in addition to her jewelry and valuables; Justin Siegel was awarded an additional $11,200 deposit from the home in addition to the couple’s shared automobile

What is the Katie Holmes Prenup?

The legal instrument known as the ‘Katie Holmes Prenup’ is officially defined as the legislative document issued by Tom Cruise upon his marriage to Katie Holmes. A Katie Holmes Prenup is a formulated agreement furnished by one or both partners of a marriage that serves as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise. The goal of a prenuptial agreement is to place limitations on prospective petitions, claims, and requests furnished by Katie Holmes or Tom Cruise in the event of the dissolution of a marriage.

Who is Involved in the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Primarily, the Katie Holmes prenup involves both partners of the marriage existing between actors Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes; however, akin to the trend associated with a variety of celebrity marriages, it may presumed that both the legal counsel responsible for the legal representation of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise – respectively – suggested the enactment of the Katie Holmes:

Careers Profiles

For those unfamiliar with the individual careers belonging to Tom Cruise or Katie Holmes, Tom Cruise is considered to be one of the single-most globally-recognized, iconic actors of the 20th century; Tom Cruise has starred in countless blockbuster films such as Top Gun, The Mission Impossible Series, Rain Man, Jerry Maguire, and Days of Thunder – Katie Holmes has also enjoyed a nominal amount of success in both television acting, as well as major motion pictures

What are the Alleged Terms of the Katie Holmes Prenup?

Although a variety of alleged reports substantiating the unofficial details expressed within the Katie Holmes prenup have been released, the verification of any and all statutes cited within the Katie Holmes prenup have been confirmed neither by publicists employed by Tom Cruise nor those employed by Katie Holmes. The following claims with regard to the Katie Holmes prenup have been alleged:

For every year that Katie Holmes remains married to Tom Cruise, the Katie Holmes prenup allows her $3 million annually

In the event that the marriage between Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise withstands 11-years’ time, the Katie Holmes prenup becomes void; in the event of a divorce after a period of marriage exceeding 11-years’ time, Katie Holmes will become entitled to half of the combined assets and monies accrued by the couple since the date of the marriage – within the State of California as ‘Community Property’

What is the Need for the Katie Holmes Prenup?

With regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage:

The statues expressed within the statutes inherent within the Katie Holms Prenup are reported to not only address the receipt of any salaries and wages subsequent to the enactment of the marriage

Wages, assets, monies, or earnings in possession of both Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise not addressed within the Katie Holmes Prenup will result in the classification of such finances as community – or shared – property.

Why Was Katt Williams Arrested?

The events that resulted in comedian Katt Williams Arrested in November of 2009 were subject to a vast array of media coverage upon their release shortly after rumors of Katt Williams Arrested; what was reported to have begun as a simple misunderstanding quickly escalated into legal situation in which the report of missing valuables, theft, and trespassing were quickly brought to light:

Reports expressing the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested explained that while residing in the house of Barry Hankerson in the State of Georgia – the famed record producer – a steward in the Hankerson household had reported that almost $4k of valuables had gone missing

The accuser, who was named as Daniel Paul Broach, identified the comedian as the perpetrator of the crime and had Katt Williams Arrested; yet, the arrest was only the beginning of what would be considered a bizarre turn of events and situations.

The Criminal Charges that Resulted in Katt Williams Arrested

In the midst of his stay in the home of Barry Hankerson, a variety of charges were tossed around by Broach; with regard to each of the allegations, Williams’ legal team summarily defended and absolved their client of both participation, as well as the reasons for Katt Williams Arrested:

Katt Williams Arrested for Trespassing

A trespassing allegation contributing to Katt Williams Arrested was swiftly thrown out as a result of Hankerson substantiating that Williams was permitted to reside at his home. Broach claimed that Williams has undergone the unlawful encroachment onto the private and personal property belonging to Hankerson.

Katt Williams Arrested for Theft

Broach expressed that in the enactment undertaken by Williams upon the personal property belonging to Hankerson, he unlawfully obtained almost $4k in valuables that Broach had reported to have gone missing. Although a settlement of the criminal allegations was kept under wraps between Hankerson and Williams, the charges of burglary leading to Katt Williams Arrested were discharged.

Events Following Katt Williams Arrested

Subsequent the preparation of Katt Williams’ defense, both testimony offered by Hankerson – as well as testimony redacted by Broach – has resulted in the charges filed against Williams from the State of Georgia to be dropped.