Overview of the Jessica Simpson Divorce

Singers Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey embarked on a romantic relationship at the close of the 20th century; nearly 2 years following their initial meeting, the couple wed on October 26th, 2002. In conjunction to rumors surfacing in November of 2005 suggesting that the couple would undergo separation, Jessica Simpson filed a petition for divorce only a month later, in which simply ‘irreconcilable differences’ were cited as the catalyst for what the media dubbed the ‘Jessica Simpson Divorce’. However, on June 30th, 2006 – almost 6 months following the separation notice – the Jessica Simpson divorce was finalized.

The Parties Involved in the Jessica Simpson Divorce

Jessica Simpson is an American singer who rose to fame in the final years of the 1990s into the early years of the 2000s; recognized as having an incredible voice, she was responsible for such hit singles including ‘I Wanna Love You Forever’, Irresistible’, and ‘A Public Affair’ – Jessica Simpson was also featured in various major motion pictures. Nick Lachey enjoyed the bulk of his fame in the late 1990s thanks to his fronting of the ‘boy band’ 98 Degrees, who were gained mainstream fame as a result of hit singles ‘I Do (Cherish You)’, ‘Thank God I Found You’, and ‘This Gift’.

The Impact of the Jessica Simpson Divorce

At the time of the Jessica Simpson divorce from husband Nick Lachey, the impact of the dissolution of the marriage is considered to have been amongst the most intense with individuals younger in age – or minors. Due to the fact that Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey starred in a reality show that aired on the MTV network, which was entitled ‘Newlyweds’, a young demographic of viewers were given the opportunity to not only witness the events taking place within the marriage of Jessica Simpson and Nick Lachey, but also feel a heightened sense of kinship with the couple.

Legal Venue of the Jessica Simpson Divorce Hearing

The Jessica Simpson Divorce was heard before a judge in California’s State Superior Court; in accordance to the couple’s residence in Los Angeles County, the Jessica Simpson divorce hearing was heard before in the Los Angeles County branch.

The Terms of the Jessica Simpson Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Jessica Simpson Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Jessica Simpson Divorce settlement:

Due to the fact that neither Jessica Simpson nor Nick Lachey furnished a prenuptial agreement, the couples shared earning following the date of marriage were legally-required to be split; however, since Jessica Simpson was considered to be the partner with superior monetary value, a legal team was orchestrated in order to enact the Jessica Simpson divorce settlement – the couples net worth was estimated to be valued at $36 million

While the initial offer furnished by Jessica Simpson’s legal team was reported to be $1.5 million, Nick Lachey was reported to have requested $18 million – half of the couple’s shared assets; however, the final sum of the Jessica Simpson divorce settlement furnished to Nick Lachey was never released

The Background of the Kate Winslet Divorce

The filing for the Kate Winslet divorce took place in March of 2010; however, an impending Kate Winslet divorce has yet to be finalized – the finalization of the divorce would result in the dissolution of the 7-year marriage of actor Kate Winslet and her husband director Sam Mendes. Akin to many celebrity divorces, a multitude of rumors have circulated with regard to the reasoning for a prospective Kate Winslet divorce; yet, none of the rumors have neither been authenticated by Kate Winslet nor Sam Mendes. As per the divorce hearing and settlement associated with the Kate Winslet Divorce – which can range from an out-of-court settlement to a divorce hearing – the reasoning behind the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

Although rumors have surfaced that a prospective Kate Winslet is the result of an extramarital affair undertaken by Sam Mendes with actor Rebecca Hall, any such validation has yet to be furnished

Who Was Involved in the Kate Winslet Divorce Filing?

English actor Kate Winslet is one of the most famous faces in Hollywood; perhaps most widely-recognized for her starring role in the blockbuster hit Titanic, which was the highest grossing film of all time prior to 2010, Kate Winslet has starred in other successful films including Reservation Road, Quills, and Finding Neverland. Kate Winslet’s husband – English director Same Mendes – has shared in his wife’s success in the motion picture industry; he has directed the following films that have received international acclaim, such as Jarhead, The Road to Perdition, and American Beauty:

Both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes share one son, in addition to the custody of a daughter birthed to Kate Winslet in her previous marriage

The Plea within the Kate Winslet Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Kate Winslet divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the determination of fault and challenge within the filing – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea within the Kate Winslet divorce petition:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kate Winslet Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kate Winslet Divorce, if both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Kate Winslet Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Kate Winslet and Sam Mendes seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

The Background of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

Edwin Valero, who was a 28-year old Venezuelan boxer, was accused of killing his wife in a hotel room in Valencia, which is a city in Venezuela on or around the time of April 19th, 2010; Jennifer Viera, who was Edwin Valero wife was 24-years old at the time of her murder; she was discovered in the early morning hours by law enforcement agents. While the details of his arrest in conjunction to the alleged murder of his wife remained hazy at first notice, Edwin Valero Wife murder investigation became clearer subsequent to the events that unfolded upon Valero’s apprehension.

The Arrest Charges of Edwin Valero Wife Murder

Edwin Valero was apprehended on Sunday the 19th after reports that Valero had allegedly confessed his crime to both hotel security, and then continued to confess the murder of his wife to police undertaking the Edwin Valero wife murder investigation upon their arrival to the hotel. Upon entering the hotel room shared by Valero and his wife, the lifeless body of Jennifer Viera was discovered; the police report mentioned the identification of 3 stab wounds on various locations her body – however, despite the confession expressed by the boxer for the Edwin Valero wife murder, the weapon assumed to have taken Viera’s life was never located by investigators.

A History of Domestic Discord Revealed in the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the past events involving domestic incidents involving Valero and his wife have resulted in charges alleged to Valero, including harassment, threats, and physical violence enacted upon Jennifer Viera; only months prior, Viera was rushed to a Venezuelan hospital after suffering broken ribs and a punctured lung resulting from an incident that Viera reported as an accidental fall.

Edwin Valero Takes His Own Life in the Midst of the Edwin Valero Wife Murder Investigation

In the morning subsequent to his apprehension, Edwin Valero was found dead due to asphyxiation from a homemade noose fashioned out of his clothing in his jail cell the Monday morning after his arrest on the previous day. Reports issued by the Venezuelan police expressed that the suicide had taken place on Monday, April 19, 2010:

Valero’s suicide was reported by a fellow inmate who had witnessed the act taking place; upon mention of the suicide, the police rushed to the aid of Valero – while Valero showed slight signs of life upon the discover by police, he was unable to be revived and died shortly afterwards

Overview of the Kevin Costner Divorce

The Kevin Costner Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between actor Kevin Costner and restaurateur Cindy Silva; the Kevin Costner Divorce was finalized in 1994, which ended the 16-yearlong marriage. Although the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Within the reports surrounding the Kevin Costner divorce, Cindy Silva was cited for her attempts to reconcile the marriage at all costs, even despite the alleged extramarital affairs undertaken by her husband.

The Parties Involved in the Kevin Costner Divorce

Kevin Costner has enjoyed an illustrious and widely-acclaimed acting career within which he has acted in some of the most famed and beloved films in history, including Dances with Wolves, JFK, Field of Dreams, The Untouchables, and The Bodyguard; in addition to the vast critical acclaim bestowed on Kevin Costner for these roles, he amassed a large fortune over the course of his career. While both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva were students at the University of California at Fullerton, the couple embarked on a romantic relationship resulting in their marriage in 1978; the couple share 3 children.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Kevin Costner Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Kevin Costner Divorce, both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Kevin Costner Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity:

In contrast the presumed intentions of both Kevin Costner and Cindy Silva with regard to the unchallenged file for divorce, allegation begun to fly with regard to the presumed infidelity undertaken by Kevin Costner throughout the couple marriage; however, these allegations were never substantiated –  the couple later cited irreconcilable differences with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement

The Terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. The State of California implements a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage with regard to their classification as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Kevin Costner Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private. However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Kevin Costner Divorce settlement:

Despite reports of the efforts put forth by Cindy Silva to save their marriage, Kevin Costner furnished a payment of $80 million with regard to the Kevin Costner divorce settlement; the amount of this payment is considered to be amongst the largest in the history of celebrity divorces occurring within the United States

Overview of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

The filing of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce occurred on April 2nd, 2011, which marked the ending of the relationship between actor Elizabeth Hurley and Indian industrialist Arun Nayar; the couple met it 2002 and began a romantic relationship shortly thereafter – the couple wed on March 2nd, 2007. Akin to traditional, non-celebrity divorce proceedings – including the filing, settlement, and finalization process –the impact of the dissolution of a union is considered to exist in a corollary fashion within celebrity divorces – the Elizabeth Hurley divorce was certainly no exception. As a result, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Parties Involved in the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

Elizabeth Hurley is an English actor who has been featured in films such as Austin Powers, Permanent Midnight, and Bedazzled; in addition to her acting fame, she was also married to actor Hugh Grant at the time of his arrest from engaging in sexual activity with a prostitute. While not an actor himself, Arun Nayar is considered to be amongst the most successful textile magnates within the global marketplace; he is currently heir to one of the largest textile companies both in India, as well as worldwide – Arun Nayar was born in India:

The couple engaged in 2 marriage ceremonies; a civil proceeding in the United Kingdom, as well as an Indian ceremony in Jodhpur, India

Reports of infidelity surfaced with regard to the Elizabeth Hurley divorce, which cited Elizabeth Hurley undertaking an extramarital affair with the Australian professional cricketer Shane Warne; although these reports have yet to be validated, she has allegedly begun a romantic relationship with Warne

The Plea within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. Due to the fact that the Elizabeth Hurley divorce has been filed recently, the associated pleas – with regard to the fault of the dissolution of marriage – have yet to be named; the following are some potential outcomes upon the determination of the plea:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce, if both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar opt to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, they may have the opportunity to settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Plea of ‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the event that both Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar seem unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault, the release of certain details of the divorce settlement may be released into public record.

Kid Cudi Arrested

On June 11th, 2010, Rapper and member of the Hip-Hip community Kid Cudi – whose real name is Scott Mescudi – was arrested in New York City within the area known as ‘Chelsea’. Despite Kid Cudi arrested, he remains one of Rapper Kanye West’s prodigies in addition to undertaking vast musical collaborations and a budding acting career. Yet, upon the arrival of law enforcement agents following the report of criminal activity, Kid Cudi was reported to have torn an apartment door from its hinges and broken into that same apartment using physical force – after Kid Cudi had gained access to the apartment of the unidentified female victim later named as Kid Cudi’s girlfriend, he was reported to have forcefully obtained and destroyed her cellphone:

If these events leading to Kid Cudi arrested were not enough, law enforcement found a glass bottle with what they had believe to be an illegal substance; upon testing, the substance was reported to be liquid cocaine

However, the events surrounding Kid Cudi arrested did not mention whether the artist was intoxicated at that time

Law enforcement agents had Kid Cudi arrested, despite the fact that he had been scheduled to perform at the ‘Bonnaroo Festival’, which is considered to be one of the nation’s largest musical festival held annually in Tennessee; however, despite Kid Cudi arrested, he managed to attend the festival and perform

What Was Kid Cudi Arrested For?

Upon Kid Cudi arrested, the applicable charges filed included criminal mischief and the possession of an illegal substance. However, due to the fact that both parties – Kid Cudi and his girlfriend – allegedly reported the incident to be the result of a domestic dispute, the charges were dropped conditionally; while the criminal mischief charges would be dismissed from Kid Cudi arrested, Kid Cudi would be required to plead guilty to possession charges regarding the glass of liquid cocaine:

What is Liquid Cocaine?

Cocaine – even in its liquid form – is considered to be one of the most highly-addictive narcotics currently in circulation, which has been the cause of millions of deaths since its introduction to society. Cocaine can impair individuals’ behavior and demeanor, which typically results in criminal activity and violence. While the possession of Cocaine is considered to be a criminal felony; depending upon the amount discovered on an individual’s person – in addition to their individual criminal record – will determine the punishment; due to the fact that Kid Cudi was without any prior convictions, he was placed on probation.

Results of Kid Cudi Arrested

Subsequent to Kid Cudi’s arrest, he was given mandatory community service, as well as a required meeting with a drug counselor; the events leading to Kid Cudi arrested also will place Kid Cudi on probation, requiring that he adhere to all legal statutes and lawful behavior. If you need legal advice and assistance, contact West Virginia lawyers.

Overview of the Emmy Rossum Divorce

The Emmy Rossum Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between music executive Justin Siegel and actor Emmy Rossum; the Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized in December of 2010, which ended the couples year-and-a-half-long marriage – the couple wed on February 17th, 2008. The reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement; in the case of the Emmy Rossum divorce, Justin Siegel was responsible for the filing of the divorce petition – subsequent to the filing, the couple stated that the dissolution of the marriage resulted from irreconcilable differences:

The Parties Involved in the Emmy Rossum Divorce

Acotr Emmy Rossum has been featured in such films as The Day Before Tomorrow, Poseidon, Dragonball: Evolution, and Mystic River; she also enjoys a successful musical career. Justin Siegel works within the music industry, and has been known for the development of a variety of artists – the couple shares no children together.

Legal Venue of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Hearing

The Emmy Rossum Divorce was finalized before a judge in the Los Angeles branch of the California Superieor Court, which is located in the City of Los Angeles.

‘Contest’ and Challenge within the Emmy Rossum Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Emmy Rossum Divorce, both Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel seemed unable or unwilling to negotiate mutual terms of the divorce or reach an agreement upon the identification of fault. However, within the State of California, a contested – or challenged – divorce hearing allows for the release of certain details of the divorce settlement to be released into public record. Although Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel presumably did not wish to have the details of the Emmy Rossum Divorce released to the general public, the inability to arrive at a meeting of the minds earned the Emmy Rossum Divorce a large amount of publicity at the time it occurred.

The Terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce Settlement

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the State of !, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Emmy Rossum Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private . However, subsequent to the ruling of the presiding judge, the following judicial review was set forth with regard to the terms of the Emmy Rossum Divorce settlement:

The Emmy Rossum divorce settlement awarded Justin Siegel with a sum of $57,000 as per his request for spousal support as a result of the dissolution of the marriage

Emmy Rossum was awarded with the couple’s shared residence in Bevereley Hills, California in addition to her jewelry and valuables; Justin Siegel was awarded an additional $11,200 deposit from the home in addition to the couple’s shared automobile

The Participants in the Kim Kardashian Video

In 2005, Kim Kardashian and her former boyfriend Willie Norwood – oftentimes referred to by his nickname ‘Ray-J’ – filmed themselves engaging in sexual activity while on vacation. Kim Kardashian, who is now 26 years old, is the daughter of Robert Kardashian – Robert Kardashian was one of the primary members of the defense team for the O.J. Simpson murder trial assisting in the acquittal of Simpson. ‘Ray-J’ is the brother of famous singer Brandy. While the credentials of both participants may not appear to render the notoriety that has been associated with the Kim Kardashian Sextape, the release of the video was one of the most talked-about within modernity.

Kim Kardashian Admitted to Filming the Sex Tape Willingly

Despite the fact that the Kim Kardashian Video portrays images and activity considered to be both private and personal, the former couple admitted to participating in the Kim Kardashian Sextape without the intention of it being released; however, subsequent to the Kim Kardashian Video being ‘leaked’ – a colloquialism used to define the unauthorized availability of a particular piece of media – its release was considered to be a highly-controversial topic.

The Controversy Surrounding the Kim Kardashian Sextape

Vivid Video, which is considered to be amongst the most prominent names in the adult film industry, maintained that they had been given access to the Kim Kardashian Video in both a legal and lawful manner; however, neither Kim Kardashian nor Ray-J have taken responsibility for the release of the video, which was filmed with the intent to remain private – as a result, Kim Kardashian undertook an injunction against the Vivid Video company in order to curtail the release of the Kim Kardashian Sextape.

The Legal Implications of the Kim Kardashian Video

Due to the fact that the details of the release of the Kim Kardashian Sextape have not been disclosed, the lawsuit brought forth by Kim Kardashian included the following:

Kim Kardashian mentioned that Vivid Video was undertaking methods of exploitation and manipulation of the assumed right to release the Kim Kardashian Video, which resulted in the offer of payment for the Kim Kardashian Video in lieu of the refusal to release it

Kim Kardashian’s legal team made mention that the release of the Kim Kardashian video would result in the slandering or unjust conveying of libelous sentiment with the expressed intention of causing harm with regard to Kim Kardashian’s persona; her reality television show ‘Keeping Up with the Kardashians’ was amongst one of the most popular on television

Finally, the release of the Kim Kardashian Video would result in the violation of her privacy; while Ray-J was never named as a codefendant, Kardashian’s legal team explained that the video was in direct violation of Kardashian’s right to privacy

The Conclusion of the Kardashian Video Scandal

Although the specifics of the lawsuit did not receive a great deal of media coverage with regard to the settlement, the Kim Kardashian Sextape was never formally released by Vivid Video; however, it did undergo an unauthorized private release over the Internet – the settlement disallows for any website to willingly host or offer the video.

A Summary of the Andre Agassi Divorce

The Andre Agassi Divorce was finalized in April of 1999, ending the nearly 2-year marriage between Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields – the couple was wed in April of 1997. Speculation surrounding the Andre Agassi Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Andre Agassi Divorce included <; for those unfamiliar with the Andre Agassi Divorce, the celebrity status of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Andre Agassi Divorce had taken place:

Andre Agassi, at the time of the Andre Agassi Divorce, was considered to be amongst the most electrifying and talented Tennis Players in the world; he had been experiencing a multitude of internationally acclaimed victories in the Olympic Games in the sport of Tennis

Brooke Shields had established herself as an acclaimed actor at a young age, starring in her first film ‘The Blue Lagoon’, which thrust her into the limelight; in addition, Brooke Shield had been modeling on a consistent basis

The Determination of Contest within the Andre Agassi Divorce

In many cases, the celebrity status enjoyed by both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields would be viewed as a gift and a privilege; however, in the case of the Andre Agassi Divorce, the media coverage latent within the Andre Agassi Divorce proceedings thrust the legal undertakings into the spotlight – a dynamic that was considered to threaten the privacy of the couple facing dissolution. The couple expressed that they had grown apart and no longer could retain a connection; they added that the divorce took place mutually and amicably:

In the event that a couple mutually decides to file for divorce in an uncontested fashion, which means that the couple has both agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, as well as to the reasoning for the ultimate dissolution of the marriage, the specific details of the divorce settlement are not released to the public record

In an attempt to maintain privacy with regard to not only the monetary terms and conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce settlement, but also with regard to the alleged reasons for the Andre Agassi Divorce taking place, the respective legal teams belonging to Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields determined that the Andre Agassi Divorce would be filed as uncontested in nature

The Terms and Conditions of the Andre Agassi Divorce

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, as well as the division of collective assets:

The Division of Assets in the Andre Agassi Divorce

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Andre Agassi and Brooke Shields. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Andre Agassi Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

The terms of the prenuptial agreement were kept confidential, but details regarding the division of assets provided information suggesting that couple would split what was estimated to be upwards of $130 million in communal assets, as well as homes in Los Angeles and Las Vegas

A Summary of the Events Leading Up to the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In 1997, and Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson filed for divorce; as a result of their celebrity status, the couple refrained from releasing the possible catalysts for the undertaking of the divorce process within the State of California – however, media sources had reported that irretrievable differences with regard to each member of the couple’s career path had manifested in a contrasting fashion:

Kirstie Alley and Bob Alley wed in 1970 and divorced almost 7 years later; her marriage to Parker Stevenson was Kirstie Alley’s second marriage, which took place in 1983 – almost 14 years prior to the Kirstie Alley

Both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson are acclaimed actors, who have starred in a variety of noteworthy roles, such as ‘Look Who’s Talking’ and ‘A Separate Piece’

The couple produced 2 children from their marriage, William and Lillie; both children were adopted by the couple in a joint fashion

The Kirstie Alley Divorce in the State of California

Reports stated that Kirstie Alley wished to divorce in Maine, while Setvenson wished to divorce in California; ultimately, the Kirstie Alley divorce took place in California. The divorce laws applicable to the State of California undertake the following stipulations with regard to filing for divorce. In the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the probability of the enactment of a prenuptial agreement wass quite high; as per a large part of celebrity marriages taking place subsequent to one or both of the couples reaching a certain point of celebrity – these types of agreements are commonly undertaken. However, regardless of any or all expressed agreements existing in tandem with the divorce proceedings taking place within the Kirstie Alley Divorce, the couple will be required to adhere to the following parameters with regard to the dissolution of marriage:

The Determination of Fault

Reports released in news sources depicted the Kirstie Alley Divorce as occurring in an amicable and agreeable fashion; reports showed both Kirstie Alley and Parker Stevenson to have remained within good standing with each other. Yet, the parameters of the determination of ‘fault’ in the State of California require the following with regard to the determination of fault:

One or both of the parties must be deemed as mentally incompetent

Irreconcilable difference leading to the irretrievable dissolution of the union; in this case, the divergence of career paths was determined to serve as the catalyst for the Kirstie Alley divorce

The Prenuptial Agreement in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

No prenuptial agreement was formulated by the couple in order to serve as a preemptive, preventative measure with regard to the prospect of the dissolution of the marriage taking place; with regard to the divorce laws enacted within the State of California, a ‘no-fault’ divorce taking place will result in the even split of ‘community property’ – this is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage. However, in the case of the Kirstie Alley Divorce, in addition to a variety of celebrities, the receipt of any salary subsequent to marriage will result in its determination as community – or shared – property:

As per the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement, Kirstie Alley kept the couple’s home in Encino, California; she sold her home in 2010 – over 10 years following the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement

Custody and Children in the Kirstie Alley Divorce

In a handwritten note located in tandem with the Kirstie Alley divorce settlement papers, Alley explains that she was requesting the right to bring her children to the set of ‘Deconstructing Harry’, which was a movie in which Kirstie Alley was slated to act.