Overview of the Jason London Divorce

Born on November 7 of 1972, Jason London is an American actor, who is best known for his starriing role as Randall Floyd in the 1980’s classic Dazed and Confused. Following this role, London has sporadically earned parts in smaller films; however, London has recently been in the news as a result of his lengthy divorce with former wife Charlie Spradling.

Jason London married Spradling in November of 1999. The couple remained married until 2002, when the couple separated amidst rumors of infidelity on the part of London. Although this relationship seems like any other Hollywood romance, the London case is somewhat unique because the divorce was not finalized until a decade later. Spradling and London filed a no-contest divorce in a Los Angeles family court; however, the divorce was never finalized because the documents were not formally entered into the city’s court system. The divorce documents, were just recently filed, in March of 2011 in a Los Angeles Superior Court, effectively ending the marriage between London and Spradling. As a result of this lengthy delay, London was not allowed to officially re-marry until his previous marriage was either annulled or terminated through divorce. Problems arose because of this situation, due to London’s longtime relationship with girlfriend Sofia Karstens. When the divorce was finally formalized earlier this year, London then proposed to longtime girlfriend Sofia Karstens—the couple plans to officially marry in the summer of 2011.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Jason London Divorce:

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Jason London Divorce, both Jason London and Charlie Spradling opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Jason London Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Jason London Divorce Settlement:

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the case of the Jason London Divorce, Jason London and Charlie Spradling undertook a settlement that offered Spradling sole legal and physical custody of the couple’s 15-year old daughter. In addition, London is ordered by the Los Angeles Superior Court to provide over $1,000 per month in the form of child support payments to Spradling. Although this fee seems somewhat large considering London’s relative dearth of wealth, neither side in the Jason London divorce settlement was ordered to pay spousal support.

Who is Kobe Bryant?

Born August 23, 1978 Kobe Bryan is an American professional basketball superstar who currently plays shooting guard for the Los Angeles Lakers of the NBA. Bryant, who was recognized as the nation’s top high school basketball player in 1996, skipped college to enter the NBA draft, where the future star was chosen 13th overall by the Charlotte Hornets. Following this pick, Bryan was traded to the Los Angeles Lakers for Center Vlade Divac.

Kobe Bryant is regarded as one of the greatest basketball players of all time; the explosive Bryant is a 5-time NBA champion, 2-time NBA Most Valuable Player Award winner, 13-time NBA All-Star and 2-time scoring champ. In addition to his enviable skill-set, Bryant is regarded as one of the fiercest competitors in sports; the Philadelphia native is often compared to Michael Jordan in regards to not only his style of play, but his unrivaled ferocity. Although this passion for the game ultimately has led to great success for Bryant, his competitive edge has also caused the star to fall in disfavor.

Kobe Bryant’s on-the-court Incident:

On April 12, 2011 while the Lakers were playing their rivals, the San Antonio Spurs, Bryant was called for a routine fall. Upset by the call, Bryant stormed to the bench in the midst of an expletive-filled tirade. As the camera panned to a clearly frustrated and angered Bryant, the star shouted a homophobic slur aimed at the referee who whistled the foul. The slur, which was not picked up in audio by cameras, was easy read as a result of the emphasis and anger which it was delivered. Although the commentators refrained from commenting on the slur, the footage hit the Internet the next day and immediately sparked uproar in the gay and lesbian community.

Jarret Barrios, President of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, issued a response claiming that Bryant’s actions were deplorable and that the star needed to be held responsible. In response to the outrage, the National Basketball Association fined Bryant $100,000 for his hateful remarks. Following the fine, Bryan released a statement saying he didn’t mean to offend anyone when he used the homographic slur to express his frustration. In addition, Bryant promised to redeem himself in the gay and lesbian community by creating programs aimed to educate individuals against using hateful remarks.

The Kobe Bryant incident, regarding the use of homophobic rhetoric, was not viewed as a malicious nor desperate situation by his fellow peers. Numerous NBA players claimed that, between the lines, during the intensity of an NBA contest a lot of hateful remarks are said. Although these words, on their surface, appear debilitating, they are simply a part of a competitive culture and do not carry any hateful or prejudice undertones directed at a particular gender, race or sexual orientation.

Who is Lenny Dykstra?

Born February 10, 1963, Lenny Dykstra is a former Major League Baseball player, who is best known for his rugged style and clutch-performances with the New York Mets during the late 1980s and the Philadelphia Phillies throughout the early 90s. Although Dykstra enjoyed a successful Major League career, the star was forced to retire as a result of nagging injuries. Dykstra, who played his last season in 1996, attempted a comeback in 1998 before officially retiring at the age of 35. During his time in the Major League’s Dykstra was known as a hard-nosed competitor and rough personality; Dykstra was loved by teammates for his hustle, but was often criticized for his party-boy lifestyle. Following his retirement, Dykstra amassed a fortune through various investments in the stock market and in car washes.

During Dykstra’s retirement, the former baseball star managed a stock portfolio and served as president of his privately held companies, including a fueling facility, car washes, a real estate development company and a venture to develop several “I Sold it on EBay” stores. As a result of his initial success, Dykstra transformed into somewhat of a tall-tale; investors throughout the world were amazed how profitable his businesses were, considering the former star’s antipathy towards reading and education in general.

Lenny Dysktra would often appear on various Fox New Programs, picking stocks or offering insight regarding the stock market. During the peak of his business operation, Dykstra purchased Wayne Gretzky’s former home for $17 million in hopes of flipping it. Dykstra was unfortunately unsuccessful at selling the estate; the baseball star still owes more than $13 million on the house and has currently stopped paying its mortgage.

Lenny Dykstra Arrest and Bankruptcy:

In September of 2008, Dykstra started a high-end jet charter company and magazine marketed towards professional athletes, named Player’s Club. The publication was part of a business model to offer financial advice to professional athletes with information about his particular investment ideas. In early 2009; however, evidence piled-up indicating that Dykstra’s financial empire was merely a façade. An article in GQ, which was written by Kevin Coughlin, after the writer had spent nearly 3 months alongside Dykstra, depicted the star as fraudulent and revealed incidents accusing Dykstra of bounced checks, lawsuits, credit card fraud and Dykstra’s refusal to pay printing costs and other costs associated with the magazine.

In July 2009, Dykstra filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The star’s estimated net worth, which was at nearly $60 million in 2008, in his Bankruptcy filing listed roughly $50,000 in assets against nearly $50 million in liabilities. In connection with Dykstra’s bankruptcy filing, a court-appointed federal trustee charged the baseball player with lying under oath, improperly hiding and selling assets, as well as repeatedly acting in a “fraudulent and deceitful manner” during his ongoing case. The trustee continued by asking the bankruptcy court to deny Dykstra’s request to have his bankruptcy discharged.

On April 13, 2011 the former New York Met and Philadelphia Philly was arrested for investigation of grand theft—this arrest came one day after Dykstra was charged with a federal bankruptcy crime. The grand theft charged stemmed from suspicion of trying to buy a stolen car while the bankruptcy crime revolves from Dykstra’s plan to illegally sell the majority of his home’s furnishing to a consignment store. For this charge, Dykstra faces up to five years in federal prison.

Who is Nicolas Cage?

Born January 7, 1964 Nicolas Cage, born Nicolas Coppola, is an American actor, director and producer, who has appeared in over 60 films throughout his career, most notably Raising Arizona, Leaving Las Vegas, The Rock, National Treasure, Con Air and Face/Off.

Nicolas Cage was born in Long Beach, California; his father, August Coppola, is the brother of legendary film director, Francis Ford Coppola. In addition to these ties, Cage’s family also includes actress Talia Shire, directs Roman and Sofia Coppola, film producer Gian-Carlo Coppola, and actors Jason Schwartzman and Robert Carmine. To avoid the presence of nepotism, the actor changed his name early in his career; the last name was inspired in part by the Marvel Comics superhero Luke Cage. Throughout Cage’s illustrious career, the actor has been nominated twice for an Academy Award, winning once for his performance in Leaving Las Vegas. Like so many successful actors, who have been fortunate enough to amass a fortune, Nicolas Cage has had legal troubles and numerous run-ins with the law.

Nicolas Cage Tax Problems:

Nicolas Cage has some unusual spending habits; the actor has purchased a number of castles and exotic pets, such as octopuses. In addition to his love for unique assets, Cage is also a prominent purchaser of real estate. Seemingly every year the actor buys and sells a massive lot of land.

On July 14, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service filed documents in connection with a federal tax lien against property owned by Cage in New Orleans, Louisiana concerning Cage’s unpaid federal taxes. The Internal Revenue Service alleged that Cage failed to pay over $6 million dollars in federal income tax for the 2007 taxable year. Furthermore, the Internal Revenue Service placed an additional lien of more than $350,000 in unpaid taxes, which dated from 2002 to 2004. In response to these liens, Cage filed a $20 million lawsuit, filed on October 16, 2009, against his business manager, Samuel Levin, claiming that Levin had failed to pay taxes when they were due and had placed Cage in risky real estate investments. Cage, who claimed his manager acted in severe negligence and fraudulent activities, is also facing separate lawsuits from Red Curb and East West Bank Investments for unpaid multimillion dollar loans.

In response to the suit filed against him, Levin filed a counter-complaint and responded by stating that he warned Cage that the actor was living beyond his means and urged him to spend less. Levin claimed that he advised Cage to forego his 15 real-estate purchases, his Gulfstream jet, a fleet of yachts, a squadron of Rolls Royces and to refrain from buying millions of dollars in jewelry and art. Although Cage remains one of Hollywood’s highest paid actors, earning more than $40 million per year, the star’s financial problems have raised concerns, especially in this economic environment.

Nicolas Cage Arrest:

On April 15, 2011, Nicolas Cage was arrested in New Orleans for suspicion of disturbing the peace, domestic battery abuse and public intoxication, after law enforcement agents were flagged down by onlookers who noticed Cage grab his wife’s upper arm while appearing under the influence. For this action, Cage was held in police custody until $11,000 bail was posted by his friend. Cage has been ordered to appear in court on May 31st.

Who is Brook Mueller?

Born August 19, 1977 Brooke Mueller is an American Actress who is best known for her role was “Janet” in the 1999 film “Witchhouse” as well as her recent marriage to Movie Star and pop-culture icon Charlie Sheen.  With Sheen, Mueller gave birth to twin sons, Bob and Max, on March 14, 2009. Sheen filed for divorce from Mueller in November of 2010 following an infamous incident between the couple, in which, Mueller accused Sheen of strangling her and threatening to kill her.  Currently the two stars are engaged in a bitter and controversial custody battle over their children.

The divorce was approved by a Los Angeles Superior Court judge and will become officially effective on May 2, 2011. Similarly to her ex-husband, Brooke Mueller has faced numerous legal troubles; these run-ins with the law, as well as her ex-husband’s outlandish behavior, have complicated the custody hearing.

Brooke Mueller’s Legal Troubles and Drug Test:

In September of 1996, Brooke Mueller was arrested for driving under the influence and property damage. The actress was then arrested 5 years later in March of 2001 for possession of cocaine. These legal troubles have recently resurfaced in alignment with Mueller and Sheen’s child custody case. In addition to these legal troubles, Mueller has long battled an addiction to drugs. The actress reportedly checked into a rehab center after peculiar behavior during the early part of April; the actress was seen trying to hock jewelry and a stereo at a pawn shop in Inglewood, California. Later that week, Brooke Mueller refused to partake in a drug test, which was court-ordered to prove that the mother is responsible for caring for a child. As a result of her ex-husband’s media tour and recent downfall, the former actress has requested full custody of the couple’s twin children.

Actor Charlie Sheen and his ex-wife appeared in a Los Angeles courtroom on April 19th, 2011 to face off in a custody battle over Max and Bob. Sheen and his attorney planned to argue that Mueller has fallen victim to a drug relapse and is unfit to care for their children. Mueller’s mother, who is currently caring for the troubled couple’s children, has stated that Sheen is clearly unfit to care for anyone, including himself. TMZ, popular gossip media outlet, has reported that Sheen’s ex-wife, Denise Richards, has offered to let the boys live with her until things are stable in Sheen’s and Mueller’s life.

The custody case, which is still pending, is assumed to be a heated controversy between the mercurial couple. Sheen is expected to request full custody of the twins, while claiming that Brooke Mueller, considering her recent relapse, is unfit to raise the couple’s children. In response, Brooke Mueller is expected to also claim full custody, as a result of her ex-husband’s, expletive-filled rants, his firing from the hit television show Two and a Half Men, and his absurd behavior are blatant red flags that would impede him from properly raising children.

Overview of the Brenda Strong Divorce:

Born on March 25th of 1960, Brenda Strong is an American Actress and prominent yoga instructor, who is most widely known for her role as Mary Young, on the hit television show Deperate Housewives.

Brenda Strong married Tom Henri in July of 1989; together couple shares one child, Zakery Henri. The Brenda Strong Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Strong and Henry; the Brenda Strong Divorce was filed on January 14, 2011, which ended the 21-year long marriage between Henri and Strong. Although the divorce has yet to be finalized, the papers were filed by Brenda, claiming irreconcilable differences as the mechanism that prompted the dissolution. The couple, who was happily married for nearly two decades, decided to amicably call it quits. Strong, who is 50, filed for the divorce and claimed that she is looking to embark on these proceedings in the most streamlined manner possible. As a result of the couple’s individual wealth and the lack of a prenuptial agreement, it is assumed that the filing will be relatively smooth—something of a novel feat when compared to the majority of celebrity marriages.

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Brenda Strong Divorce:

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Brenda Strong Divorce, both Tom Henri and Brenda Strong opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Brenda Strong Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Brenda Strong Divorce Settlement:

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the case of the Brenda Strong Divorce, Tom Henri and Brenda Strong are in the process of negotiating a disclosed divorce settlement that will include custody and subsequent child support payments for their lone child. In the State of California, there exists a statute that recognizes joint assets accrued by a couple subsequent to marriage as ‘community property’; community property was split upon the finalization of the Brenda Strong Divorce – supplemental agreements with regard to the additional furnishing of assets or monies are typically kept private.

A Summary of the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce:

Born on June 10, 1965 Elizabeth Hurley is an English actress and model is best associated with the cosmetics company, Estee Lauder and for her roles in various Hollywood films. Hurley met fellow British celebrity, Hugh Grant in 1987 and the pair famously started dating until 1995. During this time, Hugh Grant notoriously solicited the services of a female prostitute, which invariably ended the relationship between Grant and Hurley. In April of 2002, Hurley gave birth to a son, although the child’s father, Steve Bing, denied paternity by alleging that the couple had a brief and non-exclusive relationship in 2001—subsequent paternity tests proved that Bing was indeed the child’s father. Following the birth of Damian Charles Hurley, Elizabeth began dating Indian textile heir Arun Nayar.

On March 2, 2007, Hurley and Nayar married at Sudeley Castle and then in a more traditional ceremony, married again at the Umaid Bhawan Palace in Jodhpur, India. In total, the wedding ceremonies were estimated to have cost nearly $4 million dollars and were attented by numerous celebrities including Elton John. On December 12, 2010, amid reports linking Hurley with Australian cricketer Shane Warne, the actress and model announced, via her twitter account, that she and Nayar had been separated for several months. Hurley officially filed for divorce on April 2, 2011 claiming that Nayar’s “unreasonable behavior” was the cause for the dissolution of the couple’s marriage.

The Elizabeth Hurley Divorce is currently pending; the divorce was filed in Early April of 2011, which effectively ended the 4 year marriage between Arun Nayar and Elizabeth Hurley. The actress, who was 45 at the time of divorce in her home country of England. Hurley, who made some scandalous headlines when spotted with married cricket pro, Shane Warne, claimed that Nayar had committed numerous extramarital affairs. Nayar, who is currently dating a model, has contested the divorce filing of Hurley; as a result of this contest and the accusations made by both parties regarding infidelity, the Elizabeth Hurley divorce is bound to get ugly.

The Terms of Alimony in the Elizabeth Hurley Divorce:

Although the couple did not share any children, the divorce proceedings, because of the inherent accusations and challenges latent in the filing, will precipitate some drama between the former couple. In addition to the accusations it is unclear whether the couple filed a prenuptial agreement before the wedding—it is assumed, because of the wealth of both individuals, that neither Hurley nor Nayar filed a prenuptial agreement. The party at fault and the terms of the divorce will give way to the appropriate transfer of funds or assets between the parties.

Overview of the Neve Campbell Divorce:

Born October 3, 1973 Neve Campbell is a Canadian Actress who rose to stardom from her role in the hit television series Party of Five. Since this role, Campbell has gained worldwide success as a result of her starring performance in the hit horror film Scream and its various sequels.

Neve Campbell has been married twice; her first marriage was to fellow Canadian actor Jeff Colt in April of 1005. The two met when Colt was a bartender at Toronto’s Pantages Theatre; the couple divorced three years later in May of 1998. In 2005, Campbell began dating English Actor, John Light, while the two were filming the movie Investigating Sex. The couple got engaged in December of 2005 and married in Malibu on May 5, 2007. The couple lived together in London for 5 years, before Campbell filed for divorce on June 30, 2010 in Los Angeles, California.

The Neve Campbell Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between John Light and Neve Campbell; the Neve Campbell Divorce was finalized in 2010, which ended the 3-yearlong marriage. Although the case of the Neve Campbell Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Neve Campbell Divorce:

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Neve Campbell Divorce, both John Light and Neve Campbell opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Neve Campbell Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity. Campell, who cited irreconcilable differences, as the reason for divorce, asked the Los Angeles County Court System to disallow any request for spousal support. The exes, who remain close friends, embarked on a relatively simple divorce hearing; the couple did not have a prenuptial agreement nor any children that invariably complicate the settlement.

The Terms of the Neve Campbell Divorce Settlement:

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the case of the Neve Campbell Divorce, John Light and Neve Campbell undertook a settlement that did not award any spousal support to Light. Although the divorce is still pending it is not assumed that Light will contest this plea. The former couple claim that the divorce is an amicable one and that the termination of marriage was due to differences that stemmed from the actor’s busy lifestyles.

Overview of the Roseanna Divorce

Born November 3, 1952 Roseanna Barr is an American actress, television producer, comedian and film director. Roseanne began her career in stand-up comedy at various night clubs throughout Colorado. The actress’ big break came in 1987, when she was cast in her own sitcom, Roseanne, which instantly became a hit. The show, which lasted nine seasons, earned Barr both an Emmy Award and a Golden Globe award for best actress in a sitcom.

Roseanne Barr married Ben Thomas, her former personal security guard, on February 14, 1995. The two wed at Caesers Tahoe and enjoyed reception at Planet Hollywood. Before the couple wed, Barr underwent in-vitro fertilization and became pregnant with a boy, named Buck. The couple stayed together until 2002.

The Roseanna Divorce marked the dissolution of the marriage between Ben Thomas and the comedic legend; the Roseanna Divorce was finalized in 2002, which ended the 7-yearlong marriage between Ben Thomas and Roseanna. Although the case of the Roseanna Divorce, which was considered by various media outlets as a celebrity, the impact of the dissolution of a union is thought to be universal; amongst the events and undertakings within a divorce proceeding, a divorce has the potential to elicit heightened emotions, such as sadness and loss. Furthermore, the reasoning for the breakdown of a marriage – regardless of the degree of celebrity status – will typically provide a legal framework for the terms and conditions latent within a divorce settlement:

The Plea of ‘No Contest’ within the Roseanna Divorce

An uncontested divorce is one in which both parties have reached a mutual agreement with regard to the reasons behind filing for divorce, as well as the placement of fault in conjunction to the breakdown of the marriage. In the case of the Roseanna Divorce, both Ben Thomas and Roseanna opted to file for a divorce uncontested – or unchallenged – in nature, which retained the classification of the reason for the Roseanna Divorce as a result, a bulk of celebrity couples undertaking divorce proceedings opt to either settle outside of court or file for divorce in an uncontested fashion in order to avoid potential media coverage and publicity.

The Terms of the Roseanna Divorce Settlement:

A divorce settlement will typically include 3 primary facets with regard to the terms and conditions set forth by the presiding court official who was responsible for determining spousal support – in the form of alimony, child custody – and subsequent child support payments, and the division of assets. In the case of the Roseanna Divorce, Ben Thomas and Roseanna undertook a settlement that focused primarily on the custody of the couple’s son. Roseanne, who was awarded custody of Buck, agreed that her former husband was allowed to visit Buck 10 days a month on her estate in Hawaii. This settlement; however, has recently been contested by Thomas who claims that Barr reneged on the child custody agreement latent in the divorce settlement. In November of 2010, Roseanne promised to fly Thomas and his wife to Hawaii to visit his son. Roseanne, who relocated to Hawaii with her current husband and son, was allowed to move if she agreed to the terms of the divorce settlement, which required Roseanne to provide an all-expense paid trip for Thomas to visit Buck. It turns out; however, that Roseanne refuses to abide by this agreement—the comedy icon allegedly told Ben that if he wants to visit their son, he would need to buy his own plane ticket. In response to Roseanne’s claim, Thomas filed a complaint with the Los Angeles County Court system to enforce the order and reimburse him for the fees incurred from his most recent trip to Hawaii. In response to this legal action, Roseanna filed for full-custody of Buck on April 11, 2011—the case is currently pending.

A Summary of the Ted Danson Divorce:

Born December 29, 1947 Ted Danson is an American actor, best known for his starring roles in the hit sitcom, Cheers. Throughout his career, Danson has been nominated for fourteen Emmy Awards, ten Golden Gloves, one American Comedy Award and one Screen Actors Guild Award.

Ted Danson has been married three times; he and his first wife, Randy Danson, were married from 1970 to 1975. Following divorce, Danson then married Casey Coates in 1977. In 1979, the couple gave birth to their first child, but shortly thereafter, Coates suffered a debilitating stroke, forcing the acting star to care for his wife. During recuperation, the couple later adopted a daughter; however, an affair with fellow star, Whoopie Goldberg, ultimately led to the Ted Danson divorce from Couples.

The Ted Danson Divorce was finalized in 1993, which ended the 16 year marriage between Ted Danson and Casey Coates – the couple was wed in 1977. Speculation surrounding the Ted Danson Divorce suggests that the events leading up to the Ted Danson Divorce included extramarital affairs; for those unfamiliar with the Ted Danson Divorce, the celebrity status of Ted Danson and Casey Coates, and the involvement with Whoopie Goldberg thrust the dissolution of the couple’s marriage into media headlines making it a highly-publicized event in the time that the Ted Danson Divorce had taken place. The reasons for this are not surprising, due to the fact that Ted Danson  is regarded as one of the most-widely recognized actors of his time.

The Terms and Conditions of the Ted Danson Divorce:

Although the filing of an uncontested divorce was ideal with regard to the privacy of the celebrity couple, both Ted Danson and Casey Coates were required to adhere to both preexisting terms and conditions, as well as adhere to any subsequent petitions filed, which included the award of spousal support through alimony, child custody of the couple’s 2 children, and the division of the couple’s shared assets:

Alimony – in the form of spousal support – expressed the agreements; Ted Danson petitioned for alimony payments from Casey Coates upon the finalization of the Ted Danson Divorce. The following provision of spousal support was reported to have taken place within the Ted Danson Divorce:

The Terms of the Prenuptial Agreements in the Ted Danson Divorce:

The Tad Danson divorce, as a result of the marriage taking place before Danson was thrust into stardom, did not include a prenuptial agreement. This ultimately led to the transfer of over $30 million dollars from Danson to Coates.

Petitions Expressed in the Ted Danson Divorce:

Custody of the couple’s 2 children would determine both the nature, as well as the classification of the custodial responsibility undertaken by Ted Danson and Casey Coates; the award of sole – or primary – custody allows that parent named as the primary or sole custodian to both maintain residence with the child, as well as become eligible for the receipt of child support payments. The following determination of custody was reported to have taken place within the Ted Danson Divorce:

Coates was given primary custody of the couple’s two children (one adopted and one biological).

The Division of Assets in the Ted Danson Divorce:

The division of ‘community property’ is defined as any assets that were attained subsequent to the marriage of Ted Danson and Casey Coates. However, in certain cases, additional agreements will have been set forth in supplementary agreements with regard to assets and monies. With regard to the Ted Danson Divorce, the following division of assets is reported to have taken place:

Because Danson cheated on Coates with Goldberg, Danson was found to be the reason for the dissolved marriage. As a result of his infidelity, Danson was forced to pay Coates upwards of $30 million dollars. This money was not only used to provide child support, but also to pay for the emotional damages caused by Dansons’ extra-marital affairs.